Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 49
Filtrar
2.
Int J Infect Dis ; 129: 188-196, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36775188

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Vaccination has been effective in ameliorating the impact of COVID-19. Here, we report vaccine effectiveness (VE) of the nationally available COVID-19 vaccines in Mexico. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a COVID-19 surveillance system to assess the VE of the BNT162b2, messenger RNA (mRNA)-12732, Gam-COVID-Vac, Ad5-nCoV, Ad26.COV2.S, ChAdOx1, and CoronaVac vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19 hospitalization, and death in Mexico. The VE was estimated using time-varying Cox proportional hazard models in vaccinated and unvaccinated adults, adjusted for age, sex, and comorbidities. VE was also estimated for adults with diabetes, aged ≥60 years, and comparing the predominance of SARS-CoV-2 variants B.1.1.519 and B.1.617.2. RESULTS: We assessed 793,487 vaccinated and 4,792,338 unvaccinated adults between December 24, 2020 and September 27, 2021. The VE against SARS-CoV-2 infection was the highest for fully vaccinated individuals with mRNA-12732 (91.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 90.3-92.4) and Ad26.COV2.S (82.2%, 95% CI 81.4-82.9); for COVID-19 hospitalization, BNT162b2 (84.3%, 95% CI 83.6-84.9) and Gam-COVID-Vac (81.4% 95% CI 79.5-83.1), and for mortality, BNT162b2 (89.8%, 95% CI 89.2-90.2) and mRNA-12732 (93.5%, 95% CI 86.0-97.0). The VE decreased for all vaccines in adults aged ≥60 years, people with diabetes, and periods of Delta variant predominance. CONCLUSION: All the vaccines implemented in Mexico were effective against SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19 hospitalization, and death. Mass vaccination with multiple vaccines is useful to maximize vaccination coverage.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Adulto , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Vacuna BNT162 , Ad26COVS1 , México/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunación , Hospitalización , ARN Mensajero
3.
Int J Neurosci ; 133(3): 233-237, 2023 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33765889

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Osmotic demyelination syndrome (ODS) is a non-inflammatory process of the central nervous system caused by extracellular osmotic changes, which leads to oligodendrocyte apoptosis and disruption of myelin sheaths, usually affecting patients with underlying systemic conditions that impose susceptibility to osmotic stress. Description of ODS in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is limited to a few case reports. METHODS: Here, we report a 44-year-old man with NHL that had an incidental diagnosis of ODS. We conducted a literature review of the published cases of ODS in NHL patients from 1959 to 2020, aiming to describe the characteristics of these patients. RESULTS: A total of seven patients were summarized (four men and three women), including our case and six patients from published reports. Risk factors such as weight loss and alcoholism were reported in five (71.4%) patients. Hyponatremia was found in six (85.7%) of the cases, and none of them had overly rapid sodium correction. Four cases were asymptomatic, and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma was the most common subtype of NHL (85.7%). The outcome was favorable in most cases; only two deaths not directly related to ODS were reported. CONCLUSION: We wish to suggest that systemic and metabolic stress induced by NHL may be associated with the development of central osmotic demyelination, and therefore, NHL may be a novel risk factor for ODS. Clinicians should be aware of ODS in patients with hematological malignancies, even in the absence of traditional risk factors.


Asunto(s)
Alcoholismo , Enfermedades Desmielinizantes , Hiponatremia , Linfoma no Hodgkin , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedades Desmielinizantes/complicaciones , Hiponatremia/complicaciones , Factores de Riesgo , Alcoholismo/complicaciones , Linfoma no Hodgkin/complicaciones
4.
Int J Neurosci ; 133(6): 672-675, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34370958

