Acceptability of a rectal microbicide douche for HIV prevention: a mixed-methods analysis of a first-in-human formulation pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: DREAM-01 was an open label, dose-escalation and variable osmolarity study to identify a tenofovir HIV-prevention douche/enema that could achieve protective colon tissue cell concentrations and high acceptability. To assess impact on sexual enjoyment, iso-osmolar and hypo-osmolar placebo douches were provided for at-home use before receptive anal sex (RAS). METHODS: Eighteen HIV-uninfected men who have RAS were administered three tenofovir douches at the research clinic: Product A, an iso-osmolar dose; Product B, an iso-osmolar escalation dose; and Product C, a hypo-osmolar escalation dose. Following Products A and C, participants were given a saline douche of matching osmolarity to use at home before RAS. Participants reported acceptability via a computer-assisted self-interview and in-depth interview in this mixed-methods study. RESULTS: All three products were rated acceptable by 17 (95%) of the participants. A majority (94%) would be likely or very likely to use any of the three products before RAS. Of those who used the saline douches before RAS and then rated their sexual enjoyment, most reported that their sexual enjoyment was not affected. Interview data revealed that participants found the product easy to incorporate into their regular routine, but would prefer to use more liquid for cleansing. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that the hypo-osmolar Product C, which also provides the most rapid delivery of tenofovir for HIV prevention, is acceptable for future safety trials and that our sample reports high likelihood of using a rectal microbicide douche for HIV prevention. Our findings support continued pursuit of a tenofovir rectal microbicide douche. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02750540.

To Improve Motivational Barriers to Retention in High Resolution Anoscopy, Patients and Providers Recommend Social and Environmental Changes: A Sequential Explanatory Mixed-Methods Pilot Study in a Federally Qualified Health Center.

Loss to follow-up (LTFU) in high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) programs jeopardizes the procedure's potential to help prevent anal cancer. We explored quality improvement factors to understand how to address this LTFU. Using the transtheoretical COM-B Model (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, and Behavior) and a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design, we surveyed and interviewed 13 patients who remained engaged in HIV care but who delayed their HRA monitoring or treatment visits in the same community clinic, and 6 HRA clinicians and medical assistants. Analyses involved descriptive statistics and rapid qualitative analysis. Patients were racially, ethnically, and economically representative of the LTFU population, and were generally experienced with HRA (Mean HRA visits = 4.6, SD = 2.8, mdn = 3). Providers were experienced clinicians and medical assistants (Mean years providing HRA = 6.0, SD = 2.2). Analyses revealed two primary, related barriers: (A) motivational barriers such as physical pain, discomfort, embarrassment, and anxiety; which were largely borne from (B) opportunity barriers such as difficulties with scheduling, inconsistent after-care (particularly for pain and discomfort), anxiety-inducing exam rooms and equipment, and internalized and anticipated stigma. Capability barriers, such as limited health literacy about HRA, were less common and, like motivational barriers, linked to opportunity barriers. Participants recommended potential facilitators, including easier scheduling, standardization of pain management and after-care services, and examination room modifications to reduce anxiety. To retain HRA patients in community settings, interventions should address social and physical opportunity barriers that strongly determine motivational and capability barriers. Improving convenience, standardizing pain management, and introducing stigma interventions specific to HRA, could alleviate both motivational and capability barriers.

