Emergence of cefiderocol resistance during ceftazidime/avibactam treatment caused by a large genomic deletion, including ampD and piuCD genes, in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

We report the emergence of cefiderocol resistance during the treatment of a ST312 Pseudomonas aeruginosa respiratory infection with ceftazidime/avibactam. whole genome sequencing (WGS) revealed that resistance was caused by a large genomic deletion, including PiuDC (iron transport system) and AmpD (ampC negative regulator), driven by the integration of phage DNA. Thus, our findings alert that this type of deletion could be an efficient (two mechanisms in one step) specific cefiderocol resistance mechanism that might occur nonspecifically upon treatment with ß-lactams that select for AmpC overexpression.

Ceftolozane/tazobactam plus tobramycin against free-floating and biofilm bacteria of hypermutable Pseudomonas aeruginosa epidemic strains: Resistance mechanisms and synergistic activity.

OBJECTIVE: Acute exacerbations of biofilm-associated Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in cystic fibrosis (CF) have limited treatment options. Ceftolozane/tazobactam (alone and with a second antibiotic) has not yet been investigated against hypermutable clinical P. aeruginosa isolates in biofilm growth. This study aimed to evaluate, using an in vitro dynamic biofilm model, ceftolozane/tazobactam alone and in combination with tobramycin at simulated representative lung fluid pharmacokinetics against free-floating (planktonic) and biofilm states of two hypermutable P. aeruginosa epidemic strains (LES-1 and CC274) from adolescents with CF. METHODS: Regimens were intravenous ceftolozane/tazobactam 4.5 g/day continuous infusion, inhaled tobramycin 300 mg 12-hourly, intravenous tobramycin 10 mg/kg 24-hourly, and both ceftolozane/tazobactam-tobramycin combinations. The isolates were susceptible to both antibiotics. Total and less-susceptible free-floating and biofilm bacteria were quantified over 120-168 h. Ceftolozane/tazobactam resistance mechanisms were investigated by whole-genome sequencing. Mechanism-based modelling of bacterial viable counts was performed. RESULTS: Monotherapies of ceftolozane/tazobactam and tobramycin did not sufficiently suppress emergence of less-susceptible subpopulations, although inhaled tobramycin was more effective than intravenous tobramycin. Ceftolozane/tazobactam resistance development was associated with classical (AmpC overexpression plus structural modification) and novel (CpxR mutations) mechanisms depending on the strain. Against both isolates, combination regimens demonstrated synergy and completely suppressed the emergence of ceftolozane/tazobactam and tobramycin less-susceptible free-floating and biofilm bacterial subpopulations. CONCLUSION: Mechanism-based modelling incorporating subpopulation and mechanistic synergy well described the antibacterial effects of all regimens against free-floating and biofilm bacterial states. These findings support further investigation of ceftolozane/tazobactam in combination with tobramycin against biofilm-associated P. aeruginosa infections in adolescents with CF.

In vitro dynamics and mechanisms of cefiderocol resistance development in wild-type, mutator and XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the dynamics and mechanisms of stepwise resistance development to cefiderocol in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. METHODS: Cefiderocol resistance evolution was analysed in WT PAO1, PAOMS (mutS mutator derivate) and three XDR clinical isolates belonging to ST111, ST175 and ST235 clones. Strains were incubated in triplicate experiments for 24 h in iron-depleted CAMHB with 0.06-128 mg/L cefiderocol. Tubes from the highest antibiotic concentration showing growth were reinoculated into fresh medium containing concentrations up to 128 mg/L for 7 consecutive days. Two colonies per strain and experiment were characterized by determining the susceptibility profiles and WGS. RESULTS: Evolution of resistance was significantly enhanced in PAOMS, but was variable for the XDR strains, including levels similar to PAOMS (ST235), similar to PAO1 (ST175) or even below PAO1 (ST111). WGS revealed 2-5 mutations for PAO1 lineages and 35-58 for PAOMS. The number of mutations in the XDR clinical strains ranged from 2 to 4 except for one of the ST235 experiments in which a mutL lineage was selected, thus increasing the number of mutations. The most frequently mutated genes were piuC, fptA and pirR, related to iron uptake. Additionally, an L320P AmpC mutation was selected in multiple lineages and cloning confirmed its major impact on cefiderocol (but not ceftolozane/tazobactam or ceftazidime/avibactam) resistance. Mutations in CpxS and PBP3 were also documented. CONCLUSIONS: This work deciphers the potential resistance mechanisms that may emerge upon the introduction of cefiderocol into clinical practice, and highlights that the risk of resistance development might be strain-specific even for XDR high-risk clones.

