Early-life famine exposure and risk of osteoporosis and low bone mineral density: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Early-life exposure to famine has been hypothesized to influence long-term bone health, potentially increasing the risk of osteoporosis and fractures in later life. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the association between early-life famine exposure and the risk of osteoporosis, bone mineral density (BMD) loss, and fractures. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase, supplemented by manual searches on Google Scholar. Observational studies examining the impact of early-life famine exposure on osteoporosis, BMD, and fracture risk were included. Data were extracted and quality assessed independently by two reviewers, and meta-analyses were performed using the Mantel-Haenszel method for odds ratios (OR) and Hedges' g for standardized mean differences (SMD). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic, and meta-regression analyses were conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. RESULTS: From 6147 initial studies, 10 met the inclusion criteria, with 8 included in the meta-analysis. The early-life famine-exposed group showed a significantly higher incidence of osteoporosis (OR = 2.12, 95%CI [1.35, 3.34], I2 = 88%) and fractures (OR = 1.58, 95%CI [1.07, 2.33], I2 = 92%) compared to non-exposed individuals. Meta-regression indicated that higher female prevalence in studies made the association with osteoporosis stronger, while higher ages strengthened the association with fractures. Exposure during fetal and childhood stages was particularly associated with increased risks of osteoporosis and fractures. Additionally, famine exposure correlated with lower BMD, particularly in the heels, femoral neck, and total hip regions. CONCLUSION: Early-life famine exposure is significantly associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis, fractures, and lower BMD in later life. These results emphasize the lasting effects on bones from early lack of nutrition and stress the importance of specific interventions for bone health in groups with past famine experiences. Future studies should investigate the reasons behind these connections and assess preventative approaches to reduce the negative effects on bone health in those impacted.

Preoperative SSRI use increases perioperative transfusion need in patients undergoing surgical procedures on the hip joint.

PURPOSE: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are commonly prescribed for psychiatric conditions. Previous studies have shown that SSRIs can increase bleeding risk by affecting platelet aggregation. However, their impact on perioperative outcomes in hip surgery remains uncertain. This case-control study examines the link between preoperative SSRI use and perioperative transfusion requirements in hip surgery patients. METHODS: Data from the M161Ortho dataset of Pearl Diver patient records database were utilized. Patients who underwent hip joint surgery between 2010 and 2022 and had documented preoperative SSRI use within one month prior to surgery were included. Patients with coagulopathy disorders or coagulopathy medication use were excluded. Perioperative transfusion need was defined as receiving red blood cell or whole blood transfusions on the same date or within 10 days following the surgery. RESULTS: A total of 75,374 patients with preoperative SSRI use were matched with an equal number of non-SSRI users. Preoperative SSRI use was associated with an increased risk of requiring perioperative transfusion (5.7% vs. 5.1%, P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis demonstrated increased transfusion risk in patients undergoing pinning (2.6% vs. 1.8%, P = 0.02), open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) (8.9% vs. 8.2%, P = 0.007), and total hip arthroplasty (THA) (3.8% vs. 3.4%, P < 0.001), but no significant difference was observed in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty. CONCLUSION: Clinicians should be aware of the potential risk of increased perioperative transfusion requirements in hip surgery patients using SSRIs, especially during pinning, ORIF, and THA procedures. It is essential to consider this when managing patients on SSRIs before hip surgery.

