RESUMEN
A nonthrombotic iliac vein lesion is defined as the extrinsic compression of the iliac vein. Symptoms of lower extremity chronic venous insufficiency or pelvic venous disease can develop secondary to nonthrombotic iliac vein lesion. Anatomic compression has been observed in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Causative factors that lead to symptomatic manifestations remain unclear. To provide guidance for providers treating patients with nonthrombotic iliac vein lesion, the VIVA Foundation convened a multidisciplinary group of leaders in venous disease management with representatives from the American Venous Forum and the American Vein and Lymphatic Society. Consensus statements regarding nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions were drafted by the participants to address patient selection, imaging for diagnosis, technical considerations for stent placement, postprocedure management, and future research/educational needs.
Asunto(s)
Consenso , Vena Ilíaca , Stents , Insuficiencia Venosa , Humanos , Vena Ilíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Vena Ilíaca/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Venosa/terapia , Insuficiencia Venosa/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia Venosa/fisiopatología , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Riesgo , Valor Predictivo de las PruebasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Inadvertent intra-arterial injection of sclerosants is an uncommon adverse event of both ultrasound-guided and direct vision sclerotherapy. This complication can result in significant tissue or limb loss and significant long-term morbidity. OBJECTIVES: To provide recommendations for diagnosis and immediate management of an unintentional intra-arterial injection of sclerosing agents. METHODS: An international and multidisciplinary expert panel representing the endorsing societies and relevant specialities reviewed the published biomedical, scientific and legal literature and developed the consensus-based recommendations. RESULTS: Actual and suspected cases of an intra-arterial sclerosant injection should be immediately transferred to a facility with a vascular/interventional unit. Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) is the key investigation to confirm the diagnosis and help select the appropriate intra-arterial therapy for tissue ischaemia. Emergency endovascular intervention will be required to manage the risk of major limb ischaemia. This includes intra-arterial administration of vasodilators to reduce vasospasm, and anticoagulants and thrombolytic agents to mitigate thrombosis. Mechanical thrombectomy, other endovascular interventions and even open surgery may be required. Lumbar sympathetic block may be considered but has a high risk of bleeding. Systemic anti-inflammatory agents, anticoagulants, and platelet inhibitors and modifiers would complement the intra-arterial endovascular procedures. For risk of minor ischaemia, systemic oral anti-inflammatory agents, anticoagulants, vasodilators and antiplatelet treatments are recommended. CONCLUSION: Inadvertent intra-arterial injection is an adverse event of both ultrasound-guided and direct vision sclerotherapy. Medical practitioners performing sclerotherapy must ensure completion of a course of formal training (specialty or subspecialty training, or equivalent recognition) in the management of venous and lymphatic disorders (phlebology), and be personally proficient in the use of duplex ultrasound in vascular (both arterial and venous) applications, to diagnose and provide image guidance to venous procedure. Expertise in diagnosis and immediate management of an intra-arterial injection is essential for all practitioners performing sclerotherapy.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To report 36-month outcomes and subgroup analysis of the ABRE study evaluating the safety and effectiveness of the Abre venous self-expanding stent system for the treatment of symptomatic iliofemoral venous outflow obstruction disease. METHODS: The ABRE study was a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized study that enrolled and implanted Abre venous stents in 200 participants (mean age 51.5 years [SD ± 15.9], 66.5% women) with symptomatic iliofemoral venous outflow obstruction at 24 global sites. Outcomes assessed through 36 months included patency, major adverse events, stent migration, stent fracture, and quality-of-life changes. Adverse events and imaging studies were adjudicated by independent clinical events committee and core laboratories, respectively. RESULTS: Primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency through 36 months by Kaplan-Meier estimates were 81.6%, 84.8%, and 86.3%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of major adverse events through 36 months was 10.2%, mainly driven by 12 thrombosis events. Subgroup analyses demonstrated a primary patency of 76.5% in the acute deep vein thrombosis group, 70.4% in the postthrombotic syndrome group, and 97.1% in the nonthrombotic iliac vein lesion group through 36 months. The overall mean lesion length was 112.4 mm (SD ± 66.1). There were no stent fractures or migrations in this study. Quality of life and venous functional assessments demonstrated significant improvements from baseline to 36 months across all patient subsets. CONCLUSIONS: Results from the ABRE study demonstrated sustained patency with a good safety profile after implantation of a dedicated venous stent in patients with symptomatic iliofemoral venous outflow obstruction disease.