Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Neural Transm (Vienna) ; 118(11): 1609-12, 2011 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21479865

RESUMEN

Making an accurate diagnosis of dementia in Parkinson's disease (PD-D) patients is a challenge that neurologists will have to face in the coming years. In 2007, a Task force of the Movement Disorders Society proposed operational diagnostic criteria for the diagnosis of PD-D, consisting of step I and step II. We assessed the validity of step I with reference to the diagnosis made after a formal neuropsychological evaluation and by applying the current gold standard for the diagnosis of PD-D (DSM IV). Step I had a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 95.5%. Step I displayed a positive predictive value of 70%, a negative predictive value of 97%, and an accuracy of 93.4%. The clinimetric properties observed in our setting suggest that step I may be considered as a good screening tool (negative predictive value of 97%); however, using step I alone to make a diagnosis of PD-D may lead to an overestimation of dementia in PD, particularly in patients with considerable dysexecutive deficits (positive predictive value of 70%). In conclusion, formal neuropsychology and longitudinal follow-up are still required for the diagnosis and categorization of dementia in PD.


Asunto(s)
Comités Consultivos/normas , Algoritmos , Demencia/diagnóstico , Demencia/epidemiología , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas/normas , Enfermedad de Parkinson/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comorbilidad/tendencias , Errores Diagnósticos/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...