RESUMEN
Identifying people at risk for progressive chronic kidney disease and connecting them with recommended care is crucial for providing timely and optimal treatment. The ASSIST-CKD (A programme to Spread eGFR [estimated glomerular filtration rate] graph Surveillance for the early identification, Support and Treatment of people with progressive CKD [chronic kidney disease]) trial evaluated the effect of graphical eGFR reporting to primary care physicians on late presentation to a nephrologist in the United Kingdom. Trial data were obtained from the UK Renal Registry. Although the results were neutral, the data generated from the ASSIST-CKD trial are informative and provide useful estimates of the intervention effect. The trial also provides valuable insights into the challenges of implementing complex interventions in busy health care environments, which can be used to guide the designs of future interventions.
Asunto(s)
Progresión de la Enfermedad , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Atención Primaria de Salud , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Humanos , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/diagnóstico , Atención Primaria de Salud/normas , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Femenino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The evidence for acute effects of air pollution on mortality in India is scarce, despite the extreme concentrations of air pollution observed. This is the first multi-city study in India that examines the association between short-term exposure to PM2·5 and daily mortality using causal methods that highlight the importance of locally generated air pollution. METHODS: We applied a time-series analysis to ten cities in India between 2008 and 2019. We assessed city-wide daily PM2·5 concentrations using a novel hybrid nationwide spatiotemporal model and estimated city-specific effects of PM2·5 using a generalised additive Poisson regression model. City-specific results were then meta-analysed. We applied an instrumental variable causal approach (including planetary boundary layer height, wind speed, and atmospheric pressure) to evaluate the causal effect of locally generated air pollution on mortality. We obtained an integrated exposure-response curve through a multivariate meta-regression of the city-specific exposure-response curve and calculated the fraction of deaths attributable to air pollution concentrations exceeding the current WHO 24 h ambient PM2·5 guideline of 15 µg/m3. To explore the shape of the exposure-response curve at lower exposures, we further limited the analyses to days with concentrations lower than the current Indian standard (60 µg/m3). FINDINGS: We observed that a 10 µg/m3 increase in 2-day moving average of PM2·5 was associated with 1·4% (95% CI 0·7-2·2) higher daily mortality. In our causal instrumental variable analyses representing the effect of locally generated air pollution, we observed a stronger association with daily mortality (3·6% [2·1-5·0]) than our overall estimate. Our integrated exposure-response curve suggested steeper slopes at lower levels of exposure and an attenuation of the slope at high exposure levels. We observed two times higher risk of death per 10 µg/m3 increase when restricting our analyses to observations below the Indian air quality standard (2·7% [1·7-3·6]). Using the integrated exposure-response curve, we observed that 7·2% (4·2%-10·1%) of all daily deaths were attributed to PM2·5 concentrations higher than the WHO guidelines. INTERPRETATION: Short-term PM2·5 exposure was associated with a high risk of death in India, even at concentrations well below the current Indian PM2·5 standard. These associations were stronger for locally generated air pollutants quantified through causal modelling methods than conventional time-series analysis, further supporting a plausible causal link. FUNDING: Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development.
Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos , Contaminación del Aire , Ciudades , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales , Mortalidad , Material Particulado , India/epidemiología , Contaminación del Aire/efectos adversos , Contaminación del Aire/análisis , Humanos , Material Particulado/efectos adversos , Material Particulado/análisis , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/efectos adversos , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/análisis , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Modelos TeóricosRESUMEN
Background: Solid organ transplant recipients have a high risk of severe outcomes from SARS-CoV-2 infection. A comprehensive understanding of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic across multiple waves in the solid organ transplant population and how this compares to the general population is limited. We conducted a population-based cohort study using linked administrative healthcare databases from Ontario, Canada to answer this question. Methods: We included 15 306 solid organ transplant recipients and 12 160 904 individuals from the general population. Our primary outcome was the rate (per 100 person-years) of severe COVID-19 (ie, hospitalization or death with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test) occurring between January 25, 2020, and November 30, 2022. Results: Compared with the general population, solid organ transplant recipients had almost a 6 times higher rate of severe COVID-19 (20.39 versus 3.44 per 100 person-years), with almost 5.5 times as high a rate of death alone (4.19 versus 0.77 per 100 person-years). Transplant recipients with severe COVID-19 were substantially younger (60.1 versus 66.5 y) and had more comorbidities. The rate of severe COVID-19 declined over time in the solid organ transplant population, with an incidence rate of 41.25 per 100 person-years in the first wave (January 25, 2020, to August 31, 2020) and 18.41 in the seventh wave (June 19, 2022, to November 30, 2022, Omicron era). Conclusions: Solid organ transplant recipients remain at high risk of severe outcomes when they are infected with SARS-CoV-2. Resources and strategies to mitigate the impact of SARS-CoV-2 exposure are needed in this vulnerable patient population.
