Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Res Sq ; 2024 Jun 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38883796

RESUMEN

Background: Retention of study participants in observational studies is essential to maintaining the representativeness of the population, minimizing selection bias, and assuring sufficient statistical power. The aim of this report is to describe the structures and strategies used to retain participants in The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY) Study, an observational study of children at increased genetic risk for type 1 diabetes followed in an intense protocol with frequent clinic visits from birth until age 15. Methods: A systematic review of methodologies used to retain research subjects identified four domains: barrier reduction strategies; community building strategies; follow-up/reminder strategies; and tracing strategies. Independent reviewers categorized the retention strategies implemented by the TEDDY Study into each of these domains. Strategies not fitting into any of these categories were placed into a fifth category unique to TEDDY. Results: TEDDY identified over one hundred retention strategies used during the 15 years of follow-up; most could be categorized in these domains. Those unique to TEDDY included (1) study organization and structures to support retention; (2) efforts to meet the changing developmental needs of the TEDDY population, (3) implementation of efforts to address protocol challenges in real-time; and (4) employment of a re-engagement protocol for those who had dropped out of the study. Conclusion: Pediatric cohort studies should include strategies, structures, and resources addressing retention at the study's initiation. It is recommended that child and parent engagement in addition to the developmental needs of the child be an integrated focus of all strategies. Putting mechanisms in place to address protocol and retention challenges in real time would facilitate effectively addressing challenges as they arise. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00279318.

2.
Diabetes Care ; 45(3): 624-633, 2022 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35043162

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY) study is uniquely capable of investigating age-specific differences associated with type 1 diabetes. Because age is a primary driver of heterogeneity in type 1 diabetes, we sought to characterize by age metabolic derangements prior to diagnosis and clinical features associated with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The 379 TEDDY children who developed type 1 diabetes were grouped by age at onset (0-4, 5-9, and 10-14 years; n = 142, 151, and 86, respectively) with comparisons of autoantibody profiles, HLAs, family history of diabetes, presence of DKA, symptomatology at onset, and adherence to TEDDY protocol. Time-varying analysis compared those with oral glucose tolerance test data with TEDDY children who did not progress to diabetes. RESULTS: Increasing fasting glucose (hazard ratio [HR] 1.09 [95% CI 1.04-1.14]; P = 0.0003), stimulated glucose (HR 1.50 [1.42-1.59]; P < 0.0001), fasting insulin (HR 0.89 [0.83-0.95]; P = 0.0009), and glucose-to-insulin ratio (HR 1.29 [1.16-1.43]; P < 0.0001) were associated with risk of progression to type 1 diabetes. Younger children had fewer autoantibodies with more symptoms at diagnosis. Twenty-three children (6.1%) had DKA at onset, only 1 (0.97%) of 103 with and 22 (8.0%) of 276 children without a first-degree relative (FDR) with type 1 diabetes (P = 0.008). Children with DKA were more likely to be nonadherent to study protocol (P = 0.047), with longer duration between their last TEDDY evaluation and diagnosis (median 10.2 vs. 2.0 months without DKA; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: DKA at onset in TEDDY is uncommon, especially for FDRs. For those without familial risk, metabolic monitoring continues to provide a primary benefit of reduced DKA but requires regular follow-up. Clinical and laboratory features vary by age at onset, adding to the heterogeneity of type 1 diabetes.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Cetoacidosis Diabética , Factores de Edad , Niño , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Cetoacidosis Diabética/complicaciones , Cetoacidosis Diabética/etiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Insulina
3.
Diabetes Technol Ther ; 23(7): 517-521, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33544017

