RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Hospitalizations of high-risk infants are among the most expensive in the United States, with many requiring surgery and months of intensive care. Healthcare costs and resource use associated with hospitalized infant opioid exposure are less well known. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of high-risk infants aged <1 y admitted from 47 children's hospitals from 2010 to 2020 was identified from Pediatric Healthcare Information System. High-risk infants were identified by International Classification of Diseases 9/10 codes for congenital heart disease procedures, medical and surgical necrotizing enterocolitis, extremely low birth weight, very low birth weight, hypoxemic ischemic encephalopathy, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and gastrointestinal tract malformations. Healthcare resource utilization was estimated using standardized unit costs (SUCs). The impact of opioid use on SUC was examined using general linear models and an instrumental variable. RESULTS: Overall, 126,897 high-risk infants were identified. The cohort was majority White (57.1%), non-Hispanic (72.0%), and male (55.4%). Prematurity occurred in 26.4% and a majority underwent surgery (77.9%). Median SUC was $120,585 (interquartile range: $57,602-$276,562) per infant. On instrumental variable analysis, each day of opioid use was associated with an increase of $4406 in SUC. When adjusting for biologic sex, race, ethnicity, insurance type, diagnosis category, number of comorbidities, mechanical ventilation, and total parental nutrition use, each day of opioid use was associated with an increase of $2177 per infant. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged opioid use is significantly associated with healthcare utilization and costs for high-risk infants, even when accounting for comorbidities, intensive care, ventilation, and total parental nutrition use. Future studies are needed to estimate the long-term complications and additional costs resulting from prolonged opioid exposures in high-risk infants.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Over the last decade, the intravenous (IV) formulation of acetaminophen (APAP) has gained popularity as a safe and effective first-line analgesic in the neonatal intensive care unit and it is especially useful in peri-operative settings where oral agents are contraindicated. The primary objective was to examine the outcomes and costs associated with the use of IV APAP in combination with opioids versus opioids alone as a pain management strategy after neonatal esophageal atresia (EA) and tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) repair. METHODS: Data from the Pediatric Health Information System was used to examine 1137 hospitalizations for EA/TEF repair from October 2015 to September 2018. Neonates administered opioids only, or IV APAP in combination with opioids as pain management, were included. RESULTS: Neonates receiving IV APAP experienced a longer median LOS, but a significantly lower mortality rate, a decreased mean daily cost, and reduced opioid use compared to neonates given only opioids. The two groups had no significant differences in pharmacy and total costs. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the use of IV APAP alongside opioids in EA/TEF repair is associated with reduced mortality and opioid use, as well as longer LOS.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The role of altruism in the acceptance of novel preventive healthcare technologies like vaccines has not been thoroughly elucidated. METHODS: We 1:1 randomized n = 2004 Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) participants residing in the USA into a control or treatment arm with vaccination decisions framed altruistically, to elicit their preferences for COVID-19 vaccination using web-based discrete choice experiments. We used conditional and mixed logit models to estimate the impact of framing decisions in terms of altruism on vaccination acceptance. RESULTS: Valid responses were provided by 1674 participants (control, n = 848; treatment, n = 826). Framing vaccination decisions altruistically had no significant effect on vaccination acceptance. Further, respondents' degree of altruism had no association with vaccination acceptance. LIMITATIONS: The MTurk sample may not be representative of the American population. We were unable to ascertain concordance between stated and revealed preferences. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Framing vaccination decisions in terms of altruism does not appear to significantly influence vaccination acceptance and may not be an effective nudging mechanism to increase the uptake of novel vaccines. Instead, a favorable vaccination profile appears to be the primary driver of uptake.
