Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Access: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Access by Urologist vs Radiologist.

Introduction: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a minimally invasive procedure indicated for the management of staghorn calculi or renal calculi >2.0 cm. Percutaneous renal access is a critical step in this procedure and can be performed by either urologists or interventional radiologists. The purpose of this study is to perform a meta-analysis to compare outcomes between urologist and interventional radiologist-mediated access. Methods: An electronic literature search was conducted to identify studies comparing urologist- and interventional radiologist-acquired access. Studies must have included both urologist- and intervention radiologist-acquired access data but were excluded if (1) not in English; (2) abstract without full text; (3) unable to determine who acquired access; and (4) only included either urologist or interventional radiologist data. Meta-analysis comparison was generated with the Review Manager 5.4 software. Results: After screening the abstracts and title, 55 relevant studies were identified. Nine articles were utilized in the meta-analysis. Urologist-acquired access was associated with a greater stone-free rate (risk ratio [RR] = 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.20), a reduction in major complications (RR = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.53-0.92), and a shorter hospital stay (mean difference -0.40; 95% CI, -0.64 to -0.16) in comparison with radiologist-acquired access. Urologist-acquired access was associated with greater blood loss (mean difference 0.46; 95% CI, 0.32-0.60) when compared with interventional radiology-acquired access. No significant differences were found with regard to unusable access, multiple tracts, supracostal access, ancillary procedure requirement, operative time, minor complications, and transfusions. Conclusions: Urologist-acquired access may be associated with a higher stone-free rate and a reduction in major complications, whereas interventional radiologist-mediated access may be associated with a reduction in blood loss, despite similar transfusion rates.

Using Peritumor and Intratumor Vascularity on Preoperative Imaging to Predict Fuhrman Grade Histology of Renal Tumors.

Objective: To investigate if peritumor and/or intratumor vasculature is associated with high-grade tumor histology for renal cell carcinoma. Methods: A retrospective review at a tertiary care facility was performed of patients who underwent radical nephrectomy or partial nephrectomy for a renal tumor between January 2015 and December 2020. Data of tumor characteristics were collected from final pathology reports. A single radiologist specializing in genitourinary imaging reviewed all preoperative cross-sectional imaging for peritumor vessels and intratumor vessels. Single and multivariable logistic regression was utilized to identify variables associated with high-grade tumor histology. Results: The average tumor size on final pathology report was 6.4 cm (range 3.0-17.0 cm). Ninety-two patients (56.1%) had either an enlarged peritumor vessel (n = 72), an intratumor vessel (n = 3), or both a peritumor vessel and an intratumor vessel (n = 17). Of the 92 patients with either a peritumor vessel or both a peritumor vessel and intratumor vessel, 60.9% of these patients had high Fuhrman grade histology on final pathology report (60.9% vs 39.1%, p < 0.001). Pathologic stage T1a tumors with an enlarged peritumor vessel on preoperative imaging were associated with high Fuhrman grade histology (58.3% vs 41.7%, p = 0.015). Across all stages, the presence of an enlarged peritumor vessel was significantly associated with high Fuhrman grade (odds ratio: 2.37, 95% confidence interval 1.17-4.9, p = 0.01). Conclusion: Findings suggest that vessels surrounding small renal tumors and large renal tumors is associated with high tumor grade (Fuhrman grade >3). Further research is needed to support the association of peritumor vessels with high tumor grade.

Comparison of Management and Outcomes of Symptomatic Urolithiasis During the COVID-19 Pandemic to a Comparative Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinical presentation and outcomes for patients who presented with symptomatic urolithiasis during the initial months of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed Emergency Department (ED) presentations from a Philadelphia healthcare system for symptomatic urolithiasis between March and June 2020 and compared these with presentations for the same time period from the year prior. Patient demographics, stone characteristics, management, and clinical outcomes were compared between the 2 years. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-nine patients presented during 2020 compared to 269 in 2019. There were fewer patients who presented during the initial COVID-19 pandemic surge who had obesity (37.41% vs 49.44%, P = .024), hyperlipidemia (18.71% vs 31.60, P = .006), and asthma (5.76% vs 16.73%, P = .002). Although overall stone characteristics did not differ between the 2 groups, a larger proportion of patients in 2020 presented with an obstructing stone (81.16% vs 64.1%, P = .001). Patients who presented during the COVID-19 pandemic did not have higher rates of infection, acute kidney injury, or complications. Rates of surgical modalities, emergent procedures, and discharges from the ED were similar between the 2 years. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic initial surge resulted in fewer ED presentations for symptomatic urolithiasis; however, patients who did present were more likely to have obstructing stones, perhaps due to delaying presentation to avoid COVID-19 exposure in the ED. Despite higher rates of obstruction, clinical outcomes and morbidity were similar.