RESUMEN

Objective: As diabetes is a risk factor for severe symptoms, hospitalization, and death with COVID-19 disease, we aimed to assess the prevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies in children and adults with and without type 1 diabetes in Colorado during 2020. Research Design and Methods: We developed a highly sensitive and specific test for antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and measured the antibodies in children and adults with new-onset (n = 129) and established type 1 diabetes (n = 94) seen for routine diabetes care at our center between January and October 2020. The antibodies were also measured in 562 children and 102 adults from the general population of Colorado. Results: The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in persons with new-onset type 1 diabetes (0.8%; 95% confidence interval 0.1%-4.2%) or those with established disease (4.3%; 1.7%-10.4%) did not differ from that in the general population children (2.8%; 1.8%-4.6%) or adults (3.9%; 1.5%-9.7%). In a subset of individuals with positive antibodies (n = 31), antibodies remained positive for up to 9 months, although the levels decreased starting 3 months after the infection (P = 0.007). Conclusions: From January to October 2020, the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were not different in children and adults with and without type 1 diabetes in Colorado. We found no evidence for increased prevalence of COVID-19 infections among youth with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes. (COMIRB Protocol 20-1007).


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/inmunología , Prueba Serológica para COVID-19 , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Preescolar , Colorado/epidemiología , Proteínas de la Nucleocápside de Coronavirus/inmunología , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fosfoproteínas/inmunología , Prevalencia , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/inmunología , Adulto Joven
4.
Pediatr Diabetes ; 22(2): 360-368, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33179853

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine adherence to the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in multiple islet autoantibody children in stage 1 of developing type 1 diabetes (T1D). METHODS: Children are followed from birth in The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY) study. Completion of an OGTT is recommended every 6 months in children ≥3 years of age who are multiple islet autoantibody positive. Factors associated with adherence to the OGTT protocol were examined. RESULTS: The average subject level adherence with the OGTT protocol was 62% although there were large differences across countries; Finnish participants and older children from Sweden were more adherent than participants from the United States and Germany. Factors associated with nonadherence included having a first-degree relative with T1D, using a local laboratory rather than a TEDDY center for the OGTT, and maternal underestimation of the child's risk for T1D. Children were more adherent to the OGTT if their mothers: were more satisfied with TEDDY participation, reported monitoring the child for T1D by checking blood glucose levels at home, and viewed participating in TEDDY as the primary way they were monitoring the child for T1D. CONCLUSIONS: In a study of children in stage 1 of T1D, adherence to an OGTT protocol was suboptimal despite extensive efforts to communicate the child's high risk to parents. These findings provide important guidance for development of strategies to improve methods for detecting progression or the development of T1D in high-risk pediatric populations.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/psicología , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa , Cooperación del Paciente , Autoanticuerpos/sangre , Niño , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/sangre , Femenino , Finlandia , Alemania , Humanos , Islotes Pancreáticos/inmunología , Masculino , Suecia , Estados Unidos
5.
Dev Psychobiol ; 59(5): 658-667, 2017 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28555778

RESUMEN

Saliva offers a relatively noninvasive method for measuring analytes such as cortisol, holding particular promise for use in pediatric populations on a large scale if a rigorous collection protocol is feasible in diverse settings. The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young study protocol, conducted in centers in the United States, Sweden, Finland, and Germany, used salivary collection to assess cortisol level as a physiologic marker of stress. Saliva was collected using Sorbettes from subjects at 3.5, 4.5, and 5.5 years of age. Parents collected a morning sample, and staff collected pre- and post-blood draw samples. Feasibility was assessed based on protocol completion, adherence with instructions, factors affecting adherence, and sufficiency of saliva sample for cortisol determination. Collection of saliva samples in a diverse pediatric population is feasible. Establishing non-invasive and acceptable methods for collecting physiological parameters of stress will allow better exploration of determinants of health in this important population.


Asunto(s)
Hidrocortisona/análisis , Saliva/química , Manejo de Especímenes/métodos , Biomarcadores , Preescolar , Ritmo Circadiano/fisiología , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Proyectos de Investigación
6.
BMC Pediatr ; 17(1): 127, 2017 05 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28511706

