Effect of laterality on the postoperative survival of non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing pneumonectomy.

Background: Pneumonectomy is one of the important surgical methods for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study evaluated the effects of laterality on the short- and long-term survival of NSCLC patients undergoing pneumonectomy. Methods: We reviewed the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database to retrieve the data of patients who underwent pneumonectomy for stage I-III NSCLC from 2004 to 2015. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce the selection bias. Logistic regression was used to analyze the correlation between laterality and mortality at 3, 6, and 9 months. The Kaplan-Meier curve was used to further assess the effect of laterality on overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 4,763 patients met the enrollment criteria [right-sided, 1,988 (41.7%); left-sided, 2,775 (58.3%)]. After PSM, 1,911 patients for each side were included in the further analysis. The first 6 months following pneumonectomy was the main period of death, with 32.0% (428/1,336) and 19.9% (250/1,258) of right- and left-sided deaths occurring during this period. The logistic regression analysis showed that right-sided pneumonectomy was an independent risk factor for 3- (P<0.001) and 6-month (P<0.001) mortality. However, laterality had no significant effect on postoperative death at 7-9 months (P=0.82). In the total cohort, right-sided patients had worse OS (P<0.001), but the subgroup survival analysis of patients with a follow-up period >6 months revealed that laterality had no statistically significant effect on OS (P=0.75). Conclusions: Right-sided pneumonectomy was associated with a higher perioperative mortality risk that lasted about 6 months. After that period, laterality was not observed to have a significant prognostic effect on the OS of patients undergoing pneumonectomy.

Case Report: Uniportal robot-assisted thoracoscopic double-sleeve lobectomy after neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

Minimally invasive thoracic surgery, including video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, has been proven to have an advantage over open thoracotomy with less pain, fewer postoperative complications, faster discharge, and better tolerance among elderly patients. We introduce a uniportal robot-assisted thoracoscopic double-sleeve lobectomy performed on a patient following neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Specialized instruments like customized trocars with a reduced diameter, bulldog clamps, and double-needle sutures were utilized to facilitate the maneuverability through the single incision. This technique integrates the merits of multiport robot-assisted thoracic surgery with uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Repair: From Total Endoscopic To Closed-Chest Robotic.

Minimally invasive cardiac surgery has evolved over the past few decades, thanks to advancements in technology and surgical techniques. These advancements have allowed surgeons to perform cardiac interventions through small incisions, reducing surgical trauma and improving patient outcomes1. However, despite these advancements, thoracoscopic mitral repair has not been widely adopted by the cardiac surgery community, possibly due to the lack of familiarity with video-assisted procedures1. Over the years, various minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) techniques have been developed to achieve comparable or better results while minimizing surgical trauma. These techniques have evolved from direct-vision procedures performed through a right thoracotomy with a rib retractor to video-directed approaches using long-shafted instruments1. Robotic surgery, introduced in the late 90s, has also played a significant role in mitral valve repair. The da Vinci system, the only robotic platform currently used for cardiac surgery, provides surgeons with enhanced dexterity and high-definition 3D visualization, allowing for precise and accurate procedure2, and is now the preferred approach for mitral repair in many programs3. The first mitral repair using the da Vinci system was performed in Europe by Carpentier and Mohr in 1998, followed by the first mitral replacement by Chitwood in the USA in 20002-4. The advantages of robotic technology allow surgeons to perform complex repair techniques such as papillary muscle repositioning and sliding leaflet plasty4. Studies have shown that robotic mitral surgery results in shorter ICU and hospital stays, better quality of life postoperatively, and improved cosmesis compared to conventional surgery5,6. In our experience, we have also observed significant benefits with robotic surgery, including reduced blood loss and the need for transfusions. This can be attributed to the closed-chest technique, which eliminates the need for a thoracotomy and rib retractor, reducing the risk of bleeding associated with these approaches7. In this article, we will compare the surgical steps of endoscopic and robotic mitral valve repair, providing detailed information on patient selection, operative techniques, and the requirements for building a successful program. By understanding the advantages and challenges of both approaches, surgeons can make informed decisions and provide the best possible care for their patients. Combined ablation and multivalvular procedures are mostly performed in few centers by minimally invasive techniques.

Uniportal pure robotic-assisted thoracic surgery-technical aspects, tips and tricks.