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Vena Femoral , Vena Ilíaca , Diseño de Prótesis , Calidad de Vida , Stents , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Vena Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Vena Femoral/fisiopatología , Vena Ilíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Vena Ilíaca/fisiopatología , Síndrome de May-Thurner/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome de May-Thurner/terapia , Síndrome de May-Thurner/fisiopatología , Síndrome Postrombótico/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome Postrombótico/fisiopatología , Síndrome Postrombótico/etiología , Síndrome Postrombótico/terapia , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis de la Vena/fisiopatología , Trombosis de la Vena/terapiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Effective treatment options are available for chronic venous insufficiency associated with superficial venous reflux. Although many patients with C2 and C3 disease based on the CEAP (Clinical-Etiological-Anatomical-Pathophysiological) classification have combined great saphenous vein (GSV) and saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) reflux, some may not have concomitant SFJ reflux. Several payors have determined that symptom severity in patients without SFJ reflux does not warrant treatment. In patients planned for venous ablation, we tested whether Venous Clinical Severity Scores (VCSS) are equivalent in those with GSV reflux alone compared with those with both GSV and SFJ reflux. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at 10 centers. Inclusion criteria were: candidate for endovenous ablation as determined by treating physician; 18 to 80 years of age; GSV reflux with or without SFJ reflux on ultrasound; and C2 or C3 disease. Exclusion criteria were prior deep vein thrombosis; prior vein ablation on the index limb; ilio-caval obstruction; and renal, hepatic, or heart failure requiring prior hospitalization. An a priori sample size was calculated. We used multiple linear regression (adjusted for patient characteristics) to compare differences in VCSS scores of the two groups at baseline, and to test whether scores were equivalent using a priori equivalence boundaries of +1 and -1. In secondary analyses, we tested differences in VCSS scores in patients with C2 and C3 disease separately. RESULTS: A total of 352 patients were enrolled; 64.2% (n = 226) had SFJ reflux, and 35.8% (n = 126) did not. The two groups did not differ by major clinical characteristics. The mean age of the cohort was 53.9 ± 14.3 years; women comprised 74.2%; White patients 85.8%; and body mass index was 27.8 ± 6.1 kg/m2. The VCSS scores in patients with and without SFJ reflux were found to be equivalent; SFJ reflux was not a significant predictor of VCSS score; and mean VCSS scores did not differ significantly (6.4 vs 6.6, respectively, P = .40). In secondary subset analyses, VCSS scores were equivalent between C2 patients with and without SFJ reflux, and VCSS scores of C3 patients with SFJ reflux were lower than those without SFJ reflux. CONCLUSIONS: Symptom severity is equivalent in patients with GSV reflux with or without SFJ reflux. The absence of SFJ reflux alone should not determine the treatment paradigm in patients with symptomatic chronic venous insufficiency. Patients with GSV reflux who meet clinical criteria for treatment should have equivalent treatment regardless of whether or not they have SFJ reflux.
Asunto(s)
Várices , Insuficiencia Venosa , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Masculino , Vena Safena/diagnóstico por imagen , Vena Safena/cirugía , Várices/diagnóstico por imagen , Várices/cirugía , Estudios Transversales , Insuficiencia Venosa/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia Venosa/terapia , Vena Femoral , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Biomanufacturing practitioners and researchers describe the norms that should govern the growing, global field, to include safety, security, sustainability, and social responsibility. These '4S Principles' should be broadly adopted so that the future of the field may provide the greatest benefits to society.
