Adjunctive venous sinus stenting in transvenous embolization of vein of Galen malformations.

BACKGROUND: Vein of Galen malformations are congenital arteriovenous malformations primarily treated by endovascular embolization via transarterial or transvenous approaches. transvenous embolization can be utilized to close the malformation but may be difficult in patients with venous stenosis or blockages, which drive venous hypertension and lead to significant neurologic consequences. Here, we illustrate the atypical placement of an intracranial venous sinus stent to improve outflow after transvenous embolization in pediatric patients with the vein of Galen malformation. METHODS: A retrospective review of clinical databases at two high-volume endovascular centers from January 2018 to March 2023 identified all vein of Galen malformation patients who received a venous sinus stent during transvenous embolization. Clinical data, imaging, angioarchitecture, operative details, postoperative management, and follow-up were reviewed. RESULTS: Three patients presented for transvenous embolization after multiple staged transarterial embolizations of their vein of Galen malformation. Transvenous access was complicated by lateral sinus stenosis, which was temporarily relieved by balloon angioplasty. After transvenous embolization by pressure cooker technique, the dural sinuses were stented using the existing venous guide catheter. Venous angiography demonstrated improved flow across the stenosed areas and post-embolization angiography demonstrated normalized venous drainage with widely patent stents. One patient experienced postoperative oculomotor nerve palsy unrelated to the stent placement. All patients demonstrated a complete cure of their vein of Galen malformations with patent venous sinus stents on follow-up. CONCLUSION: In patients with the vein of Galen malformation and venous hypertension receiving transvenous embolization, venous sinus stenting may be a safe and effective option to reduce aberrant cortical venous drainage and improve normal outflow. Further studies are warranted to investigate its benefit in high-flow vascular malformations.

Higher intracranial positioning of an 8 Fr guide catheter improves efficacy of aspiration thrombectomy in large vessel occlusion stroke.

BACKGROUND: Higher positioning of a large bore guide catheter during endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is hypothesized to potentially improve thrombectomy success. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intracranial guide catheter placement during EVT using a multicenter database. METHODS: We reviewed data on consecutive patients undergoing EVT for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) at three comprehensive stroke centers between October 2019 and December 2022. Participants were allocated to one of two cohorts: intracranial (n=141)-guide catheter tip positioned in the petrous carotid or further distal; and control (n=285)-guide catheter tip below the petrous carotid. Primary outcome was excellent reperfusion (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia (TICI) 2c or better), first pass effect (TICI 2c or better after one pass), and arterial access to final reperfusion time. The unpaired t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Fisher's exact test were used to compare themeans, medians and proportions of the two groups, respectively. P values & lt;0.05 were considered statistically significant two cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 426 patients were included in the analysis. Patients with guide catheter location in the petrous segment or further distal had a significantly higher first-pass effect (111/284, 39.1% vs 37/141, 26.2%, P=0.009). There was no significant difference in final excellent recanalization rates between groups (202/285, 70.9% vs 92/141, 65.2%, P=0.266). Furthermore, intracranial positioning of the guide catheter was associated with significantly shorter time to final recanalization (median 21.0 (13.0-38.0) min vs 30.0 (17.0-48.0) min, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Positioning a large bore guide catheter in the petrous segment or further distal resulted in a significantly higher rate of first pass effect, faster procedural times, and equivalent final excellent reperfusion rates compared with more proximal guide catheter placement for patients with anterior circulation LVO.

Radiographic predictors of neurologic outcomes in patients with basilar artery occlusion: A single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials indicate functional and mortality benefits in endovascular therapy for basilar artery occlusion (BAO). However, these studies only include patients who meet specific prognostic scores. This study investigates radiographic predictors of posterior circulation territory infarcts that may predict neurologic outcome at 90-day post-intervention. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of a prospectively maintained thrombectomy database of all patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy for BAO. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, baseline functional status (mRS), and severity of presenting neurologic deficits (NIHSS) were collected. Pc-ASPECTS, posterior circulation collateral score (PCCS), and basilar artery on computed tomography angiography (BATMAN) measured radiographic characteristics. Core infarct territory was identified. Primary outcomes were good neurologic outcome (mRS 0-3) and poor neurologic outcome (mRS 4-6) at 90-day post-thrombectomy. 90-day mortality was a secondary outcome. RESULTS: About 21.5% of patients achieved a good neurologic outcome. About 32.3% of patients were deceased at 90 days. Receiver operating characteristic analysis shows PCCS collateral scores (AUC = 0.74, SE = 0.03, CI = 0.62-0.74) and BATMAN (AUC = 0.72, SE = 0.04, CI = 0.35-0.49) have potential to differentiate between those with good neurologic outcome from those with poor neurologic outcome. Although there was no statistically significant difference in AUC between the three curves, pc-ASPECTS score trended toward being weaker predictor of neurologic outcome (AUC = 0.49, SE = 0.04, CI = 0.35-0.49). There were significant associations between 90-day poor neurologic outcome and established infarcts within the pons (p = 0.01), left cerebellum (p = 0.01), and left occipital lobe (p = 0.03) on pre-thrombectomy CT. CONCLUSION: Low BATMAN and PCCS collateral scores can be predictors of poor neurologic outcomes at 90-day post-thrombectomy for BAO while pc-ASPECTS score may be a weaker predictor of outcome.

Safety and Efficacy of Conscious Sedation Versus General Anesthesia for Distal Vessel Thrombectomy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Anesthesia modality for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for distal and medium vessel occlusions remains an open question. General anesthesia (GA) may offer advantages over conscious sedation (CS) because of reduced patient movement facilitating catheter navigation, but concerns persist about potential delays and hypotension affecting collateral circulation. METHODS: In our prospectively maintained stroke registry from December 2014 to July 2023, we identified patients with distal and medium vessel occlusions defined as M2, M3, or M4 occlusion; A1 or A2 occlusion; and P1 or P2 occlusion, who underwent EVT for acute ischemic stroke. We compared patients who received CS with those who received GA. Primary outcomes were early neurological improvement (ENI), successful reperfusion, first-pass effect, and good outcome at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included intracerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: Of 279 patients, 69 (24.7%) received GA, whereas 193 (69.2%) received CS. CS was associated with higher odds of ENI compared with GA (odds ratio [OR] 2.59, 95% CI [1.04-6.98], P < .05). CS was also associated with higher rates of successful reperfusion (OR 2.33, 95% CI [1.11-4.93], P < .05). CS nonsignificantly trended toward lower rates of mortality (OR 0.51, 95% CI [0.2-1.3], P = .16). No differences in good outcome at 90 days, intracerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, or first-pass effect were seen. CONCLUSION: The use of CS during EVT seems to be safe and feasible with regard to successful recanalization, hemorrhagic complications, clinical outcome, and mortality. In addition, it may be associated with a higher rate of ENI. Further randomized studies in this specific EVT subpopulation are warranted.

Vein of Galen Malformations.

Significant efforts have been made over the last few decades to improve the diagnosis and management of patients with vein of Galen malformations (VOGMs). The mainstays of treatment remain focused on primary endovascular management by staged transarterial embolizations with adjunctive use of transvenous embolization, medical therapy, and neurosurgical intervention for symptom control in select patients. Innovation in endovascular technology and techniques as well as promising new genomic research elucidating potential therapeutic targets hold significant promise for the future of VOGM treatment.

Endovascular Alternatives to Transhepatic Shunt Creation.

Portomesenteric decompression is often necessary to treat patients with refractory symptoms of portal hypertension. When transjugular or direct intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation is not feasible or is inadequate, surgical portosystemic shunt creation is considered, which carries significant morbidity and mortality in these high-risk patients. Surgery is further complicated in patients with portomesenteric thrombosis who require concurrent thrombectomy and long-term anticoagulation. In this article, we outline the technique for performing advanced endovascular alternatives to intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation including mesocaval and splenorenal shunting. We will also discuss some of the clinical considerations for treating these patients with symptomatic portal hypertension and portomesenteric thrombosis.