Endourological management of a rare radiopaque ritonavir-composed urinary calculus.

Protease inhibitors are a source of nephrolithiasis in HIV + patients, and these stones are described as not detected by CT. While urinary stones are commonly associated with certain protease inhibitors, stones composed of ritonavir are rare. We present the case of a 58-year-old female on ritonavir-boosted atazanavir who presented to our clinic complaining of gross hematuria and flank pain secondary to a ureteral stone. Surgical removal revealed the stone to be composed of 100% ritonavir with no usual urinary stone components. This is the first report of an HIV medicine stone being detectable by CT scan described as 100% ritonavir.

Investigating Fluid Intake in an Underserved Community: What Factors Are Associated with Low Urine Volume on 24-Hour Urine Collection?

Background: Stone prevention is dependent on high fluid intake, with evidence that low urine volume (LUV) can promote nephrolithiasis in the absence of other metabolic abnormalities. Herein, we investigate patient-related factors associated with LUV on initial 24-hour urine collection in an underserved population. Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of patients treated by a single surgeon for nephrolithiasis from August 2014 to January 2019. Patients who submitted 24-hour urine samples were divided into two groups based on whether their initial collection was >2 L or not. Factors associated with 24-hour urine volume were analyzed using bivariate and multivariate analyses. As a secondary outcome, we investigated factors associated with corrected 24-hour urine volume on repeat 24-hour urine collection. Results: Two hundred eight patients (45.1%) submitted 24-hour urine collections, 63.9% (133/208) of which demonstrated a urine volume of <2 L. LUV was more common in female patients (77.1% vs 49.5%; p = 0.001) and patients with no insurance and Medicaid (no insurance [100%] vs Medicaid [74.1%] vs Medicare/private [58.6%]; p = 0.02). Female gender and insurance status were independent predictors of LUV in the multivariable analysis. Seventeen of 43 patients (39.5%) with LUV who provided a subsequent collection were able to correct their urine volume. Patients who improved their LUV were older (58.5 vs 45.9 years, p = 0.0149) and more likely to have surgical intervention for their kidney stones (94.1% vs 53.8%, p = 0.006). In our multivariable analysis, surgical intervention was associated with correcting urine volume. Conclusions: Female patients and those with no insurance or Medicaid were more likely to have LUV on an initial 24-hour urine collection. Further research into barriers to fluid intake is important for these two groups, along with directed patient education on strategies for increasing fluid intake.

Prescribing Trends in Post-operative Pain Management After Urologic Surgery: A Quality Care Investigation for Healthcare Providers.

OBJECTIVE: To assess prescribing and refilling trends of narcotics in postoperative urology patients at our institution. Although the opioid epidemic remains a public health threat, no series has assessed prescribing patterns across urologic surgery disciplines following discharge. METHODS: All urologic surgeries were retrospectively reviewed from May 2017-April 2018. Demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative pain management strategies were analyzed. Narcotics usage following surgery were reported in total morphine equivalents (TME). Opioid refill rate was characterized by medical specialty and stratified by urologic discipline. RESULTS: 817 cases were reviewed. Mean age and TME at discharge was 57±15.6 years and 35.43±19.5 mg, respectively. 13.6% (mean age 55±15.9) received a narcotic refill following discharge (mean TME/refill 37.7±28.9 mg). A higher proportion of patients with a pre-operative opioid prescription received a refill compared to opioid naïve patients (38.2% vs 21.6%, P < .01). Refill rate did not differ between urologic subspecialties (P = .3). Urologists were only responsible for 20.4% of all refills filled, despite all patients continuing follow-up with their surgeon. Procedures with the highest rates of post-operative refills were in oncology, male reconstruction/trauma and endourology. Patients with a history of chronic pain (OR 1.9, CI 1.1-3.3) preoperative narcotic prescription (OR 1.6, CI 1.0-2.6), and higher ASA score (OR 1.8, CI 1.6-2.8) were more likely to obtain a postoperative opioid prescription refill. CONCLUSION: Approximately 1 in 7 postoperative urology patients receive a postoperative narcotics refill; however, nearly two-thirds receive refills exclusively from non-urologic providers. Attempts to avoid overprescribing of postoperative narcotics need to account for both surgeon and nonsurgeon sources of opioid refills.