Asunto(s)
Biotecnología , Responsabilidad Social , Biotecnología/tendencias , Biotecnología/economía , Humanos , Estados Unidos , SeguridadRESUMEN
Published scientific evidence demonstrate the current spread of healthcare misinformation in the most popular social networks and unofficial communication channels. Up to 40% of the medical websites were identified reporting inappropriate information, moreover being shared more than 450,000 times in a 5-year-time frame. The phenomenon is particularly spread in infective diseases medicine, oncology and cardiovascular medicine. The present document is the result of a scientific and educational endeavor by a worldwide group of top experts who selected and analyzed the major issues and related evidence-based facts on vein and lymphatic management. A section of this work is entirely dedicated to the patients and therefore written in layman terms, with the aim of improving public vein-lymphatic awareness. The part dedicated to the medical professionals includes a revision of the current literature, summing up the statements that are fully evidence-based in venous and lymphatic disease management, and suggesting future lines of research to fulfill the still unmet needs. The document has been written following an intense digital interaction among dedicated working groups, leading to an institutional project presentation during the Universal Expo in Dubai, in the occasion of the v-WINter 2022 meeting.
Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Manejo de la Enfermedad , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Established condition-specific patient-reported outcome measures for varicose veins are limited to the measurement of health status and function. A treatment satisfaction measure is needed to understand patient satisfaction with different treatment options. The aim of this study was to design a Venous Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (VenousTSQ) that would be ready for large-scale data collection and psychometric evaluation. METHODS: Relevant items were selected from the -TSQ Item Library and new items were designed where necessary. A draft VenousTSQ was prepared using the existing AneurysmTSQ as a template. Fifteen interviews were conducted from 4 days to 16 months after the procedure. The interviews were designed to elicit important sources of satisfaction or dissatisfaction before completion of draft questionnaires. The VenousTSQ drafts were modified between sets of interviews until no further changes were required. RESULTS: The final VenousTSQ consists of two questionnaires: VenousTSQ early (VenousTSQe) and VenousTSQ status (VenousTSQs). Items that need be asked only once are in the VenousTSQe, whereas those that can usefully be asked more than once are in the VenousTSQs. Of the 16 unique items forming the VenousTSQ, 12 were from the -TSQ Item Library. Only 1 of these 12 required significant modification. CONCLUSIONS: The VenousTSQ represents a condition-specific psychological outcome measure for varicose veins, enabling patient satisfaction or dissatisfaction with such treatments to be measured. Large-scale data collection is under way to establish optimal scoring, quantitative validity, and reliability of the VenousTSQ.
Asunto(s)
Satisfacción del Paciente , Várices , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Várices/cirugía , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Psicometría , Satisfacción PersonalRESUMEN
The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 and the subsequent pandemic has highlighted the need for animal models that faithfully replicate the salient features of COVID-19 disease in humans. These models are necessary for the rapid selection, testing, and evaluation of potential medical countermeasures. Here, we performed a direct comparison of two distinct routes of SARS-CoV-2 exposure-combined intratracheal/intranasal and small particle aerosol-in two nonhuman primate species, rhesus and cynomolgus macaques. While all four experimental groups displayed very few outward clinical signs, evidence of mild to moderate respiratory disease was present on radiographs and at necropsy. Cynomolgus macaques exposed via the aerosol route also developed the most consistent fever responses and had the most severe respiratory disease and pathology. This study demonstrates that while all four models produced suitable representations of mild COVID-like illness, aerosol exposure of cynomolgus macaques to SARS-CoV-2 produced the most severe disease, which may provide additional clinical endpoints for evaluating therapeutics and vaccines.