RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In the context of an aging population, identifying risk factors for Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), specific to older people, is important. However, if age is a known risk factor for VRE infection, a limited number of studies have focused on older patients. This study aimed to identify potential risk factors for VRE acquisition in a population aged 65 years and older, during a large VRE outbreak that occurred in a teaching hospital in Lyon, France, from December 2013 to July 2014. METHODS: The present retrospective, multi-center, descriptive, and analytical study used part of a previous cohort, and included only a sub-group of patients aged 65 years and older. The analysis of the factors included in the original study was completed with factors more specific to geriatric patients. Inclusion criteria were patients aged 65 years and older, in contact with a VRE index patient. Patients were screened by rectal swabs. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 180 VRE contacts were included and 18 patients became carriers. Multivariate analysis showed that risk factors for VRE acquisition in older people included major contact type (RR: 5.31, 95%CI [1.33; 21.19]), number of antibiotics used (RR: 1.36, 95%CI [1.04; 1.76]), a score of McCabe = 2 (RR: 116.39, 95%CI [5.52; 2455.98]), ethylism (RR: 5.50, 95%CI [1.49; 20.25]), and dementia (RR: 7.50, 95%CI [1.89; 29.80]). CONCLUSIONS: This study was able to demonstrate risk factors for VRE acquisition in older people. These risk factors should be taken into account when in the presence of older people in a VRE infected unit.
Asunto(s)
Envejecimiento/efectos de los fármacos , Envejecimiento/fisiología , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina/efectos de los fármacos , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina/fisiología , Vancomicina/farmacología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico , Resistencia a la Vancomicina/efectos de los fármacos , Resistencia a la Vancomicina/fisiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Healthcare workers are highly exposed to various types of disinfectants and cleaning products. Assessment of exposure to these products remains a challenge. We aimed to investigate the feasibility of a method, based on a smartphone application and bar codes, to improve occupational exposure assessment among hospital/cleaning workers in epidemiological studies. METHODS: A database of disinfectants and cleaning products used in French hospitals, including their names, bar codes and composition, was developed using several sources: ProdHyBase (a database of disinfectants managed by hospital hygiene experts), and specific regulatory agencies and industrial websites. A smartphone application has been created to scan bar codes of products and fill a short questionnaire. The application was tested in a French hospital. The ease of use and the ability to record information through this new approach were estimated. RESULTS: The method was tested in a French hospital (7 units, 14 participants). Through the application, 126 records (one record referred to one product entered by one participant/unit) were registered, majority of which were liquids (55.5%) or sprays (23.8%); 20.6% were used to clean surfaces and 15.9% to clean toilets. Workers used mostly products with alcohol and quaternary ammonium compounds (>90% with weekly use), followed by hypochlorite bleach and hydrogen peroxide (28.6%). For most records, information was available on the name (93.7%) and bar code (77.0%). Information on product compounds was available for all products and recorded in the database. CONCLUSION: This innovative and easy-to-use method could help to improve the assessment of occupational exposure to disinfectants/cleaning products in epidemiological studies.
Asunto(s)
Detergentes , Desinfectantes , Procesamiento Automatizado de Datos , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Personal de Hospital , Adulto , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aplicaciones Móviles , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Proyectos PilotoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to estimate the length of stay of patients with hospital-acquired infections hospitalized in ICUs using a multistate model. DESIGN: Active prospective surveillance of hospital-acquired infection from January 1, 1995, to December 31, 2012. SETTING: Twelve ICUs at the University of Lyon hospital (France). PATIENTS: Adult patients age greater than or equal to 18 years old and hospitalized greater than or equal to 2 days were included in the surveillance. All hospital-acquired infections (pneumonia, bacteremia, and urinary tract infection) occurring during ICU stay were collected. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The competitive risks of in-hospital death, transfer, or discharge were considered in estimating the change in length of stay due to infection(s), using a multistate model, time of infection onset. Thirty-three thousand four-hundred forty-nine patients were involved, with an overall hospital-acquired infection attack rate of 15.5% (n = 5,176). Mean length of stay was 27.4 (± 18.3) days in patients with hospital-acquired infection and 7.3 (± 7.6) days in patients without hospital-acquired infection. A multistate model-estimated mean found an increase in length of stay by 5.0 days (95% CI, 4.6-5.4 d). The extra length of stay increased with the number of infected site and was higher for patients discharged alive from ICU. No increased length of stay was found for patients presenting late-onset hospital-acquired infection, more than the 25th day after admission. CONCLUSIONS: An increase length of stay of 5 days attributable to hospital-acquired infection in the ICU was estimated using a multistate model in a prospective surveillance study in France. The dose-response relationship between the number of hospitalacquired infection and length of stay and the impact of early-stage hospital-acquired infection may strengthen attention for clinicians to focus interventions on early preventions of hospital-acquired infection in ICU.
Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Infección Hospitalaria/terapia , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Estadísticos , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES We aimed to ascertain the factors associated with lack of isolation precautions (IP) in patients infected or colonized by third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (3GCR-E) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in hospital settings. DESIGN Prospective surveillance and audit of practices. SETTING The study included 4 university hospitals in Lyon, France. PARTICIPANTS All patients hospitalized between April and June in 2013 and 2015 were included. Case patients had ≥1 clinical sample positive for MRSA and/or 3GCR-E. METHODS Factors associated with the lack of IP implementation were identified using multivariate logistic regression. The incidence of MDRO infections was expressed per 10,000 patient days. RESULTS Overall, 57,222 patients accounting for 192,234 patient days of hospitalization were included, and 635 (1.1%) MDRO cases were identified. MRSA incidence was 2.5 per 10,000 patient days (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.1-3.0) and 3GCR-E incidence was 10.1 per 10,000 patient days (95% CI, 9.2-11.0), with no crude difference between 2013 and 2015 (P=.15 and P=.11, respectively). Among 3GCR-E, the main species were Escherichia coli (43.8%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (31.0%). Isolation precautions were implemented in 78.5% of cases. Lack of IP implementation was independently associated with patient age, year, specialty, hospital, colonization compared with infection, and lack of medical prescription for IPs (adjusted odds ratio, 17.4; 95% CI, 8.5-35.8; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS MRSA and 3GCR-E infections and/or colonizations are frequent in healthcare settings, and IPs are implemented in most cases. When IPs are lacking, the main factor is the absence of medical prescription for IPs, underscoring the need for alerts to physicians by the microbiological laboratory and/or the infection control team. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:1188-1195.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/epidemiología , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/prevención & control , Aislamiento de Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Resistencia a las Cefalosporinas , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Resistencia a Múltiples Medicamentos , Enterobacteriaceae/aislamiento & purificación , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Hospitales , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Control de Infecciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por Klebsiella/epidemiología , Infecciones por Klebsiella/prevención & control , Klebsiella pneumoniae/aislamiento & purificación , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) in intensive care units (ICUs) are associated with increased length of stay (LOS). The objective of this study was to graphically describe by heat mapping LOS of patients hospitalized in ICUs related to the occurrence of HAI and severity at admission measured by the Simplified Acute Physiological Score II (SAPSII). METHODS: Adult patients hospitalized in ICUs of Lyon University Hospitals (France) were included in an active standardized surveillance study of HAI from January 1, 1995-December 31, 2012. Surveillance included adult patients aged ≥18 years hospitalized ≥2 days. Patient follow-up ended at ICU discharge or death. LOS was calculated in days from differences between dates of entry and discharge from ICUs. HAIs recorded were pneumonia, bacteremia, and urinary tract infection. The heat map was designed with a spreadsheet software. RESULTS: A total of 34,694 patients were analyzed. Among infected patients, 72.3% had 1 infected site (IS), 23% had 2 ISs, and 4.7% had 3 ISs. Median LOS was 24 days in infected patients (20.4 days among patients with 1 IS, 34.2 days among patients with 2 ISs, and 45.3 days among patients with 3 ISs) and 5 days in noninfected patients (P < .001). Two groups of multi-infected patients with long LOSs were identified with the heat map. CONCLUSIONS: The heat map facilitated easy-to-implement semi-quantitative visualization of increasing LOS through the SAPSIIs and number of ISs.
Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/patología , Procesamiento Automatizado de Datos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Tiempo de Internación , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Francia , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
"RESEAU MATER" is useful to monitor nosocomial infections in maternity and contributes to the decreasing trend of it, since its implementation. Specifically, this network demonstrates its efficiency in the control of endometritis following vaginal deliveries, but not in the control of urinary tract infections. The aim of this study is to determine whether the difference between the control of endometritis and of urinary tract infection could be explained by an unsuitable regression model or by an unsuitable care policy concerning urinary cares. This study includes (1) the analysis of historic data of the network and (2) the description of French guidelines for maternity cares and available evaluations, concerning endometritis and urinary tract infection prevention. Univariate and multivariate odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for the total study period of 1999-2013, for these infections and their risk factors. The endometritis frequency is decreasing, in association with no significant evolution of associated risk factors, but urinary tract infection frequency is constant, in association with a increasing trend of its risk factors such as intermittent catheterization and epidural analgesia. In French guidelines, all preventive measures against endometritis are clearly broadcasted by all field operators, and repeated audits have reinforced the control of their application. But preventive measures against urinary tract infection seem to be broadcasted exclusively in the circle of infection prevention agencies and not in the obstetrics societies or in the Health Ministry communication. Urinary tract infection prevention requires a clearer public and professional policy in favor of a more efficient urinary cares, with a specific target to maternity.
Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico , Endometritis/prevención & control , Comunicación en Salud , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Infecciones Urinarias/prevención & control , Adulto , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Between 2013 and 2014 a Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) outbreak occurred in a teaching hospital in France. The outbreak was significant possibly due to the lack of implementation of recommended control measures. The aim of this study was to identify the effect of the lack of adherence to control measures for prevention of VRE acquisition in contact patients taking into account individual risk factors. Contact patients (first two months of the outbreak) with VRE acquisition were compared to patients without VRE acquisition (univariate and logistic regression), in terms of institutional characteristics (unit of hospitalization and isolation measures) and risk factors. Between December 2013 and February 2014, 282 contact patients were included in the study. The prevalence of VRE acquisition was 6.4% (18/282). Significant risk factors for VRE acquisition according to logistic regression analysis were; lack of isolation, hospitalization in the same hospital unit as a VRE carrier patient and lack of isolation (RR=856.8, p=0.001), hospitalization in a specific unit (RR=927.4, p=0.002), McCabe score equal to 2 (RR=5233.6, p=0.008), age (RR=1.2 by year, p=0.011), hemodialysis (RR=36.1, p=0.011), central venous catheter (RR=25.4, p=0.021) and surgery (RR=0.012, p=0.007). Antibiotic use was a significant risk factor for VRE acquisition using univariate analysis (p<10-3). The findings confirm that the factors focused on by the study (lack of isolation and dedicated unit) had a significant effect on VRE acquisition as patient associated factors. It highlights the importance of observance of the guidelines.
