Preclinical in vivo assessment of the activity of AZD7442 anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies against Omicron sublineages.

Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies have been successful in protecting vulnerable populations against SARS-CoV-2. However, their effectiveness has been hampered by the emergence of new variants. To adapt the therapeutic landscape, health authorities have based their recommendations mostly on in vitro neutralization tests. However, these do not provide a reliable understanding of the changes in the dose-effect relationship and how they may translate into clinical efficacy. Taking the example of EvusheldTM (AZD7442), we aimed to investigate how in vivo data can provide critical quantitative results and project clinical effectiveness. We used the Golden Syrian hamster model to estimate 90 % effective concentrations (EC90) of AZD7442 in vivo against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1, BA.2 and BA.5 variants. While our in vivo results confirmed the partial loss of AZD7442 activity for BA.1 and BA.2, they showed a much greater loss of efficacy against BA.5 than that obtained in vitro. We analyzed in vivo EC90s in perspective with antibody levels measured in a cohort of immunocompromised patients who received 300 mg of AZD7442. We found that a substantial proportion of patients had serum levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein IgG above the estimated in vivo EC90 for BA.1 and BA.2 (21 % and 92 % after 1 month, respectively), but not for BA.5. These findings suggest that AZD7442 is likely to retain clinical efficacy against BA.2 and BA.1, but not against BA.5. Overall, the present study illustrates the importance of complementing in vitro investigations by preclinical studies in animal models to help predict the efficacy of monoclonal antibodies in humans.

Current status of pathogen handling in European laboratories: focus on viral inactivation process.

For handling safely infectious agents, European laboratories must comply with specific EC Directives, national regulations and recommendations from the World Health Organization (WHO). To prevent laboratory acquired infections (LAIs) and pathogens dissemination, a key biosafety rule requires that any infectious material (clinical specimens or research samples) manipulated outside a biosafety cabinet (BSC) must be inactivated unless the lack of infectivity is proven. This inactivation process is a crucial step for biosafety and must be guided by a rigorous experimental qualification and validation procedure. However, for diagnostic or research laboratories, this process is not harmonized with common standard operation procedures (SOPs) but based on individual risk assessment and general international guidelines which can pose problems in emergency situations such as major outbreaks or pandemics. This review focuses on viral inactivation method, outlining the current regulatory framework, its limitations and a number of ways in which biosafety can be improved.