Efficacy and safety of asfotase alfa in patients with hypophosphatasia: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Hypophosphatasia (HPP) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by defective bone mineralization, leading to skeletal abnormalities and systemic complications. Asfotase alfa, a recombinant human tissue-nonspecific alkaline phosphatase (TNSALP) enzyme replacement therapy, has emerged as a promising treatment for HPP. However, a comprehensive evaluation of its efficacy and safety is warranted to guide clinical practice effectively. METHODS: The study followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and was registered in Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). A search strategy across databases found studies on asfotase alfa for HPP. Two researchers independently extracted and assessed data. This systematic review examined how the drug impacted clinical outcomes such as survival rates, musculoskeletal symptoms, respiratory function, growth measurements, dental health, quality of life, and laboratory results. RESULTS: This systematic review included 15 articles with a total of 455 HPP patients. Asfotase alfa was predominantly administered at a dose of 6 mg per kg per week among the reviewed studies. Notable findings included enhanced survival rates, relief from musculoskeletal pain, improvements in respiratory outcomes, growth parameters, dental health, and quality of life. Changes in laboratory variables indicated positive responses to treatment, including changes such as increase in alkaline phosphatase (ALP), decline in pyridoxal 5'-phosphate (PLP) and inorganic pyrophosphate (PPi) levels. CONCLUSION: Asfotase alfa demonstrates efficacy in improving clinical outcomes and safety in patients with HPP. Its therapeutic benefits extend across various domains. However, Larger, age-stratified comparative studies are needed to further investigate the drug's effects in HPP patients.

EXPRESS: Short-term Efficacy of Moderate Intensity Rosuvastatin in COVID-19 Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: As the COVID-19 pandemic persists, the exploration of adjunct therapies to mitigate disease severity remains a priority. Statins, known for their pleiotropic effects, have been under investigation for their potential role in managing COVID-19 complications. METHODS: The study was conducted in a single referral hospital and adhered to Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines. Eligible participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into either the rosuvastatin group or the control group. Outcome measures included vital signs, laboratory data, clinical outcomes, and patient symptoms. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were enrolled. No significant differences were observed between the rosuvastatin and control groups in terms of baseline characteristics and laboratory parameters, except for the fact that rosuvastatin-treated patients showed lower levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) in comparison with the controls on both the first and fifth days (38.1 ± 16.3 vs. 50.5 ± 25.3) compared to the control group. Clinical outcomes, including hospital length of stay, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission, need for intubation, and 1-month mortality, did not differ significantly between the two groups. Symptom scales, as assessed by the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (Borg RPE) and Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ), showed significant improvement in the rosuvastatin group compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides insights into the short-term efficacy of moderate-intensity rosuvastatin in COVID-19 patients. Further research is warranted to elucidate the long-term effects and optimal dosing of statins in COVID-19 management.

Comparative Analysis of PCI Strategies in Aortic Stenosis Patients Undergoing TAVI: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been increasingly used in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). Since coronary artery disease (CAD) is common among these patients, it is crucial to choose the best method and timing of revascularization. This study aims to compare different timing strategies of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with severe AS undergoing TAVI to clarify whether PCI timing affects the patients' outcomes or not. METHODS: A frequentist network meta-analysis was conducted comparing three different revascularization strategies in patients with CAD undergoing TAVI. The 30-day all-cause mortality, in-hospital mortality, all-cause mortality at 1 year, 30-day rates of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and major bleeding, and the need for pacemaker implantation at 6 months were analyzed in this study. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis revealed that PCI during TAVI had higher 30-day mortality (RR = 2.46, 95% CI = 1.40-4.32) and in-hospital mortality (RR = 1.70, 95% CI = [1.08-2.69]) compared to no PCI. Post-TAVI PCI was associated with higher 1-year mortality compared to other strategies. While no significant differences in major bleeding or stroke were observed, PCI during TAVI versus no PCI (RR = 3.63, 95% CI = 1.27-10.43) showed a higher rate of 30-day MI. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that among patients with severe AS and CAD undergoing TAVI, PCI concomitantly with TAVI seems to be associated with worse 30-day outcomes compared with no PCI. PCI after TAVI demonstrated an increased risk of 1-year mortality compared to alternative strategies. Choosing a timing strategy should be individualized based on patient characteristics and procedural considerations.