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Aerosoles , Animales , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Macaca fascicularis , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Iliofemoral venous obstruction is recognized with increasing frequency as the underlying cause of lower extremity symptoms including edema, pain, skin changes, and, in advanced cases, ulceration. This study sought to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Abre venous self-expanding stent system for the treatment of symptomatic iliofemoral venous outflow obstruction. METHODS: The ABRE Study (A Multi-Center, Non-Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the Abre Venous Self-Expanding Stent System in Patients With Symptomatic Iliofemoral Venous Outflow Obstruction) is a single-arm, multicenter, prospective study that included 200 subjects from 24 global sites. The primary end points were 12-month primary patency and major adverse events within 30 days. Secondary end points included lesion and procedure success, primary-assisted and secondary patency, major adverse events, stent migration, stent fracture, and quality of life changes. End point-related adverse events and imaging studies were adjudicated by independent clinical events committee and core laboratories, respectively. RESULTS: Venous obstruction cause was classified as acute deep vein thrombosis (16.5%, 33/200), post-thrombotic syndrome (47.5%, 95/200), or nonthrombotic iliac vein lesion (36.0%, 72/200). The common iliac and external iliac veins were stented in 96.0% (192/200), 80.5% (161/200) of subjects, respectively. Stent implant into the common femoral vein was required in 44.0% (88/200). Primary patency at 12 months was 88.0% (162/184). Four (2.0%) major adverse events occurred within 30 days. Twelve-month primary-assisted and secondary patency were 91.8% (169/184) and 92.9% (171/184), respectively. No stent fractures or migrations were reported. Mean target limb Villalta score decreased from 11.2±5.6 at baseline to 4.1±4.8 at 12 months, and the mean target limb revised Venous Clinical Severity Score decreased from 8.8±4.7 at baseline to 4.3±3.6 at 12 months. Clinically meaningful improvements in quality of life and venous functional assessment scores from baseline were demonstrated through 12 months in all measures. CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic iliofemoral venous obstruction can be successfully treated with an Abre venous stent. Study outcomes demonstrated a high patency rate with a good safety profile. Patients demonstrated a significant reduction in clinical symptoms and improvement in quality of life that was maintained through 12-month follow-up. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03038438.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Calidad de Vida , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Humanos , Vena Ilíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Stents , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción VascularRESUMEN
The present study was designed to evaluate the utility of environmental samples for convenient but accurate detection of avian influenza virus (AIV) in commercial poultry houses. First, environmental samples from AIV-negative commercial layer facilities were spiked with an H5N2 low pathogenic AIV and were evaluated for their effect on the detection of viral RNA immediately or after incubation at -20 C, 4 C, 22 C, or 37 C for 24, 48, or 72 hr. Second, Swiffer pads, drag swabs, and boot cover swabs were evaluated for their efficiency in collecting feces and water spiked with the H5N2 LPAIV under a condition simulated for a poultry facility floor. Third, environmental samples collected from commercial layer facilities that experienced an H5N2 highly pathogenic AIV outbreak in 2014-15 were evaluated for the effect of sampling locations on AIV detection. The half-life of AIV was comparable across all environmental samples but decreased with increasing temperatures. Additionally, sampling devices did not differ significantly in their ability to collect AIV-spiked environmental samples from a concrete floor for viral RNA detection. Some locations within a poultry house, such as cages, egg belts, house floor, manure belts, and manure pits, were better choices for sampling than other locations (feed trough, ventilation fan, and water trays) to detect AIV RNA after cleaning and disinfection. Samples representing cages, floor, and manure belts yielded significantly more PCR positives than the other environmental samples. In conclusion, environmental samples can be routinely collected from a poultry barn as noninvasive samples for monitoring AIV.