RESUMEN: La pérdida de seguimiento (LTFU) en los programas de anoscopia de alta resolución (HRA) pone en peligro el potencial del procedimiento para ayudar a prevenir el cáncer anal. Exploramos factores de mejora de la calidad para comprender cómo abordar este LTFU. Utilizando el modelo COM-B transteórico (Capacidad, Oportunidad, Motivación y Comportamiento) y un diseño de métodos mixtos explicativos secuenciales, encuestamos y entrevistamos a 13 pacientes que permanecieron involucrados en la atención del VIH pero que retrasaron sus visitas de seguimiento o tratamiento de la HRA en la misma clínica comunitaria y 6 médicos y asistentes médicos de la HRA. Los análisis involucraron estadísticas descriptivas y análisis cualitativo rápido. Los pacientes eran representativos de la población LTFU en cuanto a raza, etnia, y estatus económico. En general, tenían experiencia con HRA (visitas HRA media = 4,6, DE = 2,8, mdn = 3). Los proveedores eran médicos y asistentes médicos con experiencia (promedio de años proporcionando HRA = 6,0, DE = 2,2). Los análisis revelaron dos barreras principales relacionadas: (A) barreras motivacionales como el dolor físico, la incomodidad, la vergüenza y la ansiedad; que se debieron en gran medida a (B) barreras de oportunidad, como dificultades con la programación, cuidados posteriores inconsistentes (particularmente para el dolor y el malestar), salas de examen y equipos que inducen ansiedad, y estigma internalizado y anticipado. Las barreras a la capacidad, como la limitada alfabetización sanitaria sobre la HRA, fueron menos comunes y, al igual que las barreras motivacionales, estaban vinculadas a las barreras de oportunidades. Los participantes recomendaron posibles facilitadores, incluida una programación más sencilla, la estandarización del manejo del dolor y los servicios de cuidados posteriores, y modificaciones en la sala de examen para reducir la ansiedad. Para retener a los pacientes de HRA en entornos comunitarios, las intervenciones deben abordar las barreras de oportunidades sociales y físicas que determinan fuertemente las barreras motivacionales y de capacidad. Mejorar la conveniencia, estandarizar el manejo del dolor e introducir intervenciones de estigma específicas para la HRA podría aliviar las barreras tanto motivacionales como de capacidad.

The Global Impact of Diversifying PrEP Options: Results of an International Discrete Choice Experiment of Existing and Potential PrEP Strategies with Gay and Bisexual Men and Physicians.

To improve current and future use of existing (oral, injectable) and potential future (implants, douches) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) products, we must understand product preferences relative to one another, among gay and bisexual men (GBM), and physicians who prescribe PrEP. We completed an online discrete choice experiment (DCE) with separate groups of GBM and/or physicians from the United States, South Africa, Spain, and Thailand. Participants were presented information on PrEP products, including daily pills, event-driven pills (2-1-1 regimen), injections, subdermal implants (dissolvable, removable), and rectal douches. Next, they completed a choice exercise in which they were shown 10 screens, each presenting 3 of the aforementioned products at a time with 11 attributes for physicians and 10 attributes for GBM. For the attributes that were not constant, one level was shown per screen for each product. Participants selected the product they preferred most and rated their likelihood to select (GBM) or recommend (physicians) that product. Data were modeled using hierarchical Bayes estimation; resulting model coefficients were used to develop attribute importance measures and product preferences. For GBM across all countries, if all aforementioned PrEP products were on the market at the same time, over 90% of GBM would use some form of PrEP; 100% of physicians would recommend at least one of the PrEP products. There were variations in product preference by country. GBM in the United States and Thailand preferred the injection (21.7%, 22.9%, respectively), while the dissolvable implant was preferred in South Africa and Spain (19.9%, 19.8%, respectively). In the United States, South Africa, and Spain (where physician data were available), physicians were most likely to recommend the dissolvable implant (37.2%, 40.6%, 38.3%, respectively).

History of Rectal Product Use and Country of Residence Influence Preference for Rectal Microbicide Dosage Forms Among Young Sexual and Gender Minorities: A Multi-country Trial Comparing Placebo Douche, Suppository, and Insert Products.

The DESIRE Study (MTN-035) explored product preference among three placebo rectal microbicide (RM) formulations, a rectal douche (RD), a suppository, and an insert, among 210 sexually active transgender people and men who have sex with men in five counties: the United States, Peru, Thailand, South Africa, and Malawi. Participants used each product prior to receptive anal sex (RAS) for 1 month, following a randomly assigned sequence, then selected their preferred product via computer assisted self-interview. In-depth interviews examined reasons for preference. We compared product preference and prior product use by country to explore whether geographic location and experience with the similar products impacted preference. A majority in the United States (56%) and Peru (58%) and nearly half in South Africa (48%) preferred the douche. Most in Malawi (59%) preferred the suppository, while half in Thailand (50%) and nearly half in South Africa (47%) preferred the insert. Participants who preferred the douche described it as quick and easy, already routinized, and serving a dual purpose of cleansing and protecting. Those who preferred the insert found it small, portable, discreet, with quick dissolution. Those who preferred the suppository found the size and shape acceptable and liked the added lubrication it provided. Experience with product use varied by country. Participants with RD experience were significantly more likely to prefer the douche (p = 0.03). Diversifying availability of multiple RM dosage forms can increase uptake and improve HIV prevention efforts globally.

