The Dunning‒Kruger effect in resident predicted and actual performance on the American Board of Emergency Medicine in-training examination.

Objectives: The Dunning-Kruger effect (DKE) is a cognitive bias wherein individuals who are unskilled overestimate their abilities, while those who are skilled tend to underestimate their capabilities. The purpose of this investigation is to determine if the DKE exists among American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) in-training examination (ITE) participants. Methods: This is a prospective, cross-sectional survey of residents in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited emergency medicine (EM) residency programs. All residents who took the 2022 ABEM ITE were eligible for inclusion. Residents from international programs, residents in combined training programs, and those who did not complete the voluntary post-ITE survey were excluded. Half of the residents taking the ITE were asked to predict their self-assessment of performance (percent correct), and the other half were asked to predict their performance relative to peers at the same level of training (quintile estimate). Pearson's correlation (r) was used for parametric interval data comparisons and a Spearman's coefficient (ρ) was determined for quintile-to-quintile comparisons. Results: A total of 7568 of 8918 (84.9%) residents completed their assigned survey question. A total of 3694 residents completed self-assessment (mean predicted percentage correct 67.4% and actual 74.6%), with a strong positive correlation (Pearson's r 0.58, p < 0.001). There was also a strong positive correlation (Spearman's ρ 0.53, p < 0.001) for the 3874 residents who predicted their performance compared to peers. Of these, 8.5% of residents in the first (lowest) quintile and 15.7% of residents in the fifth (highest) quintile correctly predicted their performance compared to peers. Conclusions: EM residents demonstrated accurate self-assessment of their performance on the ABEM ITE; however, the DKE was present when comparing their self-assessments to their peers. Lower-performing residents tended to overestimate their performance, with the most significant DKE observed among the lowest-performing residents. The highest-performing residents tended to underestimate their relative performance.

American Board of Emergency Medicine Report on Residency and Fellowship Training Information (2023-2024).

The American Board of Emergency Medicine gathers extensive background information on Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education-accredited emergency medicine residency and fellowship programs as well as the residents and fellows training in those programs. We present the 2024 annual report on the status of physicians training in ACGME-accredited emergency medicine training programs in the United States.

American Board of Emergency Medicine Report on Residency and Fellowship Training Information (2022-2023).

The American Board of Emergency Medicine gathers extensive background information on the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education-accredited emergency medicine residency and fellowship programs and the residents and fellows training in those programs. We present the 2023 annual report on the status of physicians training in ACGME-accredited emergency medicine training programs in the United States.

Clinical variables for predicting type-1 and type-2 non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction in those presenting with ischemic symptoms.

Introduction: The accuracy of detecting myocardial infarction (MI) has greatly improved with the advent of more sensitive assays, and this has led to etiologic subtyping. Distinguishing between type 1 and type 2 non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) early in the clinical course allows for the most appropriate advanced diagnostic procedures and most efficacious treatments. The purpose of this study was to investigate the predictive effect of demographic and clinical variables on predicting NSTEMI subtypes in patients presenting with ischemic symptoms. Material and methods: We performed a single institution retrospective cohort study of patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) with ischemic signs and symptoms consistent with non-ST-segment myocardial infarction, for whom results of coronary angiography were available. We analyzed demographic, laboratory, echocardiography and angiography data to determine predictors of NSTEMI sub-types. Results: Five hundred and forty-six patients were enrolled; 426 patients were found on coronary angiography to have type 1 acute MI (T1AMI), whereas 120 patients had type 2 acute MI (T2AMI). Age (OR per year = 1.03 (1.00, 1.05), p = 0.03), prior MI (OR = 3.50 (1.68, 7.22), p = 0.001), L/H > 2.0 (OR = 1.55 (1.12, 2.13), p = 0.007), percentage change in troponin I > 25% (OR = 2.54 (1.38, 4.69), p = 0.003), and regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) (OR = 3.53 (1.46, 8.54), p = 0.004) were independent predictors of T1AMI, whereas sex, race, body mass index, hypertension, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), heart failure, family history (FH) of coronary artery disease (CAD), HbA1c, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were not. Conclusions: Key clinical variables such as age, prior MI, L/H ratio, percentage change in troponin I, and presence of RWMA on echocardiogram may be utilized as significant predictors of T1AMI in patients presenting with ischemic symptoms to the ED.