Knee fusion versus above knee amputation as two options to deal with knee periprosthetic joint infection.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) poses a significant challenge in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), with recurrence rates as high as 14-28%, leading to substantial morbidity and treatment costs. When conventional treatments fail, knee fusion and above-the-knee amputation (AKA) emerge as alternative options. Existing literature offers conflicting views on the efficacy and impact of knee fusion versus AKA with varied outcomes and limitations. METHODS: This retrospective national study spanning 2010-2022 investigates Knee Fusion and AKA as options for addressing Knee PJI. Utilizing PearlDiver Patient Records Database, procedural, and reimbursement data on over 100 million individuals from all the US was evaluated. Readmission rates, costs, and complications of the mentioned procedures were assessed using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes within a 90-day period and one-year post-operation. Statistical analyses, including chi-square tests and regression models, were conducted using integrated R software. RESULTS: The study reveals a substantial escalation (p < 0.0001) in the proportion of patients opting for AKA compared to arthrodesis. While age as a demographic factor showed no significant difference, arthrodesis patients exhibited lower comorbidity scores (3.6 ± 2.9 vs. 4.6 ± 3.4, p < 0.001). Arthrodesis correlated with higher 90-day thromboembolism rates (9.2% vs. 7.3%, p < 0.001), blood transfusion requirements (23.2% vs. 14.4%, p < 0.001), and acute renal failure incidence (p = 0.008) but demonstrated lower rates of urinary tract infections (p = 0.047) and cerebrovascular accidents (p < 0.001). At 1 year, arthrodesis was associated with higher infection rates (38.7% vs. 36.4%, p < 0.001). Arthrodesis patients had significant increased 90-day and 1-year readmission rates and hospitalization costs ($12,732 vs. $18,826, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found higher rates of 1-year thromboembolism, infection, acute renal failure, and readmission in the arthrodesis group. AKA patients had more sepsis and cerebrovascular accidents. A patient-centered conversation is best for persistent infections and failed revision TKA. Considering the patient's quality of life, goals, and health status, this discussion should cover each procedure's risks and complications.

Is asymptomatic bacteriuria a noticeable risk factor for periprosthetic joint infection following total joint arthroplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is a common procedure that improves the quality of life for severe arthritis patients. The rising demand for TJA places enormous financial strain on the world's healthcare systems, which is exacerbated by postoperative readmissions for complications such as periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine if asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) increases infection risk. METHODS: We conducted searches in three databases: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Screening steps have been carried out according to PRISMA guidelines. The study focused on patients who had undergone TJA and exhibited ASB. Two reviewers independently screened, assessed quality, and extracted data. Meta-analysis used Mantel-Haenszel method. RESULTS: Following full-text screening, 12 studies were deemed eligible for inclusion in the systematic review, encompassing a total of 42,592 patients. A heightened occurrence of PJI was observed among TJA patients with ASB in comparison to controls (OR [95%CI] = 3.47 [1.42-8.44]). However, microorganisms responsible for the PJIs differed from those identified in the urine cultures of ASB. Additionally, analyses indicate that preoperative antibiotic treatment for ASB does not significantly affect the subsequent risk of PJI (OR [95% CI] = 1.00 [0.42-2.39]). Unlike surgical site infection (SSI), which did not show a difference in the rate of occurrence between the two groups, TJA patients with ASB were more likely to experience superficial wound infection (OR [95%CI] = 3.81 [2.02-7.21]). CONCLUSION: This review and meta-analysis confirm that ASB correlate with heightened risks of PJI and superficial infection in TJA patients. However, no relationship was found between ASB and PJI microorganisms which raise doubts about the role of ASB microorganisms as the direct cause of infection following TJA.