RESUMEN

Background and aim: With an ever-increasing population of patients recovering form severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), recognizing long-standing and delayed neurologic manifestations is crucial. Here, we present a patient developing posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) in the convalescence form severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).Case presentation: A 61-year-old woman with severe (COVID-19) confirmed by nasopharyngeal real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) required invasive mechanical ventilation 24-hours after admission. During her intensive care unit stay, she developed transient acute kidney injury and septic shock. She was extubated after 22 days. On day 25, she developed generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain showed bilateral subcortical lesions on the parietal and occipital lobes and multiple micro-and macro-bleeds, consistent with PRES. At this point, RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 in a respiratory specimen and cerebrospinal fluid was negative. She was discharged home 35 days after admission on oral levetiracetam. Control MRI five months after discharge showed bilateral focal gliosis. On follow-up, she remains seizure-free on levetiracetam.Conclusions: PRES has been observed before as a neurological manifestation of acute COVID-19; to our knowledge, this is the first PRES case occurring in a hospitalized patient already recovered from COVID-19. A persistent proinflammatory/prothrombotic state triggered by SARS-CoV-2 infection may lead to long-standing endothelial dysfunction, resulting in delayed PRES in patients recovering from COVID-19. With a rapid and exponential increase in survivors of acute COVID-19, clinicians should be aware of delayed (post-acute) neurological damage, including PRES.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Síndrome de Leucoencefalopatía Posterior , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , COVID-19/complicaciones , SARS-CoV-2 , Síndrome de Leucoencefalopatía Posterior/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome de Leucoencefalopatía Posterior/etiología , Síndrome de Leucoencefalopatía Posterior/patología , Convalecencia , Levetiracetam
5.
Lancet Reg Health Am ; 17: 100392, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36405887

RESUMEN

Background: Human monkeypox, a zoonosis historically endemic to West and South Africa, has led to a worldwide outbreak driven by human-to-human transmission resulting in an international public health emergency. Endemic and outbreak monkeypox cases may differ in their affected populations, clinical features, and outcomes. Thus, profiling cases of the current monkeypox outbreak worldwide is crucial. Methods: We performed a nationwide observational surveillance-based study from May 24 to September 5, 2022. Patients that met the operational clinical definition of monkeypox or symptomatic close contacts of confirmed cases were tested by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Clinical data were collected with a standardized case-report form. We report epidemiologic, sociodemographic, and clinical characteristics of confirmed cases. Findings: Five-hundred and sixty-five human monkeypox confirmed cases were analysed; 97.2% were men, of whom 59.5% identified as men who have sex with men, and 54.5% had human immunodeficiency virus infection. The median age was 34 years. All patients but one had rash (99.8%), 78.9% had fever, and 47.8% reported myalgia. The anogenital area was the most commonly affected one by rash (49.6%), and proctitis occurred in 6.2% of patients. Six patients required hospitalization, of which one died due to causes unrelated to monkeypox. Interpretation: The 2022 monkeypox outbreak in Mexico is mainly driven by middle-aged men who have sex with men, of which a large proportion are persons who live with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Clinical features such as the high proportion of anogenital lesions suggest sexual contact is a pivotal transmission mechanism in this outbreak. Funding: This research was supported by grant A1-S-18342 from Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT), Mexico (to S.I.V.-F.).

6.
Can J Neurol Sci ; 50(5): 745-750, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35979659

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Half of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) present elevated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein levels within 1 week since symptom onset and 80% within 2 weeks. Our objective was to determine the clinical and prognostic implication of albuminocytological dissociation in early GBS. METHODS: An ambispective cohort study was conducted. Good outcome was considered if the patient was able to walk unaided (Guillain-Barré disability score [GDS] ≤ 2 points) at 3-month follow-up. Patients were classified into two groups: with and without albuminocytological dissociation; we compared clinical and paraclinic characteristics between the groups. We analyzed clinical and electrophysiological factors related to presenting early dissociation through a multivariate model. RESULTS: We included 240 patients who fulfilled Asbury criteria for GBS. On further selection, only 94 patients fulfilled inclusion. Mean age was 45.94 ± 17.1 years and 67% were male. Median time from symptom onset to admission was 5 days (IQR 3-6). Regarding albuminocytological dissociation and electrophysiological variants, we found a significant difference: acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP) [60.6% vs 26.2%, p = 0.002], acute motor axonal neuropathy (AMAN) [21.2% vs 49.1%, p = 0.009] and acute motor sensory axonal neuropathy (AMSAN) [12.1% vs 1.6%, p = 0.05]. We did not observe significant differences in recovery of independent walking in short term between both groups. The presence of conduction block in any variant (OR 3.21, 95% CI 1.12-9.16, p = 0.02) and absence of sural registration (OR 5.69, 95% CI 1.48-21.83, p = 0.011) were independent factors related to early dissociation. CONCLUSIONS: Early dissociation (<7 days) is not associated with any particular clinical feature or unfavorable outcome. It is more common to see in AIDP rather than axonal variants.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Guillain-Barré , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/diagnóstico , Pronóstico , Estudios de Cohortes , Axones
9.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 10(8)2022 Aug 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36016185