RESUMEN
Enfortumab vedotin is a fully human monoclonal antibody directed to Nectin-4 and conjugated to monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), approved for treatment of previously treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). This population analysis characterized pharmacokinetics of enfortumab vedotin and free (unconjugated) MMAE, identified covariates affecting pharmacokinetics, and evaluated weight-based dosing for enfortumab vedotin. Exposure-response analyses characterized relationships between enfortumab vedotin and free MMAE exposures and efficacy/safety endpoints. Data from 748 patients with locally advanced or mUC in 5 clinical studies were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Patients received enfortumab vedotin 0.50-1.25 mg/kg every 3 weeks or on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Relevant covariates retained in final models were evaluated for clinical relevance to enfortumab vedotin and free MMAE exposures. Although some covariates produced differences in exposure, the magnitude of changes was not clinically meaningful. Simulations indicated weight-based dosing yielded more consistent exposures across body weight groups vs. a hypothetical fixed-dose regimen of enfortumab vedotin 95 mg (calculated for median body weight, 75 kg). Exposure-response analysis showed average enfortumab vedotin concentrations were not a statistically significant predictor of overall survival (hazard ratio 0.91, 95% confidence interval: 0.72-1.14; P = 0.41); all exposure quartiles had a greater median overall survival than chemotherapy (11.0-12.6 vs. 9.0 months). Enfortumab vedotin and free MMAE exposures were statistically significant predictors of grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (both P < 0.0001). This analysis supports enfortumab vedotin 1.25 mg/kg on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in hospitalized children. Pediatric AKI receiving acute kidney replacement therapy (KRT) is associated with long-term chronic kidney disease (CKD), hypertension, and death. We aim to determine the outcomes after AKI in children who did not receive acute KRT, since these remain uncertain. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of all hospitalized children (0-18 years) surviving AKI without acute KRT between 1996-2020 in Ontario, Canada, identified by validated diagnostic codes in provincial administrative health databases. Children with prior KRT, CKD, or AKI were excluded. Cases were matched with up to four hospitalized comparators without AKI by age, neonatal status, sex, intensive care unit admission, cardiac surgery, malignancy, hypertension, hospitalization era, and a propensity score for AKI. Patients were followed until death, provincial emigration, or censoring in March 2021. The primary outcome was long-term major adverse kidney events (MAKE-LT; a composite of all-cause mortality, long-term KRT, or incident CKD). RESULTS: We matched 4,173 pediatric AKI survivors with 16,337 hospitalized comparators. Baseline covariates were well-balanced following propensity score matching. During median 9.7-year follow-up, 18% of AKI survivors developed MAKE-LT vs. 5% of hospitalized comparators (hazard ratio [HR] 4.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6-4.4). AKI survivors had higher rates of long-term KRT (2% vs. <1%; HR 11.7, 95%CI 7.5-18.4), incident CKD (16% vs. 2%; HR 7.9, 95%CI 6.9-9.1), incident hypertension (17% vs. 8%; HR 2.3, 95%CI 2.1-2.6), and AKI during subsequent hospitalization (6% vs. 2%; HR 3.7, 95%CI 3.1-4.5), but no difference in all-cause mortality (3% vs. 3%; HR 0.9, 95%CI 0.7-1.1). CONCLUSIONS: Children surviving AKI without acute KRT were at higher long-term risk of CKD, long-term KRT, hypertension, and subsequent AKI vs. hospitalized comparators.
RESUMEN
Nurses play a key role in providing in-hospital care to patients. Worldwide, there has been a shortage of nursing staff, putting enormous strain on the existing nursing workforce physically and mentally. A vicious cycle of demanding workplaces exacerbated by perennial shortages leads to attrition and high staff turnover. A centralized, automated infusion pump monitoring system optimizes and augments nurses' performance in the hospital by cutting down on nurse visits to the patient's bedside for every matter, whether significant or insignificant. This viewpoint intends to highlight that by filtering out the noise effectively, nurses can focus on improving patient outcome-led interventions and enhancing the quality of care.