Cefiderocol resistance genomics in sequential chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the activity of cefiderocol against sequential P. aeruginosa isolates from chronically-infected cystic fibrosis patients as well as to investigate the potential mechanisms involved in resistance through whole genome sequencing. METHODS: Three sequential P. aeruginosa isolates from each of 50 chronically-colonized cystic fibrosis patients were studied. MICs for novel and classical antipseudomonal agents were determined by broth microdilution and whole genome sequences (n = 150) were obtained to investigate the presence of mutations within a set of chromosomal genes involved in P. aeruginosa antibiotic resistance (n = 40) and iron uptake (n = 120). RESULTS: Cefiderocol showed the lowest MIC50/90 values and its susceptibility rate was comparable to other novel antipseudomonal agents. Clinical resistance was documented in 9 isolates from 6 patients. Resistance genes associated with a statistically significant increase in cefiderocol MICs included ampC, pmrAB, galU, fusA1 and those coding the penicillin-binding proteins PBP2 and PBP3. Likewise, mutations within several genes participating in different iron-uptake systems were found to be significantly associated with resistance, including genes participating in the pyochelin and pyoverdin biosynthesis and several tonB-dependent receptors. Mutator and small colony variants isolates were also associated with increased cefiderocol MICs. DISCUSSION: Cefiderocol resistance is modulated by a complex mutational resistome, potentially conferring cross-resistance to novel beta-lactam beta-lactamase combinations, as well as an extended list of mutated iron-uptake genes. Monitoring the acquisition of mutations in all these genes will be helpful to guide treatments and mitigate the emergence and spread of resistance to this novel antibiotic.

Comparative analysis of in vitro dynamics and mechanisms of ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam resistance development in Pseudomonas aeruginosa XDR high-risk clones.

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the dynamics and mechanisms of stepwise resistance development to ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam in XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical strains. METHODS: XDR clinical isolates belonging to ST111 (main resistance mechanisms: oprD-, dacB-, CARB-2), ST175 (oprD-, ampR-G154R) and ST235 (oprD-, OXA-2) high-risk clones were incubated for 24 h in Müeller-Hinton Broth with 0.125-64 mg/L of ceftolozane + tazobactam 4 mg/L or imipenem + relebactam 4 mg/L. Tubes from the highest antibiotic concentration showing growth were reinoculated into fresh medium containing concentrations up to 64 mg/L for 7 consecutive days. Two colonies per strain from each of the triplicate experiments were characterized by determining the susceptibility profiles, whole genome sequencing (WGS), and in vitro fitness through competitive growth assays. RESULTS: Resistance development occurred more slowly and reached a lower level for imipenem/relebactam than for ceftolozane/tazobactam in all tested XDR strains. Moreover, resistance development to imipenem/relebactam remained low even for ST175 isolates that had developed ceftolozane/tazobactam resistance during therapy. Lineages evolved in the presence of ceftolozane/tazobactam showed high-level resistance, imipenem/relebactam hypersusceptibility and low fitness cost, whereas lineages evolved in the presence of imipenem/relebactam showed moderate (borderline) resistance, no cross-resistance to ceftolozane/tazobactam and high fitness cost. WGS evidenced that ceftolozane/tazobactam resistance was mainly caused by mutations in the catalytic centres of intrinsic (AmpC) or acquired (OXA) ß-lactamases, whereas lineages evolved in imipenem/relebactam frequently showed structural mutations in MexB or in ParS, along with some strain-specific mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Imipenem/relebactam could be a useful alternative for the treatment of XDR P. aeruginosa infections, potentially reducing resistance development during therapy.