American Board of Emergency Medicine Report on Residency and Fellowship Training Information (2021-2022).

The American Board of Emergency Medicine gathers extensive background information on the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education-accredited emergency medicine residency and fellowship programs, as well as the residents and fellows training in those programs. We present the 2022 annual report on the status of physicians training in Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education-accredited emergency medicine training programs in the United States.

The effect of cardiac geometry variation according to sex and race on outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence and long-term consequences of differences in baseline cardiac geometry (as a result of hypertension) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are ill-defined. The primary purpose of this study was to clarify whether there were differences among sexual and racial groups in echocardiographic findings reflecting cardiac geometry and adaptation in patients undergoing PCI for ACS and whether this could explain the differences in outcomes seen between these groups. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed 1-year follow-up data from a single institution, a retrospective, observational study that enrolled 1,153 patients who presented with ACS and were treated with PCI, for whom echocardiographic data were available. RESULTS: Normal, concentric hypertrophy, and eccentric hypertrophy in males vs. females were observed as follows: 29% vs. 19% (p = 0.001), 25% vs. 31% (p = 0.02), and 8% vs. 14% (p = 0.004), respectively. The primary endpoint of all-cause death (n = 89, 7.7%) occurred in 48 (10.5%) females and in 41 (8.2%) males, p = 0.03. Major adverse cardiac events and bleeding (MACE-B - all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke or hospitalization for bleeding) was higher among women than men (21.6% vs. 13.5%, p = 0.0002). Males with eccentric hypertrophy (EH) had similar MACE-B outcomes as females with EH 1-year post-PCI (29% vs. 32%, respectively, p = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: Females undergoing PCI for ACS are at higher risk for worse outcomes because they are more likely to express the eccentric hypertrophy phenotype; however, it did not account for the difference in adverse outcomes observed between sexes.

Impact of a scribe program on patient throughput, physician productivity, and patient satisfaction in a community-based emergency department.

Previous literature on the impact of scribe programs varies and has mostly been reported from academic institutions or other clinics. We report the implementation of the scribe program in the emergency room of a community hospital and its impact on patient throughput, physician productivity, and patient satisfaction. We performed a quasi-experimental, before-and-after study measuring patient throughput metrics, physician productivity, and patient satisfaction. The intervention measuring the scribe implementation was divided into pre- and post-implementation periods. Patient throughput metrics were (1) door-to-room time, (2) room-to-doc time, (3) door-to-doc time, (4) doc-to-disposition time, and (5) length of stay for discharged/admitted patients. Our secondary outcome was physician productivity, which was calculated by measuring total patients seen per hour and work relative value units per hour. Additionally, we calculated the time-motion analysis in minutes to measure the emergency department physician's efficiency by recording the following: (1) chart preparation, (2) chart review, (3) doctor-patient interaction, (4) physical examination, and (5) post-visit documentation. Finally, we measured patient satisfaction as provided by Press Ganey surveys. Data analysis was conducted in 12,721 patient encounters in the pre-scribe cohort, and 13,598 patient encounters in the post-scribe cohort. All the patient throughput metrics were statistically significant (p < 0.0001). The patients per hour increased from 2.3 ± 0.3 pre-scribe to 3.2 ± 0.6 post-scribe cohorts (p < 0.001). Total work relative value units per hour increased from 241(3.1 ± 1.5 per hour) pre-scribe cohort to 336 (5.2 ± 1.4 per hour) post-scribe cohort (p < 0.001). The pre-scribe patient satisfaction was high and remained high in the post-scribe cohort. There was a significant increase in the clinician providing satisfactory feedback from the pre-scribe (3.9 ± 0.3) to the post-scribe (4.7 ± 0.1) cohorts (p < 0.01). We describe a prospective trial of medical scribe use in the emergency department setting to improve patient throughput, physician productivity, and patient satisfaction. We illustrate that scribe use in community emergency department is feasible and results in improvement in all three metrics.

Erratum: This Article Corrects: "Assessment of Physician Well-being, Part Two: Beyond Burnout".