RESUMEN
AIMS: We studied the pharmacokinetics and exposure-response relationships of the brentuximab vedotin (BV) antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) and unconjugated monomethyl auristatin E in haematologic malignancies. METHODS: This population pharmacokinetic analysis included data from five adult and three paediatric studies. Exposures in virtual adult and paediatric populations following BV 1.8 mg/kg (maximum 180 mg) intravenously every 3 weeks were simulated. Clinical endpoints included overall response rate, grade ≥2 peripheral neuropathy (PN) and grade ≥3 neutropenia. RESULTS: BV ADC exhibited linear pharmacokinetics, well-described by a three-compartment model, with body weight being the only significant covariate for exposure. Monomethyl auristatin E exhibited time-varying formation rate. Simulated steady-state BV ADC exposures in patients aged 12 to <18 years were similar to those of adult patients, but 23%-38% lower in patients aged 2 to <12 years. Despite lower exposure, clinical activity was observed with BV 1.8 mg/kg every 3 weeks in those aged 2 to <12 years (overall response rate: 2 to <12 years, 60%; 12 to <18 years, 43%). In adult, but not paediatric patients, increased BV ADC exposures were associated with grade ≥2 PN and grade ≥3 neutropenia occurrence. CONCLUSIONS: BV pharmacokinetics in adult and paediatric patients were consistent. BV ADC exposures were lower in patients aged 2 to <12 years vs. ≥12 years, but no apparent clinically relevant differences in efficacy, grade ≥2 PN or grade ≥3 neutropenia were observed. These data support body weight-based dosing of BV in patients irrespective of age; thus, dose adjustment in those 2 to <12 years does not appear warranted.
Asunto(s)
Peso Corporal , Brentuximab Vedotina , Inmunoconjugados , Humanos , Niño , Brentuximab Vedotina/administración & dosificación , Brentuximab Vedotina/farmacocinética , Brentuximab Vedotina/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Preescolar , Inmunoconjugados/farmacocinética , Inmunoconjugados/administración & dosificación , Inmunoconjugados/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Modelos Biológicos , Neoplasias Hematológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Adulto Joven , Factores de Edad , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Oligopéptidos/farmacocinética , Oligopéptidos/administración & dosificación , Oligopéptidos/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Simulación por ComputadorRESUMEN
Importance: Lichen planopilaris (LPP) is a form of scarring alopecia associated with progressive, permanent hair loss. Symptoms range from burning pain to itching, also carrying substantial psychological morbidity. Yet, disease characteristics, pathophysiology, and effective treatment data are limited, making treatment a challenge. Objective: To describe the prevalence and dermatologist-prescribed treatment patterns of LPP among US adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used the Explorys database. The prevalence analysis used a 15% random sample and identified US adults with LPP diagnoses between 2017 and 2019. The LPP treatment analysis included all patients with LPP diagnoses between 2016 and 2020 and a dermatologist encounter in the first year after diagnosis. Data were analyzed from January 2023 to April 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes of the prevalence analysis were the crude and standardized prevalence estimates of US adults with LPP across age, sex, and racial groups. The main outcomes of the treatment analysis were the frequency of LPP treatments within 1 year of diagnosis, and the number of patients who continued treatment beyond 1 year, switched treatments, and combined treatments. Results: Among 1â¯466â¯832 eligible patients analyzed for prevalence, 241 patients had an LPP diagnosis (222 [92.1%] female; median [IQR] age, 64 [54-73] years). Standardized overall prevalence was 13.4 per 100â¯000 (95% CI, 11.7-15.1). In the treatment analysis, 991 patients had an LPP diagnosis (907 [91.5%] female; median (IQR) age, 60 [47-69] years). Most received at least 1 type of medication (635 [64.1%]), most frequently intralesional corticosteroids (370 [37.3%]) and topical corticosteroids (342 [34.5%]), followed by doxycycline (104 [10.5%]) and hydroxychloroquine (72 [7.3%]). Treatment continued beyond 1 year in 71 of 200 patients (35.5%) prescribed intralesional corticosteroids and 7 of 29 patients (24.1%) prescribed hydroxychloroquine. Treatment switching at 1 year occurred in 32 of 254 patients (12.6%) first prescribed an intralesional corticosteroid and in 44 of 194 (22.7%) first prescribed a topical corticosteroid. Combinations of 2 or 3 treatment types were given to 137 (13.8%) and 74 (7.5%) patients, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study reported prevalence and treatment patterns for US adults with LPP in a representative sample. Most patients with LPP received treatment, and many received multiple treatment types and switched treatments, suggesting further research into medication selection offers clinical benefit.