RESUMEN: El estudio DESIRE (MTN-035) exploró la preferencia de producto entre tres formulaciones de microbicida rectal (MR) de placebo, una ducha rectal, un supositorio y un inserto, entre 210 personas transgénero y hombres que tienen sexo con hombres en cinco países: los Estados Unidos, Perú., Tailandia, Sudáfrica y Malawi. Los participantes utilizaron cada producto antes del sexo anal receptive (SAR) durante un mes, siguiendo una secuencia asignada al azar, luego seleccionaron su producto preferido mediante una autoentrevista asistida por computadora. Las entrevistas en profundidad examinaron los motivos de preferencia. Comparamos la preferencia de producto y el uso previo del producto por país para explorar si la ubicación geográfica y la experiencia con la forma farmacéutica impactaron la preferencia. Una mayoría en los Estados Unidos (56%) y Perú (58%) y casi la mitad en Sudáfrica (48%) prefirieron la ducha rectal. La mayoría en Malawi (59%) prefirió el supositorio, mientras que la mitad en Tailandia (50%) y casi la mitad en Sudáfrica (47%) prefirió el inserto. Los participantes que prefirieron la ducha rectal la describieron como rápida y fácil, ya parte de su rutina y que tenía el doble propósito de limpiar y proteger. Los que prefirieron el inserto lo consideraron pequeño, portátil, discreto y de rápida disolución. Los que prefirieron el supositorio encontraron que tenía un tamaño y forma aceptables y proveía lubricación adicional. La experiencia con el uso del producto varió según el país. Los participantes con experiencia con duchas rectales tenían significativamente más probabilidades de preferir la ducha rectal (p = 0,03). Diversificar la disponibilidad de múltiples formas farmacéuticas de MR puede aumentar la aceptación y mejorar los esfuerzos de prevención del VIH a nivel mundial.

Tenofovir Douche as HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis for Receptive Anal Intercourse: Safety, Acceptability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics (DREAM 01).

BACKGROUND: Despite highly effective HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) options, no options provide on-demand, nonsystemic, behaviorally congruent PrEP that many desire. A tenofovir-medicated rectal douche before receptive anal intercourse may provide this option. METHODS: Three tenofovir rectal douches-220 mg iso-osmolar product A, 660 mg iso-osmolar product B, and 660 mg hypo-osmolar product C-were studied in 21 HIV-negative men who have sex with men. We sampled blood and colorectal tissue to assess safety, acceptability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. RESULTS: The douches had high acceptability without toxicity. Median plasma tenofovir peak concentrations for all products were several-fold below trough concentrations associated with oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). Median colon tissue mucosal mononuclear cell (MMC) tenofovir-diphosphate concentrations exceeded target concentrations from 1 hour through 3 to 7 days after dosing. For 6-7 days after a single product C dose, MMC tenofovir-diphosphate exceeded concentrations expected with steady-state oral TDF 300 mg on-demand 2-1-1 dosing. Compared to predrug baseline, HIV replication after ex vivo colon tissue HIV challenge demonstrated a concentration-response relationship with 1.9 log10 maximal effect. CONCLUSIONS: All 3 tenofovir douches achieved tissue tenofovir-diphosphate concentrations and colorectal antiviral effect exceeding oral TDF and with lower systemic tenofovir. Tenofovir douches may provide a single-dose, on-demand, behaviorally congruent PrEP option, and warrant continued development. Clinical Trials Registration . NCT02750540.

A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies That Address HIV-Related Stigmas Among US Healthcare Workers and Health Systems: Applying a Theory-Based Ontology to Link Intervention Types, Techniques, and Mechanisms of Action to Potential Effectiveness.