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The use of analgesic antipyretics (ANAP) in children have long been a matter of controversy. Data on their practical use on an individual level has, however, been scarce. There are indications of possible effects on glucose homeostasis and immune function related to the use of ANAP. The aim of this study was to analyze patterns of analgesic antipyretic use across the clinical centers of The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY) prospective cohort study and test if ANAP use was a risk factor for islet autoimmunity. METHODS: Data were collected for 8542 children in the first 2.5 years of life. Incidence was analyzed using logistic regression with country and first child status as independent variables. Holm's procedure was used to adjust for multiplicity of intercountry comparisons. Time to autoantibody seroconversion was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model with cumulative analgesic use as primary time dependent covariate of interest. For each categorization, a generalized estimating equation (GEE) approach was used. RESULTS: Higher prevalence of ANAP use was found in the U.S. (95.7%) and Sweden (94.8%) compared to Finland (78.1%) and Germany (80.2%). First-born children were more commonly given acetaminophen (OR 1.26; 95% CI 1.07, 1.49; p = 0.007) but less commonly Non-Steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAID) (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.78, 0.95; p = 0.002). Acetaminophen and NSAID use in the absence of fever and infection was more prevalent in the U.S. (40.4%; 26.3% of doses) compared to Sweden, Finland and Germany (p < 0.001). Acetaminophen or NSAID use before age 2.5 years did not predict development of islet autoimmunity by age 6 years (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.99-1.09; p = 0.27). In a sub-analysis, acetaminophen use in children with fever weakly predicted development of islet autoimmunity by age 3 years (HR 1.05; 95% CI 1.01-1.09; p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: ANAP use in young children is not a risk factor for seroconversion by age 6 years. Use of ANAP is widespread in young children, and significantly higher in the U.S. compared to other study sites, where use is common also in absence of fever and infection.


Asunto(s)
Acetaminofén/efectos adversos , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/efectos adversos , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Antipiréticos/efectos adversos , Autoinmunidad/efectos de los fármacos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/etiología , Islotes Pancreáticos/efectos de los fármacos , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Autoanticuerpos/sangre , Biomarcadores/sangre , Preescolar , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Islotes Pancreáticos/inmunología , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
7.
Pediatr Diabetes ; 17(6): 441-8, 2016 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26251221

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Type 1 diabetes (T1D) or celiac disease (CD) develops in at least 2% of the general population. Early detection of disease-specific autoimmunity and subsequent monitoring would be possible if screening tests were more widely available. Currently, screening for islet autoimmunity is available only in a research setting, and CD-specific autoimmunity screening is limited to those in high-risk groups. This study assessed the feasibility of incorporating T1D and CD autoantibody screening into a pediatric practice. METHODS: Patient engagement strategies, blood collection preference, blood sample volume, rate of autoantibody detection in the general population, and parental satisfaction were assessed. Over 5 weeks, research staff recruited 200 patients, aged 2-6 yr from two pediatric practices in the Denver area to be screened for islet autoantibodies (IAs) and the transglutaminase antibody. RESULTS: Of the 765 parents approached, 200 (26%) completed the same-day screening. Of the 565 subjects who did not complete the screening, 345 expressed interest, but were unable to make a participation decision. A finger stick, compared with a venous draw, was the preferred method of sample collection. Both methods yielded sufficient blood volume for autoantibody determination. IAs or the transglutaminase antibody were detected in 11 subjects. Parents expressed satisfaction with all aspects of participation. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that it is feasible to conduct this type of screening in a pediatric clinic. Such screening could lead to increased disease awareness and the possible benefits that can result from early detection.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/diagnóstico , Tamizaje Masivo/psicología , Autoanticuerpos/sangre , Niño , Preescolar , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/inmunología , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Pediatría , Transglutaminasas/inmunología
8.
Public Health Nutr ; 17(12): 2853-62, 2014 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24477208