This corrects West J Emerg Med. 2019 March;20(2):291-304. Assessment of Physician Well-being, Part Two: Beyond Burnout Lall MD, Gaeta TJ, Chung AS, Chinai SA, Garg M, Husain A, Kanter C, Khandelwal S, Rublee CS, Tabatabai RR, Takayesu JK, Zaher M, Himelfarb NT. Erratum in West J Emerg Med. 2020 May;21(3):727. Author name misspellled. The sixth author, originally published as Abbas Hussain, MD is revised to Abbas Husain, MD. Abstract: Part One of this two-article series reviews assessment tools to measure burnout and other negative states. Physician well-being goes beyond merely the absence of burnout. Transient episodes of burnout are to be expected. Measuring burnout alone is shortsighted. Well-being includes being challenged, thriving, and achieving success in various aspects of personal and professional life. In this second part of the series, we identify and describe assessment tools related to wellness, quality of life, resilience, coping skills, and other positive states.

Assessment of Physician Well-being, Part One: Burnout and Other Negative States.

Physician well-being is a complex and multifactorial issue. A large number of tools have been developed in an attempt to measure the nature, severity, and impact of both burnout and well-being in a range of clinical populations. This two-article series provides a review of relevant tools and offers guidance to clinical mentors and researchers in choosing the appropriate instrument to suit their needs, whether assessing mentees or testing interventions in the research setting. Part One begins with a discussion of burnout and focuses on assessment tools to measure burnout and other negative states. Part Two of the series examines the assessment of well-being, coping skills, and other positive states.

Assessment of Physician Well-being, Part Two: Beyond Burnout.

Part One of this two-article series reviews assessment tools to measure burnout and other negative states. Physician well-being goes beyond merely the absence of burnout. Transient episodes of burnout are to be expected. Measuring burnout alone is shortsighted. Well-being includes being challenged, thriving, and achieving success in various aspects of personal and professional life. In this second part of the series, we identify and describe assessment tools related to wellness, quality of life, resilience, coping skills, and other positive states.

Impact of a scribe program on patient throughput, physician productivity, and patient satisfaction in a community-based emergency department.

Previous literature on the impact of scribe programs varies and has mostly been reported from academic institutions or other clinics. We report the implementation of the scribe program in the emergency room of a community hospital and its impact on patient throughput, physician productivity, and patient satisfaction. We performed a quasi-experimental, before-and-after study measuring patient throughput metrics, physician productivity, and patient satisfaction. The intervention measuring the scribe implementation was divided into pre- and post-implementation periods. Patient throughput metrics were (1) door-to-room time, (2) room-to-doc time, (3) door-to-doc time, (4) doc-to-disposition time, and (5) length of stay for discharged/admitted patients. Our secondary outcome was physician productivity, which was calculated by measuring total patients seen per hour and work relative value units per hour. Additionally, we calculated the time-motion analysis in minutes to measure the emergency department physician's efficiency by recording the following: (1) chart preparation, (2) chart review, (3) doctor-patient interaction, (4) physical examination, and (5) post-visit documentation. Finally, we measured patient satisfaction as provided by Press Ganey surveys. Data analysis was conducted in 12,721 patient encounters in the pre-scribe cohort, and 13,598 patient encounters in the post-scribe cohort. All the patient throughput metrics were statistically significant (p < 0.0001). The patients per hour increased from 2.3 ± 0.3 pre-scribe to 3.2 ± 0.6 post-scribe cohorts (p < 0.001). Total work relative value units per hour increased from 241(3.1 ± 1.5 per hour) pre-scribe cohort to 336 (5.2 ± 1.4 per hour) post-scribe cohort (p < 0.001). The pre-scribe patient satisfaction was high and remained high in the post-scribe cohort. There was a significant increase in the clinician providing satisfactory feedback from the pre-scribe (3.9 ± 0.3) to the post-scribe (4.7 ± 0.1) cohorts (p < 0.01). We describe a prospective trial of medical scribe use in the emergency department setting to improve patient throughput, physician productivity, and patient satisfaction. We illustrate that scribe use in community emergency department is feasible and results in improvement in all three metrics.

The top 100 cited articles published in emergency medicine journals.

