RESUMEN
Postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) may live years with their disease on therapies with minimal toxicities but they will eventually progress on first-line therapy. For those eligible for second-line therapy, PIK3CA mutation testing is recommended in estrogen receptor-positive, her2-negative disease. If present, alpelisib, a PI3K inhibitor, has been shown to improve progression-free survival. Hyperglycemia is a common side effect of alpelisib. We describe a case of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) necessitating treatment in the intensive care unit (ICU) in a woman with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) started on alpelisib. A 76-year-old female with diet-controlled T2DM and mBC was placed on second-line treatment with alpelisib after progression on first-line therapy. After more than 2 weeks of treatment, the patient presented to the emergency department with nausea and vomiting. Lab results showed DKA and she was admitted to the ICU for further management. This case highlights the need for a multidisciplinary approach to caring for patients who are started on a PI3K inhibitor. We propose 5 guidelines to prevent hyperglycemia in those started on apelisib: (1) strict criteria for initiating alpelisib, (2) understand the steps needed to prevent hyperglycemia, (3) get help from a multidisciplinary team, (4) act immediately when hyperglycemia is noted, and (5) record blood glucose values. By implementing these steps, we hope to prevent critical hyperglycemic episodes in vulnerable patients on alpelisib.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Hiperglucemia , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Hiperglucemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Receptor ErbB-2 , TiazolesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Premature infants are predisposed to developing deformational plagiocephaly. Deformational plagiocephaly may affect the infant's social well-being and neurobehavioral development. PURPOSE: This pilot study investigated the feasibility and safety of the preemie orthotic device (POD); a noncommercial, supportive orthotic device to manage deformational plagiocephaly. METHODS: The setting for this prospective, descriptive, phase 1 clinical trial was 2 urban and 1 suburban neonatal intensive care units that provided care for critically ill premature and term infants. Participants included a convenience sample of 10 premature extremely low-birth-weight infants weighing less than 1 kg. All participants received the experimental treatment with the POD. Time spent on the device with and without the supportive foam insert, provider perception, adverse events, and head shape measurements were collected to assess feasibility and safety of the device. RESULTS: Participants had a median gestational age of 25.4 weeks and median birth weight of 0.673 kg. The POD was used a median of 21.2 hours per day and the foam insert was used a median of 11.1 hours per day. At enrollment, 1 participant had a normal cranial index compared with 5 participants at study completion. All participants had normal cranial symmetry at study enrollment and completion. No device-related adverse events were reported. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: The POD was found to be feasible and safe. Staff had favorable responses to the device. Recommendations by nursing staff included enlarging the device to extend its use. IMPLICATION FOR RESEARCH: Further studies are warranted to assess the POD's effectiveness.
Asunto(s)
Diseño de Equipo , Aparatos Ortopédicos , Plagiocefalia no Sinostótica/terapia , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recien Nacido con Peso al Nacer Extremadamente Bajo , Recien Nacido Extremadamente Prematuro , Recién Nacido , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Masculino , Enfermeras Neonatales , Proyectos Piloto , Plagiocefalia no Sinostótica/prevención & controlRESUMEN
This study replicated the 1989 national study by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching in which the relative importance of teaching, scholarship, and service in tenure decisions was examined. The deans of the National League for Nursing accredited programs (N= 187) and deans of Allied Health programs belonging to the Association of Schools of Allied Health Professions (N=75) were surveyed to identify the core values and evaluation processes used in granting tenure. Most deans who participated stated it is difficult to achieve tenure in the absence of publication in refereed journals. The number of journal publications, reputation of the journal, presentation at scientific conferences, and published reviews of the scholars' books are considered critical in granting tenure. Furthermore, advising students, service in the department and university, and course evaluation by students were considered critical to granting tenure. Overall, the opinions of the nursing and allied health deans on the core values and the evaluation processes used in tenure decisions were similar, but divergent from those of the "health sciences" faculty members in the Carnegie Foundation study. These findings suggest a shift in the criteria used in tenure decisions today.
Asunto(s)
Personal Administrativo/psicología , Docentes/normas , Administración de Personal/normas , Selección de Personal/normas , Valores Sociales , Adulto , Anciano , Empleos Relacionados con Salud/educación , Empleos Relacionados con Salud/normas , Actitud , Toma de Decisiones , Docentes de Enfermería/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Administración de Personal/métodos , Edición , Escuelas para Profesionales de Salud/normas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , EscrituraRESUMEN
AIM: This paper presents a prospective cross-sectional study that investigated the tenure rate and the primary criterion use in granting tenure in nursing and allied health education in the United States of America. BACKGROUND: Given the recent trend by highly skilled professionals to seek employment in other countries, a clear understanding of the conditions of service in higher education is important to educators contemplating the relocating to another country. The preponderance of the published literature on academic tenure is from the United States of America, where educators continue to debate the value of the tenure system and the criteria to be used in tenure decisions. METHOD: We surveyed the deans of National League for Nursing accredited programmes (n = 187) and deans of allied health programmes belonging to the association of schools of allied health professions (n = 75) in the United States of America. The questionnaire sought demographic and institution-related information, tenure rate and weightings attached to teaching, scholarship and service in tenure decision. The data were collected in 2002. FINDINGS: Allied health and nursing educators had 47% and 35% tenure rates, respectively. The overwhelming majority of the deans in our study, 77%, ranked teaching as the primary criterion used in tenure decisions in their institutions. On the other hand, fewer than 25% rated scholarship and fewer than 5% rated service as the most important criterion used for tenure in their institution. The responses of the deans were modulated by the type and ownership of the institution in which they were employed and the characteristics of the educators. CONCLUSION: The implications for preparing future educators in the United States of America for long-term careers in allied health and nursing professions are that: (1) teaching is less highly valued in research-oriented universities; and (2) heavy teaching workloads may be detrimental to the chances of obtaining tenure. Replication of the study in other countries would have the potential to facilitate the employment mobility and educator exchange.