Asunto(s)
Alopecia , Liquen Plano , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Transversales , Prevalencia , Liquen Plano/epidemiología , Liquen Plano/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Alopecia/epidemiología , Alopecia/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto Joven , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Fármacos Dermatológicos/administración & dosificación , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To determine COVID-19 vaccine uptake among physicians in Ontario, Canada from 14 December 2020 to 13 February 2022. DESIGN: Population-based retrospective cohort study. SETTING: All registered physicians in Ontario, Canada using data from linked provincial administrative healthcare databases. PARTICIPANTS: 41 267 physicians (including postgraduate trainees) who were Ontario residents and registered with the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario were included. Physicians who were out of province, had not accessed Ontario Health Insurance Plan-insured services for their own care for ≥5 years and those with missing identifiers were excluded. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were the proportions of physicians who were recorded to have received at least one, at least two and three doses of a Health Canada-approved COVID-19 vaccine by study end date. Secondary outcomes were how uptake varied by physician characteristics (including age, sex, specialty and residential location) and time elapsed between doses. RESULTS: Of 41 267 physicians, (56% male, mean age 47 years), 39 359 (95.4%) received at least one dose, 39 148 (94.9%) received at least two doses and 35 834 (86.8%) received three doses of a COVID-19 vaccine. Of those who received three doses, the proportions were 90.4% among those aged ≥60 years and 81.2-89.5% among other age groups; 88.7% among family physicians and 89% among specialists. 1908 physicians (4.6%) had no record of vaccination, and this included 3.4% of family physicians and 4.1% of specialists; however, 28% of this group had missing specialty information. CONCLUSIONS: In Ontario, within 14 months of COVID-19 vaccine availability, 86.8% of physicians had three doses of a COVID-19 vaccine, compared with 45.6% of the general population. Findings may signify physicians' confidence in the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Médicos , Humanos , Ontario , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , COVID-19/prevención & control , Adulto , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
IMPORTANCE: Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) may increase digoxin concentration, a medication with a narrow therapeutic index. Small changes in digoxin concentration could predispose individuals to the risk of toxicity. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the risk of digoxin toxicity in older adults taking digoxin following co-prescription of TMP-SMX compared with co-prescription of amoxicillin. DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada (2002-2020) using linked health care data. Participants comprised 47,961 older adults taking digoxin (58% women; median age 80 years [interquartile range 74-86]) who were newly treated with TMP-SMX (n = 10,273) compared with those newly treated with amoxicillin (n = 37,688). EXPOSURE: Co-prescription of TMP-SMX versus amoxicillin in older adults concurrently taking digoxin. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE: The primary outcome was a hospital encounter (i.e., hospital admission or emergency department visit) with digoxin toxicity within 30 days of the antibiotic prescription. Inverse probability of treatment weighting on the propensity score was used to balance comparison groups on indicators of baseline health. Weighted risk ratios (RR) were obtained using modified Poisson regression and weighted risk differences (RD) using binomial regression. The number needed to harm (NNH) was calculated as 1/RD. RESULTS: A hospital encounter with digoxin toxicity occurred in 49/10,273 (0.48%) patients treated with TMP-SMX versus 32/37,688 (0.08%) in those treated with amoxicillin (weighted RR, 5.71 [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.19 to 10.24]; weighted RD, 0.39% [95% CI, 0.25% to 0.53%]; NNH 256 [95% CI, 233 to 400]). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: In older adults taking digoxin, the 30-day risk of a hospital encounter with digoxin toxicity was nearly 6 times higher in those co-prescribed TMP-SMX versus amoxicillin, although the absolute risk difference was low (0.4%). Physicians should prescribe an alternative antibiotic when clinically appropriate. If TMP-SMX must be co-prescribed with digoxin (if the benefit is believed to outweigh the risk), digoxin should be dose-reduced on an individual basis.
