The Clinical Course of Bowel Urgency Severity Among Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease-A Real-World Study.

BACKGROUND: Bowel urgency is a highly burdensome symptom among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). OBJECTIVES: To assess changes in severity of bowel urgency and identify predictors of worsening or improvement among patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) at 6 months from their enrollment visit. METHODS: Data from patients in the Study of a Prospective Adult Research Cohort with IBD were analyzed. Enrolled patients with CD or UC with 6-month visits were included. Changes and predictors of bowel urgency severity over 6 months in patients with CD or UC were examined using two separate analyses: (a) "worsening" versus "no change" excluding those with moderate-to-severe bowel urgency at enrollment, and (b) "improvement" versus "no change" excluding those with no bowel urgency at enrollment. The enrollment characteristics were compared within these groups. RESULTS: At baseline, in both CD and UC, use of biologics and/or immunomodulators at enrollment was similar across cohorts. Among patients with CD, 206 of 582 (35.4%) reported worsening, and 195 of 457 (42.7%) reported improvement in bowel urgency. Younger age (P = 0.013) and moderate-to-severe bowel urgency (P < 0.001) were associated with improvement. Moderate bowel urgency (P = 0.026) and bowel incontinence while awake (P = 0.022) were associated with worsening. Among patients with UC, 84 of 294 (28.6%) reported worsening, and 111 of 219 (50.7%) reported improvement in bowel urgency. Higher symptomatic disease severity (P = 0.011) and more severe bowel urgency (P < 0.001) were associated with improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Bowel urgency is an unpredictable and unstable symptom among patients with IBD. Over 50% of patients with CD or UC experienced either worsening or improvement at 6 months postenrollment.

WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT BOWEL URGENCY IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE (IBD)?: Around six to eight in every ten patients with inflammatory bowel disease suffer from bowel urgency, a sudden need to have bowel movement. Many patients with IBD perceive bowel urgency as a bothersome symptom impacting their everyday activities. WHY DID WE DO THIS STUDY?: Despite the importance of bowel urgency, the changes in bowel urgency severity among the IBD-affected US population are yet to be fully known. We aimed to assess changes in severity of bowel urgency in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) at 6 months. WHAT HAVE WE FOUND FROM THIS STUDY?: Bowel urgency is a common and unpredictable symptom among patients with CD and UC. Over 50% of patients reported that the severity of bowel urgency has either worsened or improved at the 6 months postenrollment. While about 40­50% of IBD patients reported improvement, about 30% reported worsening, suggesting a lack of effective therapies to treat bowel urgency. FUTURE IMPLICATION: There is a need for advanced therapies to resolve bowel urgency in patients with CD and UC.

Patient interpretations of patient-reported outcome measures to assess bowel urgency: qualitative interviews in ulcerative colitis.

OBJECTIVES: Bowel urgency is an impactful core symptom of ulcerative colitis (UC). Patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires have been developed and used to assess the patient experience of this important symptom. The objective of this paper is to present evidence from qualitative research conducted to support the use and interpretation of select PRO questionnaires to assess bowel urgency related to the UC patient experience. METHODS: Qualitative interviews were conducted with ten adults with a clinician-confirmed diagnosis of moderately to severely active UC. Interviews aimed to document patient interpretation of modified recall periods for the Urgency Numeric Rating Scale (Urgency NRS), two global assessments (i.e., the Patient Global Impression of Severity [PGIS] and Patient Global Impression of Change [PGIC]), and four items (Items 11, 16, 23, and 26) of the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ), and explore the patient perspective of meaningful change on these questionnaires. RESULTS: Both modified Urgency NRS versions (with 7-day or 3-day recall period) were interpreted as intended by most patients (≥ 88.9%), and slightly more than half of patients (60.0%) reported that the 7-day recall period was more relevant to their bowel urgency experience. Patients reported thinking of bowel urgency (≥ 80.0%) or bowel urgency-related accidents (70.0% of patients) when interpreting the global assessments and IBDQ items. Most patients reported a 1- to 3-point change as the smallest meaningful improvement that would be meaningful on the Urgency NRS (similar to findings on other questionnaires). CONCLUSION: Adults with UC can understand and respond to the Urgency NRS with modified recall periods (i.e., 7-day or 3-day), interpret the conceptual content of the PGIS, PGIC, and select IBDQ items to be inclusive of bowel urgency and bowel urgency-related accidents, and select answers representing meaningful improvements on the Urgency NRS, PGIS, PGIC, and IBDQ item response scales. These results further contribute patient-centered data to existing UC and bowel urgency research.

