Transient SARS-CoV-2 RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase Mutations after Remdesivir Treatment for Chronic COVID-19 in Two Transplant Recipients: Case Report and Intra-Host Viral Genomic Investigation.

Remdesivir is the first FDA-approved drug for treating severe SARS-CoV-2 infection and targets RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) that is required for viral replication. To monitor for the development of mutations that may result in remdesivir resistance during prolonged treatment, we sequenced SARS-CoV-2 specimens collected at different treatment time points in two transplant patients with severe COVID-19. In the first patient, an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipient, a transient RdRp catalytic subunit mutation (nsp12:A449V) was observed that has not previously been associated with remdesivir resistance. As no in vitro study had been conducted to elucidate the phenotypic effect of nsp12:A449V, its clinical significance is unclear. In the second patient, two other transient RdRp mutations were detected: one in the catalytic subunit (nsp12:V166A) and the other in an accessory subunit important for processivity (nsp7:D67N). This is the first case report for a potential link between the nsp12:V166A mutation and remdesivir resistance in vivo, which had only been previously described by in vitro studies. The nsp7:D67N mutation has not previously been associated with remdesivir resistance, and whether it has a phenotypic effect is unknown. Our study revealed SARS-CoV-2 genetic dynamics during remdesivir treatment in transplant recipients that involved mutations in the RdRp complex (nsp7 and nsp12), which may be the result of selective pressure. These results suggest that close monitoring for potential resistance during the course of remdesivir treatment in highly vulnerable patient populations may be beneficial. Development and utilization of diagnostic RdRp genotyping tests may be a future direction for improving the management of chronic COVID-19.

Mycoplasma hominis infections in solid organ transplant recipients: Clinical characteristics, treatment outcomes, and comparison of phenotypic and genotypic susceptibility profiles.

BACKGROUND: Mycoplasma hominis can cause significant infections after solid organ transplantation (SOT). Treatment should be guided by susceptibility testing, but conventional lab methods are laborious with prolonged turnaround time (TAT). This case series compares the phenotypic and genotypic susceptibility profiles of M. hominis isolates identified from SOT patients. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective study evaluating SOT recipients with confirmed M. hominis infections. Patients' demographic, clinical, microbiological, and radiographic data were collected. Culture of M. hominis isolates was performed according to current Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Phenotypic susceptibility testing was performed by University of Alabama Diagnostic Mycoplasma Laboratory. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) was performed followed by bioinformatic analysis of known genetic determinants of resistance. RESULTS: Seven SOT recipients with M. hominis infections were identified. Two out of seven (28.5%) patients had resistance detected by phenotypic susceptibility testing (Case 5 to levofloxacin and Case 7 to tetracycline). Genomic analyses confirmed the presence of mutations in the parC and parE topoisomerase genes at positions conferring to fluoroquinolone resistance in the isolate from Case 5, while the tetracycline-resistant isolate from Case 7 harbored the tetM gene. The median TAT from the date of specimen collection was 24 days for phenotypic susceptibility testing and 14 days for genotypic susceptibility testing. All seven patients received antimicrobials directed toward M. hominis and recovered with complete resolution of infection. CONCLUSIONS: WGS may offer a novel and more rapid methodology for M. hominis susceptibility testing to help optimize antimicrobial usage, but more data are needed.