Visual scoring of aortic valve calcifications on low-dose CT in lung cancer screening.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate risk factors for prevalence and progression of aortic valve calcification (AVC) in lung cancer screening participants and also to assess the sensitivity and reliability of visual AVCs on low-dose CT (LDCT) for predicting aortic stenosis (AS) in high-risk smokers. METHODS: We reviewed 1225 consecutive participants in annual LDCT screening for lung cancer at the Mount Sinai Hospital between 2010 and 2017. Sensitivity and specificity of moderate/severe AVC score on LDCT to identify AS on echocardiogram were calculated for 126 participants who had both within 12 months. Using regression analyses, risk factors for AVC at baseline, for progression, and for new AVC on annual rounds of screening were identified. Reliability of AVC assessment on LDCT was assessed by comparing visual AVC scores (1) with standard-dose, electrocardiography (ECG)-gated CT for 31 participants who had both within 12 months and (2) with Agatston scores of 1225 participants and by determining (3) the intra-reader agreement of 1225 participants. RESULTS: Visual AVC scores on LDCT had substantial agreement with the severity of AS on echocardiography and substantial inter-observer and excellent intra-observer agreement. Sensitivity and specificity of moderate/severe visual AVC scores for moderate/severe AS on echocardiogram were 100% and 94%, respectively. Significant predictors for baseline AVC were male sex (OR = 2.52), age (OR10 years = 2.87), and coronary artery calcification score (OR = 1.18), the significant predictor for AVC progression after baseline was pack-years of smoking (HR10 packyears = 1.14), and significant predictors for new AVC on annual LDCT were male sex (HR = 1.51), age (HR10 years = 2.17), CAC (HR = 1.09)  and BMI (HR = 1.06). CONCLUSIONS: AVC scores on LDCT should be documented, especially in lung cancer screening program. KEY POINTS: • LDCT screening for lung cancer provides an opportunity to identify lung cancer and cardiovascular disease in asymptomatic smokers. • Visual aortic valve calcification scores could be reliably evaluated on LDCT and had substantial agreement with the severity of aortic valve stenosis on echocardiography. • Sensitivity and specificity of moderate/severe visual AVC scores on LDCT for moderate/severe AS on echocardiogram were 100% and 94%, respectively.

Single- Versus Multicenter Surgeons' Risk-Adjusted Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Procedural Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Since 2010, 460+ hospital mergers have occurred in the United States, rerouting historical coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) referral patterns. The goals of this study were: (1) to compare risk-adjusted CABG outcomes between single-center versus multicenter surgeons; and (2) for multicenter surgeons, to evaluate the risk-adjusted outcomes between their home (primary) versus satellite (secondary) hospitals. METHODS: Using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database, nonemergent, first-time CABG procedures (n = 543,403) performed in the US between 2011 and 2014 were extracted across 1,120 centers and for 2,676 surgeons. Surgeons were classified as multicenter if they performed operations at two separate hospitals for ≥ 2 consecutive quarters; their home hospital was identified as their highest volume center. Observed-to-expected outcome ratios were reported using approved multivariable risk models for 30-day operative mortality and major morbidity. RESULTS: Of 2,676 cardiac surgeons, 668 (25.0%) operated at multiple centers. The observed-to-expected mortality ratios were 1.06 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 1.12) and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.94 to 1.00) for multi- and single-center surgeons (p < 0.001). For multicenter surgeons, the observed-to-expected mortality ratios were 1.17 (95% CI, 1.09 to 1.27) versus 1.01 (95% CI, 0.96 to 1.07), p < 0.001, for their satellite versus home facilities, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Single-center surgeons performing CABG had lower risk-adjusted outcome rates compared with multicenter surgeons, who performed better at their home versus satellite hospitals. To improve future quality of care, surgeons, health care networks, and health policy makers should now more closely scrutinize their single versus multicenter performance.