Histologic assessments in ulcerative colitis: the evidence behind a new endpoint in clinical trials.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment goals for ulcerative colitis (UC) are evolving from the achievement of clinical remission to more rigorous goals defined by endoscopic and histologic healing. Achievement of deeper remission targets aims to reduce the risk of colectomy, hospitalizations, and colorectal cancer. AREAS COVERED: This review covers histologic assessments, histologic remission as a clinical trial endpoint, and the association between histologic disease activity and clinical outcomes. Future directions are also discussed, including the use of advanced imaging and artificial intelligence technologies, as well as potential future treatment targets beyond histologic remission. EXPERT OPINION: Histologic assessments are used for their sensitivity in measuring mucosal inflammatory changes in UC. Due to correlation with disease activity, histologic assessments may support clinical decision-making regarding treatment decisions as such assessments can be associated with rates of clinical relapse, hospitalization, colectomy, and neoplasia. While histologic remission is limited by varying definitions and multiple histologic indices, work is ongoing to create a consensus on the use of histologic assessments in clinical trials. As research advances, aspirational targets beyond histologic remission, such as molecular healing and disease clearance, are being explored.

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is the most common inflammatory bowel disease and often results in bloody diarrhea, frequent bowel movements, and bowel urgency. Patients with UC are at greater risk for hospitalization, surgery, and colorectal cancer. To reduce these risks, the goals of UC treatment are changing from mainly addressing symptoms to reducing inflammation at a deeper histologic, or microscopic, level. The inflammation in UC causes distinct microscopic changes in the colon, which can be assessed after collecting biopsies or tissue samples. This review provides an overview of histologic remission (when no signs of inflammation are seen in tissue samples viewed under a microscope) as a treatment goal in UC.Histologic remission has been shown to be associated with lower rates of relapse, hospitalization, surgical removal of the colon, and colorectal cancer. However, using histologic remission as a treatment target can be difficult due to varying definitions and the many different scoring assessments available to healthcare providers. Updated guidance from regulatory agencies and academic organizations has helped align definitions of histologic remission and how to assess histologic healing in clinical trials.The introduction of targeted advanced therapies has allowed for deeper healing with the potential for histologic resolution. This enables clinicians and researchers to aim for treatment targets that are harder to achieve but have a greater impact for patients in the course of their disease. New technologies such as artificial intelligence, high-resolution endoscopy, and digital pathology have also led to targets beyond histologic healing, aiming to restore the function of the colon's mucosal barrier and disease clearance.

Association of Bowel Urgency With Quality-of-Life Measures in Patients With Moderately-to-Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: Results From Phase 3 LUCENT-1 (Induction) and LUCENT-2 (Maintenance) Studies.

Background: Improvement in bowel urgency (BU) was associated with better clinical outcomes in phase 3 LUCENT-1 (induction) and LUCENT-2 (maintenance) studies in moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). We assessed association of BU with quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes. Methods: LUCENT-1: 1162 patients randomized 3:1 to intravenous mirikizumab 300 mg or placebo every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 12 weeks. LUCENT-2: 544 mirikizumab induction responders re-randomized 2:1 to subcutaneous mirikizumab 200 mg or placebo Q4W through Week (W) 40 (W52 of continuous treatment). Patients reported BU severity in the past 24 hours using a validated Urgency Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). In patients with baseline Urgency NRS ≥3, the association between BU Clinically Meaningful Improvement (CMI; ≥3-point decrease) and remission (score 0 or 1) with patient-reported outcomes was assessed at W12 and W52. Results: A significantly greater proportion of patients with versus without BU Remission achieved IBDQ remission (W12: 87.3% vs 42.7%, P < .0001; W52: 91.4% vs 45.5%, p < .0001). Similarly, BU Remission was associated with more patients achieving CMI in SF-36 Physical Component Summary (W12: 69.0% vs 44.4%, P < .0001; W52: 77.5% vs 42.1%, P < .0001) and Mental Component Summary (W12: 53.5% vs 41.0%, P = .0019; W52: 62.0% vs 38.3%, P < .0001) scores. At W12 and W52, patients with BU CMI or Remission showed significant improvements in EQ-5D-5L and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment:UC scores. Significant improvements were also seen in fatigue, abdominal pain, and nocturnal stool. Conclusions: In patients with moderately-to-severely active UC, improvement in BU was associated with improved QoL in phase 3 LUCENT-1 and LUCENT-2 studies. Clinical Studies: LUCENT-1: NCT03518086; LUCENT-2: NCT03524092.

