Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; : 1-9, 2024 Sep 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39236698

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Beta-lactam antibiotics (BLAs) commonly cause hypersensitivity reactions in children. These reactions are categorized into immediate reactions, which include urticaria, angioedema, bronchospasm, and anaphylaxis, and non-immediate reactions, such as maculopapular rashes and delayed-onset urticaria/angioedema. Rashes in children, often caused by infections, may be misdiagnosed as BLA allergy. However, over 90% tolerate the medication following an allergic evaluation. METHODS: We aimed to evaluate patients with negative single-day drug provocation test (sdDPT) results for subsequent reactions and to determine the negative predictive value (NPV) of sdDPT for immediate (less than 1 h) and non-immediate (more than 1 h) suspected BLA allergy. In addition, non-immediate reactions were assessed by classifying them as occurring within 1-6 h or after 6 h. Patients who underwent sdDPT for suspected BLA allergy and tested negative between 2019 and 2023 were included in the study. They were questioned via telephone interviews about their reuse of the tested drug. RESULTS: 404 patients who underwent sdDPT for suspected BLA allergy were evaluated. The NPV of BLA sdDPT was determined to be 97.3%. When patients were categorized based on the time interval between the last dose and the reaction, the NPV was 97% for those experiencing a reaction within the first hour of drug use and 96.7% for reactions occurring after more than 1 h. Non-immediate reactions were further evaluated, revealing an NPV of 98.7% for reactions occurring between 1 and 6 h, and 92.5% for reactions occurring after 6 h. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that sdDPT has a high NPV for both immediate and non-immediate reactions. However, the NPV of sdDPT was lower for reactions occurring more than 6 h after the last dose.

2.
Allergy Asthma Proc ; 45(3): 201-206, 2024 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38755786

RESUMEN

Background: Liposomal amphotericin B (LAMB) is a crucial agent in the treatment of invasive fungal diseases caused by a wide variety of yeasts and molds. In the presence of an infection caused by a fungal agent resistant to alternative antifungal drugs, desensitization may be the only option to continue treatment. However, there is insufficient information and consensus with regard to amphotericin B desensitization protocols in the pediatric age group. Objective: We present our experience with five cases of patients in whom successful desensitization protocols were applied with LAMB, along with a review of the literature on pediatric cases. We also provide a sample desensitization protocol that we successfully applied. Methods: Pediatric patients who continued their treatment with the successful rapid desensitization protocol conducted at the Paediatric Allergy and Immunology Clinic of the Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital between September 2019 and September 2023 were examined. Desensitization protocols were applied based on Castells' desensitization protocol. Results: Five patients ages between 5 and 12 years were referred to us due to the development of anaphylaxis during their treatment with LAMB. Anaphylaxis is diagnosed clinically, according to the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology guidelines: anaphylaxis (2021 update). A 16-step desensitization protocol was prepared by using LAMB solutions at four different dilutions (0.001, 0.01, 0.1, and 1 mg/mL). Each solution consisted of four steps, with a 15-minute infusion for each step. The patients were premedicated with 1 mg/kg/dose methylprednisolone and an antihistamine. Conclusion: The data we present on the successful application of a sample protocol to five cases, particularly in a pediatric setting, are noteworthy valuable contributions to the field, which demonstrates the feasibility and success of rapid desensitization with LAMB in pediatric patients. This can provide important insights and potentially serve as a reference for medical professionals working with similar cases in the future.


Asunto(s)
Anfotericina B , Antifúngicos , Desensibilización Inmunológica , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Anfotericina B/uso terapéutico , Anfotericina B/administración & dosificación , Anafilaxia , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Desensibilización Inmunológica/métodos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/terapia , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Eur J Pediatr ; 183(8): 3407-3415, 2024 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38767692

RESUMEN

This retrospective study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of colistin used in combination therapy for treating nosocomial bloodstream infections caused by multi-drug resistant gram-negative pathogens in pediatric patients. Patients aged between 1 month and 18 years consecutively hospitalized with healthcare-associated bloodstream infections necessitating the administration of intravenous colistin at Dr. Sami Ulus Training and Research Hospital between January 2015 and January 2020 were included in the study. Patient-specific detailed clinical information, prognoses, and laboratory findings on days 1, 3, and 7 of colistin treatment were obtained from medical records. The study included 45 pediatric patients receiving intravenous colistin; 26 (57.8%) were male and 19 (42.2%) were female, with a median age of 18 months. While the clinical response was observed at 82.2% and microbiological response at 91.1% with colistin treatment, two patients (4.4%) discontinued treatment due to side effects without assessing treatment response. The most common adverse effect associated with the use of colistin was nephrotoxicity, which occurred in eight patients (17.8%). Among these patients, only one had pre-existing chronic kidney failure.    Conclusion: Colistin used in combination therapy may be effective and safe for treating nosocomial infections caused by multi-drug resistant gram-negative bacteria in pediatric patients, who often have high mortality rates and limited treatment options. What is Known: • Colistin is an antibacterial agent used in the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) and is associated with significant adverse effects such as nephrotoxicity. • The increasing prevalence of hospital-acquired infections has led to the expanded use of colistin in clinical practice. What is New: • The study demonstrates a high clinical and microbiological response rate to combination therapy with colistin in the treatment of infections caused by MDR-GNB. • The study highlights the importance of monitoring nephrotoxicity in pediatric patients receiving colistin, showing that these effects can be reversible after treatment cessation.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Bacteriemia , Colistina , Infección Hospitalaria , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Colistina/uso terapéutico , Colistina/efectos adversos , Colistina/administración & dosificación , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Bacterias Gramnegativas/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...