Asunto(s)
Altruismo , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Conducta de Elección , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/psicología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Vacunación/psicologíaRESUMEN
Importance: High-risk infants, defined as newborns with substantial neonatal-perinatal morbidities, often undergo multiple procedures and require prolonged intubation, resulting in extended opioid exposure that is associated with poor outcomes. Understanding variation in opioid prescribing can inform quality improvement and best-practice initiatives. Objective: To examine regional and institutional variation in opioid prescribing, including short- and long-acting agents, in high-risk hospitalized infants. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study assessed high-risk infants younger than 1 year from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2022, at 47 children's hospitals participating in the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS). The cohort was stratified by US Census region (Northeast, South, Midwest, and West). Variation in cumulative days of opioid exposure and methadone treatment was examined among institutions using a hierarchical generalized linear model. High-risk infants were identified by International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision codes for congenital heart disease surgery, medical and surgical necrotizing enterocolitis, extremely low birth weight, very low birth weight, hypoxemic ischemic encephalopathy, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and other abdominal surgery. Infants with neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome, in utero substance exposure, or malignant tumors were excluded. Exposure: Any opioid exposure and methadone treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: Regional and institutional variations in opioid exposure. Results: Overall, 132â¯658 high-risk infants were identified (median [IQR] gestational age, 34 [28-38] weeks; 54.5% male). Prematurity occurred in 30.3%, and 55.3% underwent surgery. During hospitalization, 76.5% of high-risk infants were exposed to opioids and 7.9% received methadone. Median (IQR) length of any opioid exposure was 5 (2-12) cumulative days, and median (IQR) length of methadone treatment was 19 (7-46) cumulative days. There was significant hospital-level variation in opioid and methadone exposure and cumulative days of exposure within each US region. The computed intraclass correlation coefficient estimated that 16% of the variability in overall opioid prescribing and 20% of the variability in methadone treatment was attributed to the individual hospital. Conclusions and Relevance: In this retrospective cohort study of high-risk hospitalized infants, institution-level variation in overall opioid exposure and methadone treatment persisted across the US. These findings highlight the need for standardization of opioid prescribing in this vulnerable population.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Lactante , Femenino , Embarazo , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Niño , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Metadona , Hospitales Pediátricos , Recien Nacido con Peso al Nacer Extremadamente BajoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) hospitalizations have increased since the 2014 guideline update recommended against the use of palivizumab for preterm infants born ≥29 0/7 weeks' gestational age (GA) without additional risk factors. A novel drug candidate, nirsevimab, has been developed for this population. We analyzed the cost-effectiveness of palivizumab/nirsevimab vs. no prophylaxis in this population. METHODS: A hybrid-Markov model predicted the RSV clinical course in the first year of life and sequelae in the subsequent four years for preterm infants from the healthcare and societal perspectives. Model parameters were derived from the literature. We calculated costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) to produce an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) evaluated at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000/QALY. Sensitivity analyses assessed model robustness. A threshold analysis examined nirsevimab pricing uncertainty. RESULTS: Compared to no prophylaxis, palivizumab costs $9572 and $9584 more from the healthcare and societal perspectives, respectively, with 0.0019 QALYs gained per patient over five years, resulting in ICERs >$5 million per QALY from each perspective. Results were robust to parameter uncertainties; probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that no prophylaxis had a 100% probability of being cost-effective. The threshold analysis suggested that nirsevimab is not cost-effective when compared to no prophylaxis if the price exceeds $1962 from a societal perspective. CONCLUSION: Palivizumab is dominated by no prophylaxis for preterm infants 29 0/7-34 6/7 weeks' GA with no additional risk factors. Relevant stakeholders should consider alternatives to palivizumab for this population that are both effective and economical.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Embarazo , Femenino , Palivizumab/uso terapéutico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Edad Gestacional , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/prevención & control , Virus Sincitiales Respiratorios , HospitalizaciónRESUMEN
Class III malocclusion for individuals with cleft lip and palate has historically been managed with surgery. Orthodontic protraction is a noninvasive alternative that may be associated with lower costs. This analysis investigated the budget impact of protraction versus surgery from an institutional perspective. Using a decision tree, analysis was conducted using costs derived from Medicaid reimbursement codes and using actual institutional reimbursement. Probabilities of success, failure, and complications were based on a clinical trial comparing the 2 treatment modalities. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses tested the robustness of results to model parameters. Based on Medicaid fee schedules and failure rates requiring additional surgery, the total cost of protraction was $79,506 versus $172,807 for surgery, resulting in $93,302 cost-savings per patient. The cost and probability of surgery success, as well as the cost of surgery failure and repeat surgery, had the largest impact on these cost-savings. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed cost-savings of nearly $92,000 or higher in >50% of simulations. This study showed that protraction is associated with lower costs than surgery and may present a cost-effective alternative to surgery in eligible, appropriate patients.
Asunto(s)
Labio Leporino , Fisura del Paladar , Maloclusión de Angle Clase III , Humanos , Labio Leporino/cirugía , Fisura del Paladar/cirugíaRESUMEN
Inappropriate dental antibiotic prescriptions to prevent infective endocarditis in the United States results in â¼$31 million in excess costs to the healthcare system and patients. This includes out-of-pocket costs ($20.5 million), drug costs ($2.69 million) and adverse event costs (eg, Clostridioides difficile and hypersensitivity) of $5.82 million (amoxicillin), $1.99 million (clindamycin), and $380,849 (cephalexin).