Asunto(s)
Amoxicilina , Antibacterianos , Digoxina , Combinación Trimetoprim y Sulfametoxazol , Humanos , Digoxina/efectos adversos , Digoxina/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Retrospectivos , Amoxicilina/efectos adversos , Amoxicilina/administración & dosificación , Combinación Trimetoprim y Sulfametoxazol/efectos adversos , Combinación Trimetoprim y Sulfametoxazol/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Cohortes , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Ontario/epidemiología , Cardiotónicos/efectos adversos , Cardiotónicos/uso terapéutico , Cardiotónicos/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
Background: It is unclear whether the use of higher dialysate bicarbonate concentrations is associated with clinically relevant changes in the pre-dialysis serum bicarbonate concentration. Objective: The objective is to examine the association between the dialysate bicarbonate prescription and the pre-dialysis serum bicarbonate concentration. Design: This is a retrospective cohort study. Setting: The study was performed using linked administrative health care databases in Ontario, Canada. Patients: Prevalent adults receiving maintenance in-center hemodialysis as of April 1, 2020 (n = 5414) were included. Measurements: Patients were grouped into the following dialysate bicarbonate categories at the dialysis center-level: individualized (adjustment based on pre-dialysis serum bicarbonate concentration) or standardized (>90% of patients received the same dialysate bicarbonate concentration). The standardized category was stratified by concentration: 35, 36 to 37, and ≥38 mmol/L. The primary outcome was the mean outpatient pre-dialysis serum bicarbonate concentration at the patient level. Methods: We examined the association between dialysate bicarbonate category and pre-dialysis serum bicarbonate using an adjusted linear mixed model. Results: All dialysate bicarbonate categories had a mean pre-dialysis serum bicarbonate concentration within the normal range. In the individualized category, 91% achieved a pre-dialysis serum bicarbonate ≥22 mmol/L, compared to 87% in the standardized category. Patients in the standardized category tended to have a serum bicarbonate that was 0.25 (95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.93, 0.43) mmol/L lower than patients in the individualized category. Relative to patients in the 35 mmol/L category, patients in the 36 to 37 and ≥38 mmol/L categories tended to have a serum bicarbonate that was 0.70 (95% CI = -0.30, 1.70) mmol/L and 0.87 (95% CI = 0.14, 1.60) mmol/L higher, respectively. There was no effect modification by age, sex, or history of chronic lung disease. Limitations: We could not directly confirm that all laboratory measurements were pre-dialysis. Data on prescribed dialysate bicarbonate concentrations for individual dialysis sessions were not available, which may have led to some misclassification, and adherence to a practice of individualization could not be measured. Residual confounding is possible. Conclusions: We found no significant difference in the pre-dialysis serum bicarbonate concentration irrespective of whether an individualized or standardized dialysate bicarbonate was used. Dialysate bicarbonate concentrations ≥38 mmol/L (vs 35 mmol/L) may increase the pre-dialysis serum bicarbonate concentration by 0.9 mmol/L.
Contexte: On ignore si des concentrations plus élevées de bicarbonate dans le dialysat sont associées à des changements cliniquement significatifs dans le taux de bicarbonate sérique prédialyse. Objectif: Examiner l'association entre la prescription de bicarbonate du dialysat et le taux de bicarbonate sérique prédialyse. Conception: Étude de cohorte rétrospective. Cadre: Étude réalisée en Ontario (Canada) à partir des données administratives de santé. Sujets: Ont été inclus les adultes prévalents qui recevaient une hémodialyse chronique en centre le 1er avril 2020 (n=5 414). Mesures: Les sujets ont été regroupés dans les catégories suivantes de concentration en bicarbonate dans le dialysat utilisée dans leur unité de dialyse: individualisée (ajustée selon le taux de bicarbonate sérique prédialyse) ou normalisée (même concentration pour >90% des sujets). La catégorie « standardisée ¼ a été stratifiée selon la concentration: 35 mmol/L, 36 à 37 mmol/L et ≥38 mmol/L. Le principal critère d'évaluation était le taux moyen de bicarbonate sérique prédialyse en ambulatoire au niveau du patient. Méthodologie: Nous avons examiné l'association entre la catégorie de concentration en bicarbonate du dialysat et le taux de bicarbonate sérique prédialyse à l'aide d'un modèle linéaire mixte corrigé. Résultats: Pour toutes les catégories de concentration en bicarbonate du dialysat, le taux moyen de bicarbonate sérique prédialyse était dans la plage normale. Dans la catégorie « individualisée ¼, 91% des sujets avaient un taux de bicarbonate sérique prédialyse de ≥22 mmol/L, comparativement à 87% dans la catégorie « standardisée ¼. Les patients de la catégorie « standardisée ¼ tendaient à avoir un taux de bicarbonate sérique de 0,25 mmol/L (IC 95%: -0,93 à 0,43) inférieur à celui des patients de la catégorie « individualisée ¼. Comparé aux patients de la catégorie 35 mmol/L, les patients des catégories 36 à 37 mmol/L et ≥38 mmol/L tendaient respectivement à avoir un taux de bicarbonate sérique de 0,70 