Uric acid and metabolic syndrome: Importance of hyperuricemia cut-off.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between HyperUricemia (HU) and Metabolic Sindrome (MS) and if Uric Acid (UA) should be inserted into MS definitions is a matter of debate. Aim of our study was to evaluate the correlation between UA and HU with Insulin Resistance (IR) and MS in a population of hypertensive patients. HU was defined with two cut-offs (the classic one of ≥6 mg/dL for women and ≥ 7 for men; the newly proposed URRAH one with ≥5.6 mg/dL for both sexes). METHODS: We enrolled 473 Hypertensive patients followed by the Hypertension Unit of San Gerardo Hospital (Monza, Italy). IR was defined through TG/HDL ratio and NCEP-ATP-III criteria were used for MS diagnosis. RESULTS: MS was found in 33.6 % while HU affected 14.8 % of subjects according to the traditional cut-off and 35.9 % with the URRAH cut-off. 9.7 % (traditional cut-off) and 17.3 % (URRAH's threshold) of the subjects had both HU and MS. UA level was significantly higher in MS group (5.7 vs 4.9 mg/dL, p < 0.0001) as well as for HU (29.0 vs 7.6 % and 51.6 vs 28.0 %, for classic and URRAH cut-off respectively, p < 0.0001 for both comparison). Logistic multivariable regression models showed that UA is related to MS diagnosis (OR = 1.608 for each 1 mg/dL), as well as HU with both cut-off (OR = 5.532 and OR = 3.379, p < 0.0001 for all comparison, for the classic cut-off and the URRAH one respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The main finding of our study is that UA and HU significantly relate to IR and MS. The higher the values of UA and the higher the cut-off used, the higher the strength of the relationship.

Hyperuricemia in Cardiac Rehabilitation Patients: Prevalence and Association with Functional Improvement and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.

INTRODUCTION: The role of uric acid (UA) and Hyper Uricemia (HU) in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) patients have been very little studied. AIM: To evaluate the prevalence of HU and if it is associated to the functional improvement obtained or the left ventricular Ejection Fraction (EF) in CR patients after Acute or Chronic Coronary Syndrome (ACS and CCS respectively). METHODS: We enrol 411 patients (62.4 ± 10.2 years; males 79.8%) enrolled in the CR program at Niguarda Hospital (Milan) from January 2012 to May 2023. HU was defined both as the classic cut-off (> 6 for females, > 7 mg/dL for males) and with the newly identified one by the URRAH study (> 5.1 for females, > 5.6 mg/dL for males). All patients performed a 6MWT and an echocardiography at the beginning and at the end of CR program. RESULTS: Mean UA values were within the normal range (5.6 ± 1.4 mg/dL) with 19.5% (classic cut-off) HU patients with an increase to 47.4% with the newer one. Linear regression analysis showed no role for UA in determining functional improvement, while UA and hyperuricemia (classic cut-off) were associated to admission and discharge EF. The same was not with the URRAH cut-off. CONCLUSIONS: HU is as frequent in CR patients as in those with ACS and CCS. UA didn't correlate with functional recovery while it is associated with admission and discharge EF as also is for HU (classic cut-off). Whit the URRAH cut-off HU prevalence increases significantly, however, it doesn't show any significant association with EF.

Neurological hypertensive emergencies: Correlation of blood pressure values with in-hospital outcomes in ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND: Few certainties exist regarding optimal management of Blood Pressure (BP) in the very first hours after an ischemic stroke and many questions remain still unanswered. Our work aimed to evaluate the role of BP and its trend as possible determinants of in-hospital mortality (primary outcome), discharge disabilities and hospitalization length (secondary outcomes) in ischemic stroke patients presented with Hypertensive Emergencies (HE). METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients presented to Niguarda Hospital, Emergency Department (ED), from 2015 to 2017 with a neurological ischemic HE. BP at ED presentation (T0), its management in ED (T1) and its values at the stroke unit admission (T2) were evaluated. RESULTS: 267 patients were included (0.13 % of all ED accesses and 17.9 % of all ischemic strokes). In the whole population, BP values were not associated with in-hospital mortality while T0 and T2 SBP result were associated to discharge disability and hospitalization length. In pre-specified subgroup analysis these associations were confirmed only in untreated subjects (not anti-hypertensive nor thrombolysis). In fact, no significant relationship can be found between BP values and any secondary outcome in thrombolysis and anti-hypertensive treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: BP values and its management can not be related to in-hospital mortality in stroke patients, presented with HE, while they are associated to discharge disability and hospitalization length. In subgroup analysis, results were confirmed only in untreated (not anti-hypertensive therapies nor thrombolytic).

Fighting Cardiac Thromboembolism during Transcatheter Procedures: An Update on the Use of Cerebral Protection Devices in Cath Labs and EP Labs.

Intraprocedural stroke is a well-documented and feared potential risk of cardiovascular transcatheter procedures (TPs). Moreover, subclinical neurological events or covert central nervous system infarctions are concerns related to the development of dementia, future stroke, cognitive decline, and increased risk of mortality. Cerebral protection devices (CPDs) were developed to mitigate the risk of cardioembolic embolism during TPs. They are mechanical barriers designed to cover the ostium of the supra-aortic branches in the aortic arch, but newer devices are able to protect the descending aorta. CPDs have been mainly designed and tested to provide cerebral protection during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), but their use in both Catheterization and Electrophysiology laboratories is rapidly increasing. CPDs have allowed us to perform procedures that were previously contraindicated due to high thromboembolic risk, such as in cases of intracardiac thrombosis identified at preprocedural assessment. However, several concerns related to their employment have to be defined. The selection of patients at high risk of thromboembolism is still a subjective choice of each center. The aim of this review is to update the evidence on the use of CPDs in either Cath labs or EP labs, providing an overview of their structural characteristics. Future perspectives focusing on their possible future employment are also discussed.