Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Contemp Clin Trials ; 58: 1-12, 2017 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28445783

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Rates of glycemic control remain suboptimal nationwide. Medication intensification for diabetes can have undesirable side effects (weight gain, hypoglycemia), which offset the benefits of glycemic control. A Shared Medical Appointment (SMA) intervention for diabetes that emphasizes weight management could improve glycemic outcomes and reduce weight while simultaneously lowering diabetes medication needs, resulting in less hypoglycemia and better quality of life. We describe the rationale and design for a study evaluating a novel SMA intervention for diabetes that primarily emphasizes low-carbohydrate diet-focused weight management. METHODS: Jump Starting Shared Medical Appointments for Diabetes with Weight Management (Jump Start) is a randomized, controlled trial that is allocating overweight Veterans (body mass index≥27kg/m2) with type 2 diabetes into two arms: 1) a traditional SMA group focusing on medication management and self-management counseling; or 2) an SMA group that combines low-carbohydrate diet-focused weight management (WM/SMA) with medication management. Hemoglobin A1c reduction at 48weeks is the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include hypoglycemic events, diabetes medication use, weight, medication adherence, diabetes-related quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. We hypothesize that WM/SMA will be non-inferior to standard SMA for glycemic control, and will reduce hypoglycemia, diabetes medication use, and weight relative to standard SMA, while also improving quality of life and costs. CONCLUSIONS: Jump Start targets two common problems that are closely related but infrequently managed together: diabetes and obesity. By focusing on diet and weight loss as the primary means to control diabetes, this intervention may improve several meaningful patient-centered outcomes related to diabetes.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Visita a Consultorio Médico , Sobrepeso/epidemiología , Sobrepeso/terapia , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/organización & administración , Glucemia , Índice de Masa Corporal , Pesos y Medidas Corporales , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Dieta Baja en Carbohidratos/métodos , Hemoglobina Glucada , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/economía , Calidad de Vida , Proyectos de Investigación , Automanejo/métodos , Método Simple Ciego , Veteranos , Pérdida de Peso , Programas de Reducción de Peso/organización & administración
2.
N C Med J ; 77(3): 180-2, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27154884

RESUMEN

There are myriad reasons why individuals choose to follow a gluten-free diet, which continues to be a pervasive nutrition trend. This commentary includes a discussion of the most common reasons that patients choose gluten-free foods, including celiac disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Celíaca/dietoterapia , Dieta Sin Gluten , Enfermedad Celíaca/diagnóstico , Humanos
3.
Contemp Clin Trials ; 35(1): 106-16, 2013 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23506974

RESUMEN

A variety of diet approaches achieve moderate weight loss in many individuals. Yet, most diet interventions fail to achieve meaningful weight loss in more than a few individuals, likely due to inadequate adherence to the diet. It is widely conjectured that targeting the diet to an individual's food preferences will enhance adherence, thereby improving weight loss. This article describes the design considerations of a study protocol aimed at testing this hypothesis. The study is a 2-arm randomized trial recruiting 216 medical outpatients with BMI ≥30 kg/m(2) followed for 48 weeks. Participants in the experimental arm (Choice) select from two of the most widely studied diets for weight loss, a low-carbohydrate, calorie-unrestricted diet (LCD) or a low-fat, reduced-calorie diet (LFD). The participant's choice is informed by results from a validated food preference questionnaire and a discussion of diet options with trained personnel. Choice participants are given the option to switch to the other diet after three months, if desired. Participants in the Control arm are randomly assigned to follow one of the two diets for the duration of follow-up. The primary outcome is weight assessed every 2-4 weeks for 48 weeks. Secondary outcomes include adherence to diet by food frequency questionnaire and obesity-specific health-related quality of life. If assisting patients to choose their diet enhances adherence and increases weight loss, the results will support the provision of diet options to patients who desire weight loss, and bring us one step closer to remediating the obesity epidemic faced by our healthcare systems.


Asunto(s)
Dieta Reductora/métodos , Dieta , Prioridad del Paciente , Pérdida de Peso , Restricción Calórica , Carbohidratos de la Dieta , Grasas de la Dieta , Humanos , Cooperación del Paciente , Calidad de Vida , Proyectos de Investigación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...