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite the high number of vaccines administered against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) worldwide, the information on the psychological/psychiatric adverse events following immunization (AEFI) with these newly developed vaccines remains scarce. OBJECTIVE: To describe the frequency of psychological/psychiatric symptoms among recipients of five different anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and to explore the factors associated with their development reported in the nationwide Mexican registry of AEFI against SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: Descriptive study of all the psychological/psychiatric symptoms, including anxiety, panic attacks, insomnia, and agitation reported to the Mexican Epidemiological Surveillance System from 21 December 2020 to 27 April 2021, among adult (≥18 years old) recipients of 7,812,845 doses of BNT162b2, ChAdOx1 nCov-19, rAd26-rAd5, Ad5-nCoV, or CoronaVac. The factors associated with their development are determined by multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: There were 19,163 AEFI reports during the study period; amongst them, 191 (1%) patients had psychological/psychiatric symptoms (median age of 41 years, interquartile range of 32-54; 149 [78%] women) for an observed incidence of 2.44 cases per 100,000 administered doses (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.12-2.82), 72.8% of psychiatric AEFIs were reported among recipients of BNT162b2. The median time from vaccination to symptom onset was 35 min (interquartile range: 10-720). Overall, the most common psychological/psychiatric symptoms were anxiety in 129 (67.5%) patients, panic attacks in 30 (15.7%), insomnia in 25 (13%), and agitation in 11 (5.7%). After adjusting for the confounding factors, the odds for developing psychological/psychiatric symptoms were higher for those concurrently reporting syncope (odds ratio [OR]: 4.73, 95% CI: 1.68-13.33); palpitations (OR: 2.47, 95% CI: 1.65-3.70), and dizziness (OR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.10-2.28). CONCLUSION: In our population, psychological/psychiatric symptoms were extremely infrequent AEFIs. No severe psychiatric AEFIs were reported. Immunization stress-related responses might explain most of the detected cases.

10.
Epilepsia ; 63(10): e144-e149, 2022 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35943891

RESUMEN

The COVID-19 pandemic led to the development and emergency approval of an array of effective vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. Given the relatively small number of patients included in vaccine trials, postapproval epidemiological surveillance is crucial to detect infrequent vaccine-related adverse events. We conducted a nationwide retrospective descriptive study evaluating the incidence of seizures among recipients of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in Mexico from December 24, 2020 (date of administration of first doses nationwide) to October 29, 2021. Among 81 916 351 doses of any vaccine that were administered, we documented seizures in 53 patients, of which 31 (60%) were new onset seizures. The incidence rate of seizures per million doses was highest for mRNA-1273 (Moderna) with 2.73 per million, followed by BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) with 1.02 per million, and Ad5-nCoV (CanSino) with 1.01 per million. Thus, we found that seizures following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination are exceedingly rare events.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas , Vacuna BNT162 , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Humanos , México/epidemiología , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Convulsiones/inducido químicamente , Convulsiones/etiología , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Vacunas/efectos adversos
11.
J Clin Immunol ; 42(8): 1593-1599, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35976470

