RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for bifurcation lesions still represents a clinical challenge. The Bioss Lim C is a dedicated device for bifurcation lesions, features a tapered shape and large cells, and thus appears as a promising adjunct to the current interventional cardiologists' armamentarium. We aimed at conducting a prospective multicenter study focusing on early and long-term results after Bioss Lim C implantation for true coronary bifurcation lesions. METHODS: Patients with true bifurcation lesions in whom Bioss Lim C implantation was attempted were enrolled in four Italian centers. An explicit bifurcation management approach was recommended, leaving however the choice between one- vs. two-stent strategies at operator's discretion. Acute and long-term results were systematically appraised, focusing on an acute composite of complex side branch (SB) rewiring, SB pinching, or SB occlusion (primary efficacy endpoint), as well as major adverse events (MACE, i.e. death, myocardial infarction [MI], or target vessel revascularization [TVR]), individual components of MACE, and stent thrombosis. RESULTS: A total of 207 patients were included, with age of 67.3±10.8 years, and 40 (19.3%) women. The target lesion was located in the left main in 48 (23.2%) patients, whereas proximal reference vessel diameter was 3.69±0.48 mm, and lesion length 20.3±3.4 mm. According to the Medina classification, most patients (60 [30.9%]) had 1-1-1 lesions. Drug-eluting stent implantation in the SB was carried out in 19 (9.3%) subjects, and kissing balloon inflation was used in 67 (32.5%). The primary efficacy endpoint occurred in 27 (13.0%), with side branch (SB) occlusion in two (1.0%), SB pinching in 23 (11.1%), and complex SB rewiring in six (2.9%), and was most frequent in patients with lower body mass index or dyslipidemia. After 24.1±19.5 months, MACE were adjudicated in 23 (11.1%) subjects, with death in 10 (4.8%), MI in six (2.9%), and TVR in seven (3.4%), as well as stent thrombosis in one (0.5%). CONCLUSIONS: This study supports a wider adoption of the Bioss Lim C dedicated bifurcation device, thanks to the favorable acute results as well as long-term clinical outcomes, as well as its versatility for the stenting strategy provisionally or eventually adopted by operators.
Asunto(s)
Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Stents , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Anciano , Estudios Prospectivos , Italia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diseño de Prótesis , Factores de Tiempo , Stents Liberadores de FármacosRESUMEN
Chronic organized thrombus as a result of prior untreated myocardial infarction can determine myocardial ischemia. This entity appears as an angiographically irregular and hazy image; optical coherence tomography is useful to evaluate these ambiguous lesions and guide interventional treatment.
RESUMEN
To date, very little is known about the performance of a sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable magnesium scaffold (Mg-BRS) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). A multicenter cohort analysis was performed on 69 consecutive AMI subjects treated with Mg-BRS. Procedural success was obtained in all cases, and no in-hospital events were reported. At 9-month follow-up, no cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization, or Mg-BRS thrombosis was reported. Although our analysis showed encouraging results, larger studies and longer-term follow-up are needed to better understand the potential benefits associated with the use of a Mg-BRS in AMI patients.
Asunto(s)
Implantes Absorbibles , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Magnesio/administración & dosificación , Infarto del Miocardio/cirugía , Sirolimus/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Aguda , Anciano , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Italia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Diseño de Prótesis , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
AIMS: To evaluate clinical outcomes at 24 months in an unselected population with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug eluting stents (DES), as compared with bare metal stents (BMS). METHODS AND RESULTS: We report our series of 245 consecutive patients with STEMI undergoing PCI with DES (n=117) or BMS (n=128) from January 2003 to August 2005. The primary endpoint was the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) assessed at 24 months. The secondary endpoint was the incidence of stent thrombosis according to the Academic Research Consortium classification. Propensity score was used to adjust groups for baseline and angiographic characteristics. The adjusted rate of the primary endpoint was lower in DES as compared with BMS group (15.2% vs 25.7%; HR 0.6 [95% CI 0.3-1.11, p=0.1), driven by a significant reduction of TVR (10.1% vs 23.0%; HR 0.4 [95% CI 0.2-1.01, p=0.03), without any significant difference regarding the composite end point of death and recurrent myocardial infarction (7.6% vs 5.4%; HR 1.4 [95% CI 0.4-5.01, p=0.6). The cumulative incidence of stent thrombosis was 5.3% in DES vs 0.8% in BMS group (p=0.06). CONCLUSIONS: The use of DES in STEMI was associated with lower TVR rates, but no differences were observed about death and myocardial infarction at 24 months, as compared with BMS.