A Critical Appraisal of the American College of Surgeons Medically Necessary, Time Sensitive Procedures (MeNTS) Scoring System, Urology Consensus Recommendations and Individual Surgeon Case Prioritization for Resumption of Elective Urological Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

PURPOSE: Resumption of elective urology cases postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic requires a systematic approach to case prioritization, which may be based on detailed cross-specialty questionnaires, specialty specific published expert opinion or by individual (operating) surgeon review. We evaluated whether each of these systems effectively stratifies cases and for agreement between approaches in order to inform departmental policy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated triage of elective cases postponed within our department due to the COVID-19 pandemic (March 9, 2020 to May 22, 2020) using questionnaire based surgical prioritization (American College of Surgeons Medically Necessary, Time Sensitive Procedures [MeNTS] instrument), consensus/expert opinion based surgical prioritization (based on published urological recommendations) and individual surgeon based surgical prioritization scoring (developed and managed within our department). Lower scores represented greater urgency. MeNTS scores were compared across consensus/expert opinion based surgical prioritization and individual surgeon based surgical prioritization scores. RESULTS: A total of 204 cases were evaluated. Median MeNTS score was 50 (IQR 44, 55), and mean consensus/expert opinion based surgical prioritization and individual surgeon based surgical prioritization scores were 2.6±0.6 and 2.2±0.8, respectively. Median MeNTS scores were 52 (46.5, 57.5), 50 (44.5, 54.5) and 48 (43.5, 54) for individual surgeon based surgical prioritization priority 1, 2 and 3 cases (p=0.129), and 55 (51.5, 57), 47.5 (42, 56) and 49 (44, 54) for consensus/expert opinion based surgical prioritization priority scores 1, 2, and 3 (p=0.002). There was none to slight agreement between consensus/expert opinion based surgical prioritization and individual surgeon based surgical prioritization scores (Kappa 0.131, p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Questionnaire based, expert opinion based and individual surgeon based approaches to case prioritization result in significantly different case prioritization. Questionnaire based surgical prioritization did not meaningfully stratify urological cases, and consensus/expert opinion based surgical prioritization and individual surgeon based surgical prioritization frequently disagreed. The strengths and weaknesses of each of these systems should be considered in future disaster planning scenarios.

Aquablation for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in a Large Volume Prostate with an Intravesical Median Lobe.

Background: Aquablation is a relatively new minimally invasive technology for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) that has shown significant promise in its clinical efficacy and utility. Larger prostates or prostates with a median lobe are a common limitation to other minimally invasive treatment options. There is evidence that Aquablation maintains efficacy for larger prostates and prostates with an intravesical median lobe. Herein, we describe 3-month follow-up results for a patient who underwent Aquablation for a large prostate with a significant intravesical median lobe. Case: Our patient is a 72-year-old man with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to BPH refractory to pharmacotherapy. Patient underwent Aquablation of the prostate, which was 110 cc in volume and had a large intravesical median lobe component. At 3-month follow-up patient had reduction in his AUA-SS from 21 to 12, improvement in uroflow from 8.2 to 16 mL/second, and improvement in postvoid residual from 90 to 13 mL. Conclusion: Aquablation has been shown to be efficacious for the treatment of BPH in patients with large prostates and intravesical median lobes. This case report further demonstrates effective treatment for patients who fit this profile.

Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Is an Independent Risk Factor for Nephrolithiasis in Women: Findings from NHANES III.