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Information on anaphylaxis among recipients of vaccines against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) remains scarce. OBJECTIVE: To identify the observed incidence of anaphylaxis in recipients of different anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. METHODS: A nationwide observational study among recipients of 61,414,803 doses of seven different anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, describing the incidence and characteristics of adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) who developed anaphylaxis as an adverse event following immunization (AEFI) against SARS-CoV-2 vaccines between December 24, 2020, and October 15, 2021, in Mexico. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients developed anaphylaxis as an AEFI, for an overall observed incidence of 1.07 cases per 1,000,000 (95% CI 0.84-1.37) administered doses. Eighty-six percent of the patients were female, consistent with previous reports of AEFI to COVID-19 vaccines. mRNA-based vaccine recipients had the highest frequency of anaphylaxis, followed by adenovirus-vectored vaccines and inactivated virus recipients, with an observed incidence of 2.5, 0.7, and 0.2 cases per 1,000,000 doses administered, respectively. Only 46% of the patients received correct treatment with epinephrine as the first-line treatment through the appropriate route and dose. We detected one case of anaphylactic reaction-related death occurring 5 min following immunization with ChAdOx1 nCov-19 for a mortality rate of 1.5% among those who developed this AEFI. CONCLUSIONS: In our population, anaphylactic reactions were infrequent. Our study provides further evidence supporting the security of these newly developed vaccines.


Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Anafilaxia/inducido químicamente , Anafilaxia/epidemiología , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/efectos adversos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , SARS-CoV-2 , México/epidemiología
12.
Eur J Neurol ; 29(11): 3368-3379, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35841212

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Information on Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) as an adverse event following immunization (AEFI) against SARS-CoV-2 remains scarce. We aimed to report GBS incidence as an AEFI among adult (≥18 years) recipients of 81,842,426 doses of seven anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines between December 24, 2020, and October 29, 2021, in Mexico. METHODS: Cases were retrospectively collected through passive epidemiological surveillance. The overall observed incidence was calculated according to the total number of administered doses. Vaccines were analyzed individually and by vector as mRNA-based (mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2), adenovirus-vectored (ChAdOx1 nCov-19, rAd26-rAd5, Ad5-nCoV, and Ad26.COV2-S), and inactivated whole-virion-vectored (CoronaVac) vaccines. RESULTS: We identified 97 patients (52 males [53.6%]; median [interquartile range] age 44 [33-60] years), for an overall observed incidence of 1.19/1,000,000 doses (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97-1.45), with incidence higher among Ad26.COV2-S (3.86/1,000,000 doses, 95% CI 1.50-9.93) and BNT162b2 recipients (1.92/1,00,000 doses, 95% CI 1.36-2.71). The interval (interquartile range) from vaccination to GBS symptom onset was 10 (3-17) days. Preceding diarrhea was reported in 21 patients (21.6%) and mild COVID-19 in four more (4.1%). Only 18 patients were tested for Campylobacter jejuni (positive in 16 [88.9%]). Electrophysiological examinations were performed in 76 patients (78.4%; axonal in 46 [60.5%] and demyelinating in 25 [32.8%]); variants were similar across the platforms. On admission, 91.8% had a GBS disability score ≥3. Seventy-five patients (77.3%) received intravenous immunoglobulin, received seven plasma exchange (7.2%), and 15 (15.5%) were treated conservatively. Ten patients (10.3%) died, and 79.1% of survivors were unable to walk independently. CONCLUSIONS: Guillain-Barré syndrome was an extremely infrequent AEFI against SARS-CoV-2. The protection provided by these vaccines outweighs the risk of developing GBS.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna BNT162 , COVID-19 , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Vacuna BNT162/efectos adversos , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/efectos adversos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/inducido químicamente , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/epidemiología , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapéutico , Incidencia , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad
13.
Rev. invest. clín ; 74(3): 121-130, May.-Jun. 2022. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1409570