mmol/L (IC 95%: -0,30 à 1,70) et de 0,87 mmol/L (IC 95%: 0,14 à 1,60) plus élevé. L'âge, le sexe ou les antécédents de maladie pulmonaire chronique n'ont pas semblé modifier l'effet. Limites: Il n'a pas été possible de confirmer directement que toutes les mesures de laboratoire avaient été effectuées avant la dialyse. Les données sur les concentrations de bicarbonate prescrites pour les séances de dialyse individuelles n'étaient pas disponibles, ce qui peut avoir conduit à une classification erronée. De plus, l'observance d'une pratique d'individualisation n'a pas pu être mesurée. Une confusion résiduelle est possible. Conclusion: Nous n'avons observé aucune différence significative dans les taux de bicarbonate sériques prédialyse, qu'on ait utilisé une concentration individualisée ou standardisée de bicarbonate dans le dialysat. L'utilisation d'un dialysat à ≥38 mmol/L (c. 35 mmol/L) de bicarbonate peut entraîner une hausse de 0,9 mmol/L du taux de bicarbonate sérique prédialyse.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the relationships between brentuximab vedotin (BV) pharmacokinetics, age, and body weight (BW) with efficacy and safety in pediatric and young adult patients with previously untreated, high-risk classical Hodgkin lymphoma in the phase III AHOD1331 study. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Overall, 296 patients (age 2-21 years) in the overall population were randomized to and received BV + chemotherapy; the pharmacokinetic subpopulation comprised 24 patients (age <13 years). Age- and/or BW-based (pharmacokinetic surrogates) subgroup analyses of efficacy and safety were conducted for the overall population. Exposure-response analyses were limited to the pharmacokinetic subpopulation. RESULTS: There were no visible trends in disease characteristics across pediatric age subgroups, whereas BW increased with age. Observed antibody-drug conjugate exposures in patients ages <12 years were lower than those in adults administered BV 1.8 mg/kg every 3 weeks, as exposure increased with BW. Nevertheless, no detrimental impact on event-free survival was seen in younger subgroups: 3-year event-free survival rates were 96.2% (2-<12 years) and 92.0% (12-<18 years), with no events observed in those ages <6 years. Neither early response nor lack of need for radiation therapy was associated with high pharmacokinetic exposure. No evidence of exposure-driven grade ≥2 or ≥3 peripheral neuropathy or grade ≥3 neutropenia was seen in exposure-safety and BW-based subgroup analyses; the incidence of these safety events was comparable across pediatric age subgroups, despite lower exposure in younger children. CONCLUSIONS: No further adjustments based on age or BW are required for the BV dosage (1.8 mg/kg every 3 weeks) approved in children.
Asunto(s)
Peso Corporal , Brentuximab Vedotina , Enfermedad de Hodgkin , Humanos , Brentuximab Vedotina/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/mortalidad , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/patología , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto Joven , Preescolar , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacocinética , Inmunoconjugados/administración & dosificación , Inmunoconjugados/farmacocinética , Inmunoconjugados/efectos adversos , Inmunoconjugados/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Importance: Recent guidelines call for better evidence on health outcomes after living kidney donation. Objective: To determine the risk of hypertension in normotensive adults who donated a kidney compared with nondonors of similar baseline health. Their rates of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline and risk of albuminuria were also compared. Design, Setting, and Participants: Prospective cohort study of 924 standard-criteria living kidney donors enrolled before surgery and a concurrent sample of 396 nondonors. Recruitment occurred from 2004 to 2014 from 17 transplant centers (12 in Canada and 5 in Australia); follow-up occurred until November 2021. Donors and nondonors had the same annual schedule of follow-up assessments. Inverse probability of treatment weighting on a propensity score was used to balance donors and nondonors on baseline characteristics. Exposure: Living kidney donation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hypertension (systolic blood pressure [SBP] ≥140 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure [DBP] ≥90 mm Hg, or antihypertensive medication), annualized change in eGFR (starting 12 months after donation/simulated donation date in nondonors), and albuminuria (albumin to creatinine ratio ≥3 mg/mmol [≥30 mg/g]). Results: Among the 924 donors, 66% were female; they had a mean age of 47 years and a mean eGFR of 100 mL/min/1.73 m2. Donors were more likely than nondonors to have a family history of kidney failure (464/922 [50%] vs 89/394 [23%], respectively). After statistical weighting, the sample of nondonors increased to 928 and baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. During a median follow-up of 7.3 years (IQR, 6.0-9.0), in weighted analysis, hypertension occurred in 161 of 924 donors (17%) and 158 of 928 nondonors (17%) (weighted hazard ratio, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.75-1.66]). The longitudinal change in mean blood pressure was similar in donors and nondonors. After the initial drop in donors' eGFR after nephrectomy (mean, 32 mL/min/1.73 m2), donors had a 1.4-mL/min/1.73 m2 (95% CI, 1.2-1.5) per year lesser decline in eGFR than nondonors. However, more donors than nondonors had an eGFR between 30 and 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at least once in follow-up (438/924 [47%] vs 49/928 [5%]). Albuminuria occurred in 132 of 905 donors (15%) and 95 of 904 nondonors (11%) (weighted hazard ratio, 1.46 [95% CI, 0.97-2.21]); the weighted between-group difference in the albumin to creatinine ratio was 1.02 (95% CI, 0.88-1.19). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of living kidney donors and nondonors with the same follow-up schedule, the risks of hypertension and albuminuria were not significantly different. After the initial drop in eGFR from nephrectomy, donors had a slower mean rate of eGFR decline than nondonors but were more likely to have an eGFR between 30 and 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at least once in follow-up. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00936078.
Asunto(s)
Albuminuria , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Hipertensión , Trasplante de Riñón , Riñón , Donadores Vivos , Nefrectomía , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Nefrectomía/efectos adversos , Riñón/fisiopatología , Presión Sanguínea , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with hidradenitis suppurativa have substantial unmet clinical needs and scarce therapeutic options. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab, a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that selectively inhibits interleukin (IL)-17F and IL-17A, in patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa. METHODS: BE HEARD I and II were two identically designed, 48-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre phase 3 trials. Patients aged 18 years or older with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa were randomly assigned 2:2:2:1 using interactive response technology (stratified by worst Hurley Stage at baseline and baseline systemic antibiotic use) to receive subcutaneous bimekizumab 320 mg every 2 weeks; bimekizumab 320 mg every 2 weeks to week 16, then every 4 weeks to week 48; bimekizumab 320 mg every 4 weeks to week 48; or placebo to week 16, then bimekizumab 320 mg every 2 weeks. The primary outcome was an hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response of at least 50%, defined as a reduction in total abscess and inflammatory nodule count of at least 50% from baseline with no increase from baseline in abscess or draining tunnel count (HiSCR50) at week 16. Efficacy analyses included all randomly assigned study patients (intention-to-treat population). Safety analyses included all patients who received at least one full or partial dose of study treatment in the safety set, and of bimekizumab in the active-medication set. These trials are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04242446 and NCT04242498, and both are completed. FINDINGS: Patients for BE HEARD I were recruited from Feb 19, 2020, to Oct 27, 2021, and 505 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned. Patients for BE HEARD II were recruited from March 2, 2020, to July 28, 2021, and 509 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned. The primary outcome at week 16 was met in the group who received bimekizumab every 2 weeks using modified non-responder imputation; higher responder rates were observed with bimekizumab versus placebo in both trials: 138 (48%) of 289 patients versus 21 (29%) of 72 patients in BE HEARD I (odds ratio [OR] 2·23 [97·5% CI 1·16-4·31]; p=0·0060) and 151 (52%) of 291 patients versus 24 (32%) of 74 patients in BE HEARD II (2·29 [1·22-4·29]; p=0·0032). In BE HEARD II, HiSCR50 was also met in the group who were administered bimekizumab every 4 weeks (77 [54%] of 144 vs 24 [32%] of 74 with placebo; 2·42 [1·22-4·80]; p=0·0038). Responses were maintained or increased to week 48. Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 40 (8%) patients in BE HEARD I and in 24 (5%) patients in BE HEARD II treated with bimekizumab over 48 weeks. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events to week 48 were hidradenitis in both trials, in addition to coronavirus infection and diarrhoea in BE HEARD I, and oral candidiasis and headache in BE HEARD II. One death was reported across the two trials, and was due to congestive heart failure in a patient with substantial cardiovascular history treated with bimekizumab every 2 weeks in BE HEARD I (considered unrelated to bimekizumab treatment by the investigator). No new safety signals were observed. INTERPRETATION: Bimekizumab was well tolerated by patients with hidradenitis suppurativa and produced rapid and deep clinically meaningful responses that were maintained up to 48 weeks. Data from these two trials support the use of bimekizumab for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa. FUNDING: UCB Pharma.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Hidradenitis Supurativa , Humanos , Hidradenitis Supurativa/tratamiento farmacológico , Método Doble Ciego , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Interleucina-17/antagonistas & inhibidoresRESUMEN