Muestreo ambiental para la detección del virus de la influenza aviar en instalaciones de aves de postura comerciales. El presente estudio fue diseñado para evaluar la utilidad de las muestras ambientales para la detección rápida pero precisa del virus de la influenza aviar (AIV) en casetas avícolas comerciales. Primero, muestras ambientales de las instalaciones comerciales de aves de postura negativas para influenza aviar se inocularon con un virus de la influenza de baja patogenicidad (LPAIV) H5N2 y se evaluaron para determinar su efecto en la detección de ARN viral inmediatamente o después de la incubación a -20 C, 4 C, 22 C o 37 C durante 24 hr, 48 hr o 72 horas. En segundo lugar, se evaluaron las esponjas marca Swiffer, los hisopos de arrastre y los cubre botas para muestreo ambiental para determinar su eficiencia en la recolección de heces y agua inoculada con el virus de influenza aviar de baja patogenicidad H5N2 en una condición simulada de piso de una instalación avícola. En tercer lugar, muestras ambientales recolectadas de instalaciones comerciales de ponedoras que experimentaron un brote de influenza aviar altamente patógena H5N2 en 2014-15, se evaluaron para determinar el efecto de la ubicación de muestreo en la detección de influenza aviar. La vida media del virus de la influenza aviar fue comparable en todas las muestras ambientales, pero disminuyó con el aumento de la temperatura. Además, los dispositivos de muestreo no difirieron significativamente en su capacidad para recolectar muestras ambientales inoculadas con influenza aviar de un piso de concreto para la detección de ARN viral. Algunas ubicaciones dentro de la caseta aviar, como jaulas, bandas transportadoras de huevo, piso de la caseta, bandas transportadoras de gallinasa y fosas de gallinasa, fueron las mejores opciones para el muestreo en comparación con otras ubicaciones (comederos, ventiladores y bandejas de agua) para detectar el ARN del virus de influenza después de la limpieza y desinfección. Las muestras que representan jaulas, piso y bandas transportadoras de gallinasa arrojaron significativamente más resultados positivos de PCR que las otras muestras ambientales. En conclusión, las muestras ambientales se pueden recolectar rutinariamente de uns granja avícola como muestras no invasivas para monitorear al virus de influenza aviar.
Asunto(s)
Subtipo H5N2 del Virus de la Influenza A , Virus de la Influenza A , Gripe Aviar , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral , Animales , Gripe Aviar/diagnóstico , Gripe Aviar/epidemiología , Aves de Corral , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
[Box: see text]With the support of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American Vein & Lymphatic Society, the American Venous Forum, the Canadian Society of Phlebology, the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe, the European Venous Forum, the International Pelvic Pain Society, the International Union of Phlebology, the Korean Society of Interventional Radiology, the Society of Interventional Radiology, and the Society for Vascular Surgery.
Asunto(s)
Várices , Canadá , Humanos , Pelvis , Estados Unidos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , VenasRESUMEN
Airborne transmission is predicted to be a prevalent route of human exposure with SARS-CoV-2. Aside from African green monkeys, nonhuman primate models that replicate airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 have not been investigated. A comparative evaluation of COVID-19 in African green monkeys, rhesus macaques, and cynomolgus macaques following airborne exposure to SARS-CoV-2 was performed to determine critical disease parameters associated with disease progression, and establish correlations between primate and human COVID-19. Respiratory abnormalities and viral shedding were noted for all animals, indicating successful infection. Cynomolgus macaques developed fever, and thrombocytopenia was measured for African green monkeys and rhesus macaques. Type II pneumocyte hyperplasia and alveolar fibrosis were more frequently observed in lung tissue from cynomolgus macaques and African green monkeys. The data indicate that, in addition to African green monkeys, macaques can be successfully infected by airborne SARS-CoV-2, providing viable macaque natural transmission models for medical countermeasure evaluation.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/fisiopatología , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Macaca mulatta , SARS-CoV-2/fisiología , Animales , COVID-19/patología , COVID-19/transmisión , Chlorocebus aethiops , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa , Femenino , Pulmón/patología , Macaca fascicularis , Masculino , Esparcimiento de VirusRESUMEN
