Suction in Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy: Evolution, Development, and Outcomes from Experimental and Clinical studies. Results from a Systematic Review.

CONTEXT: Controversy exists regarding the therapeutic benefit of suction use during percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL). OBJECTIVE: To review and highlight the options available in the use of suction for PCNL, and to discuss their strengths and limitations. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic literature search was performed using Scopus, EMBASE, and PubMed. Thirty four studies were included. There was one ex vivo study. Among clinical studies, 24 used a vacuum/suctioning sheath and nine a handpiece suction device/direct-in-scope suction. The suction technique was employed in standard, mini-PCNL, supermini-PCNL, and enhanced supermini­PCNL techniques. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Handpiece suction devices demonstrated better safety and efficiency in treating large stones than nonsuction PCNL and in a much shorter time. Trilogy and ShockPulse-SE were equally effective, safe, and versatile for standard PCNL and mini-PCNL. The heavier handpiece makes Trilogy less ergonomically friendly. Laser suction handpiece devices can potentiate laser lithotripsy by allowing for better laser control with simultaneous suction of small fragments and dust. Integrated suction-based sheaths are available in reusable and disposable forms for mini-PCNL only. Mini-PCNL with suction reported superior outcomes for operative time and stone-free rate to mini-PCNL. This also helped minimize infectious complications by a combination of intrarenal pressure reduction and faster aspiration of irrigation fluid reducing the risk of sepsis, enhance intraoperative vision, and improve lithotripsy efficiency, which makes it a very attractive evolution for PCNL. CONCLUSIONS: Suction devices in PCNL are reforming the way PCNL is being done. Adding suction to mini-PCNL reduces infectious complications and improves the stone-free rate. Our review shows that despite the limited evidence, suction techniques appear to improve PCNL outcomes. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this review, we looked at the intra- and perioperative outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) with the addition of suction. With better stone fragmentation and fewer postoperative infections, this technology is very useful particularly for mini-PCNL.

Ultralow-Dose Intraoperative Computed Tomography During Endoscopic Stone Surgery: A Quality Improvement Project.

Objectives: To improve care in patients with large kidney stones using advanced intraoperative imaging techniques to reduce perioperative radiation exposure, improve stone-free rates (SFRs), and reduce the number of surgical interventions in a quality improvement project. Patients and Methods: Patients with kidney stones appropriate for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) treatment were scheduled into a hybrid operating room for endoscopic surgery (PCNL and/or ureteroscopy) with intent to perform intraoperative CT (ICT). Imaging was performed using an Artis Zeego Care+Clear™ (Siemens) robotic-armed multiplanar fluoroscopy system with collimation to the level of the affected kidney(s). After the initial case, the proprietary CARE™ (combined applications to reduce exposure) protocol was used. When the hybrid room was unavailable, a mobile CT scanner (O-Arm; Medtronics) was used in the traditional room (n = 2). Results: Thirty-one ICTs were performed in 23 consecutive patients during endoscopic stone procedures with a median effective radiation dose of 1.39 mSv per scan, significantly less than the preoperative noncontrast CT (12.02 mSv) in the same patients (p < 0.001). Longitudinal radiation exposure associated with stone treatment significantly decreased by 83% (15.80 to 2.68 mSv, p < 0.001) compared with a similar historical PCNL cohort. Clinically significant residual stones (≥3 mm) were identified at initial ICT in eight patients (35%) and further treated in six patients. One patient had missed residual stone diagnosed 34 days after surgery, which was apparent on re-review of the ICT. Thus, final verified SFR was 87% for all stages. Mean number of procedures improved from 1.77 to 1.30 (p = 0.05) and rate of postoperative CT scans improved from 82% to 26% (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Ultralow-dose ICT was demonstrated to simultaneously improve SFR and number of staged treatments, and greatly reduce the perioperative radiation dose for our patients. The findings support the continued use of this modality to benefit all patients with large stones.