Asunto(s)
Endocarditis Bacteriana , Endocarditis , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Profilaxis Antibiótica/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Amoxicilina , Endocarditis/etiología , Endocarditis/prevención & control , OdontologíaRESUMEN
Importance: Autistic children have poorer oral health and greater oral care challenges, which are often associated with sensory overresponsivity, than neurotypical peers. It is important to identify innovative solutions enabling dentists to successfully perform standard clinic-based procedures for this population. Objective: To determine whether a sensory-adapted dental environment (SADE) reduces physiological and behavioral distress in autistic children undergoing dental cleanings, compared with a regular dental environment (RDE). Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized crossover trial was conducted at a pediatric dentistry clinic in a large urban children's hospital between May 2016 and April 2022. Coders were blinded to study condition for physiological but not behavioral measurements. Autistic children aged 6 to 12 years were identified and invited to participate. Interested families were enrolled consecutively; after confirmation of autism diagnosis, children were randomized. Analysis for this per-protocol study were conducted from April to October 2022. Intervention: Each child underwent 1 RDE and 1 SADE dental cleaning, administered in randomized and counterbalanced order approximately 6 months apart. SADE included modified visual, auditory, and tactile stimuli. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was physiological stress, assessed by electrodermal activity. The secondary outcome was behavioral distress measured from video recordings. Results: Among 452 families invited to participate, 220 children were enrolled, and 162 children (mean [SD] age, 9.16 [1.99] years; 136 [84.0%] male) with confirmed autism were randomized, with 83 children receiving RDE first and 80 children receiving SADE first. Most children (94 children [58.0%]) had moderate autism severity. Children had significantly lower physiological stress during dental care in SADE compared with RDE (mean difference in skin conductance level, -1.22 [95% CI, -2.17 to -0.27] µS), suggesting decreased sympathetic activity and increased relaxation during SADE dental care. No significant differences were found in nonspecific skin conductance responses (mean difference, -0.30 [95% CI, -0.86 to 0.25] per min). Video-coded frequency and duration of behavioral distress (but not questionnaire) measures were significantly lower in SADE vs RDE (Cohen d = -0.84 to -1.19). Physiological stress was associated with behavioral distress during the dental cleaning (eg, nonspecific skin conductance responses associated with the Frankl Scale: ß = -0.29; 95% CI, -0.39 to -0.19); age, IQ, and expressive communication moderated the intervention's success. No participants withdrew due to adverse effects. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized crossover trial of autistic children, using SADE was safe and efficacious in decreasing physiological and behavioral distress during dental care. This is important because enhancing oral care is critical for autistic children; this intervention may also be beneficial for populations beyond autism. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02430051.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Autístico , Humanos , Masculino , Niño , Femenino , Estudios CruzadosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Limited studies have directly compared health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in different countries during the COVID-19 global pandemic. The objective of this study was to evaluate the HRQoL outcomes in the US, Sweden, and Norway during the first year under the pandemic. METHODS: In April 2020, during early phase of the pandemic, separately in the US, Sweden, and Norway, we surveyed 2,734, 1,003 and 1,020 respondents, then again in January 2021, we collected 2,252, 1,013 and 1,011 respondents. The survey was first developed in English and translated into Swedish and Norwegian. Selected variables were used for the current study. We collected respondents' HRQoL using the EQ-5D-5L. Respondents' background information included their sociodemographic data, medical history, and COVID-19 status. We reported the EQ-5D-5L utility, EQ-VAS, and the proportion of problems with each of the EQ-5D-5L health subdomains. Population quality-adjusted life year (QALY) changes based on EQ-5D-5L utility scores were also calculated. Outcomes were stratified by age. One-way ANOVA test was used to detect significant differences between countries and Student's t-tests were used to assess the differences between waves. RESULTS: Respectively for the US, Sweden, and Norway, mean EQ-5D-5L utilities were 0.822, 0.768, and 0.808 in April 2020 (p < 