Clinical and demographic factors affecting trough levels of isavuconazole in critically ill patients with or without COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The broad-spectrum antifungal isavuconazole is administered to treat invasive aspergillosis and mucormycosis. OBJECTIVES: Isavuconazole plasma concentrations in critically ill ICU patients with or without COVID-19 and invasive fungal infection were determined, and factors for sub-therapeutic drug levels (<1 µg/mL) were evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Isavuconazole plasma levels were measured as part of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in ICUs of a tertiary hospital. Concentrations determined 20-28 h after previous dosing were defined as trough (Cmin ) levels. A total of 160 Cmin levels from 62 patients with invasive fungal infections were analysed, 30 of which suffering from COVID-19. Patient characteristics included into univariable and multivariable analyses were gender, age, COVID-19 status, body mass index (BMI), sepsis-related organ failure (SOFA) score, renal replacement therapy (RRT) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) requirement. RESULTS: The mean Cmin of isavuconazole in all patients was 1.64 µg/mL (interquartile range 0.83-2.24 µg/mL, total range 0.24-5.67 µg/mL). In total, 34.4% of the Cmin values (corresponding to 46.8% of patients) were below a threshold concentration of 1 µg/mL. Drug concentrations between patients with or without COVID-19 did not differ (p = .43). In contrast, levels were significantly lower in patients with female sex (p = .0007), age ≤ 65 years (p = .002), BMI > 25 (p = .006), SOFA score > 12 (p = .026), RRT (p = .017) and ECMO requirement (p = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Isavuconazole plasma levels can be negatively affected by patients' risk factors, supportive renal replacement and ECMO therapy. Future prospective studies analysing the relevance of isavuconazole drug levels in ICU patient outcome are urgently needed.

Isavuconazole therapeutic drug monitoring in critically ill ICU patients: A monocentric retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: The broad-spectrum triazole isavuconazole is used for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis and mucormycosis. Data regarding human plasma concentrations in clinical routine of the drug are rare. OBJECTIVES: Plasma concentrations of isavuconazole were determined in critically ill ICU patients while considering different patients' characteristics. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of isavuconazole plasma concentrations were obtained as part of routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of ICU patients with invasive aspergillosis or other fungal infections treated with isavuconazole. Plasma levels 0-4 h after last dosing were defined as peak levels (Cmax ), those 20-28 h after last dosing as trough levels (Cmin ). RESULTS: Overall, 223 isavuconazole levels of 41 patients were analysed, divided into 141 peak levels and 82 trough levels. The overall median Cmax was 2.36 µg/ml (mean 2.43 µg/ml, range 0.41-7.79 µg/ml) and the overall median Cmin was 1.74 µg/ml (mean 1.77 µg/ml, range 0.24-4.96 µg/ml). In total, 31.7% of the Cmin values of the total cohort were below the plasma target concentrations of 1 µg/ml, defined as EUCAST antifungal clinical breakpoint for Aspergillus fumigatus. Both peak and trough plasma levels of isavuconazole were significantly lower among patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥25. In addition, a significant correlation was observed between isavuconazole trough levels and sepsis-related organ failure assessment (SOFA) score. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that isavuconazole plasma concentrations vary in critical ill ICU patients. Significantly lower isavuconazole levels were associated with elevated BMI and higher SOFA score indicating a need of isavuconazole TDM in this specific patient population.

Randomized Clinical Study of Temporary Transvenous Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in Difficult-to-Wean Patients.