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is the most frequent cause of acute flaccid paralysis and if not diagnosed and treated timely, a significant cause of long-term disability. Incidence in Latin America ranges from 0.71 to 7.63 cases/100,000 person-years. Historically, GBS has been linked to infections (mainly gastrointestinal by Campylobacter jejuni) and vaccines (including those against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 [SARS-CoV-2]); however, a trigger cannot be detected in most cases. Regarding SARS-CoV-2, epidemiological studies have found no association with its development. Acute motor axonal neuropathy is the most common electrophysiological variant in Mexico and Asian countries. Intravenous immunoglobulin or plasma exchanges are still the treatment cornerstones. Mortality in Mexico can be as high as 12%. Advances in understanding the drivers of nerve injury in GBS that may provide the basis for developing targeted therapies have been made during the past decade; despite them, accurate criteria for selecting patients requiring acute treatment, prognostic biomarkers, and novel therapies are still needed. The newly-developed vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 have raised concerns regarding the potential risk for developing GBS. In the midst of coronavirus disease 2019 and vaccination campaigns against SARS-CoV-2, this review discusses the epidemiology, clinical presentation, management, and outcomes of GBS in Mexico.

15.
Neurology ; 98(19): e1933-e1941, 2022 05 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35277439

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Information on stroke among severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines remains scarce. We report stroke incidence as an adverse event following immunization (AEFI) among recipients of 79,399,446 doses of 6 different SARS-CoV-2 vaccines (BNT162b2, ChAdOx1 nCov-19, Gam-COVID-Vac, CoronaVac, Ad5-nCoV, and Ad26.COV2-S) between December 24, 2020, and August 31, 2021, in Mexico. METHODS: This retrospective descriptive study analyzed stroke incidence per million doses among hospitalized adult patients (≥18 years) during an 8-month interval. According to the World Health Organization, AEFIs were defined as clinical events occurring within 30 days after immunization and categorized as either nonserious or serious, depending on severity, treatment, and hospital admission requirements. Acute ischemic stroke (AIS), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), and cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) cases were collected through a passive epidemiologic surveillance system in which local health providers report potential AEFI to the Mexican General Board of Epidemiology. Data were captured with standardized case report formats by an ad hoc committee appointed by the Mexican Ministry of Health to evaluate potential neurologic AEFI against SARS-COV-2. RESULTS: We included 56 patients (31 female patients [55.5%]) for an overall incidence of 0.71 cases per 1,000,000 administered doses (95% CI 0.54-0.92). Median age was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR] 55-76 years); median time from vaccination to stroke (of any subtype) was 2 days (IQR 1-5 days). In 27 (48.2%) patients, the event was diagnosed within the first 24 hours after immunization. The most frequent subtype was AIS in 43 patients (75%; 0.54 per 1,000,000 doses, 95% CI 0.40-0.73), followed by ICH in 9 (16.1%; 0.11 per 1,000,000 doses, 95% CI 0.06-0.22) and SAH and CVT, each with 2 cases (3.6%; 0.03 per 1,000,000 doses, 95% CI 0.01-0.09). Overall, the most common risk factors were hypertension in 33 (58.9%) patients and diabetes in 22 (39.3%). Median hospital length of stay was 6 days (IQR 4-13 days). At discharge, functional outcome was good (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2) in 41.1% of patients; in-hospital mortality rate was 21.4%. DISCUSSION: Stroke is an exceedingly rare AEFI against SARS-CoV-2. Preexisting stroke risk factors were identified in most patients. Further research is needed to evaluate causal associations between SARS-COV-2 vaccines and stroke.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Anciano , Vacuna BNT162 , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Femenino , Humanos , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/epidemiología , Masculino , México/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunación/efectos adversos
16.
Rev Invest Clin ; 74(3): 121-130, 2022 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35345064