Objective: To determine if radiologically diagnosed nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is an independent risk factor for nephrolithiasis using data from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III (NHANES III). Patients and Methods: NHANES III participants aged 20-74 years who underwent hepatobiliary ultrasound were classified as with NAFLD (moderate or severe hepatic steatosis in absence of other known causes of liver disease; n = 2498) or without NAFLD (controls; n = 9361). Risk of nephrolithiasis caused by NAFLD was estimated using logistic regression with propensity score adjustment. Secondary outcomes included medical stone management, lithotripsy, and surgical stone removal. Results: Participants with NAFLD were older (48.7 ± 0.4 vs 43.3 ± 0.3 years, p < 0.001) and exhibited greater prevalence of all components of metabolic syndrome: obesity (48% vs 21%), impaired glucose tolerance (17% vs 11%), diabetes mellitus (15% vs 6%), hypertension (36% vs 24%), and gout (4% vs 2%) (all p < 0.001). After adjusting for demographic, lifestyle, and metabolic factors, NAFLD was associated with increased risk nephrolithiasis (odds ratio [OR] = 1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.02-1.61], p = 0.03). The association persisted in women (OR = 1.65, 95% CI [1.17-2.32], p = 0.004) but not in men (OR = 1.04, 95% CI [0.77-1.40], p = 0.80). NAFLD was not associated with increased occurrence of medical management (OR = 1.31, 95% CI [0.84-2.05], p = 0.24), lithotripsy (OR = 1.61, 95% CI [0.83-3.33], p = 0.20), or surgical stone removal (OR = 0.83, 95% CI [0.48-1.44], p = 0.52). Conclusions: In a large U.S. population-based cross-sectional analysis, NAFLD was found to be associated with increased risk of nephrolithiasis in women after adjusting for demographic, clinical, and metabolic factors.

Factors Associated With Compliance With 24-Hour Urine Collection.

OBJECTIVE: To identify how demographic factors, stone-associated medical comorbidities, and treatment predict compliance with 24-hour urine collection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective medical record review of patients treated for urolithiasis between August 2014 and March 2017 was performed. Patient demographics, medical characteristics, stone factors, type of treatment, and compliance data were included for patients requested to submit a collection. Variables that were statistically significant on bivariate analysis were then used to formulate a model predicting submission of a 24-hour urine sample. RESULTS: Of the 303 patients who met inclusion criteria, 183 (60.4%) submitted an initial 24-hour urine collection. On bivariate analysis, patients older than 50 were more likely to submit a 24-hour urine collection (71.4% vs 51.5%; P <.001), patients with a metabolic predisposition for stones were more likely to submit a 24-hour urine collection (70.6% vs 53.1%; P <.003), and patients who did not have surgery were more likely to submit a 24-hour urine collection (97.9% vs 53.5%; P <.001). Our 3-variable prediction model found that not undergoing surgery was a strong predictor of 24-hour urine collection. CONCLUSIONS: We suspect that patients perceive surgery as a more definitive treatment for kidney stones than conservative management. Patient education on the natural history and role of metabolic management in the prevention of nephrolithiasis is essential in improving compliance with 24-hour urine collection.

Persistent Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms After Prostatic Urethral Lift Successfully Treated with Water Jet Ablation of the Prostate: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Background: We describe a patient who underwent waterjet ablation of the prostate after an unsuccessful prostatic urethral lift (PUL) procedure. Case Presentation: After PUL, our patient had incomplete bladder emptying with a postvoid residual of 600 mL. Urodynamic study of the bladder suggested detrusor underactivity. Our patient was motivated to undergo a salvage bladder outlet surgery. At 3 months after Aquablation, he reported complete resolution of bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Conclusion: This case report illustrates return of volitional voiding and significant improvement in LUTS after salvage bladder outlet treatment with waterjet ablation of the prostate.

Contemporary use trends and survival outcomes in patients undergoing radical cystectomy or bladder-preservation therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