Extended Induction and Prognostic Indicators of Response in Patients Treated with Mirikizumab with Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis in the LUCENT Trials.

BACKGROUND: Efficacy and safety of mirikizumab, a p19-targeted anti-interleukin-23 monoclonal antibody, for moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis was demonstrated previously. We evaluated clinical response, baseline characteristics, and clinical status in patients not responding by 12 weeks (W) of induction who then received extended induction treatment. METHOD: Patients unresponsive to 300 mg of intravenous (IV) mirikizumab every 4 weeks by W12 received 3 additional 300 mg IV doses every 4 weeks. Week-4 responders received 200 mg mirikizumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously until W52. Patients responding by W12 but subsequently losing response received rescue therapy with 300 mg IV for 3 doses every 4 weeks. Logistic regression modelling was performed for patients not achieving W12 clinical response to assess baseline characteristics and W12 efficacy parameters and potential prognostic factors of clinical response at W24. RESULTS: Of patients not achieving clinical response during induction, 53.7% achieved response following extended induction. After 52W, 72.2%, 43.1%, and 36.1% of patients achieved clinical response, endoscopic, and clinical remission, respectively. Of induction responders who subsequently lost response, 63.2% and 36.8% achieved symptomatic response and remission, respectively, after receiving rescue therapy No prior biologic or tofacitinib treatment, no immunomodulators at baseline, age older than 40 years, and W12 modified Mayo Score improvement were positively associated with a response to extended induction. The safety profile was similar to initial induction, with 38.3% treatment emergent adverse events, mostly mild. CONCLUSION: With "extended induction," total of 80.3% mirikizumab-treated patients achieved clinical response by W24. Potential prognostic factors determining response include disease severity, disease phenotype, C-reactive protein, and previous biologic therapy.

Extended induction with mirikizumab led to clinical response in more than half of primary nonresponders. Intravenous reinduction therapy in patients losing response during treatment led to more than 60% achieving symptomatic response, confirming the clinical benefit of these treatment strategies for harder to treat patients.

Bowel Urgency in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease: A Cross-Sectional Real-World Survey in Japan.

INTRODUCTION: Bowel urgency (BU) is among the most disruptive of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) symptoms. However, data on its prevalence and association with disease activity are limited. This real-world study of Japanese patients with IBD evaluated BU prevalence and compared clinical outcomes and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) between patients with and without BU. METHODS: Data were drawn from the Adelphi IBD Disease Specific Programme™, a cross-sectional survey of physicians and their patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). Physicians reported demographic and clinical data, including disease activity measures (Mayo score and CD Activity Index [CDAI]), for consulting patients, who voluntarily completed a patient-reported questionnaire, including HRQoL measures (Short IBD Questionnaire [SIBDQ] and EQ-5D-5L). Outcomes were compared between patients with and without BU using t-, Fisher exact and Mann-Whitney U tests as appropriate. RESULTS: Of 120 UC patients, 27.5% (n = 33) self-reported BU; physicians were unaware of BU in 54.5% (n = 18) of these patients. Patients with BU had higher mean Mayo scores (p < 0.01) and lower mean SIBDQ scores (47.9 vs 56.6, p < 0.01) than patients without BU, with mean EQ-5D-5L scores 0.83 and 0.87, respectively (p = 0.06). Physicians were satisfied with treatment but believed better control could be achieved for 39.4% of patients with BU and 35.6% without. Of 114 CD patients, 17.5% (n = 20) self-reported BU; physicians were unaware of BU in 75.0% (n = 15) of these patients. Patients with BU had higher mean CDAI scores (p < 0.01) and lower mean SIBDQ (48.7 vs 56.2, p < 0.01) and EQ-5D-5L scores (0.81 vs 0.88, p < 0.01) than patients without BU. Physicians were satisfied but believed better control could be achieved for 40.0% of patients with BU vs 19.1% without. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with BU have worse clinical outcomes and HRQoL than patients without, underlining the need for improved physician-patient communication regarding BU and new IBD therapeutic options.

Bowel Urgency in Ulcerative Colitis: Current Perspectives and Future Directions.