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between diabetes family history and infant feeding patterns. DESIGN: Data on breast-feeding duration and age at first introduction of cow's milk and gluten-containing cereals were collected in 3-month intervals during the first 24 months of life. SETTING: Data from the multicentre TEDDY (The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young) study, including centres in the USA, Sweden, Finland and Germany. SUBJECTS: A total of 7026 children, including children with a mother with type 1 diabetes (T1D; n 292), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM; n 404) or without diabetes but with a father and/or sibling with T1D (n 464) and children without diabetes family history (n 5866). RESULTS: While exclusive breast-feeding ended earlier and cow's milk was introduced earlier in offspring of mothers with T1D and GDM, offspring of non-diabetic mothers but a father and/or sibling with T1D were exclusively breast-fed longer and introduced to cow's milk later compared with infants without diabetes family history. The association between maternal diabetes and shorter exclusive breast-feeding duration was attenuated after adjusting for clinical variables (delivery mode, gestational age, Apgar score and birth weight). Country-specific analyses revealed differences in these associations, with Sweden showing the strongest and Finland showing no association between maternal diabetes and breast-feeding duration. CONCLUSIONS: Family history of diabetes is associated with infant feeding patterns; however, the associations clearly differ by country, indicating that cultural differences are important determinants of infant feeding behaviour. These findings need to be considered when developing strategies to improve feeding patterns in infants with a diabetes family history.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Diabetes Gestacional , Dieta , Familia , Conducta Alimentaria , Fenómenos Fisiológicos Nutricionales del Lactante , Leche , Adulto , Animales , Lactancia Materna , Estudios de Cohortes , Cultura , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiología , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Embarazo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
9.
Pediatr Diabetes ; 15(2): 118-26, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24034790

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY) study is designed to identify environmental exposures triggering islet autoimmunity and type 1 diabetes (T1D) in genetically high-risk children. We describe the first 100 participants diagnosed with T1D, hypothesizing that (i) they are diagnosed at an early stage of disease, (ii) a high proportion are diagnosed by an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), and (iii) risk for early T1D is related to country, population, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-genotypes and immunological markers. METHODS: Autoantibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase (GADA), insulinoma-associated protein 2 (IA-2) and insulin (IAA) were analyzed from 3 months of age in children with genetic risk. Symptoms and laboratory values at diagnosis were obtained and reviewed for ADA criteria. RESULTS: The first 100 children to develop T1D, 33 first-degree relatives (FDRs), with a median age 2.3 yr (0.69-6.27), were diagnosed between September 2005 and November 2011. Although young, 36% had no symptoms and ketoacidosis was rare (8%). An OGTT diagnosed 9/30 (30%) children above 3 yr of age but only 4/70 (5.7%) below the age of 3 yr. FDRs had higher cumulative incidence than children from the general population (p < 0.0001). Appearance of all three autoantibodies at seroconversion was associated with the most rapid development of T1D (HR = 4.52, p = 0.014), followed by the combination of GADA and IAA (HR = 2.82, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Close follow-up of children with genetic risk enables early detection of T1D. Risk factors for rapid development of diabetes in this young population were FDR status and initial positivity for GADA, IA-2, and IAA or a combination of GADA and IAA.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Precoz , Autoanticuerpos/sangre , Autoanticuerpos/genética , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/genética , Factores Epidemiológicos , Femenino , Interacción Gen-Ambiente , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Antígenos de Histocompatibilidad/genética , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino
10.
Contemp Clin Trials ; 33(2): 273-8, 2012 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22101229

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY), a multinational epidemiological study, is designed to identify environmental exposures triggering autoimmunity and type 1 diabetes (T1D) in children at increased genetic risk. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the use of an informational video in the enrollment and retention of eligible participants at the Colorado TEDDY clinical center. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Eligible participants were divided into two groups based on the inclusion of the video in the enrollment materials: the No-Video Group (n=449) did not receive the video and were contacted between 7/1/07 and 6/30/08. The Video Group (n=494) received the video and were contacted between 7/1/08 and 6/30/09. Multiple logistic regression compared the enrollment rates (percent of eligible subjects deciding to enroll) of those who received the video compared to those who did not. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model compared the differences in study retention, as defined by active participation fifteen months after the baseline visit at three months of age. RESULTS: Both groups were demographically similar. The enrollment rate was significantly higher for the Video Group (56.9%) compared to the No-Video Group (49.9%). Differences remained significant with adjustment for other known factors. A difference in retention between the two groups was not observed. CONCLUSION: Methods and materials increasing understanding and more accurately informing participants of what is involved in participation may increase enrollment in a prospective observational study.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Selección de Paciente , Grabación en Video/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Observación/métodos , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...