BACKGROUND: To end the HIV epidemic, we need to better understand how to address HIV-related stigmas in healthcare settings, specifically the common theoretical bases across interventions so that we can generalize about their potential effectiveness. PURPOSE: We describe theory-based components of stigma interventions by identifying their functions/types, techniques, and purported mechanisms of change. METHODS: This systematic review examined studies published by April 2021. We applied a transtheoretical ontology developed by the Human Behaviour Change Project, consisting of 9 intervention types (ITs), 93 behavior change techniques (BCTs), and 26 mechanisms of action (MOAs). We coded the frequency and calculated the potential effectiveness of each IT, BCT, and MOA. We evaluated study quality with a 10-item adapted tool. RESULTS: Among the nine highest quality studies, indicated by the use of an experimental design, the highest potentially effective IT was "Persuasion" (i.e. using communication to induce emotions and/or stimulate action; 66.7%, 4/6 studies). The highest potentially effective BCTs were "Behavioral practice/rehearsal" (i.e. to increase habit and skill) and "Salience of consequences" (i.e. to make consequences of behavior more memorable; each 100%, 3/3 studies). The highest potentially effective MOAs were "Knowledge" (i.e. awareness) and "Beliefs about capabilities" (i.e. self-efficacy; each 67%, 2/3 studies). CONCLUSIONS: By applying a behavior change ontology across studies, we synthesized theory-based findings on stigma interventions. Interventions typically combined more than one IT, BCT, and MOA. Practitioners and researchers can use our findings to better understand and select theory-based components of interventions, including areas for further evaluation, to expedite ending the HIV epidemic.

A randomized trial of safety, acceptability and adherence of three rectal microbicide placebo formulations among young sexual and gender minorities who engage in receptive anal intercourse (MTN-035).

Efforts to develop a range of HIV prevention products that can serve as behaviorally congruent viable alternatives to consistent condom use and oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) remain crucial. MTN-035 was a randomized crossover trial seeking to evaluate the safety, acceptability, and adherence to three placebo modalities (insert, suppository, enema) prior to receptive anal intercourse (RAI). If participants had no RAI in a week, they were asked to use their assigned product without sex. We hypothesized that the modalities would be acceptable and safe for use prior to RAI, and that participants would report high adherence given their behavioral congruence with cleansing practices (e.g., douches and/or enemas) and their existing use to deliver medications (e.g., suppositories; fast-dissolving inserts) via the rectum. Participants (N = 217) were sexual and gender minorities enrolled in five different countries (Malawi, Peru, South Africa, Thailand, and the United States of America). Mean age was 24.9 years (range 18-35 years). 204 adverse events were reported by 98 participants (45.2%); 37 (18.1%) were deemed related to the study products. The proportion of participants reporting "high acceptability" was 72% (95%CI: 65% - 78%) for inserts, 66% (95%CI: 59% - 73%) for suppositories, and 73% (95%CI: 66% - 79%) for enemas. The proportion of participants reporting fully adherent per protocol (i.e., at least one use per week) was 75% (95%CI: 69% - 81%) for inserts, 74% (95%CI: 68% - 80%) for suppositories, and 83% (95%CI: 77% - 88%) for enemas. Participants fully adherent per RAI-act was similar among the three products: insert (n = 99; 58.9%), suppository (n = 101; 58.0%) and enema (n = 107; 58.8%). The efficacy and effectiveness of emerging HIV prevention drug depends on safe and acceptable delivery modalities that are easy to use consistently. Our findings demonstrate the safety and acceptability of, and adherence to, enemas, inserts, and suppositories as potential modalities through which to deliver a rectal microbicide.

Preferences Among Physicians and Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) for a Long-Acting, Removable Implant for HIV Prevention: A Discrete Choice Study.

A longer acting, removable implant for HIV prevention has the potential to improve uptake of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) by removing the need for daily adherence to an oral tablet, reducing potential side effects, and eliminating concerns about residual drug following injections. To end the HIV epidemic, we must understand the needs and preferences of groups most affected by HIV (e.g., men who have sex with men; MSM), and the physicians who prescribe PrEP to them. This article describes a discrete choice experiment to estimate the preference share for the implant within a competitive context of other PrEP products (including the oral tablet, dissolvable implant, and injection) and evaluate the impact of potential implant attributes. Physicians who had prescribed oral PrEP (n = 75) and MSM at risk for HIV (n = 175) completed a web-based survey that prompted decision-making about PrEP product preferences. The findings from both physicians and MSM demonstrated that the removable implant could capture a meaningful portion of the preference share, making it feasible to advance in the development pipeline as an important addition to the biomedical HIV prevention toolkit. Among MSM, specifically, the cost of treatment was the most important attribute impacting product preference. Our findings inform implant developers and future payers (e.g., commercial manufacturers, insurance companies) about specific device attributes that will likely affect MSM's willingness to use and physicians' willingness to prescribe this HIV prevention strategy.