Effectiveness of synthetic versus autologous bone grafts in foot and ankle surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: All orthopaedic procedures, comprising foot and ankle surgeries, seemed to show a positive trend, recently. Bone grafts are commonly employed to fix bone abnormalities resulting from trauma, disease, or other medical conditions. This study specifically focuses on reviewing the safety and efficacy of various bone substitutes used exclusively in foot and ankle surgeries, comparing them to autologous bone grafts. METHODS: The systematic search involved scanning electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane online library, and Web of Science, employing terms like 'Bone substitute,' 'synthetic bone graft,' 'Autograft,' and 'Ankle joint.' Inclusion criteria encompassed RCTs, case-control studies, and prospective/retrospective cohorts exploring different bone substitutes in foot and ankle surgeries. Meta-analysis was performed using R software, integrating odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Cochrane's Q test assessed heterogeneity. RESULTS: This systematic review analyzed 8 articles involving a total of 894 patients. Out of these, 497 patients received synthetic bone grafts, while 397 patients received autologous bone grafts. Arthrodesis surgery was performed in five studies, and three studies used open reduction techniques. Among the synthetic bone grafts, three studies utilized a combination of recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor BB homodimer (rhPDGF-BB) and beta-tricalcium phosphate (ß-TCP) collagen, while four studies used hydroxyapatite compounds. One study did not provide details in this regard. The meta-analysis revealed similar findings in the occurrence of complications, as well as in both radiological and clinical evaluations, when contrasting autografts with synthetic bone grafts. CONCLUSION: Synthetic bone grafts show promise in achieving comparable outcomes in radiological, clinical, and quality-of-life aspects with fewer complications. However, additional research is necessary to identify the best scenarios for their use and to thoroughly confirm their effectiveness. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Risk factors of postoperative urinary retention following total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Aims: The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the pooled incidence of postoperative urinary retention (POUR) following total hip and knee arthroplasty (total joint replacement (TJR)) and to evaluate the risk factors and complications associated with POUR. Methods: Two authors conducted searches in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus on TJR and urinary retention. Eligible studies that reported the rate of POUR and associated risk factors for patients undergoing TJR were included in the analysis. Patient demographic details, medical comorbidities, and postoperative outcomes and complications were separately analyzed. The effect estimates for continuous and categorical data were reported as standardized mean differences (SMDs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs, respectively. Results: A total of 31 studies were included in the systematic review. Of these, 29 studies entered our meta-analysis, which included 3,273 patients diagnosed with POUR and 11,583 patients without POUR following TJR. The pooled incidence of POUR was 28.06%. Demographic risk factors included male sex (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.26 to 2.59), increasing age (SMD 0.16, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.27), and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 3 to 4 (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.77). Patients with a history of benign prostatic hyperplasia (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.41 to 2.83) and retention (OR 3.10, 95% CI 1.58 to 6.06) were more likely to develop POUR. Surgery-related risk factors included spinal anaesthesia (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.74) and postoperative epidural analgesia (OR 2.82, 95% CI 1.65 to 4.82). Total hip arthroplasty was associated with higher odds of POUR compared to total knee arthroplasty (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.20). Postoperatively, POUR was associated with a longer length of stay (SMD 0.21, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.39). Conclusion: Our meta-analysis demonstrated key risk variables for POUR following TJR, which may assist in identifying at-risk patients and direct patient-centered pathways to minimize this postoperative complication.

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Persian version of the Hospital for Special Surgery Anterior Cruciate Ligament Postoperative Satisfaction Survey.