0.001); 0.823, 0.783, and 0.777 in January 2021 (p < 0.001); mean EQ-VAS scores were 0.746, 0.687, and 0.692 in April 2020 (p < 0.001), 0.764, 0.682, and 0.678 in January 2021 (p < 0.001). For both waves, EQ-5D-5L utilities and EQ-VAS scores in the US remained higher than both Sweden and Norway (p < 0.001). Norwegians reported considerably lowered HRQoL over time (p < 0.01). Self-reported problems with anxiety/depression were highest for the US and Sweden, while Norwegians reported most problems with pain/discomfort, followed by anxiety/depression. The population QALYs increased in the US and Sweden, but decreased in Norway. CONCLUSIONS: In the first year of the pandemic, a rebound in HRQoL was observed in the US, but not in Sweden or Norway. Mental health issues during the pandemic warrant a major public health concern across all 3 countries.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although liver transplantation (LT) has been demonstrated to provide survival benefit for patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), data are lacking regarding resource utilization for this population after LT. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from 10 centers in North America of patients transplanted between 2018 and 2019. ACLF was identified by using the European Association for the Study of the Liver-Chronic Liver Failure criteria. RESULTS: We studied 318 patients of whom 106 patients (33.3%) had no ACLF, 61 (19.1%) had ACLF-1, 74 (23.2%) had ACLF-2, and 77 (24.2%) had ACLF-3 at transplantation. Healthcare resource utilization after LT was greater among recipients with ACLF compared with patients without ACLF regarding median post-LT length of hospital stay (LOS) (P < .001), length of post-LT dialysis (P < .001), discharge to a rehabilitation center (P < .001), and 30-day readmission rates (P = .042). Multivariable negative binomial regression analysis demonstrated a significantly longer LOS for patients with ACLF-1 (1.9 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-7.51), ACLF-2 (6.7 days; 95% CI, 2.5-24.3), and ACLF-3 (19.3 days; 95% CI, 1.2-39.7), compared with recipients without ACLF. Presence of ACLF-3 at LT was also associated with longer length of dialysis after LT (9.7 days; 95% CI, 4.6-48.8) relative to lower grades. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed greater likelihood of discharge to a rehabilitation center among recipients with ACLF-1 (odds ratio [OR], 1.79; 95% CI, 1.09-4.54), ACLF-2 (OR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.12-5.01), and ACLF-3 (OR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.40-5.73). Development of bacterial infection after LT also predicted LOS (20.9 days; 95% CI, 6.1-38.5) and 30-day readmissions (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.17-2.25). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ACLF at LT, particularly ACLF-3, have greater post-transplant healthcare resource utilization.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Hepática Crónica Agudizada , Trasplante de Hígado , Humanos , Insuficiencia Hepática Crónica Agudizada/complicaciones , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , PronósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Online longitudinal surveys may be subject to potential biases due to sample attrition. This study was designed to identify potential predictors of attrition using a longitudinal panel survey collected during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Three waves of data were collected using Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk), an online crowd-sourced platform. For each wave, the study sample was collected by referencing a US national representative sample distribution of age, gender, and race, based on US census data. Variables included respondents' demographics, medical history, socioeconomic status, COVID-19 experience, changes of health behavior, productivity, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Results were compared to pre-pandemic US norms. Measures that predicted attrition at different times of the pandemic were identified via logistic regression with stepwise selection. RESULTS: 1467 of 2734 wave 1 respondents participated in wave 2 and, 964 of 2454 wave 2 respondents participated in wave 3. Younger age group, Hispanic origin (p ≤ 0.001) and higher self-rated survey difficulty (p ≤ 0.002) consistently predicted attrition in the following wave. COVID-19 experience, employment, productivity, and limited physical activities were commonly observed variables correlated with attrition with specific measures varying by time periods. From wave 1, mental health conditions, average daily hours worked (p = 0.004), and COVID-19 impact on work productivity (p < 0.001) were associated with a higher attrition rate at wave 2, additional to the aforementioned factors. From wave 2, support of social distancing (p = 0.032), being Republican (p < 0.001), and having just enough money to make ends meet (p = 0.003) were associated with predicted attrition at wave 3. CONCLUSIONS: Attrition in this longitudinal panel survey was not random. Besides commonly identified demographic factors that contribute to panel attrition, COVID-19 presented novel opportunities to address sample biases by correlating attrition with additional behavioral and HRQoL factors in a constantly evolving environment. While age, ethnicity, and survey difficulty consistently predicted attrition, other factors, such as COVID-19 experience, changes of employment, productivity, physical health, mental health, and financial situation impacted panel attrition during the pandemic at various degrees.