RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between neighborhood-level social vulnerability on the severity of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in patients undergoing drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE). STUDY DESIGN: Single center retrospective cohort study. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients >18 years of age that underwent DISE from July 2016 to July 2022. Patient addresses were geocoded with geographic information systems, and spatial overlays were used to assign census-tract level social vulnerability index (SVI) scores in the four sub-themes: Socioeconomic (theme 1), Household Composition/Disability (theme 2), Minority Status/Language (theme 3), and Housing/Transportation (theme 4). RESULTS: The study included 165 patients (61.2 years ± 11.6; 31.0 BMI ± 6.1, 102 male, 63 female). Mild OSA was present in13 patients; 55 patients had moderate OSA; and 97 patients had severe OSA. A higher SVI value in minority status and language, and a higher BMI both predicted an increased Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) (p = 0.042, and <0.001, respectively) in the multivariate model; whereas, race, age, gender, or the other three SVI sub-theme values were not predictive. CONCLUSION: Adults residing in areas of greater social vulnerability - specifically a larger minority presence or English as a second language - and patients who are obese are more likely to have more severe OSA. There was no correlation, however, between obesity and residence in an area of high SVI. These results suggest that both neighborhood conditions and obesity are associated with OSA severity. This elevated risk has potential implications for diagnostic testing, clinic follow-ups, screening, and treatment plans for adults residing in disenfranchised neighborhoods. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
RESUMEN
A retrospective case-control study was performed to characterize the rate of missed follow-up appointments after facial trauma and identify associated risk factors.Follow-up appointments for facial trauma over a 3-month period at a single, safety net hospital were analyzed. Appointment-specific, sociodemographic, trauma, and management data were compared between cases (missed appointments) and controls (attended appointments). Univariate testing and multivariable logistic regression were employed.A total of 116 cases and 259 controls were identified, yielding a missed appointment rate of 30.9% (116/375). Missed appointments were significantly associated with initial clinic appointments compared to return visits (odds ratio [OR] 2.21 [1.38-3.54]), afternoon visits compared to morning (OR 3.14 [1.94-5.07]), lack of private health insurance (OR 2.91 [1.68-5.18]), and presence of midface fractures (OR 2.04 [1.28-3.27]). Missed appointments were negatively associated with mandible fractures (OR 0.56 [0.35-0.89]), surgical management (OR 0.48 [0.30-0.77]), and the presence of nonremovable hardware (OR 0.39 [0.23-0.64]). Upon multivariable logistic regression, missed appointments remained independently associated with afternoon visits (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.95 [1.12-3.4]), lack of private health insurance (aOR 2.73 [1.55-4.8]), and midface fractures (aOR 2.09 [1.21-3.59]).Nearly one-third of facial trauma patients missed follow-up appointments, with the greatest risk among those with afternoon appointments, lacking private health insurance, and with midface fractures.