Asunto(s)
Portador Sano/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Brotes de Enfermedades , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/epidemiología , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina/aislamiento & purificación , Anciano , Portador Sano/microbiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Hospitales de Enseñanza , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Masculino , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: According to the World Health Organization guidelines, field tests, in the context of a bid for the supply of alcohol-based hand rubs, should take into account climatic region, test period, products already in use, and type of use (hygienic or surgical) when assessing tolerance. This laborious method is often contested. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a post hoc analysis of the data of a large bid, including 5 factors, to validate the relevance of their inclusion. METHODS: For the purposes of the bid, products were compared in terms of the 4 World Health Organization tolerance criteria (appearance, intactness, moisture content, sensation) during product testing and were separated into groups on the basis of the studied factors. The post hoc analysis method included (1) comparison of the mean before-and-after difference based on the self-evaluation of the skin with the 4 World Health Organization tolerance criteria, between climatic regions, periods, products in use, test product, and the type of use; (2) generalized linear models, taking into account all studied factors. RESULTS: The analysis included data for 1,925 pairs of professionals. The means of the differences observed were independently and significantly associated with the test period (P<.001), the hygienic or surgical use (P=.010 to .041, not significant for appearance), the product already in use (significant for appearance P=.021), and the test product (P<.001). The association with climatic region was found to be significant only in the nonadjusted analysis. CONCLUSION: The type of use, the test period, and the product in use should be taken into account when designing field tests of alcohol-based hand rubs.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Desinfección de las Manos/métodos , Desinfectantes para las Manos , Clima , Desinfectantes para las Manos/administración & dosificación , Desinfectantes para las Manos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Proyectos de Investigación , Autoinforme , TemperaturaRESUMEN
Intensive care unit patients exposed to multiple devices but free of hospital-acquired infection (HAI) until discharge were identified through a surveillance network of HAIs in Lyon, France, between 2003 and 2011. Multiexposed patients were defined according to the tenth deciles of length of stay and exposures to invasive devices. Overall, 982 (5.0%) multiexposed patients were identified; 154 (15.7%) remained uninfected. Multiexposed infected patients differed from noninfected patients regarding length of exposures and mortality.
Asunto(s)
Catéteres/efectos adversos , Infección Hospitalaria , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Intubación/efectos adversos , Intubación/instrumentación , Anciano , Microbiología Ambiental , Femenino , Humanos , Control de Infecciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To measure the compliance and the quality of HH practices and the knowledge of the healthcare workers' of the university dental care center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All educators and students present were eligible for inclusion in the study. Each healthcare professional was observed in care situation over a period of 30 min. The knowledge, attitudes and opinions were collected through a questionnaire. RESULTS: Number of healthcare professionals included was 190 (64.4%). Study group consisted of 151 students (74.4%) and 39 educators (42.4%). Out of a total number of expected disinfection of hands (993), 396 were made (39.9%). Educators had a higher compliance rates than students (63.7-35.8%, P = 10(-9)). Large differences were found between care situations (compliance higher before the first care to a patient and lower during installation of patient in dental X-ray area or at exit of dental X-ray area). Concerning hand rubbing (HR), 36.6% were performed correctly, and the main error was all steps of HR not observed (54.4%), and shorter duration (46.7%). The observance and the quality of HR were associated with better knowledge. CONCLUSION: This data suggests areas of improvement: (1) A comprehensive intervention including care organization/clinic ergonomics/planning/anticipation of materials needed for care; (2) the development of HH education program should include the educators, since the behavior of students is strongly influenced and formed by their mentor's attitude and behaviors.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Placing patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in the prone position has been shown to improve survival as compared to the supine position. However, a higher frequency of pressure ulcers has been reported in patients in the prone position. The objective of this study was to verify the impact of prone positioning on pressure ulcers in patients with severe ARDS. METHODS: This was an ancillary study of a prospective multicentre randomised controlled trial in patients with severe ARDS in which the early application of long prone-positioning sessions was compared to supine positioning in terms of mortality. Pressure ulcers were assessed at the time of randomisation, 7 days later and on discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU), using the four-stage Pressure Ulcers Advisory Panel system. The primary end-point was the incidence (with reference to 1,000 days of invasive mechanical ventilation or 1,000 days of ICU stay) of new patients with pressure ulcers at stage 2 or higher from randomisation to ICU discharge. RESULTS: At randomisation, of the 229 patients allocated to the supine position and the 237 patients allocated to the prone position, the number of patients with pressure ulcers was not significantly different between groups. The incidence of new patients with pressure ulcers from randomisation to ICU discharge was 20.80 and 14.26/1,000 days of invasive mechanical ventilation (P = 0.061) and 13.92 and 7.72/1,000 of ICU days (P = 0.002) in the prone and supine groups, respectively. Position group [odds ratio (OR) 1.5408, P = 0.0653], age >60 years (OR 1.5340, P = 0.0019), female gender (OR 0.5075, P = 0.019), body mass index of >28.4 kg/m(2) (OR 1.9804, P = 0.0037), and a Simplified Acute Physiology Score II at inclusion of >46 (OR 1.2765, P = 0.3158) were the covariates independently associated to the acquisition of pressure ulcers. CONCLUSION: In patients with severe ARDS, prone positioning was associated with a higher frequency of pressure ulcers than the supine position. Prone positioning improves survival in patients with severe ARDS and, therefore, survivors who received this intervention had a greater likelihood of having pressure ulcers documented as part of their follow-up. There are risk groups for the development of pressure ulcers in severe ARDS, and these patients need surveillance and active prevention.
Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Posicionamiento del Paciente/efectos adversos , Úlcera por Presión/etiología , Posición Prona , Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Grave/terapia , Posición Supina , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Úlcera por Presión/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Respiración Artificial , Factores de Riesgo , Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Grave/mortalidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Previous trials involving patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) have failed to show a beneficial effect of prone positioning during mechanical ventilatory support on outcomes. We evaluated the effect of early application of prone positioning on outcomes in patients with severe ARDS. METHODS: In this multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial, we randomly assigned 466 patients with severe ARDS to undergo prone-positioning sessions of at least 16 hours or to be left in the supine position. Severe ARDS was defined as a ratio of the partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) of less than 150 mm Hg, with an FiO2 of at least 0.6, a positive end-expiratory pressure of at least 5 cm of water, and a tidal volume close to 6 ml per kilogram of predicted body weight. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who died from any cause within 28 days after inclusion. RESULTS: A total of 237 patients were assigned to the prone group, and 229 patients were assigned to the supine group. The 28-day mortality was 16.0% in the prone group and 32.8% in the supine group (P<0.001). The hazard ratio for death with prone positioning was 0.39 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25 to 0.63). Unadjusted 90-day mortality was 23.6% in the prone group versus 41.0% in the supine group (P<0.001), with a hazard ratio of 0.44 (95% CI, 0.29 to 0.67). The incidence of complications did not differ significantly between the groups, except for the incidence of cardiac arrests, which was higher in the supine group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe ARDS, early application of prolonged prone-positioning sessions significantly decreased 28-day and 90-day mortality. (Funded by the Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique National 2006 and 2010 of the French Ministry of Health; PROSEVA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00527813.).
Asunto(s)
Respiración con Presión Positiva , Posición Prona , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oxígeno/sangre , Respiración con Presión Positiva/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/mortalidadRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To make a field comparison of the effectiveness, ease of use, and cost of a chlorhexidine antiseptic solution (CBA) and an alcohol-based povidone-iodine solution (PVP-IA) for the prevention of central venous catheter (CVC)-related infections in an intensive care unit, with the aim of identifying the superior antisepsis agent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We measured the CVC colonization and infection incidence for PVP-IA (Betadine alcoolique(®)) and for CBA (Biseptine(®)) during two successive 1-year periods of routine surveillance (REA RAISIN network). A questionnaire on the ease of CBA use was administered. Consumption data were obtained from the hospital pharmacy. RESULTS: The study included 806 CVC (CBA period: 371). Upon switching from PVP-IA to CBA, we recorded a significant reduction in colonization incidence/100 catheter days (1.12 vs. 1.55, p=0.041), nonsignificant differences concerning CVC-related infection incidence/100 catheter days (0.28 vs. 0.26, p=0.426), and a nonsignificant reduction in CVC-related bacteremia/100 catheter days (0.14 vs. 0.30, p=0.052). PVP-IA users were at significantly higher risk of CVC colonization or infection based on a multivariate Cox model analysis (relative risk [95% CI]: 1.48 [1.01-2.15], p=0.043). The main drawbacks of CBA use were its low cleansing activity and its colorless solution. No cost advantage was found. CONCLUSIONS: Our field study revealed no major clinical advantage of CBA use in CVC infection and no cost advantage in addition to limited ease of use.
Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Clorhexidina/uso terapéutico , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Povidona Yodada/uso terapéutico , Antiinfecciosos Locales/economía , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Bacteriemia/etiología , Clorhexidina/economía , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Costos de los Medicamentos , Contaminación de Equipos , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Povidona Yodada/economía , Prohibitinas , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The 3ml volume currently used as the hand hygiene (HH) measure has been explored as the pertinent dose for an indirect indicator of HH compliance. A multicenter study was conducted in order to ascertain the required dose using different products. METHOD: The average contact duration before drying was measured and compared with references. Effective hand coverage had to include the whole hand and the wrist. Two durations were chosen as points of reference: 30s, as given by guidelines, and the duration validated by the European standard EN 1500. Each product was to be tested, using standardized procedures, by three nosocomial infection prevention teams, for three different doses (3, 2 and 1.5ml). RESULTS: Data from 27 products and 1706 tests were analyzed. Depending on the product, the dose needed to ensure a 30-s contact duration in 75% of tests ranging from 2ml to more than 3ml, and to ensure a contact duration exceeding the EN 1500 times in 75% of tests ranging from 1.5ml to more than 3ml. The aftermath interpretation is the following: if different products are used, the volume utilized does not give an unbiased estimation of the HH compliance. Other compliance evaluation methods remain necessary for efficient benchmarking.
Asunto(s)
Desinfectantes/farmacología , Desinfección de las Manos/normas , Higiene de las Manos/normas , Benchmarking , Sesgo , Seguridad de Productos para el Consumidor , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Estudios Transversales , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Francia , Desinfección de las Manos/métodos , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Control de Infecciones/normas , Masculino , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to evaluate maternal nosocomial infection rates according to the incision technique used for caesarean delivery, in a routine surveillance study. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective study of 5123 cesarean deliveries (43.2% Joel-Cohen, 56.8% Pfannenstiel incisions) in 35 maternity units (Mater Sud Est network). Data on routine surveillance variables, operative duration, and three additional variables (manual removal of the placenta, uterine exteriorization, and/or cleaning of the parieto-colic gutter) were collected. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for infection. RESULTS: The overall nosocomial infection and endometritis rates were higher for the Joel-Cohen than Pfannenstiel incision (4.5% vs. 3.3%, 0.8% vs. 0.3%, respectively). The higher rate of nosocomial infections with the Joel-Cohen incision was due to a greater proportion of patients presenting risk factors (i.e., emergency delivery, primary cesarean, blood loss > or =800 mL, no manual removal of the placenta and no uterine exteriorization). However, the Joel-Cohen technique was an independent risk factor for endometritis. CONCLUSION: The Joel-Cohen technique is faster than the Pfannenstiel technique but is associated with a higher incidence of endometritis.
Asunto(s)
Cesárea/efectos adversos , Cesárea/métodos , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Endometritis/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Infección Hospitalaria/etiología , Endometritis/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Modelos Logísticos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
AIM AND BACKGROUND: To show results of the first year of an infection surveillance network for haemodialysis patients (Dialin). In order to improve the security and quality of care, six haemodialysis centers have organized an infection watching network. The purpose of the network is to compare of the watching results between centers. This comparison includes vascular access infection (VAI), bacteraemia and C viral hepatitis. The heterogeneous pattern has been also taken into account. SURVEY TYPE: Multicenter prospective permanent survey. POPULATION: Six hundred and sixty-four haemodialyzed chronic patients, followed during one year (2005), in six voluntary haemodialysis centers. This survey has based on 71,688 treatment sessions corresponding to 6257.5 months of haemodialysis (HM). METHODS: As with the heterogeneity among centers, the acquired infection standardized ratios (observed/expected) (AISR) and 95% confidence interval are computed with Cox model which includes confounding factors found in literature or in the preliminary stage of the survey. RESULTS: VAI crude rate was 0.47 per 100HM, 0.10 per 1000 native fistulae utilisation days, 0.45 per 1000 days of prosthetic graft utilisation and 0.44 per 1000 days of catheter utilisation. Bacteraemia crude incidence rate was 0.69 per 100HM, 0.02 per 1000 days of native fistulae utilisation, 0.00 per 1000 days of prosthetic graft utilisation and 0.39 per 1000 days of catheter utilisation. No new case of C viral hepatitis was found. Prevalence rate at the beginning of the survey was 5.3% (35 over 664). Two centers had a significantly high AISR for VAI and two centers had a significantly low AISR for VAI. One center had a significantly high AISR for bacteraemia and one center had a significantly low AISR for bacteraemia. CONCLUSIONS: The first year of Dialin running demonstrates the importance of standardised surveillance method in VAI and bacteraemia surveillance but not for viral hepatitis.