PURPOSE: With over 140 million speakers spread across Iran, Afghanistan, and Tajikistan, Persian, also known as Farsi, is a pluri-centric language. The purpose of this study is to perform cross-cultural adaptation and examine the validity and reliability of the Persian translation of the Hospital for Special Surgery Anterior Cruciate Ligament Post-Operative Satisfaction Survey (HSS ACL-SS). METHODS: In this retrospective study, 102 anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) patients were asked to complete the Persian version of the HSS ACL-SS, Tegner scale, Lysholm score, the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, the Cincinnati Knee Rating System (CKRS), and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain. Internal consistency was calculated via Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Validity was assessed with the correlations of Spearman's rho. 18 patients were included in the test-retest reliability assessment. The floor and ceiling effects of the examined content validity of HSS ACL-SS. RESULTS: The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was computed at 0.959, showing outstanding internal consistency. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) demonstrated excellent results (0.986, P-value < 0.001). Insignificant ceiling effects (2.9%) and floor effects (3.9%) were detected. The Persian version of the HSS ACL-SS score significantly correlated with the SANE (r = 0.730, p < 0.001), Lysholm score (r = 0.622, p < 0.001), and CKRS (r = 0.741, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The overall performance of the Persian HSS ACL-SS was more than excellent in terms of reliability and validity. To conclude, Persian HSS ACL-SS may be used to assist patients in having a better perception of post-operative satisfaction.

Statin use in total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Introduction: There has been increased interest in the use of Statins in total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA) patients to improve outcomes and reduce postoperative complications. This study was performed to systematically review the evidence on Statin use in total joint arthroplasty, specifically its benefits and complications. Methods: Adhering to the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane database was performed to find studies reporting on the effects of Statin use on outcomes of THA and TKA. Two authors independently selected relevant papers to include. Results: A total of 18 papers were included in the final analysis. Most were retrospective studies, with heterogeneous patient selection and outcome measures. The evidence on the risks and benefits of Statin use on outcomes of total joint arthroplasty was very limited and heterogeneous. Studies were focusing on perioperative cardiac outcomes, clinical outcomes and complications, renal, pulmonary, and gastrointestinal outcomes. Due to the heterogeneity of reported data, a formal meta-analysis was not possible. Conclusions: There is some evidence in the literature suggesting that perioperative use of Statins, especially in Statin-naïve patients, may reduce cardiac (e.g. atrial fibrillation) and noncardiac (e.g. delirium) complications, while not increasing the risk of muscle or liver toxicity. The authors also found low levels of evidence that Statin use may reduce the long-term risk for revision surgery and osteolysis.

Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Who Have Crowe Type IV Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is one of the principal causes of secondary hip osteoarthritis, giving rise to considerable pain, impaired mobility, and a reduced quality of life. The optimal approach to managing individuals who have Crowe type IV DDH remains controversial. This study aimed to review the existing literature on the application of total hip arthroplasty (THA) as a treatment modality for Crowe type IV DDH, assessing its efficacy in addressing this severe hip deformity. METHODS: A comprehensive search across the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases identified relevant studies. Inclusion criteria encompassed investigations reporting outcomes of THA in Crowe type IV DDH patients. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by 2 reviewers. Utilizing R software, the prevalence of THA complications was analyzed through proportion analysis, employing the inverse variance method. RESULTS: In this systematic review, a total of 74 studies were included, comprising a collective sample size of 2,829 patients (3,356 hips) diagnosed with Crowe type IV DDH. The posterior or posterolateral approach was the most commonly utilized surgical approach, followed by the lateral Hardinge and direct lateral approaches. The majority of studies have employed subtrochanteric osteotomies. Notably, post-THA, leg length discrepancy decreased, Trendelenburg sign resolved, and back pain was reduced. Patient-reported outcome measures like the Harris Hip Score improved significantly. The pooled prevalence rates of major postoperative complications were also assessed, including dislocation (7.2%), revision (8.7%), intraoperative fractures (10.5%), loosening (5.7%), nerve paralysis (5.6%), deep vein thrombosis (3.6%), infection (3.8%), heterotopic ossification grade 2 and above (6.1%), and a complicated patient rate of 11.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Synthesizing diverse study data, an overview of THAs performance emerges, demonstrating significant enhancements in function, pain reduction, quality of life, and the correction of substantial leg length discrepancy. While THA has shown positive outcomes, instances of complications have been reported. The decision to undergo THA should involve a collaborative assessment between the surgeon and the patient, considering potential benefits and complications.