Advanced Techniques for Accessing the Portal Vein during Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation.

Transjugular portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement is a widely accepted method for reducing portal pressures in conditions including symptomatic varices, refractory ascites, hepatic hydrothorax, portomesenteric thrombosis, and Budd-Chiari syndrome. The traditional method for performing TIPS involves "blind" access into a portal vein branch from a hepatic vein, typically right portal vein to right hepatic vein, using preoperative imaging and intraoperative wedged portography for guidance. However, standard access technique may not always be feasible due to occluded portal or hepatic veins, distorted anatomy, or prior TIPS. In this article we discuss alternative techniques for accessing the portal vein for TIPS placement when standard methods are not sufficient.

Leveraging the virtual learning environment to enhance medical student engagement with interventional radiology.

PURPOSE: To evaluate medical student engagement with Interventional Radiology (IR) before and after a virtual elective course. METHODS: The elective was nine, one-hour lectures over ten weeks. An anonymous pre and post-course survey was administered to students. The hypothesis was that this course would increase student engagement with IR. Respondents answered nine questions to score their interest in, exposure to, familiarity with, and understanding of IR using a five-point Likert scale. Demographics were reported for the pre-course group only. A Wilcoxon signed-ranked test was performed to assess for significant mean change in pre and post-course responses. Among the 276 registered students, there were 144 individual, complete responses for the pre-course survey, and 60 paired responses for both surveys. RESULTS: Thirty-seven percent of respondents were first or second year medical students. Thirty percent of participants were enrolled at an institution outside of the United States, 26% are the first in their family to attend college, and 41% identified as female. Thirty-six percent reported this virtual course was one of their earliest experiences with IR. There was a significant increase in student exposure to IR generally, familiarity with IR compared to other specialties, familiarity with the IR training pathway(s), understanding of what an Interventional Radiologist does, understanding of the difference between IR and Diagnostic Radiology, and understanding of when to consult IR for patient care after completion of the course. CONCLUSION: A virtual IR elective is an effective means to increase exposure to, familiarity with, and understanding of IR.

Applications of Vascular Imaging and Interventional Radiology Modalities in the Upper Extremity: A Review.

Hand and upper extremity (HUE) vascular disorders are encountered frequently by hand surgeons in clinical practice. A wide array of imaging and vascular interventional radiology modalities exists for the diagnosis and treatment of HUE vascular disorders, some of which may not be familiar to the HUE surgeons. In this review article, we summarize the vascular imaging and vascular interventional radiology modalities and their relative advantages, disadvantages, and indications with respect to HUE pathology. We aim to familiarize HUE surgeons with the available types of diagnostic and therapeutic options for HUE vascular pathologies and aid interdisciplinary communication with vascular interventional radiology specialists during the clinical decision-making process.

Contemporary Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Evolution of Catheter-based Therapy.

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) affects more than 100 000 people in the United States annually and is the third leading cardiovascular cause of death. The standard management for PE is systemic anticoagulation therapy. However, a subset of patients experience hemodynamic decompensation, despite conservative measures. Traditionally, these patients have been treated with systemic administration of thrombolytic agents or open cardiac surgery, although attempts at endovascular treatment have a long history that dates back to the 1960s. The technology for catheter-based therapy for acute PE is rapidly evolving, with multiple devices approved over the past decade. Currently available devices fall into two broad categories of treatment methods: catheter-directed thrombolysis and percutaneous suction thrombectomy. Catheter-directed thrombolysis is the infusion of thrombolytic agents directly into the occluded pulmonary arteries to increase local delivery and decrease the total dose. Suction thrombectomy involves the use of small- or large-bore catheters to mechanically aspirate a clot from the pulmonary arteries without the need for a thrombolytic agent. A thorough understanding of the various risk stratification schemes and the available evidence for each device is critical for optimal treatment of this complex entity. Multiple ongoing studies will improve our understanding of the role of catheter-based therapy for acute PE in the next 5-10 years. A multidisciplinary approach through PE response teams has become the management standard at most institutions. An invited commentary by Bulman and Weinstein is available online. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2022.