Effective prediction of postoperative complications for patients after open hepatectomy: a simplified scoring system based on perioperative parameters.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to develop a scoring system for the prediction of postoperative complications of open hepatectomy. METHOD: All consecutive patients receiving open hepatectomy from 2015 to 2017 were included in the study. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to confirm the risk factors for postoperative complications. Afterwards, a novel scoring system was developed to predict the postoperative complications. RESULTS: The study included a total of 207 patients. For the test dataset, multivariate analysis indicated that diabetes, scale of surgery, serum potassium, and blood loss versus body weight were independent risk factors of the postoperative complications. The area under the curve (AUC) of the novel scoring system we proposed for prediction of postoperative complications of hepatectomy was 0.803, which is comparable with the AUCs of previous scoring systems. Furthermore, in the validation dataset, the corresponding AUC of the new scoring system was 0.717. CONCLUSION: This novel and simplified scoring system can effectively predict the postoperative complications of open hepatectomy and could help identify patients who are at high risk of postoperative complications.

Risk Assessment of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Liver Cirrhotic Patients with Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Objective: This study was aimed to evaluate the correlation between clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) and postoperative complications and risk predictors of postoperative complications. Methods: The retrospective study was conducted to identify the effect. The cirrhotic patients were divided into two groups, those with or without CSPH. The intraoperative and postoperative conditions were evaluated. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify potential risk predictors for postoperative complications in cirrhotic patients with CSPH. Results: The cirrhotic patients with CSPH who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) had postoperative hospitalization than the patients without CSPH. However, the incidence of postoperative complications between two groups showed no significant difference. The results of multivariate analysis showed that male, gallbladder wall >3 mm, size of stones ≥1 cm, scores of Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) ≥10, and operation time >60 minutes were the potential risk predictors for postoperative complications. Conclusions: CSPH did not increase the incidence of postoperative complications in cirrhotic patients who underwent LC, but increased conversion rate and prolonged postoperative hospitalization. Furthermore, our study showed that gender, sizes of gallbladder wall and stones, scores of MELD, and operation time were the important postoperative risk predictors for cirrhotic patients with CSPH.

Long-Term Efficacy of Laparoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation in Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term efficacy of laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation (LRFA) in early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared with other surgical procedures. Methods: A literature search of Cochrane library, PubMed, and Embase through October 2018 was conducted by two investigators (J.-F.G. and F.Y.) independently. The quality of included studies was estimated by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Review Manager 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis, and either fixed- or random-effects model was used according to the heterogeneity of included studies. The chi-square test was used for heterogeneity analysis of included studies, and subgroup analysis was conducted to estimate the heterogeneity between each study and also to estimate the efficacy of different studies. Results: A total of 11 studies involving 1691 patients were included in this analysis. Patients undergoing hepatic resection (HR) had higher 3-, 5-year overall survival rate, 3-year disease-free survival rate, and lower local recurrence rate than those undergoing LRFA. However, patients undergoing LRFA had higher 3-, 5-year overall survival rate than those undergoing other minimally invasive ablation, although there was no statistical difference in local recurrence rate or disease-free survival rate. Conclusion: HR is still an ideal choice for early HCC. If minimally invasive ablation is an alternative treatment, LRFA will be better than other minimally invasive options.