As the importance of pelvic venous disorders (PeVD) has been increasingly recognized, progress in the field has been limited by the lack of a valid and reliable classification instrument. Misleading historical nomenclature, such as the May-Thurner, pelvic congestion, and nutcracker syndromes, often fails to recognize the interrelationship of many pelvic symptoms and their underlying pathophysiology. Based on a perceived need, the American Vein and Lymphatic Society convened an international, multidisciplinary panel charged with the development of a discriminative classification instrument for PeVD. This instrument, the Symptoms-Varices-Pathophysiology ("SVP") classification for PeVD, includes three domains-Symptoms (S), Varices (V), and Pathophysiology (P), with the pathophysiology domain encompassing the Anatomic (A), Hemodynamic (H), and Etiologic (E) features of the patient's disease. An individual patient's classification is designated as SVPA,H,E. For patients with pelvic origin lower extremity signs or symptoms, the SVP instrument is complementary to and should be used in conjunction with the Clinical-Etiologic-Anatomic-Physiologic (CEAP) classification. The SVP instrument accurately defines the diverse patient populations with PeVD, an important step in improving clinical decision making, developing disease-specific outcome measures and identifying homogenous patient populations for clinical trials.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Síndrome de May-Thurner/clasificación , Pelvis/irrigación sanguínea , Síndrome de Cascanueces Renal/clasificación , Terminología como Asunto , Várices/clasificación , Venas , Insuficiencia Venosa/clasificación , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Síndrome de May-Thurner/complicaciones , Síndrome de May-Thurner/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome de May-Thurner/fisiopatología , Flebografía , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Síndrome de Cascanueces Renal/complicaciones , Síndrome de Cascanueces Renal/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome de Cascanueces Renal/fisiopatología , Várices/complicaciones , Várices/diagnóstico por imagen , Várices/fisiopatología , Venas/diagnóstico por imagen , Venas/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Venosa/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Venosa/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia Venosa/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
A new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) emerged in the winter of 2019 in Wuhan, China, and rapidly spread around the world. The extent and efficiency of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is far greater than previous coronaviruses that emerged in the 21st Century. Here, we modeled stability of SARS-CoV-2 on skin, paper currency, and clothing to determine if these surfaces may factor in the fomite transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2. Skin, currency, and clothing samples were exposed to SARS-CoV-2 under laboratory conditions and incubated at three different temperatures (4°C± 2°C, 22°C± 2°C, and 37°C ± 2°C). We evaluated stability at 0 hours (h), 4 h, 8 h, 24 h, 72 h, 96 h, 7 days, and 14 days post-exposure. SARS-CoV-2 was stable on skin through the duration of the experiment at 4°C (14 days). Virus remained stable on skin for at least 96 h at 22°C and for at least 8h at 37°C. There were minimal differences between the tested currency samples. The virus remained stable on the $1 U.S.A. Bank Note for at least 96 h at 4°C while we did not detect viable virus on the $20 U.S.A. Bank Note samples beyond 72 h. The virus remained stable on both Bank Notes for at least 8 h at 22°C and 4 h at 37°C. Clothing samples were similar in stability to the currency. Viable virus remained for at least 96 h at 4°C and at least 4 h at 22°C. We did not detect viable virus on clothing samples at 37°C after initial exposure. This study confirms the inverse relationship between virus stability and temperature. Furthermore, virus stability on skin demonstrates the need for continued hand hygiene practices to minimize fomite transmission both in the general population as well as in workplaces where close contact is common.
Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus/fisiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Neumonía Viral/virología , Piel/virología , COVID-19 , Vestuario , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Microbiología Ambiental , Humanos , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , SARS-CoV-2 , Propiedades de Superficie , TemperaturaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The proprietary cyanoacrylate closure (CAC) system vs radiofrequency ablation (RFA) trial (VenaSeal Sapheon Closure System Pivotal Study [VeClose]) showed that CAC, a nontumescent, nonthermal, nonsclerosant ablation technique, was effective and noninferior to RFA in vein closure with good 36-month outcomes. Conducted under a separate protocol, the aim of this extended follow-up was to assess the long-term safety and effectiveness of CAC and RFA for the treatment of incompetent great saphenous veins (GSV) at 5 years (60 months) of follow-up. METHODS: This 60-month extension study was conducted for all patients who completed the randomized VeClose study and who were willing to participate. The pivotal VeClose study included patients with symptomatic moderate to severe varicosities (Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology [CEAP] class C2-C4b) and symptomatic GSV incompetence who were randomly assigned (1:1) to either CAC or RFA. The primary outcome measure of this 60-month extension study was complete closure of the target vein, with planned exploratory analysis of noninferiority. Secondary outcomes included CEAP class; completion of the Venous Clinical Severity Score, EuroQol-Five Dimension survey, and Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire; patient satisfaction with treatment; adverse events (AEs) related to target GSV; and details of adjunctive procedures. RESULTS: A total of 89 patients completed the 60-month visit, which included 47 from the CAC group, 33 from the RFA group, and 9 CAC roll-in patients. No new recanalization events have been observed in the groups between 36 and 60 months of follow-up. At 60 months, Kaplan-Meier estimates for freedom from recanalization in the randomized CAC and RFA groups were 91.4% and 85.2%, respectively, demonstrating noninferiority of CAC compared with RFA. Both groups demonstrated sustained improvements in EuroQol-Five Dimension and quality of life measures through 60 months. Whereas patients assigned to C0 or C1 clinical class were excluded from the original study, more than half of all returning patients (64% [57/89]) were now assigned to C0 or C1, suggesting an improved clinical class from baseline. Furthermore, 41.1% of returning CAC patients and 39.4% of returning RFA patients are presently at least two CEAP clinical classes lower than at baseline. No long-term device- or procedure-related serious AEs occurred in either group between 36- and 60-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: CAC and RFA were effective in achieving complete target vein closure of the GSV at long-term follow-up, with CAC demonstrating continued noninferiority to RFA. CAC was also associated with sustained improvements in symptoms and quality of life, lower CEAP class, and high level of patient satisfaction without serious AEs between 36 and 60 months.
Asunto(s)
Cianoacrilatos/uso terapéutico , Ablación por Radiofrecuencia , Vena Safena/cirugía , Várices/terapia , Insuficiencia Venosa/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Cianoacrilatos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Ablación por Radiofrecuencia/efectos adversos , Recuperación de la Función , Vena Safena/diagnóstico por imagen , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Várices/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia Venosa/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Treatment of pathologic perforator veins (PPVs) can shorten time to healing and reduce recurrence of ulcers in patients with advanced venous disease. Because of limited clinical evidence and device options, widespread adoption of PPV treatment is controversial. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of endovenous laser therapy using a 400-µm optical fiber to treat PPVs. METHODS: This study was a single-arm, prospective, seven-center, nonblinded clinical study examining patients with advanced skin changes or healed or active ulceration (Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology clinical class C4b, C5, and C6). Patients received treatment with a 1470-nm laser. Procedural technical success and 10-day primary closure were evaluated. All device-related adverse events were reported. Follow-up of patients was continued for 12 months after initial ablation. RESULTS: The primary PPV closure (at 10-day visit) rate was 76.9% (95% confidence interval, 70.3%-82.4%). Successful primary closure rates of 75.7%, 70.3%, 62.1%, 68.8%, and 71.3% of PPVs were achieved at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months, respectively. Statistically significant improvements (P < .05) were seen in patients' quality of life at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months compared with screening. The percentage of patients with ulcers (22.9% at screening, 14.1% at 1 month, 13.7% at 3 months, 10.1% at 6 months, 12.3% at 9 months, and 11.1% at 12 months) displayed improvement during the course of the study. Tibial deep venous thrombosis and procedural pain were the only device-related adverse events observed. CONCLUSIONS: Endovenous laser therapy for PPV using the 400-µm optical fiber with the 1470-nm laser yielded safe and effective outcomes with no major adverse sequelae.