In Vivo Evolution of GES ß-Lactamases Driven by Ceftazidime/Avibactam Treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections.

The mechanisms underlying an in vivo switch in the resistance phenotype of P. aeruginosa after ceftazidime-avibactam treatment was investigated. The initial isolate (a blood culture) was resistant to meropenem but remained susceptible to antipseudomonal cephalosporins and combinations with ß-lactamase inhibitors. One week after ceftazidime-avibactam therapy, a subsequent isolate (a rectal swab) recovered from the same patient showed the opposite phenotype. Whole-genome sequence analysis revealed a single SNP difference between both (ST235) isolates, leading to a P162S change in blaGES-5, creating blaGES-15. Thus, blaGES-1, blaGES-5, and blaGES-15 were cloned and expressed in the wild-type strain PAO1. Susceptibility profiles confirmed the P162S substitution reverted the carbapenemase phenotype determined by the G170S change of GES-5 back into the ESBL phenotype of GES-1.

Emergence of Resistance to Novel Cephalosporin-ß-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations through the Modification of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa MexCD-OprJ Efflux Pump.

A ceftolozane-tazobactam- and ceftazime-avibactam-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolate was recovered after treatment (including azithromycin, meropenem, and ceftolozane-tazobactam) from a patient that had developed ventilator-associated pneumonia after COVID-19 infection. Whole-genome sequencing revealed that the strain, belonging to ST274, had acquired a nonsense mutation leading to truncated carbapenem porin OprD (W277X), a 7-bp deletion (nt213Δ7) in NfxB (negative regulator of the efflux pump MexCD-OprJ), and two missense mutations (Q178R and S133G) located within the first large periplasmic loop of MexD. Through the construction of mexD mutants and complementation assays with wild-type nfxB, it was evidenced that resistance to the novel cephalosporin-ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations was caused by the modification of MexD substrate specificity.

In vitro dynamics and mechanisms of resistance development to imipenem and imipenem/relebactam in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

OBJECTIVES: We analysed the dynamics and mechanisms of resistance development to imipenem alone or combined with relebactam in Pseudomonas aeruginosa WT (PAO1) and mutator (PAOMS; ΔmutS) strains. METHODS: PAO1 or PAOMS strains were incubated for 24 h in Mueller-Hinton Broth with 0.125-64 mg/L of imipenem ± relebactam 4 mg/L. Tubes from the highest antibiotic concentration showing growth were reinoculated in fresh medium containing concentrations up to 64 mg/L of imipenem ± relebactam for 7 days. Two colonies per strain, replicate experiment and antibiotic from early (Day 1) and late (Day 7) cultures were characterized by determining the susceptibility profiles, WGS and determination of the expression of ampC and efflux-pump-coding genes. Virulence was studied in a Caenorhabditis elegans infection model. RESULTS: Relebactam reduced imipenem resistance development for both strains, although resistance emerged much faster for PAOMS. WGS indicated that imipenem resistance was associated with mutations in the porin OprD and regulators of ampC, while the mutations in imipenem/relebactam-resistant mutants were located in oprD and regulatoras of MexAB-OprM. High-level imipenem/relebactam resistance was only documented in the PAOMS strain and was associated with an additional specific (T680A) mutation located in the catalytic pocket of ponA (PBP1a) and with reduced virulence in the C. elegans model. CONCLUSIONS: Imipenem/relebactam could be a useful alternative for the treatment of MDR P. aeruginosa infections, potentially reducing resistance development during treatment. Moreover, this work deciphers the potential resistance mechanisms that may emerge upon the introduction of this novel combination into clinical practice.