Generally, financial investments are necessary for portfolio management. However, the prediction of a portfolio becomes complicated in several processing techniques which may cause certain issues while predicting the portfolio. Moreover, the error analysis needs to be validated with efficient performance measures. To solve the problems of portfolio optimization, a new portfolio prediction framework is developed. Initially, a dataset is collected from the standard database which is accumulated with various companies' portfolios. For forecasting the benefits of companies, a Multi-serial Cascaded Network (MCNet) is employed which constitutes of Autoencoder, 1D Convolutional Neural Network (1DCNN), and Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) is utilized. The prediction output for the different companies is stored using the developed MCNet model for further use. After predicting the benefits, the best company with the highest profit is selected by Integration of Artificial Rabbit and Hummingbird Algorithm (IARHA). The major contribution of our work is to increase the accuracy of prediction and to choose the optimal portfolio. The implementation is conducted in Python platform. The result analysis shows that the developed model achieves 0.89% and 0.56% regarding RMSE and MAE measures. Throughout the analysis, the experimentation of the developed model shows enriched performance.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the risk of new-onset anxiety disorders in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). OBJECTIVES: To compare the risk of new-onset anxiety disorder in patients with HS and controls, and to describe risk factors for the development of anxiety in patients with HS. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective cohort analysis of a US electronic health records database between 2011 and 2020. Adults newly diagnosed with HS at a dermatology or primary care visit and control participants were included. The primary outcome was a new diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder, phobic disorders, panic disorder or unspecified anxiety. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare the crude risk of any anxiety disorder between groups and to assess the independent association with HS while controlling for potential demographic, clinical and healthcare-related confounders. RESULTS: Among 9597 patients with HS and 959 493 controls, the incidence rate (IR) of anxiety was 5.74 and 3.86 per 100 person-years (PY), respectively. The crude risk among all patients was 48% higher for those with HS vs. controls [hazard ratio (HR) 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.40-1.55]. When stratified by index encounter type, patients with HS had 2.43 (95% CI 2.13-2.77) times the risk of anxiety disorder than dermatology controls and 1.46 (95%CI 1.38-1.55) times the risk than primary care controls. The adjusted HR for patients with HS vs. controls was 1.11 (95% CI 1.05-1.17) overall, 1.26 (95% CI 1.07-1.48) in the dermatology subgroup and 1.07 (95% CI 1.01-1.13) in the primary care subgroup. Risk factors for an incident anxiety diagnosis among patients with HS included depression (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.48-1.93), female sex (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.23-1.60), younger age (HR 0.87 per 10-year increase, 95% CI 0.84-0.90), White race, in the Medicaid insurance programme (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.07-1.40), tobacco smoking (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.03-1.31) and having one or more emergency department visits in the year before a HS diagnosis. Absolute IRs of anxiety disorders were highest among patients with HS who were aged 18-29â years (7.10 per 100 PY), female (6.34 per 100 PY) and White (6.79 per 100 PY). CONCLUSIONS: HS is independently associated with an increased risk of anxiety disorders. An increased risk remains but is attenuated when confounders are controlled for. The relative risk may be particularly high in patients managed by dermatologists.
Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition characterized by painful skin lesions that often leak pus from sensitive areas of the body, including the arm pits, breasts, groin and perineum. The disease can flare in severity without notice. Due to the sensitive nature of the affected areas, unpredictability of the disease course and scarring that may occur because of chronic inflammation, HS is known to severely affect a person's quality of life. Some studies have linked HS to depression and anxiety. However, there is limited evidence describing which condition comes first, and the relationship is less well established among people from the USA with HS. This study aimed to investigate how many people with HS go on to develop a diagnosis of an anxiety disorder in the USA. We found that anxiety is more likely to develop in people with HS than in people without the disease. We also found that certain risk factors make a person with HS more likely to be diagnosed with anxiety, such as a history of depression, being female, being younger, being White, being an active cigarette smoker, being in the Medicaid insurance programme and making one or more visits to the emergency department in the year before their HS diagnosis. Overall, our study findings provide information on the association between HS and the development of anxiety, which is important to guide the clinical management of patients diagnosed with this skin condition.