IgA deficiency destabilizes homeostasis toward intestinal microbes and increases systemic immune dysregulation.

The ability of most patients with selective immunoglobulin A (IgA) deficiency (SIgAD) to remain apparently healthy has been a persistent clinical conundrum. Compensatory mechanisms, including IgM, have been proposed, yet it remains unclear how secretory IgA and IgM work together in the mucosal system and, on a larger scale, whether the systemic and mucosal anti-commensal responses are redundant or have unique features. To address this gap in knowledge, we developed an integrated host-commensal approach combining microbial flow cytometry and metagenomic sequencing (mFLOW-Seq) to comprehensively define which microbes induce mucosal and systemic antibodies. We coupled this approach with high-dimensional immune profiling to study a cohort of pediatric patients with SIgAD and household control siblings. We found that mucosal and systemic antibody networks cooperate to maintain homeostasis by targeting a common subset of commensal microbes. In IgA-deficiency, we find increased translocation of specific bacterial taxa associated with elevated levels of systemic IgG targeting fecal microbiota. Associated features of immune system dysregulation in IgA-deficient mice and humans included elevated levels of inflammatory cytokines, enhanced follicular CD4 T helper cell frequency and activation, and an altered CD8 T cell activation state. Although SIgAD is clinically defined by the absence of serum IgA, the symptomatology and immune dysregulation were concentrated in the SIgAD participants who were also fecal IgA deficient. These findings reveal that mucosal IgA deficiency leads to aberrant systemic exposures and immune responses to commensal microbes, which increase the likelihood of humoral and cellular immune dysregulation and symptomatic disease in patients with IgA deficiency.

Global differences in acute heart failure treatment: analysis of the STRONG-HF site feasibility questionnaire.

AIMS: Acute heart failure (AHF) has an impact on human health worldwide. Despite guidelines for treatment and management of AHF, mortality rates remain high. The main objective of this study was to compare standard in-hospital treatment and management of AHF against current clinical guidelines and variations across regions. METHODS: Between February 2018 and May 2021, investigators were approached to participate in the STRONG-HF study. The lead investigator at 158 sites in 20 countries completed a site feasibility questionnaire. Sites were grouped by country into five different regions: Africa and the Middle East, Eastern Europe, Russia, South America, and Western Europe. RESULTS: According to the questionnaires, there are large differences in how patients present due to AHF and where in the hospital they are treated. There were significant differences in reported percentage of AHF patients receiving angiotensin converting enzymes inhibitors across the regions (P < 0.001), mostly due to prescription of more angiotensin II receptor blockers and angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors in South America and Western Europe. Reported beta-blocker use was high across all of the regions. Device therapy and percutaneous interventions were more common in Europe. Sites reported a 5 to 8 day length of stay, while in Russia most have a 10 to 12 day length of stay. Regions reported that AHF patients follow up with a community cardiologist or general practitioner post-discharge, although follow-up was commonly more than 1 month post discharge, and not all sites had the capability to measure natriuretic peptides post discharge. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis of feasibility questionnaires, most sites reported general adherence to ESC guidelines for treatment and management of AHF patients although percutaneous and device therapy was less common outside Europe and follow-up after discharge took place late and was not as extensive as recommended. There were wide variations seen within and across regions in some areas.

CMV infection and management among pediatric solid organ transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in pediatric solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. However, the impact of asymptomatic CMV infections (ie, DNAemia) on clinical outcomes is not well established. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of children undergoing first SOT at our institution from January 2012 to June 2018. We evaluated the epidemiology of CMV infections and performed multivariable Cox regression to assess the association between CMV DNAemia without disease or CMV disease (syndrome or end-organ disease) on negative outcomes (death, re-transplantation, or moderate/severe rejection) within the first year after SOT. RESULTS: Among 271 individuals, 43 (15.9%) developed ≥1 CMV infection during the first year after SOT. There were 56 unique CMV infections including 14 episodes of CMV disease. In 167 patients offered CMV prophylaxis, only 8 (4.8%) developed their first CMV DNAemia episode while on prophylaxis 32 developed CMV DNAemia after prophylaxis completion; only 1 episode of CMV disease occurred while on antiviral prophylaxis. When accounting for receipt of ATG, oral steroids, and number of immunosuppressives on a given day, CMV disease was more strongly associated with negative outcomes (Hazard Ratio (HR): 3.28, 95% CI: 0.73-14.64; p = .12) than CMV DNAemia without disease (HR 1.42, 95% CI: 0.19- 10.79; p = .74), although not to a statistically significant degree. CONCLUSIONS: Most CMV infections occurred after completion of antiviral prophylaxis. CMV disease was more strongly associated with negative outcomes than asymptomatic CMV DNAemia and should be the focus of CMV prevention practices.

Live virus vaccination following pediatric liver transplantation: Outcomes from two academic children's hospitals.

Pediatric liver transplant (LT) recipients are often transplanted at a young age, precluding them from receiving live virus vaccinations (LVV) such as varicella (VZV) vaccine and measles, mumps and rubella. This places them at profound risk for vaccine preventable illness. We sought to detail safety of vaccination. This was a retrospective cohort study of pediatric LT recipients at two children's hospitals. Among 204 LT recipients included in the study, 97 received at least one LVV after LT. Six patients who did not receive LVV after transplant had evidence of vaccine-preventable infection following vaccination (one disseminated VZV disease, five VZV-related rash), while one patient who received LVV after transplant developed a diffuse VZV-related rash. Rejection rates were the same between those that did and did not receive a live virus vaccine post-transplant. There were no serious adverse events caused by vaccination post-transplant. LVV following LT was safe at our two institutions, although there exist limitations in our study due to its retrospective study design. Larger scale studies should be performed to evaluate the effectiveness of LVV in relation to immunosuppression.

Evolution of severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) seroprevalence among employees of a US academic children's hospital during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the cumulative seroprevalence of severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic among employees of a large pediatric healthcare system. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective observational cohort study open to adult employees at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, conducted April 20-December 17, 2020. METHODS: Employees were recruited starting with high-risk exposure groups, utilizing e-mails, flyers, and announcements at virtual town hall meetings. At baseline, 1 month, 2 months, and 6 months, participants reported occupational and community exposures and gave a blood sample for SARS-CoV-2 antibody measurement by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). A post hoc Cox proportional hazards regression model was performed to identify factors associated with increased risk for seropositivity. RESULTS: In total, 1,740 employees were enrolled. At 6 months, the cumulative seroprevalence was 5.3%, which was below estimated community point seroprevalence. Seroprevalence was 5.8% among employees who provided direct care and was 3.4% among employees who did not perform direct patient care. Most participants who were seropositive at baseline remained positive at follow-up assessments. In a post hoc analysis, direct patient care (hazard ratio [HR], 1.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-3.68), Black race (HR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.24-5.87), and exposure to a confirmed case in a nonhealthcare setting (HR, 4.32; 95% CI, 2.71-6.88) were associated with statistically significant increased risk for seropositivity. CONCLUSIONS: Employee SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence rates remained below the point-prevalence rates of the surrounding community. Provision of direct patient care, Black race, and exposure to a confirmed case in a nonhealthcare setting conferred increased risk. These data can inform occupational protection measures to maximize protection of employees within the workplace during future COVID-19 waves or other epidemics.