Bowel urgency (BU), the sudden or immediate need for a bowel movement, is one of the most common and disruptive symptoms experienced by patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Distinct from the separate symptom of increased stool frequency, BU has a substantial negative impact on quality of life and psychosocial functioning. Among patients with UC, BU is one of the top reasons for treatment dissatisfaction and one of the symptoms patients most want improved. Patients may not discuss BU often due to embarrassment, and healthcare providers may not address the symptom adequately due to the lack of awareness of validated tools and/or knowledge of the importance of assessing BU. The mechanism of BU in UC is multifactorial and includes inflammatory changes in the rectum that may be linked to hypersensitivity and reduced compliance of the rectum. Responsive and reliable patient-reported outcome measures of BU are needed to provide evidence of treatment benefits in clinical trials and facilitate communication in clinical practice. This review discusses the pathophysiology and clinical importance of BU in UC and its impact on the quality of life and psychosocial functioning. Patient-reported outcome measures developed to assess the severity of BU in UC are discussed alongside overviews of treatment options and clinical guidelines. Implications for the future management of UC from the perspective of BU are also explored.

Identification of inadequate responders to advanced therapy among commercially-insured adult patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this analysis was to assess the frequency of inadequate response over 1 year from advanced therapy initiation among patients with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) in the United States using a claims-based algorithm. Factors associated with inadequate response were also analyzed. METHODS: This study utilized claims data of adult patients from the HealthCore Integrated Research Database (HIRD®) from January 01, 2016 to August 31, 2019. Advanced therapies used in this study were tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) and non-TNFi biologics. Inadequate response to an advanced therapy was identified using a claims-based algorithm. The inadequate response criteria included adherence, switching to/added a new treatment, addition of a new conventional synthetic immunomodulator or conventional disease-modifying drugs, increase in dose/frequency of advanced therapy initiation, and use of a new pain medication, or surgery. Factors influencing inadequate responders were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 2437 patients with CD and 1692 patients with UC were included in this analysis. In patients with CD (mean age: 41 years; female: 53%), 81% had initiated TNFi, and 62% had inadequate response. In patients with UC (mean age: 42 years; female: 48%), 78% had initiated a TNFi, and 63% had an inadequate response. In both patients with CD and UC, inadequate response was associated with low adherence (CD: 41%; UC: 42%). Inadequate responders were more likely to be prescribed a TNFi (for CD: odds ratio [OR] = 1.94; p < 0.001; for UC: OR = 2.76; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: More than 60% of patients with CD or UC had an inadequate response to their index advanced therapy within 1 year after initiation, mostly driven by low adherence. This modified claims-based algorithm for CD and UC appears useful to classify inadequate responders in health plan claims data.

Clinimetric Validation of the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society Health Index in Patients With Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis in Ixekizumab Trials.

OBJECTIVE: To assess test-retest reliability, construct validity, known groups discrimination, and responsiveness of the Assessment of the SpondyloArthritis international Society Health Index (ASAS HI) to evaluate functioning, disability, and health in patients with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA). METHODS: Data were generated from 2 randomized, placebo-controlled, active-controlled phase III ixekizumab studies (COAST-V, N = 341; COAST-W, N = 316). Assessments included the following: test-retest reliability (ie, intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs] between ASAS HI scores at screening and baseline), construct validity (ie, Spearman correlation with standard r-axSpA outcome measures), known groups discrimination (ie, 1-way ANOVA comparing the ASAS HI with different disease activity categories, measured by the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score [ASDAS]), and responsiveness (ie, Spearman correlation between changes in the ASAS HI and changes in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index [BASFI], the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI], the ASDAS, and the Patient Global Assessment [PtGA] as well as ANOVA comparing changes in the ASAS HI with various responder categories). RESULTS: The ICC for test-retest reliability was 0.78 for COAST-V and 0.76 for COAST-W, indicating adequate agreement. Moderate-to-large correlations (r = 0.40-0.61) were observed between the ASAS HI and the BASDAI. Statistically significant differences (all P < 0.001) between mean ASAS HI scores were observed for subgroups based on ASDAS-defined disease activity categories at baseline and week 16. Moderate-to-large correlations existed between changes in the ASAS HI and the BASFI, BASDAI, ASDAS, and PtGA from baseline to week 16. The ASAS HI differentiated statistically (P < 0.001) between ASAS, BASDAI, and ASDAS response groups. CONCLUSION: The ASAS HI demonstrated reliability, construct validity, known groups discrimination, and responsiveness in adults with r-axSpA in 2 clinical trials.