CIDP and hemopathies, an underestimated association.

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is an immune-mediated and treatable disease that may be associated with various systemic conditions. Our objective is to describe the clinical, electrophysiological and pathological data of a series of patients with both CIDP and hemopathy. In this retrospective study, we analyzed 21 patients with CIDP and various hemopathies (malignant or not), consecutively observed for almost five years. In this particular context (with a risk of neurological complications of the hemopathy), a nerve biopsy was taken from each patient (after written consent). All the patients fulfilled the EAN/PNS electrodiagnostic criteria (2021) of CIDP: 16 with 'CIDP' and 2 with 'possible CIDP' (no data for 3 patients). For each patient, pathological analysis of nerve biopsy was compatible with the diagnosis of CIDP, and there was no evidence for hematological complication of the peripheral nervous system. In cases of peripheral neuropathy and malignant hemopathy, the possibility that the peripheral neuropathy is CIDP should not be overlooked because CIDP is clearly accessible to appropriate therapies, with high potential for a positive clinical response. If the diagnosis of CIDP is usually suspected clinically and electrophysiologically, it should be confirmed by pathological study (nerve biopsy) in certain cases. The management of such patients benefits from the collaboration of neurologists, hematologists and oncologists.

Comparison of clinical and electrophysiological features of patients with hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies with or without pain.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies (HNPP) is a rare neuropathy with a heterogeneous clinical profile. Painless recurrent palsies are the usual presentation, but neuropathic pain could be predominant or inaugural. Browsing the medical literature, we only found two articles reffering to this important clinical feature. Whether there are differences between patients with or without pain is unclear. The main objective of this study was to compare the clinical and electrophysiological features of these patients and to evaluate the impact on their disability. METHODS: All patients diagnosed with HNPP at the Limoges University Hospital Centre were included and separated into two groups according to the presence or absence of neuropathic pain. In each case, the clinical, genetic, electrodiagnostic, therapeutic features and the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) were evaluated. RESULTS: Out of 23 patients, 52% presented with neuropathic pain. There was no difference between groups regarding to clinical and electrophysiological features, except for the amplitude of the ulnar sensory nerve (p < 0,003). The amplitudes of sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs) seemed to be higher in patients with pain, but were below the lower limit of normal. Patients with pain had a higher mRS than patients without pain (p < 0,007). CONCLUSION: This study supports previous published results and highlights a trend for higher sensory amplitudes in HNPP patients with pain. We found a prevalence of neuropathic pain of 52% in patients with HNPP, underlining the need to systematically assess pain in such patients in order to improve their management.

Contribution of dot-blot assay to the diagnosis and management of myositis: a three-year practice at a university hospital centre.

OBJECTIVES: Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are heterogeneous autoimmune diseases with wide clinical spectrum that may lead to delayed diagnosis. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of IIM-specific dot-blot assay on diagnostic process of patients presenting with muscular or systemic symptoms evocating of IIM. METHODS: We collected all the prescriptions of an IIM specific dot-blot assay (8 autoantigens including Jo-1, PL-7, PL-12, SRP, Mi-2, Ku, PM/Scl and Scl-70) over a 38-month period. RESULTS: 316 myositis dot-blot assays (MSD) were performed in 274 patients (156 women, mean age 53±10.6 years) referring for muscular and/or systemic symptoms suggesting IIM. The timing of dot prescription through the diagnostic process was highly variable: without (35%), concomitantly (16%) or after electromyographic studies (35%). Fifty-nine patients (22%) had IIM according to Bohan and Peter's criteria. Among them, 29 (49%) had positive dot (8 Jo-1, 6 PM-Scl, 5 PL-12, 5 SRP, 2 Mi-2, 2 PL-7 and 1 Ku). Various other diagnoses were performed including 35 autoimmune disease or granulomatosis (12%), 19 inflammatory rheumatic disease (7%), 16 non inflammatory muscular disorders (6%), 10 drug-induced myalgia (4%), 11 infectious myositis (4%). Except 11 borderline SRP results and one transient PM-Scl, MSD was positive only in one case of IIM. Dot allowed clinicians to correct diagnosis in 4 cases and improved the diagnosis of IIM subtypes in 4 cases. CONCLUSIONS: This study reflects the interest of myositis dot in the rapid diagnosis process of patients with non-specific muscular symptoms leading to various diagnoses including IIM.

Fatigue as the main presenting symptom of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: a study of 11 cases.

Fatigue has been shown to be more frequent than previously thought in immune-mediated polyneuropathies. However, fatigue has not been reported as the main cause of referral in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) patients. Between January 2001 and December 2003, we investigated 11 patients referred for fatigue, for which we established a final diagnosis of CIDP. All patients had at least two clinical examinations including assessment of the fatigue severity scale (FSS) and one electrophysiological and laboratory work up. Additionally, 10 of the 11 patients had a nerve biopsy. There were 11 male patients. Mean age at onset was 53 +/- 11 years. Main cause of referral was fatigue in all patients. Additional symptoms included cramps (one case), distal paresthesias (six cases), limb pain (seven cases) and vasomotor disturbances (one case). Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis displayed a moderate increase in protein content in four patients. Electrophysiological analysis showed abnormalities in all patients. Among 11 patients, one fulfilled the American Academy of Neurology electrodiagnostic criteria for CIDP and three fulfilled the inflammatory neuropathy cause and treatment group or the Nicolas et al. criteria. In the eight remaining patients, a nerve biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of CIDP. Ten patients were treated, among which seven showed a significant improvement based on the FSS scale. This study shows that fatigue is a possible cause of referral for patients with CIDP and, like previous reports, emphasizes the lack of sensitivity of widely accepted electrophysiological criteria of CIDP. Long-term follow up of these patients is warranted to determine the prognosis of these minimal forms of CIDP and establish the best therapeutic strategy in such cases.