RESUMEN

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is the most frequent cause of acute flaccid paralysis and if not diagnosed and treated timely, a significant cause of long-term disability. Incidence in Latin America ranges from 0.71 to 7.63 cases/100,000 person-years. Historically, GBS has been linked to infections (mainly gastrointestinal by Campylobacter jejuni) and vaccines (including those against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 [SARS-CoV-2]); however, a trigger cannot be detected in most cases. Regarding SARS-CoV-2, epidemiological studies have found no association with its development. Acute motor axonal neuropathy is the most common electrophysiological variant in Mexico and Asian countries. Intravenous immunoglobulin or plasma exchanges are still the treatment cornerstones. Mortality in Mexico can be as high as 12%. Avances in understanding the drivers of nerve injury in GBS that may provide the basis for developing targeted therapies have been made during the past decade; despite them, accurate criteria for selecting patients requiring acute treatment, prognostic biomarkers, and novel therapies are still needed. The newly-developed vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 have raised concerns regarding the potential risk for developing GBS. In the midst of coronavirus disease 2019 and vaccination campaigns against SARS-CoV-2, this review discusses the epidemiology, clinical presentation, management, and outcomes of GBS in Mexico.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré , Vacunas , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/epidemiología , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/etiología , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/terapia , Humanos , México/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2
17.
Curr Opin Neurol ; 35(3): 375-383, 2022 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35283463

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the etiological agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), can trigger a myriad of neuropsychiatric manifestations. As a 2-year-old disease (at the writing of this manuscript), its long-term cognitive and neuropsychiatric implications, known as post-COVID-19 conditions, are incompletely recognized and mechanistically obscure. RECENT FINDINGS: Fatigue, anxiety, depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, and cognitive dysfunction are reported more frequently in COVID-19 survivors than in matching, non-COVID-19 population. Risk factors are unclear, including comorbidities, age at COVID-19 onset, or disease severity; women, however, have been reported to be at increased risk than men. Although the frequency of these symptoms decreases over time, at least one in five will have persistent cognitive and neuropsychiatric manifestations one year after recovering from COVID-19. SUMMARY: Neurocognitive and psychiatric post-COVID-19 long-term conditions are frequent and complex multifactorial sequelae. Several acute and chronic factors such as hypoxemia, cerebral thrombotic and inflammatory endothelial damage, and disruption of the blood-brain barrier (leading to parenchymal translocation of pro-inflammatory molecules, cytokines, and cytotoxic T lymphocytes) are involved, leading to microglial activation and astrogliosis. As an evolving topic, evidence derived from prospective studies will expand our understanding of post-COVID-19 these long-term outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Encefalopatías , COVID-19 , Enfermedades Neuromusculares , Ansiedad/psicología , Encéfalo , COVID-19/complicaciones , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
18.
Neurol Sci ; 43(4): 2217-2229, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35022935

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A high proportion of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) survivors may develop long-term cognitive impairment. We aimed to develop a multivariate causal model exposing the links between COVID-19-associated biomarkers, illness-related variables, and their effects on cognitive performance. METHODS: In this prospective study, we assess the potential drivers for the development of cognitive impairment in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia aged ≥ 18 years at 6-month follow-up after hospital discharge, using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Patients with pre-existing cognitive impairment were excluded. Laboratory results at hospital admission were clustered by principal component analysis (PCA) and included in a path analysis model evaluating the causal relationship between age, comorbidities, hypoxemia, invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) requirement, in-hospital delirium, and cognitive performance. RESULTS: We studied 92 patients: 54 (58.7%) men and 38 (41.3%) women, with median age of 50 years (interquartile range 42-55), among whom 50 (54.4%) tested positive for cognitive impairment at 6-month follow-up. Path analysis revealed a direct link between the thrombo-inflammatory component of PCA (C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, and neutrophils) and hypoxemia severity at hospital admission. Our model showed that low PaO2/FiO2 ratio values, unlike the thrombo-inflammatory component, had a direct effect on cognitive performance, independent from age, in-hospital delirium, and invasive mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSION: In this study, biomarkers of thrombo-inflammation in COVID-19 and low PaO2/FiO2 had a negative effect on cognitive performance 6 months after hospital discharge. These results highlight the critical role of hypoxemia as a driver for impaired cognition in the mid-term.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Disfunción Cognitiva , Adolescente , COVID-19/complicaciones , Disfunción Cognitiva/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Hipoxia/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Respiración Artificial , SARS-CoV-2
19.
Lupus ; 31(2): 228-237, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35042376