Conjoint Analysis of User Acceptability of Sustained Long-Acting Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV.

Long-acting delivery modalities of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), such as subdermal implants, are in development. To facilitate end-user uptake and sustained use, it is critical to understand potential consumers' and physician prescribers' preferences about, interest in, and relative importance of different implant features. The ordered identification of these key attributes allows implant developers to incorporate this feedback into product design, which theoretically improves acceptability, feasibility, and user experience with the device. In this study, n = 75 PrEP-prescribing physicians and n = 143 men having sex with men (MSM) at risk for HIV completed web-based surveys that directly compared the importance of eight to nine different implant features, respectively. Conjoint analysis determined the importance of these features, relative to each other. Implants presented in the study were well received, with a majority of physicians and MSM indicating that they were likely to recommend or use them. The implant was perceived as unique, reliable, and convenient, as well as able to deliver better compliance. The attributes most critical to the adoption of the implant among physicians and MSM were (1) the chance of becoming infected with HIV while on implant treatment, (2) the length of protection and size of the implant, and (3) the side effect advantages over current PrEP oral pill treatment. Some concerns about the implant included side effects and the product's safety (among MSM) and the cost or insurance coverage level for the implant (both physicians and MSM). There was also some resistance to the implantation procedure itself.

Inconsistent Counselor Fidelity in Delivering an Evidence-Based Adherence Intervention During a PrEP Trial.

Evidence-based adherence counseling interventions must be delivered with fidelity to ensure that their effectiveness is retained, but little is known regarding how counselors in biomedical HIV trials deliver these interventions. Forty-two counselors from the MTN-025/HOPE Study, which was conducted in 14 sites in sub-Saharan Africa, participated. They completed a quantitative assessment and consented for their HOPE counseling session ratings to be analyzed. Twenty-two (52%) self-identified as research nurses and 20 (48%) as counselors. Of 928 session ratings, 609 (66%) were classified as Good, 188 (20%) as Fair, and 131 (14%) as Poor, based on pre-established criteria. Overall mean ratings for session tasks and global components (each rated from 1 to 5) were 4.12 (SD = 0.45; range 2.46-4.73) and 4.02 (SD = 0.64; range 1.75-4.79), respectively. Twenty-six (62%) counselors attained Good or Fair ratings on at least 85% of their sessions, but 33% of counselors had more than 25% of their sessions rated as Poor; three counselors (7%) never met criteria for a Good session. Even after extensive training, counselors' fidelity to the intervention varied. Our findings highlight the value of fidelity monitoring using session audio-recordings, the importance of ongoing coaching and support, and the need to plan for counselors with consistently poor fidelity.

RESUMEN: Las intervenciones de consejería de adherencia basadas en la evidencia deben ser realizadas con fidelidad para asegurar que retengan su efectividad, pero se sabe poco sobre cómo los consejeros en ensayos biomédicos de VIH realizan estas intervenciones. Cuarenta y dos consejeros participaron del Estudio MTN-025/HOPE, el cual se llevó a cabo en 14 sitios en África subsahariana. Completaron un cuestionario cuantitativo y dieron su consentimiento para el análisis de las calificaciones de sus sesiones de consejería para HOPE. Veintidós (52%) se identificaron como enfermeras investigadoras y 20 (48%) como consejeros. De 928 sesiones calificadas, 609 (66%) fueron clasificadas como Buenas, 188 (20%) como Suficientes, y 131 (14%) como Mediocres, basado en criterios preestablecidos. Las calificaciones promedias de las tareas de las sesiones y de los componentes globales (calificados de 1 a 5) fueron de 4.12 (SD = 0.45; rango 2.46­4.73) y de 4.02 (SD = 0.64; rango 1.75­4.79), respectivamente. Veintiséis (62%) consejeros lograron calificaciones Buenas o Suficientes en al menos el 85% de sus sesiones, pero para el 33% de los consejeros, más del 25% de sus sesiones fueron calificadas como Mediocres; tres consejeros (7%) nunca cumplieron con los criterios de una Buena sesión. Aún después de una capacitación intensiva, la fidelidad a la intervención variaba. Nuestros hallazgos destacan el valor de monitorear para la fidelidad usando audio-grabaciones de las sesiones, la importancia de la instrucción y el apoyo continuo, y la necesidad de planear qué medidas tomar cuando hay consejeros que no son fieles a la intervención.