Rationale: Diaphragm dysfunction is frequently observed in critically ill patients with difficult weaning from mechanical ventilation. Objectives: To evaluate the effects of temporary transvenous diaphragm neurostimulation on weaning outcome and maximal inspiratory pressure. Methods: Multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled study. Patients aged ⩾18 years on invasive mechanical ventilation for ⩾4 days and having failed at least two weaning attempts received temporary transvenous diaphragm neurostimulation using a multielectrode stimulating central venous catheter (bilateral phrenic stimulation) and standard of care (treatment) (n = 57) or standard of care (control) (n = 55). In seven patients, the catheter could not be inserted, and in seven others, pacing therapy could not be delivered; consequently, data were available for 43 patients. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients successfully weaned. Other endpoints were mechanical ventilation duration, 30-day survival, maximal inspiratory pressure, diaphragm-thickening fraction, adverse events, and stimulation-related pain. Measurements and Main Results: The incidences of successful weaning were 82% (treatment) and 74% (control) (absolute difference [95% confidence interval (CI)], 7% [-10 to 25]), P = 0.59. Mechanical ventilation duration (mean ± SD) was 12.7 ± 9.9 days and 14.1 ± 10.8 days, respectively, P = 0.50; maximal inspiratory pressure increased by 16.6 cm H2O and 4.8 cm H2O, respectively (difference [95% CI], 11.8 [5 to 19]), P = 0.001; and right hemidiaphragm thickening fraction during unassisted spontaneous breathing was +17% and -14%, respectively, P = 0.006, without correlation with changes in maximal inspiratory pressure. Serious adverse event frequency was similar in both groups. Median stimulation-related pain in the treatment group was 0 (no pain). Conclusions: Temporary transvenous diaphragm neurostimulation did not increase the proportion of successful weaning from mechanical ventilation. It was associated with a significant increase in maximal inspiratory pressure, suggesting reversal of the course of diaphragm dysfunction. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03096639) and the European Database on Medical Devices (CIV-17-06-020004).

Health-related quality of life of patients with multiple organ dysfunction: individual changes and comparison with normative population.

OBJECTIVE: To determine health-related quality of life in medical intensive care patients with multiple organ dysfunction. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: A 12-bed, noncoronary, medical intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Between June 1998 and May 1999, 318 consecutively admitted adult patients with an intensive care unit stay of >24 hrs were studied. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Health-related quality of life was assessed using a generic instrument, the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 Health Survey, at admission and at 6-month follow-up. Patients who developed multiple organ dysfunction (n = 170) consumed 85% of the therapeutic activity provided in the intensive care unit. Compared with age- and sex-adjusted general population controls, multiple organ dysfunction patients had a worse preadmission health-related quality of life than other intensive care unit patients, predominantly due to a higher burden of comorbid disease. In a multivariate analysis, multiple organ dysfunction was the only variable independently associated with deteriorated physical health domains at follow-up (odds ratio, 4.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-14.6; p =.015), but it had no impact on dimensions of mental health. Analyzing the impact of different organ system failures, respiratory failure (odds ratio, 4.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-10.3; p =.002) and acute renal failure (odds ratio, 3.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-11.5; p =.05) increased the risk of deteriorated physical health at follow-up. No impact of the various organ system failures on mental health was noted. At 6-month follow-up, 83-90% of survivors had regained their previous health-related quality of life, and 94% were living at home with their families. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that preadmission health-related quality of life of our medical, noncoronary patients was substantially reduced compared with a matched general population. This demonstrates the need to take prehospitalization health-related quality of life into account when examining the outcomes of intensive care unit survivors. Multiple organ dysfunction was the major determinant of poor physical health at follow-up, but it had no impact on mental health domains.

Lack of awareness of community-acquired adverse drug reactions upon hospital admission : dimensions and consequences of a dilemma.

OBJECTIVE: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a well-known cause of hospital admission. Nevertheless a quantitative estimate of the preventability of and physicians' awareness of these reactions is lacking. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Using intensive bedside and computer-assisted drug surveillance methods a 13-month prospective pharmacoepidemiological survey was carried out on patients admitted to two medical wards of the Erlangen-Nuremberg University Hospital in Erlangen, Germany. This study aimed to define the incidence of preventable and unavoidable ADRs. In addition we investigated the awareness of the physicians to ADRs at the time of admission and the rate of contraindicated pre-admission prescriptions. RESULTS: In 78 (8.5%) of 915 (10.9%) admissions a total of 102 (42 preventable) community-acquired ADRs were detected on admission. In 45 (3.8%) of the admissions ADRs led directly to hospitalisation. 56.9% of the ADRs were not recognised by the attending physician on admission. Marked correlation was found between the awareness of ADRs and their probability and severity scores (r = 0.85 and r = 0.94, respectively; p < 0.05). The most frequently detected ADRs were due to direct toxicity and secondary pharmacological effects. Idiosyncratic reactions were often missed and 18.6% of all drugs prescribed prior to admission were contraindicated. Leading the list were diuretics, analgesics/NSAIDs and antipsychotics/sedatives. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of existing ADRs on hospital admission and appropriate prescribing prior to hospital admission require attention. Early detection of ADRs on hospital admission can be achieved by the use of computer support systems. Many ADRs could be prevented by adhering to indications and contraindications.