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disease associated with thrombotic and non-thrombotic neurologic manifestations. APS is classified as primary (PAPS) or secondary (SAPS) when it co-exists with another autoimmune disease. We aim to describe the spectrum of acute cerebrovascular disease among patients with APS, their differences between stroke subtypes, and long-term functional outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including adult (≥18 years) patients with APS followed in the stroke clinic of a tertiary-care reference center for autoimmune diseases in Mexico from 2009 to 2019. RESULTS: We studied 120 cases; 99 (82.5%) women; median age 43 years (interquartile range 35-52); 63.3% with SAPS. Demographics, comorbidities, and antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) positivity were similar between APS type and stroke subtypes. Amongst index events, we observed 84 (70%) acute ischemic strokes (AIS), 19 (15.8%) cerebral venous thromboses (CVT), 11 (9.2%) intracerebral hemorrhages (ICH), and six (5%) subarachnoid hemorrhages (SAH). Sixty-seven (55.8%) were known patients with APS; the median time from APS diagnosis to index stroke was 46 months (interquartile range 12-96); 64.7% of intracranial hemorrhages (ICH or SAH) occurred ≥4 years after APS was diagnosed (23.5% anticoagulation-related); 63.2% of CVT cases developed before APS was diagnosed or simultaneously. Recurrences occurred in 26 (22.8%) patients, AIS, in 18 (69.2%); intracranial hemorrhage, in eight (30.8%). Long-term functional outcomes were good (modified Rankin Scale ≤2) in 63.2% of cases, during follow-up, the all-cause mortality rate was 19.2%. CONCLUSION: We found no differences between stroke subtypes and APS types. aPL profiles were not associated with any of the acute cerebrovascular diseases described in this cohort. CVT may be an initial thrombotic manifestation of APS with low mortality and good long-term functional outcome.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Antifosfolípido , Enfermedades Autoinmunes , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea , Trombosis , Adulto , Síndrome Antifosfolípido/complicaciones , Síndrome Antifosfolípido/diagnóstico , Síndrome Antifosfolípido/epidemiología , Hemorragia Cerebral/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Trombosis/epidemiología , Trombosis/etiología
20.
Neurol Sci ; 43(4): 2699-2708, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34705128

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is the most frequent, severe, and disabling form of central nervous system (CNS) tuberculosis (TB). TBM paradoxical manifestations are characterized by clinical or paraclinical worsening after 1 month of effective anti-TB treatment in patients who initially responded to treatment despite the use of adjunctive corticosteroids. METHODS: Retrospective descriptive study of consecutive HIV-negative adult patients (≥ 18 years) with definitive TBM who developed a paradoxical manifestation following anti-TB in a tertiary-care hospital in Mexico from 2009 to 2019; we also conducted a literature review of published cases/series of paradoxical manifestations in HIV-negative patients from 1980 to 2020. RESULTS: We detected 84 cases of definitive TBM; 55 (68.7%) HIV-negative patients and 29 (36.3%) HIV-infected patients. Among HIV-negative patients, four (7.3%), three female and one male (19-49 years old), developed a paradoxical manifestation within 4-14 weeks following treatment initiation despite receiving adequate corticosteroid doses; Mycobacterium bovis was isolated from the cerebrospinal fluid of three cases and Mycobacterium tuberculosis in one more. Two patients developed vasculopathy-related cerebral infarctions, one severe basilar meningitis, and hydrocephalus, one more a tuberculoma. Two were treated with intravenous cyclophosphamide, and two with steroids. One of the patients treated with steroids died; patients who received cyclophosphamide had a good clinical response. CONCLUSIONS: This case series illustrates the diverse clinical/radiologic paradoxical manifestations of TBM in HIV-negative patients. Cyclophosphamide may be safe and effective in treating TBM-associated paradoxical manifestations. Specific diagnostic and care protocols for these patients are needed.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Tuberculosis Meníngea , Adulto , Antituberculosos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tuberculosis Meníngea/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Tuberculosis Meníngea/complicaciones , Tuberculosis Meníngea/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA