High-Risk ERT for Children With Cardiac Critical Illness.

BACKGROUND: A protocolized extubation readiness test (ERT), including a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT), is recommended for patients who are intubated. This quality-improvement project aimed to improve peri-extubation outcomes by using a high-risk ERT protocol in intubated cardiac patients in addition to a standard-risk protocol. METHODS: After baseline data collection, we implemented a standard-risk ERT protocol (pressure support plus PEEP), followed by a high-risk ERT protocol (PEEP alone) in cardiac subjects who were intubated. The primary outcome, a composite of extubation failure and rescue noninvasive respiratory support, was compared between phases. Ventilator duration and use of postextubation respiratory support were balancing measures. RESULTS: A total of 213 cardiac subjects who were intubated were studied, with extubation failure and rescue noninvasive respiratory support occurring in 10 of 213 (4.7%) and 8 of 213 (3.8%), respectively. We observed a reduction in the composite outcome among the 3 consecutive phases (5/29 [17.2%], 10/110 [9.1%] vs 3/74 [4.1%]; P = .10), but this did not reach statistical significance. In the logistic regression model when adjusting for admission type, the high-risk ERT protocol was associated with a significant reduction of the composite outcome (adjusted odds ratio 0.20, 95% CI 0.04-0.091; P = .037), whereas the standard-risk ERT protocol was not (adjusted odds ratio 0.48, 95% CI 0.15-1.53; P = .21). This was not accompanied by a longer ventilator duration (2.0 [1.0, 3.0], 2.0 [1.0, 4.0] vs 2.0 [1.0, 6.0] days; P = .99). CONCLUSIONS: In this quality-improvement project, a high-risk ERT protocol was implemented with improvement in peri-extubation outcomes among cardiac subjects.

Respiratory Support After Extubation in Children With Pediatric ARDS.

BACKGROUND: Postextubation respiratory support in pediatric ARDS may be used to support the recovering respiratory system and promote timely, successful liberation from mechanical ventilation. This study's aims were to (1) describe the use of postextubation respiratory support in pediatric ARDS from the time of extubation to hospital discharge, (2) identify potential risk factors for postextubation respiratory support, and (3) provide preliminary data for future larger studies. METHODS: This pilot single-center prospective cohort study recruited subjects with pediatric ARDS. Subjects' respiratory status up to hospital discharge, the use of postextubation respiratory support, and how it changed over time were recorded. Analysis was performed comparing subjects who received postextubation respiratory support versus those who did not and compared its use among pediatric ARDS severity categories. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine variables associated with the use of postextubation respiratory support and included oxygenation index (OI), ventilator duration, and weight. RESULTS: Seventy-three subjects with pediatric ARDS, with median age and OI of 4 (0.6-10.5) y and 7.3 (4.9-12.7), respectively, were analyzed. Postextubation respiratory support was provided to 54/73 (74%) subjects: 28/45 (62.2%), 19/21 (90.5%), and 7/7 (100%) for mild, moderate, and severe pediatric ARDS, respectively, (P = .01). OI and mechanical ventilation duration were higher in subjects who received postextubation respiratory support (8.7 [5.4-14] vs 4.6 [3.7-7], P < .001 and 10 [7-17] d vs 4 [2-7] d, P < .001) compared to those who did not. At hospital discharge, 12/67 (18.2%) survivors received home respiratory support (6 subjects died prior to hospital discharge). In the multivariable model, ventilator duration (adjusted odds ratio 1.3 [95% CI 1.0-1.7], P = .050) and weight (adjusted odds ratio 0.95 [95% CI 0.91-0.99], P = .02) were associated with the use of postextubation respiratory support. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of intubated subjects with pediatric ARDS received respiratory support postextubation, and a substantial proportion continued to require it up to hospital discharge.

Respiratory Therapist-Driven Extubation Readiness Testing in a Single Pediatric ICU.

BACKGROUND: There is currently no standardized way to determine suitability for extubation of pediatric ICU (PICU) patients, potentially resulting in prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation. We aimed to design and implement a protocol for screening all intubated PICU patients for extubation readiness. METHODS: We adopted the quality improvement (QI) Model for Improvement with Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles to achieve this aim. This QI project was conducted over 11 months in a multidisciplinary PICU. Outcome measures included the (1) development of a standardized extubation readiness test (ERT) that was acceptable and safe; (2) performance of ERT on > 80% of all mechanically ventilated subjects; and (3) maintenance or reduction in mechanical ventilation duration, extubation failure (non-elective re-intubation within 48 h of extubation), and need for rescue noninvasive ventilation (NIV). Balancing measures were to ensure (1) no compromise of the subject's clinical status; and (2) acceptability of the ERT workflow by medical, nursing, and respiratory therapist (RT) teams. RESULTS: Four PDSA cycles were necessary to achieve the aims of this study. During the QI period, 438 subjects were admitted to the PICU. The ERT was championed by the RTs who conducted the test during office hours. ERT performance increased from 0% (baseline) to 90% (fourth PDSA cycle). Extubation failure rate after implementing ERT was reduced compared to baseline (4/31 [12.9%] vs 3/127 [2.4%], P = .01), whereas need for rescue NIV (3/31 [9.7%] vs 10/127 [7.9%], P = .74) and duration of mechanical ventilation (2 [1-7] d vs 1 [1-3] d, P = .09) were unchanged. PICU length of stay was reduced after implementing ERT (5 [3-10] d vs 3 [1-6] d, P = .01). No subject was destabilized as a result of ERT, and PICU staff found the workflow acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: An acceptable and safe ERT protocol was implemented and found to improve outcomes in PICU subjects on mechanical ventilation.