INTRODUCTION: Our objective was to identify trends and examine the characteristics of the top 100 cited articles in emergency medicine (EM) journals. METHODS: Scopus Library database was queried to determine the citations of the top 100 EM articles. A second database (Google Scholar) was used to gather the following information: number of authors, publication year, journal name, impact factor, country of origin, and article type (original article, review article, conference paper, or editorial). The top 100 cited articles were selected and analyzed by 2 independent investigators. RESULTS: We identified 100 top-cited articles published in 6 EM journals, led by Annals of Emergency Medicine (65) and American Journal of Emergency Medicine (15). All top-cited articles were published between 1980 and 2009. The common areas of study were categorized as cardiovascular medicine, emergency department administration, toxicology, pain medicine, pediatrics, traumatology, and resuscitation. A statistically significant association was found between the journal impact factor and the number of top 100 cited articles (P < .005). CONCLUSION: The top-cited articles published in EM journals help us recognize the quality of the works, discoveries, and trends steering EM. Our analysis provides an insight to the prevalent areas of study being cited within our field of practice.

A multicenter observational study of US adults with acute asthma: who are the frequent users of the emergency department?

BACKGROUND: Despite the substantial burden of asthma-related emergency department (ED) visits, there have been no recent multicenter efforts to characterize this high-risk population. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to characterize patients with asthma according to their frequency of ED visits and to identify factors associated with frequent ED visits. METHODS: A multicenter chart review study of 48 EDs across 23 US states. We identified ED patients ages 18 to 54 years with acute asthma during 2011 and 2012. Primary outcome was frequency of ED visits for acute asthma in the past year, excluding the index ED visit. RESULTS: Of the 1890 enrolled patients, 863 patients (46%) had 1 or more (frequent) ED visits in the past year. Specifically, 28% had 1 to 2 visits, 11% had 3 to 5 visits, and 7% had 6 or more visits. Among frequent ED users, guideline-recommended management was suboptimal. For example, of patients with 6 or more ED visits, 85% lacked evidence of prior evaluation by an asthma specialist, and 43% were not treated with inhaled corticosteroids. In a multivariable model, significant predictors of frequent ED visits were public insurance, no insurance, and markers for chronic asthma severity (all P < .05). Stronger associations were found among those with a higher frequency of asthma-related ED visits (eg, 6 or more ED visits). CONCLUSION: This multicenter study of US adults with acute asthma demonstrated many frequent ED users and suboptimal preventive management in this high-risk population. Future reductions in asthma morbidity and associated health care utilization will require continued efforts to bridge these major gaps in asthma care.

Emergency department provider preferences related to clinical practice guidelines for tobacco cessation: a multicenter survey.

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to assess current emergency department (ED) provider practices and preferences for tobacco cessation interventions. The ED is an opportune place to initiate smoking cessation interventions. However, little is known about ED provider current practices and preferences for cessation counseling in the ED. METHODS: This was a survey of ED providers conducted in 2008-2009 (including physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and nurses), working at least half-time at 10 U.S. academic EDs, regarding adherence to clinical practice guidelines ("5 As") and preferences for cessation interventions/styles. Data analysis occurred in 2012-2013. RESULTS: The response rate was 64% (800 out of 1,246 completed surveys). Providers reported strongest adherence to asking about patient smoking status, followed by advising, with significant variance by clinical role. Assessing, assisting, and arranging support for patients was low overall. Most frequently used interventions were to provide patients with a list of telephone numbers for stop-smoking counseling (87%), pamphlets on smoking health risks and the benefits of stopping (85%), and referrals to the National Toll-Free Smoker's Quitline (84%). Most providers (80%) were supportive of personally conducting brief (less than 3 minutes) smoking cessation counseling sessions during the ED visit, emphasizing education and encouragement. The least appealing intervention was writing a prescription for nicotine replacement therapies or medications to stop smoking (35%). CONCLUSIONS: Interventions most likely to be used were brief and delivered with a positive tone and included referral to external resources. The logical next step is to design and test interventions that ED providers find acceptable.

History of symptom triggers in patients presenting to the emergency department for asthma.