BACKGROUND: The current study was performed to examine temporal trends and compare overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) or bladder-preservation therapy (BPT) for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. METHODS: The authors reviewed the National Cancer Data Base to identify patients with AJCC stage II to III urothelial carcinoma of the bladder from 2004 through 2013. Patients receiving BPT were stratified as having received any external-beam radiotherapy (any XRT), definitive XRT (50-80 grays), and definitive XRT with chemotherapy (CRT). Treatment trends and OS outcomes for the BPT and RC cohorts were evaluated using Cochran-Armitage tests, unadjusted Kaplan-Meier curves, adjusted Cox multivariate regression, and propensity score matching, using increasingly stringent selection criteria. RESULTS: A total of 32,300 patients met the inclusion criteria and were treated with RC (22,680 patients) or BPT (9620 patients). Of the patients treated with BPT, 26.4% (2540 patients) and 15.5% (1489 patients), respectively, were treated with definitive XRT and CRT. Improved OS was observed for RC in all groups. After adjustments with more rigorous statistical models controlling for confounders and with more restrictive BPT cohorts, the magnitude of the OS benefit became attenuated on multivariate (any XRT: hazard ratio [HR], 2.115 [95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.045-2.188]; definitive XRT: HR, 1.870 [95% CI, 1.773-1.972]; and CRT: HR, 1.578 [95% CI, 1.474-1.691]) and propensity score (any XRT: HR, 2.008 [95% CI, 1.871-2.154]; definitive XRT: HR, 1.606 [95% CI, 1.453-1.776]; and CRT: HR, 1.406 [95% CI, 1.235-1.601]) analyses. CONCLUSIONS: In the National Cancer Data Base, receipt of BPT was associated with decreased OS compared with RC in patients with stage II to III urothelial carcinoma. Increasingly stringent definitions of BPT and more rigorous statistical methods adjusting for selection biases attenuated observed survival differences. Cancer 2017;123:4337-45. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy: Current Perspectives and Future Directions.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Since its introduction, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) has undergone a variety of changes; however, it remains one of the most utilized treatment modalities for urolithiasis. The goal of this review is to provide the practicing urologist an update on contemporary trends, new technologies, and related controversies in utilizing ESWL for stone treatment. RECENT FINDINGS: ESWL use has come under scrutiny with a shift in focus to cost-effectiveness and healthcare outcomes. Fortunately, advances in lithotripter technology have spawned several generations of devices that strive to improve stone-free rates and decrease complications. Most of all, a focus on patient selection criteria has helped improve procedural success. Years of experience utilizing ESWL for stone treatment have helped urologists better optimize its use and minimize complications. Improvements in technique along with more stringent patient and stone selection have helped ESWL remain a mainstay in the treatment of stone disease.

Factors Associated with Compliance in Submitting 24-Hour Urine Collections in an Underserved Community.

PURPOSE: Patients living in underserved areas do regularly express an interest in stone prevention; however, factors limiting participation, aside from obvious cost considerations, are largely unknown. To better understand factors associated with compliance with submitting 24-hour urine collections, we reviewed our patient experience at the kidney stone clinic at a hospital that provides care for an underserved urban community. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients treated for kidney and/or ureteral stones between August 2014 and May 2016 was performed. Patient demographics, medical characteristics, stone factors, and compliance data were compiled into our data set. Patients were divided into two groups: those who did and did not submit the requested initial 24-hour urine collection. Analysis of factors related to compliance was performed using univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 193 patients met inclusion criteria for our study, 42.5% (82/193) of whom submitted 24-hour urine samples. Of the 82 collections submitted, 34.1% (28/82) were considered inadequate by creatinine level. A second urine collection within 6 months was obtained in 14.0% (27/193) of patients. Univariate analysis demonstrated that African American (AA) patients were less likely to submit an initial 24-hour urine collection than Caucasian patients (collected: 30.9% vs 51.8%; p < 0.05, respectively). Patients with a family history of kidney stones were more likely to submit an initial 24-hour urine collection than patients without a family history of kidney stones (61.1% vs 38.2%, p < 0.02, respectively). On multivariate analysis, both factors remained significant predictors of compliance with submitting a 24-hour urine collection. CONCLUSIONS: In our underserved patient population, AA patients were half as likely to submit a 24-hour urine collection than Caucasian patients, whereas patients with a positive family history of stones were more than twice as likely to submit than patients with no family history.

Bladder Preservation Therapy: A Review of the Literature and Future Directions.

Trimodal bladder preservation therapy (ie, transurethral resection followed by chemoradiotherapy) may be an acceptable treatment alternative to radical cystectomy with urinary diversion in the carefully selected patient with muscle invasive bladder cancer. Although no head-to-head randomized controlled trials have been performed, large retrospective cohort reviews and observational data analyses suggest comparable oncologic outcomes in select patients with the additional benefit of maximizing quality of life and maintaining the patient's native bladder. In this review, we discuss the evolution and clinical outcomes of bladder preservation therapy, highlighting its role in the contemporary management of muscle invasive bladder cancer.