Pregnancy and Chagas Disease: Benznidazole's Impact on Pregnancy and Newborns: A Report of Four Cases.

In recent decades and because of migration, Chagas disease has become a global public health problem. A significant focus has been placed on pregnant women who can transmit the disease to their offspring. Here, we report four cases of women who did not know that they were pregnant while they were being treated with benznidazole. A diagnosis was established according to serology and Trypanosoma cruzi polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-standardized tests. Treatment was discontinued when pregnancy was confirmed, and a thorough follow-up was carried out. Although each case was different, none of the mothers developed health problems during pregnancy, and their newborns were delivered without any teratogenic effects.

The Clinical and Parasitologic Follow-up of Trypanosoma cruzi-infected Children in a Nonendemic Country.

BACKGROUND: Chagas disease has become a global health problem, with the pediatric population being especially vulnerable. Our aim was to describe the clinical-epidemiologic aspects of disease in this population, as well as tolerance and adherence to treatment and the subsequent evolution of the disease. METHODS: A prospective study involving 949 children 0-14 years of age screened from 2007 to 2018. Diagnosis was performed by polymerase chain reaction and/or microhematocrit in <1-year-old children or serology in those ≥1 year of age. After diagnosis, children were examined for the clinical manifestation of Chagas disease and were treated with benznidazole. Treatment response was monitored by polymerase chain reaction and serology. RESULTS: Forty children were infected (4.2% of the population screened). Twelve children were diagnosed during the acute phase (≤1-year-old), 3 of whom were symptomatic, and 28 (4- to 14-year-olds) were in the chronic phase: 18 in the indeterminate phase and 10 presented cardiac and/or digestive involvement. Regarding treatment, 10 (25.6%) children had side effects (6 mild, 2 moderate and 2 severe reactions), leading to treatment interruption in 3 of them. No side effects were detected in ≤1-year-old children (P < 0.05). Cure was confirmed in 29.4% of the children during follow-up, and the age of the children at treatment (≤1 year) was clearly associated with the effectiveness of treatment (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Effectiveness and safety of treatment were optimum in ≤1-year-old children. Increased side effects, cardiac and/or digestive disorder incidence and lower treatment effectiveness were detected in older children, highlighting the need for early screening.

An observational longitudinal study to evaluate tools and strategies available for the diagnosis of Congenital Chagas Disease in a non-endemic country.

OBJECTIVES: Congenital Chagas Disease (CCD) has become a global health problem. Early diagnosis and treatment is essential for the cure of the disease. Our aim was to evaluate techniques and samples used for the diagnosis of CCD in order to improve diagnostic strategies. METHODS: A total of 181 children born in Spain from Latin American Chagas-infected mothers were consecutively enrolled and studied by microhematocrit, PCR and serology tests at 0-2, 6 and 9-12 months of age and followed up when it was required. Samples of cord blood and peripheral blood were collected for T. cruzi detection by PCR. Parasite culture was performed in patients with a positive PCR. RESULTS: Of 181 children, 7 children (3.9%) were lost to follow-up. A total of 174 children completed follow-up, 12 were diagnosed with CCD (6.9%) and 162 (93.1%) as uninfected children (negative serology tests at the end of the follow-up). Traditional parasitological diagnosis by microhematocrit had a poor performance (sensitivity was 10%), while PCR in peripheral blood showed high sensitivity (90.9%) and specificity (100%), allowing the early diagnosis of 9 infected children during the first 6-months-old. In the other 3 congenital cases, diagnosis was only possible at 12 months by serological and molecular techniques. However, PCR in cord blood showed low sensitivity (33.3%) and less specificity (96.4%) for the diagnosis. CONCLUSION: PCR in peripheral blood has proven to be the most adequate strategy for the diagnosis of CCD, allowing an early and reliable diagnosis.