Initiating chemotherapy in joint arthroplasty patients increases the risk of periprosthetic joint infections.

BACKGROUND: Total Joint Arthroplasties (TJAs) are becoming more popular, resulting in a growing economic burden due to potential postoperative complications, with periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) playing a significant role. The effect of immunosuppression on PJI risk, particularly in cancer patients following chemotherapy, is unknown. The hypothesis of this study investigated whether chemotherapy increases PJI rates in patients who received post-arthroplasty chemotherapy within one year of surgery. METHODS: Data from the M161Ortho dataset of PearlDiver patient records database were utilized using ICD-9, ICD-10, and CPT codes. The cohort includes Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA), and Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (TSA) patients who underwent post-arthroplasty chemotherapy within one year after surgery between 2010 and 2022. Patients in the matched control group did not receive post-arthroplasty chemotherapy. Pre-arthroplasty chemotherapy recipients, PJI, and post-op first year revisions were excluded. Analyses including the linear logistic regression were performed via R statistical software. RESULTS: Totally, 17,026 patients (8,558 TKAs, 6,707 THAs, and 1,761 TSAs) were included. At two (OR = 1.59, p = 0.034), three (OR = 1.57, p = 0.009), and four (OR = 1.40, p = 0.032) years for TKA, and two (OR = 2.27, p = 0.008), three (OR = 2.32, p < 0.001), and four (OR = 2.25, p0.001) years for THA, PJI rates were significantly higher in the chemotherapy group. TSA patients had a significant rise in PJI after four years (OR = 2.20, p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals a possible relationship between postoperative chemotherapy and an increased incidence of PJI in patients with arthroplasty. Chemotherapy suppresses the immune system, rendering patients more vulnerable to infections. Additional research is required to confirm these findings.

Robotic assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is not associated with increased patient satisfaction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common orthopedic surgery, yet postoperative dissatisfaction persists in around 20% of cases. Robotic total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) promises enhanced precision, but its impact on patient satisfaction compared to conventional TKA remains controversial (cTKA). This systematic review aims to evaluate patient satisfaction post-rTKA and compare outcomes with cTKA. METHODS: Papers from the following databases were identified and reviewed: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Online Library, using keywords like "Knee replacement," "Total knee arthroplasty," "Robotic," and "Patient satisfaction." Extracted data included patient satisfaction measures, Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Score, Forgotten Joint Score, SF-36, HSS, and KOOS. Statistical analysis, including odds ratio and 95% CI was performed using R software. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochrane's Q test. RESULTS: The systematic review included 17 articles, involving 1148 patients (571 in the rTKA group and 577 in the cTKA group) assessing patient satisfaction following rTKA. An analysis of proportions reveals rTKA satisfaction rate was 95%, while for cTKA, it was 91%. A meta-analysis comparing rTKA and cTKA found no statistically significant difference in patient satisfaction. Additionally, various patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were examined, showing mixed results across different studies and follow-up periods. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study found no difference in patient satisfaction outcomes in the short to mid-term for rTKA compared to conventional methods. This study does not assert superiority for the robotic approach, highlighting the need for careful consideration of various factors influencing outcomes in knee arthroplasty.

Illicit drug abuse and complexity of tibial shaft fracture based on AO/OTA classification: Is there any connection?

