Predictors of readmission after breast reconstruction: a multi-institutional analysis of 5012 patients.

BACKGROUND: Recent health care legislation institutes penalties for surgical readmissions secondary to complications. There is a paucity of evidence describing risk factors for readmission after breast reconstruction procedures. METHODS: Patients undergoing breast reconstruction in 2011 were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients were grouped as purely immediate implant/tissue-expander reconstructions or purely autologous reconstruction for analysis. Reconstructions involving multiple types of procedures were excluded due to difficulty with classification. Perioperative variables were analyzed using χ and Student t test as appropriate. Multivariate regression modeling was used to identify risk factors for readmission. RESULTS: Of 5012 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 3960 and 1052 underwent implant/expander and autologous reconstructions, respectively. Implant/expander and autologous cohorts experienced similar readmission rates (4.34% vs 5.32%, respectively; P = 0.18). However, autologous reconstructions experienced a higher rate of overall complications than implant/expander reconstructions (19.96% vs 5.86%, respectively; P < 0.05), as well as higher rates of reoperation (9.7% vs 6.5%, respectively; P < 0.05). Common predictors of readmission for implant/expander and autologous cohorts included operative time, American Society of Anesthesiologist class 3 and 4, and superficial surgical site infection. Smoking, sepsis, deep wound infection, organ space infection, and wound disruption were predictive of readmission for implant/expander reconstruction only, whereas hypertension was predictive of readmission after autologous reconstruction only. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study of readmission rates after breast reconstruction. Knowledge of specific risk factors for readmission may improve patient outcomes, steer strategies for optimizing reconstructive outcomes, and minimize readmissions.

A multi-institutional perspective of complication rates for elective nonreconstructive breast surgery: an analysis of NSQIP data from 2006 to 2010.

BACKGROUND: As elective nonreconstructive breast surgery increases in popularity, there is greater demand for accurate multi-institutional data on minor and major postoperative complications. OBJECTIVE: The authors utilized a multi-institutional database to compare 30-day morbidities and reoperation rates among the different types of elective nonreconstructive breast surgery. METHODS: Patients in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) participant use file who underwent elective nonreconstructive breast surgery between 2006 and 2010 were identified. Twenty defined morbidities were compared among mastopexy, reduction mammaplasty, and augmentation mammaplasty patients using analysis of variance and χ(2) tests for continuous variables and categorical variables, respectively. Logistic regression modeling was employed to identify preoperative risk factors for complications. RESULTS: Of the 3612 patients identified, 380 underwent mastopexy, 2507 underwent reduction mammaplasty, and 725 underwent augmentation mammaplasty. Complication rates were low in all cohorts, and patients undergoing augmentation mammaplasty had the lowest overall complication rate compared with mastopexy and reduction mammaplasty (1.24%, 2.37%, and 4.47%). Patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty had a modestly elevated incidence of overall morbidity, superficial surgical site infections, and wound disruptions (P < .05). Moreover, 30-day reoperation rates for mastopexy, reduction mammaplasty, and augmentation mammaplasty were low (1.58%, 2.07%, and 0.97%), as were the rates of life-threatening complications (0%, 0.16%, and 0%). One death was observed for all 3612 procedures (0.03%). CONCLUSIONS: Elective breast surgery is a safe procedure with an extremely low incidence of life-threatening complications and mortality. Comprehensive data collated from the NSQIP initiative add to the literature, and the findings of this multi-institutional study may help further guide patient education and expectations on potentially deleterious outcomes.