N-acetylcysteine as an antidote for paracetamol poisoning: a multicenter study. / Estudio multicéntrico sobre el tratamiento con N-acetilcisteína como antídoto en la intoxicación por paracetamol.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the most common problems related to use of N-acetylcysteine to reverse the toxic effects of paracetamol poisoning. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective descriptive observational study of clinical records for patients treated for paracetamol poisoning in 4 emergency departments during 3 years (2017-2019). We analyzed epidemiologic, clinical, and care variables, especially those related to the suitability and safety of using N-acetylcysteine as an antidote. RESULTS: We included 332 cases of poisoning of 260 patients (78%) were over the age of 16 years, and 242 (73%) were female. Two hundred sixty-eight poisonings (81%) were the result of voluntary intake. The elimination half-life was determined in 20 cases (6%). Gastrointestinal decontamination was incorrectly prescribed on 39 occasions (28%). Treatment with the antidote was begun in 195 cases (58.7%). No serious clinical signs or symptoms were present in 282 cases (85%). The correlation of paracetamol levels in urine was stronger with the amount of drug ingested voluntarily (R2 = 0.23) than with accidental intake (R2 = 0.007). Predefined severity criteria were significantly related to reported dose ingested per body weight (P = .001) and the interval between intake and first medical assistance (P = .008). CONCLUSION: Even though clear protocols are available to guide the use of antidote treatment in cases of paracetamol poisoning, variability in fundamental aspects of management is excessive.

OBJETIVO: Conocer los aspectos clínicos relacionados con el tratamiento del antídoto N-acetilcisteína (NAC) en las intoxicaciones por paracetamol. METODO: Estudio observacional y retrospectivo de los pacientes atendidos por intoxicación por paracetamol en cuatro servicios de urgencias durante 3 años (2017-2019). Se analizan variables epidemiológicas, clínicas y asistenciales, así como la idoneidad y seguridad en el empleo del tratamiento antidótico. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 332 intoxicaciones: 260 casos (78%) tenían más de 16 años y 242 (73%) fueron mujeres. Doscientos sesenta y ocho intoxicaciones (81%) fueron de causa voluntaria y la semivida de eliminación se determinó en 20 ocasiones (6%). La descontaminación digestiva se indicó de forma incorrecta en 39 ocasiones (28%). Se inició tratamiento con antídoto en 195 casos (58,7%). En 282 casos (85%) no hubo ninguna clínica de gravedad. La correlación entre la dosis referida ingerida y la paracetamolemia en los casos de ingesta voluntaria (R2 = 0,23) fue más fuerte que en los casos de ingesta accidental (R2 = 0,007). Existieron diferencias estadísticamente significativas al relacionar los criterios de gravedad con la dosis referida ajustada al peso (p = 0,001) y el intervalo desde la ingesta y la primera asistencia médica (p = 0,008). CONCLUSIONES: Existe variabilidad en aspectos fundamentales del tratamiento antidótico en las intoxicaciones por paracetamol, a pesar de estar claramente protocolizado su manejo.

Individuals With SARS-CoV-2 Infection During the First and Second Waves in Catalonia, Spain: Retrospective Observational Study Using Daily Updated Data.

BACKGROUND: A description of individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection comparing the first and second waves could help adapt health services to manage this highly transmissible infection. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe the epidemiology of individuals with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection, and the characteristics of patients with a positive test comparing the first and second waves in Catalonia, Spain. METHODS: This study had 2 stages. First, we analyzed daily updated data on SARS-CoV-2 infection in individuals from Girona (Catalonia). Second, we compared 2 retrospective cohorts of patients with a positive reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction or rapid antigen test for SARS-CoV-2. The severity of patients with a positive test was defined by their admission to hospital, admission to intermediate respiratory care, admission to the intensive care unit, or death. The first wave was from March 1, 2020, to June 24, 2020, and the second wave was from June 25, 2020, to December 8, 2020. RESULTS: The numbers of tests and cases were lower in the first wave than in the second wave (26,096 tests and 3140 cases in the first wave versus 140,332 tests and 11,800 cases in the second wave), but the percentage of positive results was higher in the first wave than in the second wave (12.0% versus 8.4%). Among individuals with a positive diagnostic test, 818 needed hospitalization in the first wave and 680 in the second; however, the percentage of hospitalized individuals was higher in the first wave than in the second wave (26.1% versus 5.8%). The group that was not admitted to hospital included older people and those with a higher percentage of comorbidities in the first wave, whereas the characteristics of the groups admitted to hospital were more alike. CONCLUSIONS: Screening systems for SARS-CoV-2 infection were scarce during the first wave, but were more adequate during the second wave, reflecting the usefulness of surveillance systems to detect a high number of asymptomatic infected individuals and their contacts, to help control this pandemic. The characteristics of individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first and second waves differed substantially; individuals in the first wave were older and had a worse health condition.

[Availability in Spain of "one pill killers" and other highly toxic drugs in infants]. / Disponibilidad en España de «one pill killers¼ y otros medicamentos altamente tóxicos en la infancia.

OBJECTIVE: To prepare a list of highly toxic drugs in infants (HTDs) marketed in Spain, comparing those that reach the lethal dose in a child of 10kg with the ingestion of 1 to 3 units. METHOD: HTDs are defined as those capable of causing severe or lethal poisoning in children less than 8-year-old. Severe poisoning is considered as that corresponding to Grade 3 in the Poisoning Severity Score classification and to the "major effects" category in publications in the American Association of Poison Control Centers. A literature review was carried out on the annual reports of the American Association of Poison Control Centers, as well as in PubMed, between January 2000 and February 2019 (Keywords "severe", "fatal", "life-threatening", "poisoning", "child", "paediatric", "toxicological emergency"). An observational, retrospective study was also conducted on infants less than 8-year-old that were seen in a Paediatric Emergency Department due to suspected drug poisoning between July 2012 and June 2018. The active ingredients responsible marketed in Spain were selected, and the lethal or highly toxic doses were determined. The number of units (pills) necessary to reach this dose in children of 10kg was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 7 HTD groups were identified: analgesics; psychotropics and other medication used in neurological disorders; catarrh decongestants - cough -antihistamine - asthma drugs; cardiovascular drugs; antibiotics, topical preparations, and other drugs. In 29 active ingredients, the ingestion of a single pill could cause death in 10kg infant, in another 13, the ingestion of 2 pills could cause death, as well as the ingestion of 3 pills in 10 cases. CONCLUSION: There are numerous HTDs marketed in Spain, some of which are available in potentially fatal presentations with few pills.