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Vigilancia de la Población , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Anciano , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de RiesgoAsunto(s)
Infecciones por Acinetobacter/prevención & control , Acinetobacter baumannii/efectos de los fármacos , Alcoholes/farmacología , Antiinfecciosos Locales/farmacología , Desinfección de las Manos/métodos , Infecciones por Acinetobacter/transmisión , Alcoholes/química , Antiinfecciosos Locales/química , HumanosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To identify independent risk factors for endometritis and urinary tract infection (UTI) after vaginal delivery, and to monitor changes in nosocomial infection rates and derive benchmarks for prevention. DESIGN: Prospective study. METHODS: We analyzed routine surveillance data for all vaginal deliveries between January 1997 and December 2003 at 66 maternity units participating in the Mater Sud-Est surveillance network. Adjusted odds ratios for risk of endometritis or UTI were obtained using a logistic regression model. RESULTS: The overall incidence rates were 0.5% for endometritis and 0.3% for UTI. There was a significant decrease in the incidence and risk of endometritis but not of UTI during the 7-year period. Significant risk factors for endometritis were fever during labor, parity of 1, and instrumental delivery and/or manual removal of the placenta. Significant risk factors for UTI were urinary infection on admission, premature rupture of membranes (more than 12 hours before admission), blood loss of more than 800 mL, parity of 1, instrumental delivery, and receipt of more than 5 vaginal digital examinations. Each maternity unit received a poster showing graphs of the number of expected and observed cases of UTI and endometritis associated with vaginal deliveries, which enabled each maternity unit to determine their rank within the network and to initiate prevention programs. CONCLUSIONS: Although routine surveillance means additional work for maternity units, our results demonstrate the usefulness of regular targeted monitoring of risk factors and of the most common nosocomial infections in obstetrics. Most of the information needed for monitoring is already present in the patients' records.
Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Parto Obstétrico/efectos adversos , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Endometritis/epidemiología , Infecciones Urinarias/epidemiología , Adulto , Infección Hospitalaria/etiología , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Endometritis/etiología , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Modelos Logísticos , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Embarazo , Factores de Riesgo , Infecciones Urinarias/etiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the adjusted rates of surgical site infection (SSI) and urinary tract infection (UTI) after cesarean delivery decrease in maternity units that perform active healthcare-associated infection surveillance. DESIGN: Trend analysis by means of multiple logistic regression. SETTING: A total of 80 maternity units participating in the Mater Sud-Est surveillance network. PATIENTS: A total of 37,074 cesarean deliveries were included in the surveillance from January 1, 1997, through December 31, 2003. METHODS: We used a logistic regression model to estimate risk-adjusted post-cesarean delivery infection odds ratios. The variables included were the maternity units' annual rate of operative procedures, the level of dispensed neonatal care, the year of delivery, maternal risk factors, and the characteristics of cesarean delivery. The trend of risk-adjusted odds ratios for SSI and UTI during the study period was studied by linear regression. RESULTS: The crude rates of SSI and UTI after cesarean delivery were 1.5% (571 of 37,074 patients) and 1.8% (685 of 37,074 patients), respectively. During the study period, the decrease in SSI and UTI adjusted odds ratios was statistically significant (R=-0.823 [P=.023] and R=-0.906 [P=.005], respectively). CONCLUSION: Reductions of 48% in the SSI rate and 52% in the UTI rate were observed in the maternity units. These unbiased trends could be related to progress in preventive practices as a result of the increased dissemination of national standards and a collaborative surveillance with benchmarking of rates.