Effect of different low doses of intrathecal morphine (0.1 and 0.2 mg) on pain and vital functions in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: a randomised controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Orthopaedic surgeries are among the most painful procedures. By adding low-dose morphine to intrathecal bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia, the analgesic effect can be improved. The objeсtive of the study was tо compare the efficacy and safety of lоw-dоse (0.1 mg аnd 0.2 mg) intrаtheсаl mоrphine (ITM). METHODS: А prоspeсtive rаndоmised study was соnduсted at the Hоspitаl оf Trаumаtоlоgy аnd Оrthоpaediсs, Riga, Latvia (February 2020 tо May 2021) and enrolled 90 patients undergoing primary hip arthroplasty. All subjects were randomised intо three study grоups, using the online tool оn www.randomiser.org . Treatment groups were allocated to intrathecal morphine (0.1 mg and 0.2 mg) in addition to bupivacaine (15 to 18 mg). The primary outcome was postoperative pain intensity among the three study groups within 24 hours by NRS. The secondary outcomes: pain at rest 4 h, 7 h, 12 h, 24 h postoperatively, respiratory rate, SpО2, morphine соnsumptiоn, оxygen supply, opioid-related аdverse reасtiоns within 24 hours postoperatively. Dаtа were аnаlysed using R version 4.2.0, applying the Mann-Whitney test, Pearson's chi-squared test, Fisher's exact test, Friedman test, Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: The primary outcome in the control, ITM 0.1 mg, ITM 0.2 mg groups, respectively: 2.56, 0.87, 0.28 (p < 0.001). The secondary outcomes in the control, ITM 0.1 mg, ITM 0.2 mg group, respectively: pain scores 4h - 1.21, 0.48, 0.17 (p = 0.068); 7 h - 2.62, 1.00, 0.17 (p < 0.001); 12 h - 3.08, 0.65, 0.37 (p < 0.001); 24 h - 2.50, 1.20, 0.41 (p < 0.001); rescue medication requests (incidence, %): 77%, 16.7%, 13.3% (p < 0.001); mean respiratory rate (breath/min) - 15.2; 15.2 (p > 0.05); mean SpO2 (%): 96.7%; 95.7%; 96.07%. Significant adverse effects: pruritus in ITM 0.2 mg group (23% of subjects, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Adult patients undergoing THA under spinal anaesthesia with bupivacaine and 0.2 mg morphine had superior analgesia to patients who received spinal analgesia with bupivacaine or bupivacaine and 0.1 mg morphine. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Study ID ISRCTN37212222; 20/04/2022 (registered retrospectively).

Severe Clostridium difficile infection with extremely high leucocytosis complicated by a concomitant bloodstream infection caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae after osteomyelitis surgery: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Clostridium difficile is one of the most common healthcare-associated infections. Pseudomembranous colitis is a serious complication of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) after septic surgery and antibacterial therapy. A sudden white blood cell (WBC) count increase and extremely high leucocytosis may be a predictor of a poor outcome. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 77 years old male was hospitalised because of lower leg osteomyelitis and was operated. He received antibacterial treatment with Cefazolin for three days and then developed a high WBC count. The course of the disease was fulminant, with a rapid increase in the WBC count up to 132,000/mm3 and a septic shock, and required cardiovascular and ventilatory support. The patient was started on intravenous Metronidazole (500 mg every eight hours) and oral Vancomycin (500 mg every six hours). The patient's condition gradually improved over a period of six days. Then a hyperthermia above 39 degrees Celsius, hypotension and painful abdominal bloating developed, and the WBC count peaked to 186,000/mm3. The blood cultures were positive for Klebsiella pneumoniae. The patient died. DISCUSSION: In our case, we describe a community-onset, healthcare-facility-associated, severe CDI complicated by a blood stream infection. The administration of oral Vancomycin, which is highly active against the intestinal flora, could have been responsible for the persistence and overgrowth of Klebsiella pneumoniae. CONCLUSIONS: Severe CDIs after orthopaedic surgery and antibacterial treatment complicated by the development of nosocomial infection significantly worsen the prognosis of the disease. Careful consideration of antibacterial therapy and early symptom recognition may help prevent catastrophic events.

Are We Meeting the Current Standards of Consent for Anesthesia? An International Survey of Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND International application of existing guidelines and recommendations on anesthesia-specific informed consent is limited by differences in healthcare and legal systems. Understanding national and regional variations is necessary to determine future guidelines. MATERIAL AND METHODS Anonymous paper surveys on their practices regarding anesthesia-specific patient informed consent were sent to anesthesiologists in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. RESULTS A total of 233 responses were received, representing 36%, 26%, and 24% of the practicing anesthesiologists in Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia, respectively. Although 85% of responders in Lithuania reported using separate forms to secure patient informed consent for anesthesia, 54.5% of responders in Estonia and 50% in Latvia reported using joint forms to secure patient informed consent for surgery and anesthesia. Incident rates were understated by 14.2% of responders and overstated by 66.4% (P<0.001), with the latter frequently quoting incident rates that are several to tens of times higher than those published internationally. Physicians obtaining consent in the outpatient setting were more satisfied with the process than those obtaining consent on the day of surgery, with 62.5% and 42.6%, respectively, agreeing that the informed consent forms provided a satisfactory description of complications (P=0.03). Patients were significantly less likely to read consent information when signing forms on the day of surgery than at earlier times (8.5% vs. 67.5%, P<0.001). Only 46.2% of respondents felt legally protected by the current consent process. CONCLUSIONS Anesthesia-specific informed patient consent practices differ significantly in the 3 Baltic states, with these practices often falling short of legal requirements. Efforts should be made to improving information accuracy, patient autonomy, and compliance with existing legal standards.