Comparison of amphotericin B lipid complex, deoxycholate amphotericin B, fluconazole, and anidulafungin activity against Candida albicans biofilm isolated from breakthrough candidemia.

INTRODUCTION: Biofilm formation causes virulence and resistance in Candida albicans. However, little is known about breakthrough candidemia isolates. We evaluated the antifungal activity of fluconazole, anidulafungin, deoxycholate amphotericin B (dAMB), and amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) against biofilms of C. albicans isolated from patients with breakthrough candidemia. METHODS: The present study used strains of C. albicans isolated from breakthrough and non-breakthrough candidemia patients (control group). The susceptibility of planktonic cells to amphotericin B, anidulafungin, and fluconazole was determined by broth microdilution. Antifungal activity in sessile cells was evaluated using the minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC), metabolic activity was estimated by reducing MTT, and biomass was estimated using crystal violet retention. RESULTS: The planktonic strains were susceptible to amphotericin B, anidulafungin, and fluconazole, with minimum inhibitory concentrations of 1, ≤0.03, and 2mg/L, respectively. However, fluconazole and anidulafungin did not exert an antifungal effect on biofilms. Additionally, dAMB and ABCL reduced the metabolic activity and biomass. However, eradication was only achieved using 16mg/L dAMB. C. albicans isolates of breakthrough candidemia exhibited strong biofilm production, and the in vitro activity of available therapeutic options was poor. CONCLUSION: In the present study, only dAMB and ABCL exhibited antibiofilm effects against sessile breakthrough candidemia isolates.

Evaluation of Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans biofilms adherence to PEEK and titanium-alloy prosthetic spine devices.

BACKGROUND: Titanium and polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) interbody cages are commonly used for spine fusion. Few data are known about bacterial and yeast biofilms formation in these implants. The aim of this study was to compare Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans biofilm formation in the surface of two different interbody devices used routinely in spine surgery. METHODS: Six bodies of proof specimens of PEEK and titanium alloy were used for microbiological tests, scanning electron microscopy, and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Experimental biofilm was produced with Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans, followed by quantitative analysis of planktonic cells and sessile cells. The comparison between the medians of biofilm quantification between the two models was performed using the Mann-Whitney test and considered the statistical difference for a p < 0.05. RESULTS: In the S. aureus model, in both planktonic and sessile cell counts, titanium-alloy samples showed lower values for colony forming units per milliliter (UFC/mL) (p < 0.05). The evaluation through the optic density of planktonic and sessile cells showed lower values in the titanium-alloy samples, however, only statistically significant in planktonic cell count (p < 0.05). The count of planktonic yeast cells in PEEK was similar to titanium-alloy samples, while the count of sessile yeast cells in titanium alloy was lower when compared to PEEK (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Titanium-alloy models were associated with less staphylococcal and Candida biofilm formation when compared with PEEK.