Using the nociception level index to compare the intraoperative antinociceptive effect of propofol and sevoflurane during clinical and experimental noxious stimulus in patients under general anesthesia.

STUDY: Propofol and sevoflurane are two anesthetic agents widely used to induce and maintain general anesthesia (GA). Their intrinsic antinociceptive properties remain unclear and are still debated. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether propofol presents stronger antinociceptive properties than sevoflurane using intraoperative clinical and experimental noxious stimulations and evaluating postoperative pain outcomes. DESIGN: A prospective randomized monocentric trial. SETTING: Perioperative care. PATIENTS: 60 adult patients with ASA status I to III who underwent elective abdominal laparoscopic surgery under GA were randomized either in propofol or sevoflurane group to induce and maintain GA. INTERVENTIONS: We used clinical and experimental noxious stimulations (intubation, tetanic stimulation) to assess the antinociceptive properties of propofol and sevoflurane in patients under GA and monitored using the NOL index, BIS index, heart rate, and mean arterial blood pressure. MEASUREMENTS: We measured the difference in the NOL index alterations after intubation and tetanic stimulation during either intravenous anesthesia (propofol) or inhaled anesthesia (sevoflurane). We also intraoperatively measured the NOL index and remifentanil consumption and recorded postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption in the post-anesthesia care unit. Intraoperative management was standardized by targeting similar values of depth of anesthesia (BIS index), hemodynamic (HR and MAP), NOL index values (below the threshold of 20), same multimodal analgesia and type of surgery. MAIN RESULTS: We found the antinociceptive properties of propofol and sevoflurane similar. The only minor difference was after tetanic stimulation: the delta NOL was higher in the sevoflurane group (39 ± 13 for the propofol group versus 47 ± 15 for sevoflurane; P = 0.04). Intraoperative and postoperative pain outcomes and opioid consumption were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a precise intraoperative experimental and clinical protocol using the NOL index, propofol does not provide a higher level of antinociception during anesthesia or analgesia after surgery when compared to sevoflurane. Anesthesiologists may prefer propofol over sevoflurane to reduce PONV or anesthesia-related pollution, but not for superior antinociceptive properties.

Criteria for early and late velopharyngoplasty in 61 children with cleft palate.

BACKGROUND: Velopharyngeal insufficiency persists in 15 to 30% of children with cleft palate, despite early velar surgery. Pharyngoplasty using a superior pedicle flap is the most common secondary surgery to treat velopharyngeal insufficiency. This study aims to identify the criteria leading to indicate velopharyngoplasty in 3 groups of age. MATERIALS AND METHODS: we conducted a retrospective single center study in the reference center for cleft palate in Paris from 2013 to 2016. We included 61 children with non-syndromic cleft operated on with a velopharyngoplasty for velopharyngeal insufficiency. Pre-operative speech and surgical assessments, as well as the operative reports of the children, were analyzed retrospectively using multivariate models. RESULTS: We included 61 patients. The only criteria factor for an early velopharyngoplasty was the Pittsburgh Weighted Speech Scale (PWSS) score (OR 1.20, CI 95% 1.07 to 1.4 ; P=.006). Criteria for a late velopharyngoplasty were a degradation of the velopharyngeal function (OR 16.07, CI 95% 1.7 to 518.7 ; P=.041) and lost of follow-up (OR 5.78, CI 95% 3.9 to 4320 ; P=.017). CONCLUSION: Criteria for early and late velopharyngoplasty were identified, and we demonstrated the insufficiency of Borel-Maisonny classification for scientific clinical study.

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome with refractory cardiogenic shock due to acute myocarditis and mononeuritis multiplex after SARS-CoV-2 infection in an adult.

A 22-year-old male with a typical history of pauci-symptomatic COVID-19 3 weeks earlier, confirmed by positive serology for SARS-CoV-2 (IgG), was admitted to the intensive care unit because of severe myocarditis with refractory cardiogenic shock that required extracorporeal life support. Due to a clinical presentation suggestive of Kawasaki-like disease with coronary aneurysm and severe systemic inflammation, intravenous immunoglobulins were administered in combination with tocilizumab. The initial clinical course was favourable with these treatments. However, the patient subsequently developed a severe mononeuritis multiplex leading to bilateral foot drop, which required intensive immunosuppressive therapy (corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide and rituximab). The clinical presentation meets the criteria for multisystem inflammatory syndrome associated with SARS-CoV-2, but includes very severe organ damages. Early recognition, a multidisciplinary approach and aggressive therapeutic intervention can lead to a favourable outcome.

A simple and fast HPLC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of direct oral anticoagulants apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban in human plasma.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) available for the treatment and prevention of thromboembolic diseases include dabigatran, a direct thrombin (IIa) inhibitor, and apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban, which are direct inhibitors of Stuart factor (Xa). DOACs have a different pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics profiles, with less probable drug-drug interactions than vitamin K antagonists. They do not require systematic therapeutic monitoring except in specific clinical situations such as emergency procedures or drug non-compliance. Furthermore, anticoagulant effects of DOACs could be impacted by renal impairment, drug-drug interactions, food interactions, or pharmacogenetic variability. In this context, we developed a method for simultaneous determination of dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban in human plasma using high performance liquid chromatography coupled with a mass spectrometry assay and applied it to 26 patient samples. Our method presents a total run time of 5 min and extends from 25 to 1000 µg/L for apixaban and dabigatran; and from 5 to 1000 µg/L for rivaroxaban. Intra- and inter-assay accuracy were between -22.3 and 25.4%; and - 23.7 and 3.8%, respectively. Precision at low and high concentrations were below 17.5%. Frozen samples were stable up to 3 months. No significant cross-contamination was observed. In conclusion, our assay can be used during clinical studies and in daily routine practice for the management of specific clinical situations at reasonable cost.