Purpose: Illicit drug abuse is a global epidemic afflicting millions worldwide. Several studies have investigated the contribution of this dependence as a risk factor for fracture, but its impacts on fracture severity have been rarely studied. The present study primarily aims to determine the relationship between illicit drug abuse and the severity of tibial shaft fractures. Methods: This retrospective study consecutively included patients aged ≥18 years with tibial shaft fracture who attended Sina Tertiary Hospital, Tehran, Iran, between 2016 and 2021. The fracture patterns were assessed according to the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification. Participants were divided into three individual specialists into groups: simple (A), wedge (B) and multifragmentary (C) fractures. The association of illicit drug abuse and other recorded variables, including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, physical activity, smoking habits and mechanism of injury, was also examined and assessed in multivariate logistic regression. Results: Of 219 patients, 26 were drug abusers, and 193 had no history of use. A total of 20 out of 26 drug abusers experienced a complex fracture, yielding a rate of 76.9%, while this rate for nonusers was 50.3% (97 out of 193), indicating a statistically significant difference between the two subgroups (p = 0.011). The smoking history also influenced the fracture pattern (p = 0.027) based on univariate analysis; however, using adjusted multivariate analysis yielded only illicit drug abuse (odds ratio = 3.495; confidence interval = 1.144-10.680) as a risk factor for more complex fractures. Conclusion: The evidence from this study suggests that complexity and fracture patterns can depend on illicit drug abuse history. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Shoulder Arthroplasty After Previous Nonarthroplasty Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes and Complications.

BACKGROUND: Many patients who undergo shoulder arthroplasty (SA) have had at least 1 nonarthroplasty shoulder surgery before the surgery. There is conflicting evidence regarding the effects of previous shoulder surgery on the outcome of SA. A systematic review was conducted to compare functional outcomes and complications between SA patients with and without prior non-SA surgery on the ipsilateral shoulder. METHODS: We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and searched MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science comprehensively from inception to January 2023. Based on 9,279 records reviewed, 26 comparative studies were included in the meta-analysis consisting of 5,431 shoulders with prior nonarthroplasty procedures (cases) and 55,144 shoulders without previous surgery (controls). Variables such as functional scores, complications, and range of motion were compared between cases and controls using Review Manager Software. In addition, subgroup analysis was conducted based on prior surgery type (rotator cuff repair [RCR], open reduction and internal fixation [ORIF], soft tissue repairs, and not specified) and type of SA (hemiarthroplasty, anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty, and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty [RTSA]). The results were presented as odds ratios (ORs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs). RESULTS: Except for a higher rate of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients who had undergone previous arthroscopic surgery (OR, 2.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.66-4.01; p < 0.01), a higher rate of complications was only observed in patients with previous ORIF. These complications included aseptic loosening (OR, 3.43; 95% CI, 2.14-5.50; p < 0.01), shoulder dislocation (OR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.05-4.84; p = 0.04), overall complication (OR, 3.95; 95% CI, 2.38-6.55; p < 0.01), and revision (OR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.28-4.97; p = 0.01). Patients with a history of previous surgery demonstrated inferior functional outcomes in comparison with the control group, including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (SMD, -0.39; 95% CI, -0.51 to -0.27; p < 0.01; I2 = 36%), Constant-Murley score (SMD, -0.34; 95% CI, -0.44 to -0.24; p < 0.01; I2 = 0%), abduction (SMD, -0.26; 95% CI, -0.45 to -0.08; p = 0.01; I2 = 54%), and flexion (SMD, -0.33; 95% CI, -0.46 to -0.21; p < 0.01; I2 = 40%). Subgroup analysis by previous type of surgery was not possible regarding functional outcomes. CONCLUSION: Patients who have had prior fracture surgery are at a higher risk of complications, reoperations, and revisions after SA than controls. The normal shoulder anatomy may be disrupted by prior surgery, which makes arthroplasty technically challenging, particularly when it comes to soft tissue balance. On the other hand, RCR before SA did not negatively affect clinical outcomes after RTSA and did not have a higher rate of overall complications (except PJI). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III (Treatment Studies). See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Factors associated with postoperative quality of life in patients with intertrochanteric fracture.

