Analysis of Factors Potentially Influencing Diagnostic Yield Among Computed Tomography-Guided Biopsies for Bone Lesions.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate patient-specific, lesion-related, and technical factors that potentially influence diagnostic yield of computed tomography (CT)-guided biopsies of bone lesions. METHODS: Computed tomography-guided bone lesion biopsies performed over a 2-year period were retrospectively reviewed, including image review and electronic medical records for pathology reports and clinical follow-up. Lesions were tabulated by prebiopsy CT and magnetic resonance imaging features. Patients with nondiagnostic biopsies were assessed for presumptive clinical diagnosis and management. RESULTS: Nondiagnostic pathology results were obtained in 31 of 156 cases (19.87%), among which diagnoses were confirmed by other tissue sampling in 9; clinical follow-up of up to 2 years yielded no diagnosis in 10 and presumptive diagnoses in 12. The nondiagnostic biopsy rate of long bone lesions was higher than that of other bone lesions (odds ratio, 3.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-9.09). There were no significant differences in patient American Society of Anesthesiologists class, mean body mass index, sedation method, number of cores, or needle gauge between diagnostic and nondiagnostic biopsy cohorts. Diagnostic yield was not significantly different between occult, lytic, or sclerotic lesions. There was no difference in diagnostic yield regarding presence of cortical break, gadolinium enhancement, or lesion depth. Magnetic resonance imaging was obtained before biopsy in significantly more nondiagnostic cases compared with diagnostic cases ( P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Computed tomography-guided biopsies had a nondiagnostic rate of 19.87%, and lesions in the long bones of the extremities were disproportionately common among this group. There was no significant association between biopsy results and several patient-specific, lesion-related, and technical factors.

Fibular Tip Periostitis: New Radiographic Sign Predictive of Chronic Peroneal Tendon Subluxation-Dislocation in Pes Planovalgus.

BACKGROUND. Tearing of the superior peroneal retinaculum is a known cause of peroneal tendon subluxation-dislocation. However, with the exception of cortical avulsions at the fibular attachment, superior peroneal retinaculum injury and subsequent peroneal tendon subluxation-dislocation are typically radiographically occult. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the previously undescribed association between radiographic fibular tip periostitis and MRI evidence of peroneal tendon subluxation-dislocation in patients with hindfoot valgus. METHODS. Thirty-five patients with radiographic fibular tip periostitis and 35 ageand sex-matched individuals without periostitis were selected from among 220 consecutively registered patients with hindfoot valgus who had undergone both ankle radiography and MRI. Studies were retrospectively assessed by two musculoskeletal radiologists in consensus and by two additional blinded radiologists independently for the presence of peroneal tendon subluxation-dislocation, presence of subfibular impingement, and hindfoot valgus angle measurements. Interobserver agreement and accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in the detection of fibular periostitis, peroneal tendon subluxation-dislocation, and subfibular impingement were calculated, and Fischer exact, Mann-Whitney, kappa coefficient, and intraclass correlation tests were performed. RESULTS. Both the consensus and the two independent interpretations showed that the frequency of peroneal tendon subluxation-dislocation was significantly greater in the group with periostitis (62.9%, 65.7%, and 85.7%) than in the group without periostitis (5.7%, 0%, and 14.3%) (p < .001). The finding of periostitis was specific and highly sensitive for predicting peroneal tendon subluxation-dislocation. The frequency of subfibular impingement was also statistically higher in the group with periostitis than in the group without it (p < .001). The hindfoot valgus angle was statistically larger in the group with periostitis than in the control group (p = .01-.002) and among patients with versus those without peroneal tendon subluxation-dislocation (p = .002 to p < .001). The blinded readers had substantial or almost perfect agreement on all imaging interpretations (concordance rate, 82.9-95.7%; κ = 0.66-0.91). CONCLUSION. The radiographic finding of fibular tip periostitis in patients with hindfoot valgus can be a predictor of peroneal tendon subluxation-dislocation and may also suggest advanced hindfoot valgus and subfibular impingement. These radiographic associations should be recognized by the radiologist, and MRI may be recommended as clinically indicated. CLINICAL IMPACT. Chronic undiagnosed peroneal tendon subluxation-dislocation can be a persistent cause of lateral ankle pain, leading to further degeneration and the possibility of complete peroneal tendon tears. Distal fibular periostitis in patients with hindfoot valgus can be a reliable radiographic indicator of this entity and may suggest the presence of subfibular impingement.