OBJECTIVES: Understanding triggers is important for managing asthma particularly for patients who seek emergency department (ED) care for exacerbations. The objectives of this analysis were to delineate self-reported triggers in ED patients and to assess associations between triggers and asthma knowledge, severity, and quality of life. METHODS: At the time of an ED visit, 296 patients were asked what were their usual asthma triggers based on a checklist of 25 potential items, and what they thought specifically precipitated their current ED visit. Using standardized scales, patients also were asked about asthma knowledge, severity, and quality of life. RESULTS: The mean age was 44 years and 72% were women. Patients cited a mean of 12 triggers; most patients had diverse triggers spanning respiratory infections, environmental irritants, emotions, allergens, weather, and exercise. Patients with more triggers were more likely to be women (odds ratio (OR) = 2.0, confidence interval (CI) = 1.3, 3.2, p = .002), obese (OR = 1.7, CI = 1.1, 2.5, p = .01), and to not have a smoking history (OR = 1.9, CI = 1.3, 2.9, p = .001). There were no associations between number of triggers and current age, age at diagnosis, education, socioeconomic status, or race/ethnicity. Patients who cited more triggers had more frequent flares (OR = 1.1, CI = 1.1, 1.2, p < .0001), worse quality of life scores (OR 1.6, CI = 1.1, 2.4, p = .02), and were more likely to have been previously hospitalized for asthma (OR = 1.9, CI = 1.3, 2.9, p = .003) and to have previously required oral corticosteroids (OR = 2.9, CI = 1.6, 5.1, p = .003). There was little clustering of specific triggers according to the variables we considered except for more frequent animal allergy in patients diagnosed at a younger age (OR = 2.8, CI = 1.7, 4.5, p < .0001) and worse quality of life in patients citing emotional stress as a trigger (OR = 2.5, CI = 1.5, 4.0, p = .0002). Patients attributed their current ED visit to multiple precipitants, particularly respiratory infections and weather, and these were concordant with what they reported were known triggers. CONCLUSIONS: Patients presenting to the ED for asthma reported multiple triggers spanning diverse classes of precipitants and having more triggers was associated with worse clinical status. ED patients should be instructed that although it may not be possible to eliminate all triggers, mitigating even some triggers can be helpful.

Time to seeking emergency department care for asthma: self-management, clinical features at presentation, and hospitalization.

OBJECTIVES: Understanding the events preceding emergency department (ED) asthma visits can guide patient education regarding managing exacerbations and seeking timely care. The objectives of this analysis were to assess time to seeking ED care, self-management of asthma exacerbations, and clinical status on presentation. METHODS: A total of 296 patients was grouped according to time to seeking ED care: ≤1 day (22%), 2-5 days (44%), and >5 days (34%) and was compared for clinical and psychosocial characteristics. Asthma severity at presentation was obtained from patient report with the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) and the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) and from physicians' ratings using decision to hospitalize as an indicator of worse status. RESULTS. Mean age was 44 years, 72% were women, 10% had been in the ED in the prior week, and 28% came to the ED by ambulance. Patients who waited longer were more likely to be older, have more depressive symptoms, and have been in the ED in the prior week. They also were more likely to have taken more medications, but they were not more likely to have visited or consulted their outpatient physicians. Patients who waited longer reported worse ACQ (p < .0001) and AQLQ (p = .0002) scores and were more likely to be hospitalized for the current exacerbation (odds ratio 1.9, 95% CI 1.1, 3.2, p = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who waited longer to come to the ED had worse asthma on presentation, had more functional limitations, and were more likely to be hospitalized. The ability to gauge severity of exacerbations and the use of the ED in a timely manner are important but often overlooked are self-management skills that patients should be taught.

Improving patient flow in acute coronary syndromes in the face of hospital crowding.

BACKGROUND: The current paradigm for the evaluation of patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in the emergency department (ED) is focused on the identification of patients with active underlying coronary disease. The majority of patients evaluated in the ED setting do not have active underlying cardiac disease. OBJECTIVE: To measure the effect of bedside point-of-care (POC) cardiac biomarker testing on telemetry unit admissions from the ED. Furthermore, to evaluate the effect telemetry admissions have on ED length of stay (LOS) and overall hospital LOS. METHODS: Primary data were collected over two 6-month periods in an urban teaching hospital ED. This was an observational cohort study conducted pre- and post-availability of a POC testing platform for cardiac biomarkers. Major measures included number of overall telemetry admissions, ED LOS, hospital LOS, and disposition. Patients were followed at 30 days for significant cardiac events, repeat ED visit or admission, and death. RESULTS: In the post-implementation period there was a 30% (95% confidence interval [CI] 36-44%) reduction in admissions to telemetry with a 33% (95% CI 26-39%) reduction in ED LOS and a 20% (95% CI 7-34%) reduction in hospital LOS. There was a 62% reduction in overall mortality between the pre-implementation period and the post-implementation period (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: The focused use of a rapid cardiac disposition protocol can dramatically impact resource utilization, expedite patient flow, and improve short-term outcomes for patients with suspected ACS.