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Terapia por Láser/instrumentación , Fibras Ópticas , Úlcera Varicosa/cirugía , Venas/cirugía , Insuficiencia Venosa/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Terapia por Láser/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Úlcera Varicosa/diagnóstico por imagen , Úlcera Varicosa/fisiopatología , Venas/diagnóstico por imagen , Venas/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Venosa/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia Venosa/fisiopatología , Cicatrización de HeridasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The cyanoacrylate closure (CAC) procedure is a safe and effective modality for the treatment of an incompetent saphenous vein. Thrombus extension into the deep vein, known as endovenous glue-induced thrombosis (EGIT), may be a worrisome complication of the procedure. However, the incidence, classification, and risk factors of EGIT have not been elucidated. We report, herein, the incidence, classification, and risk factors of EGIT following the CAC procedure for an incompetent saphenous vein. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of prospectively collected data of CAC patients. Preoperatively, the diameter, reflux time, and peak reflux velocity of the saphenous vein were measured. The CAC procedure was performed as per the instructions for use. Postoperative follow-up was conducted at 1 week, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after the procedure. Postoperative duplex scanning was performed to evaluate the occlusion of the target vein and presence of EGIT. Demographic data, risk factors, procedure details, and follow-up data were also obtained. A four-tier classification system and recommended treatment plan were developed based on the EGIT grade. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 22.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY). A P value of <.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: During the study period, the CAC procedure was performed in 191 patients (126 females [66.0%]). The mean age was 56.1 ± 11.7 years (range, 19-84) years. After the procedure, pain, the Revised Venous Clinical Severity Score, and the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire score were significantly improved (P < .001). EGIT developed in 11 patients (5.8%). EGIT of grades I and II developed in seven (63.6%) and four (36.4%) patients, respectively. Duplex follow-up was conducted for all patients with EGIT without anticoagulation. Regarding the analysis of risk factors for the development of EGIT, the preoperative saphenous vein diameter of <5 mm was the only risk factor (P = .040). CONCLUSIONS: EGIT is not an uncommon complication of CAC. A small diameter of the saphenous vein (<5 mm) is a risk factor for the development of EGIT. A classification system and treatment protocol for EGIT based on the area of thrombus extension into the deep vein is proposed for managing patients.
Asunto(s)
Cianoacrilatos/efectos adversos , Vena Safena , Várices/terapia , Insuficiencia Venosa/terapia , Trombosis de la Vena/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Vena Safena/diagnóstico por imagen , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Várices/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia Venosa/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Hypersensitivity reaction presenting as a distinctive erythematous rash has been reported following VenaSeal™ cyanoacrylate adhesive closure. We report the frequency of hypersensitivity reactions, time to onset, duration, and severity of symptoms in patients treated with cyanoacrylate adhesive closure at a single institution. Patient and procedural factors associated with hypersensitivity reactions were evaluated. METHODS: A combined retrospective/prospective review of cyanoacrylate adhesive closure-treated patients was conducted over five years. Data collected from electronic medical records were reviewed for the presence of hypersensitivity reactions along with the time of onset, duration of symptoms, and severity of reaction. Severity was classified as mild if no treatment or over the counter medication was provided, moderate if steroids were required, and severe if the reaction lasted >30 days or required vein excision. RESULTS: Three hundred and seventy-nine limbs were treated in 286 patients (313 treatment days). Hypersensitivity reactions occurred in 18 patients (5.8% treatments, 6.3% patients). Thirteen were mild (4.2%), four were moderate (1.3%), and one was severe (0.3%). No patient or procedural predictive factors for hypersensitivity reaction were identified other than a trend towards decreased hypersensitivity reactions in patients with Clinical, Etiologic, Anatomic, Pathophysiologic (CEAP) clinical class C4-C6 (p = .06). Second limb treatment on a subsequent day was performed in 27 patients, and no hypersensitivity reactions occurred. Symptom onset time ranged from 1 to 23 days, with a mean of 13 days (confidence interval (CI) ±3.5 days). Duration of symptoms ranged from 3 to 28 days (mean 10.8 CI ±4.9 days). CONCLUSIONS: Hypersensitivity reactions occurred in 6.0% of patients treated with cyanoacrylate adhesive closure, but most were mild and self-limited. Severe reactions were uncommon. No predictive patient or procedural factors were found to be associated with hypersensitivity reactions other than a trend towards decreased risk in patients with advanced CEAP clinical class. Previous cyanoacrylate adhesive closure treatment was not a predictive factor for hypersensitivity reaction in patients undergoing treatment at a later date.