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Calidad de Vida , COVID-19/epidemiología , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Pandemias , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The use of therapeutic hypothermia (TH) for mild hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE) remains controversial and inconsistent. We analysed trends in TH and maternal and infant characteristics associated with short-term outcomes of infants with mild HIE. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis of the California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative database 2010-2018. E-value analysis was conducted to determine the potential impact of unmeasured confounding. SETTING: California neonatal intensive care units. PATIENTS: 1364 neonates with mild HIE. INTERVENTIONS: Supportive care versus TH. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Factors associated with TH and mortality. RESULTS: The proportion of infants receiving TH increased from 46% in 2010 to 79% in 2018. TH was more likely in the setting of singleton birth (OR 2.69, 95% CI 1.21 to 5.39), no major birth defects (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.42 to 3.30), operative vaginal delivery (OR 3.04, 95% CI 1.80 to 5.10) and 5-minute Apgar score ≤5 (OR 3.17, 95% CI 2.43 to 4.13). Mortality was associated with small for gestational age (OR 5.79, 95% CI 1.90 to 18.48), <38 weeks' gestation (OR 7.31 95% CI 2.39 to 24.93), major birth defects (OR 11.62, 95% CI 3.97 to 38.00), inhaled nitric oxide (OR 12.73, 95% CI 4.00 to 44.53) and nosocomial infection (OR 7.98, 95% CI 1.15 to 47.03). E-value analyses suggest that unmeasured confounding may have contributed to some of the observed effects. CONCLUSIONS: Variation in management of mild HIE persists, but therapeutic drift has become more prevalent over time. Further studies are needed to assess long-term outcomes alongside resource utilisation to inform evidence-based practice.
Asunto(s)
Hipotermia Inducida , Hipoxia-Isquemia Encefálica , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Hipotermia Inducida/efectos adversos , Hipoxia-Isquemia Encefálica/complicaciones , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido/terapia , Embarazo , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The duration of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been historically confined in many centers to two weeks. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of additional weeks on ECMO beyond two weeks for newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) who may require longer stays to maximize survival potential. METHODS: We modeled lifetime outcomes using a decision tree from the US societal perspective. Survival at discharge, probability of long-term sequelae, direct medical costs, indirect costs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) for long-term disability were considered. Considering the nature of severity of CDH, we used $200,000 per QALY as the willingness-to-pay threshold in the base case. RESULTS: The lifetime costs per CDH infant generated from staying on ECMO for ≤2 weeks, 2-3 weeks, and >3 weeks are $473,334, $654,771, $1,007,476, respectively (2018 USD), and the total QALYs gained from each treatment arm are 1.83, 3.6, and 5.05. In the base case, the net monetary benefits are -$108,034 for ECMO ≤2 weeks, $64,258 for 2-3 weeks, and $2955 for >3 weeks. In probabilistic simulations, a duration of ≤2 weeks is dominated by a duration of 2-3 weeks in 65.3% of cases and dominated by > 3 weeks in 60.2% of cases. A duration of 2-3 weeks is more cost-effective than >3 weeks in 68.6% of simulations. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that 2-3 weeks of ECMO may be the most cost-effective for CDH infants that are unable to wean off at 2 weeks from the US societal perspective. Regardless of ECMO duration, ECMO use generates positive incremental NMB at WTP of $200,000 if the survival probability is greater than 0.3. Future research must be conducted to evaluate the long-term outcomes and sequelae of CDH patients post-discharge to better inform the clinical decision-making in neonatal intensive care unit.