Introduction: Intertrochanteric fractures, which make up the majority of hip fractures, are a common and serious injury that can greatly impact quality of life. Treatment of such fractures comprises nearly half of the costs contributed to hip fractures. Identifying the factors affecting the functional outcomes of patients after intertrochanteric fracture can help to reduce burden of disease for the patient and healthcare system. The present study investigated the factors underlying the worsening of short form-36 score (SF-36) scores for intertrochanteric fracture patients. Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study was designed based on data from our clinic. All consecutive patients with intertrochanteric fractures from November 2016 to September 2020 were reviewed. The exclusion criteria included patients having a second injury or having had previous surgery related to the hip and those with incomplete data. Baseline characteristics of patients were extracted from annotated records. The lab data were acquired from the electronic hospital system. The outcomes were SF-36 scores obtained by phone contact with patients or their families. Statistical analysis was conducted in SPSS. Results: A total of 310 patients were included in the current study. The female gender, advanced age, history of diabetes, thyroid malfunction, cancer, osteoporosis, anticoagulant use and blood transfusion were identified as risk factors for lower SF-36 scores. Low levels of haemoglobin before surgery, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), BUN/Creatinine, and white blood count values correlated with lower SF-36 scores. Conclusion: Numerous contextual variables affected the functional outcomes of the patients. Consideration of these factors could be helpful in reducing costs and improving the quality of life for intertrochanteric fracture patients.

Association between ELMO1 gene polymorphisms and diabetic kidney disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Previous research has suggested that the ELMO1 gene may play a role in the development of diabetic kidney disease. Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is a serious complication of diabetes and the leading cause of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: This study aim was to systematically review and explore the association between ELMO1 gene polymorphisms and diabetic kidney disease. A comprehensive systematic review provides a clear conclusion and high-level evidence for the association between ELMO1 gene and DKD for future application in personalized medicine. METHODS: A comprehensive search of electronic databases, per PRISMA instructions, was conducted in Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and PubMed databases from 1980 to January 2023. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using appropriate models. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to explore potential sources of heterogeneity and assess the robustness of the findings. RESULTS: A total of 5794 diabetes patients with DKD, 4886 diabetes patients without DKD, and 2023 healthy controls were included in the 17 studies that made up this systematic review. In the investigation of DM (Diabetes Mellitus) with DKD vs. DM without DKD, the susceptibility for DKD for the EMLO1 rs741301 polymorphism indicated a significant difference under the dominant, homozygote, and recessive genetic models. The susceptibility for DKD for the EMLO1 rs1345365, rs10255208, and rs7782979 polymorphisms demonstrated a significant difference under the allele genetic models in the analysis of DM with DKD vs. DM without DKD groups. There was a considerable increase in DKD risk in the Middle East when the population was stratified by the region. CONCLUSION: The findings of the meta-analysis show that there are a significant connection between the EMLO1 rs741301 polymorphism and DKD susceptibility in overall analyses; as well as rs1345365, rs10255208, and rs7782979 polymorphisms; especially in the Middle East region.

Antibiotic-Coated Intramedullary Nailing Managing Long Bone Infected Non-Unions: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.

Long bone infected non-unions are such an orthopedic challenge that antibiotic-coated intramedullary nailing (ACIN) has become a viable therapeutic option for their management. This study aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of the available data about the use of antibiotic-coated nailing in the treatment of long bone infected non-unions. Following the PRISMA guideline in this meta-analysis, a systematic literature search was conducted across major databases for studies evaluating ACIN in long bone infected non-unions. The primary outcome measures included union rates, infection control, complications and functional status. Five eligible studies encompassing 183 patients in total met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed no difference in the union rate in the antibiotic-coated intramedullary nailing group compared to that of the control group (OR = 1.73 [0.75-4.02]). Antibiotic-coated intramedullary nailing demonstrated no association with higher infection eradication (OR = 2.10 [0.97-4.54]). Also, functional outcome measure was mostly not significantly different between ACIN and control interventions. According to this meta-analysis, compared to the management of controls, ACIN is neither linked to increased union rates nor decreased infection rates. The paucity of research on this topic emphasizes the continuous need for additional well-designed randomized controlled trials for the application of antibiotics-coated intramedullary nailing in long bone non-unions.