Asunto(s)
Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas , Cuidados Posteriores , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas/terapia , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Alta del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Examine: (1) Prevalence of diagnosed venous thromboembolism (VTE) in infants <6 months discharged from U.S. NICUs; (2) Associations between sociodemographic and clinical factors and VTE; (3) Secondary outcomes related to VTE. STUDY DESIGN: Multivariable logistic regressions examined associations between VTE and sociodemographic and clinical factors among infants <6 months discharged from Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) NICUs between 2016 and 2019. RESULTS: Of 201,033 infants, 2720 (1.35%) had diagnosed VTE. Birthweight 300-1000 g (aOR 3.14, 95% CI 2.54-3.88), 1000-1500 g (aOR 1.77, 95% CI 1.40-2.42) versus 2500-3999 g, and public (aOR 1.18, 95% CI 1.02-1.37) versus private insurance were associated with increased odds of VTE, as were CVC, TPN, mechanical ventilation, infection, ECMO, and surgery. All types of central lines (non-tunneled and tunneled CVCs, PICCs, and umbilical catheters) had higher odds of VTE than not having that type of line. CVCs in upper versus lower extremities had higher odds of VTE. CONCLUSION: Infants with risk factors may require monitoring for VTE. Results may inform VTE prevention.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Periférico , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Tromboembolia Venosa , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Niño , Hospitales Pediátricos , Humanos , Lactante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Describe the financial burden and worry that families of preterm infants experience after discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). METHODS: We surveyed 365 parents of preterm infants in a cross-sectional study regarding socio-demographics, supplemental security income (SSI), and financial worry. We completed a multivariable logistic regression model to examine the adjusted association of financial worry with modifiable factors. RESULTS: We found that 53% of participants worried about healthcare costs after NICU discharge. After adjusting for socio-demographic and infant characteristics, we identified that, aOR (95% CI), out-of-pocket costs from the NICU index hospitalization, 3.51 (1.7, 7.26) and durable medical equipment use, 2.41 (1.11, 5.23) was associated with increased financial worry while enrollment in SSI, 0.38 (0.19, 0.76) was associated with decreased financial worry. CONCLUSIONS: We identified factors that could contribute to financial burden after NICU discharge that may advise future work to target financial support systems.
Asunto(s)
Recien Nacido Prematuro , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Estudios Transversales , Estrés Financiero , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Alta del PacienteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Uncertainties exist surrounding the timing of liver transplantation (LT) among patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure grade 3 (ACLF-3), regarding whether to accept a marginal quality donor organ to allow for earlier LT or wait for either an optimal organ offer or improvement in the number of organ failures, in order to increase post-LT survival. METHODS: We created a Markov decision process model to determine the optimal timing of LT among patients with ACLF-3 within 7 days of listing, to maximize overall 1-year survival probability. RESULTS: We analyzed 6 groups of candidates with ACLF-3: patients age ≤60 or >60 years, patients with 3 organ failures alone or 4-6 organ failures, and hepatic or extrahepatic ACLF-3. Among all groups, LT yielded significantly greater overall survival probability vs. remaining on the waiting list for even 1 additional day (p <0.001), regardless of organ quality. Creation of 2-way sensitivity analyses, with variation in the probability of receiving an optimal organ and expected post-transplant mortality, indicated that overall survival is maximized by earlier LT, particularly among candidates >60 years old or with 4-6 organ failures. The probability of improvement from ACLF-3 to ACLF-2 does not influence these recommendations, as the likelihood of organ recovery was less than 10%. CONCLUSION: During the first week after listing for patients with ACLF-3, earlier LT in general is favored over waiting for an optimal quality donor organ or for recovery of organ failures, with the understanding that the analysis is limited to consideration of only these 3 variables. LAY SUMMARY: In the setting of grade 3 acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF-3), questions remain regarding the timing of transplantation in terms of whether to proceed with liver transplantation with a marginal donor organ or to wait for an optimal liver, and whether to transplant a patient with ACLF-3 or wait until improvement to ACLF-2. In this study, we used a Markov decision process model to demonstrate that earlier transplantation of patients listed with ACLF-3 maximizes overall survival, as opposed to waiting for an optimal donor organ or for improvement in the number of organ failures.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Throughout the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, susceptible-infectious-recovered (SIR) modeling has been the preeminent modeling method to inform policy making worldwide. Nevertheless, the usefulness of such models has been subject to controversy. An evolution in the epidemiological modeling field is urgently needed, beginning with an agreed-upon set of modeling standards for policy recommendations. The objective of this article is to propose a set of modeling standards to support policy decision making. METHODS: We identify and describe 5 broad standards: transparency, heterogeneity, calibration and validation, cost-benefit analysis, and model obsolescence and recalibration. We give methodological recommendations and provide examples in the literature that employ these standards well. We also develop and demonstrate a modeling practices checklist using existing coronavirus disease 2019 literature that can be employed by readers, authors, and reviewers to evaluate and compare policy modeling literature along our formulated standards. RESULTS: We graded 16 articles using our checklist. On average, the articles met 6.81 of our 19 categories (36.7%). No articles contained any cost-benefit analyses and few were adequately transparent. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant room for improvement in modeling pandemic policy. Issues often arise from a lack of transparency, poor modeling assumptions, lack of a system-wide perspective in modeling, and lack of flexibility in the academic system to rapidly iterate modeling as new information becomes available. In anticipation of future challenges, we encourage the modeling community at large to contribute toward the refinement and consensus of a shared set of standards for infectious disease policy modeling.