The uniportal access for robotic thoracic surgery presents itself as a natural evolution of minimally invasive thoracic surgery (MITS). It was developed by surgeons who pioneered the uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (U-VATS) in all its aspects following the same principles of a single incision by using robotic technology. The robotic surgery was initially started as a hybrid procedure with the use of thoracoscopic staplers by the assistant. However, due to the evolution of robotic modern platforms, the staplers can be nowadays controlled by the main surgeon from the console. The pure uniportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (U-RATS) is defined as the robotic thoracic surgery performed through a single intercostal (ic) incision, without rib spreading, using the robotic camera, robotic dissecting instruments and robotic staplers. There are presented the advantages, difficulties, the general aspects and specific considerations for U-RATS. For safety reasons, the authors recommend the transition from multiportal-RATS through biportal-RATS to U-RATS. The use of robotic dissection and staplers through a single incision and the rapid undocking with easy emergent conversion when needed (either to U-VATS or to thoracotomy) are safety advantages over multi-port RATS that cannot be overlooked, offering great comfort to the surgeon and quick and smooth recovery to the patient.

Comparison of active versus passive robotic-endoscope-holder-assisted unisurgeon uniportal thoracoscopic surgery in terms of surgical efficacy and patient safety.

Background: Few studies have compared robotic-arm-assisted unisurgeon uniportal surgeries with conventional human-assisted uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgeries (VATSs) in terms of surgical efficacy and patient safety. In the present study, we compared the aforementioned surgeries. Methods: We explored two robotic endoscope holders-a passive robotic platform (ENDOFIXexo, EA group) and a pedal-controlled active robotic platform (MTG-100, MA group)-for unisurgeon uniportal surgeries and compared the surgical outcomes with those of human-assisted uniportal surgeries (HA group) in 228 patients with a lung lesion (size, <5 cm). The primary parameters for this comparison were surgical efficacy, patient safety, and short-term patient outcomes. Results: No significant differences were observed among the EA, MA, and HA groups. The success rate of robotic-arm-assisted unisurgeon uniportal wedge resection was 100%, regardless of the group. No major differences were noted in preparation time between the EA and MA groups. Segmentectomy was more favorable in the EA group than in the MA group. The rates of surgical conversion were 5% and 60% in the EA and MA groups, respectively. The EA and MA groups did not differ considerably from the HA group in terms of postoperative complications. Conclusions: Unisurgeon uniportal wedge resection may be effectively performed using a robotic endoscope holder, without the need for any human assistants with an expert hand. However, the rate of surgical conversion increases with the complexity of uniportal anatomic resections. The passive platform appears to be more suitable for unisurgeon uniportal surgery than the active pedal-controlled platform given the equipment in contemporary operating rooms.

The SUPER reporting guideline suggested for reporting of surgical technique.

Background: Existing reporting guidelines pay insufficient attention to the detail and comprehensiveness reporting of surgical technique. The Surgical techniqUe rePorting chEcklist and standaRds (SUPER) aims to address this gap by defining reporting standards for surgical technique. The SUPER guideline intends to apply to articles that encompass surgical technique in any study design, surgical discipline, and stage of surgical innovation. Methods: Following the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network approach, 16 surgeons, journal editors, and methodologists reviewed existing reporting guidelines relating to surgical technique, reviewed papers from 15 top journals, and brainstormed to draft initial items for the SUPER. The initial items were revised through a three-round Delphi survey from 21 multidisciplinary Delphi panel experts from 13 countries and regions. The final SUPER items were formed after an online consensus meeting to resolve disagreements and a three-round wording refinement by all 16 SUPER working group members and five SUPER consultants. Results: The SUPER reporting guideline includes 22 items that are considered essential for good and informative surgical technique reporting. The items are divided into six sections: background, rationale, and objectives (items 1 to 5); preoperative preparations and requirements (items 6 to 9); surgical technique details (items 10 to 15); postoperative considerations and tasks (items 16 to 19); summary and prospect (items 20 and 21); and other information (item 22). Conclusions: The SUPER reporting guideline has the potential to guide detailed, comprehensive, and transparent surgical technique reporting for surgeons. It may also assist journal editors, peer reviewers, systematic reviewers, and guideline developers in the evaluation of surgical technique papers and help practitioners to better understand and reproduce surgical technique. Trial Registration: https://www.equator-network.org/library/reporting-guidelines-under-development/reporting-guidelines-under-development-for-other-study-designs/#SUPER.

The SUPER reporting guideline suggested for reporting of surgical technique: explanation and elaboration.

Background: Surgical technique plays an essential role in achieving good health outcomes. However, the quality of surgical technique reporting remains heterogeneous. Reporting checklists could help authors to describe the surgical technique more transparently and effectively, as well as to assist reviewers and editors evaluate it more informatively, and promote readers to better understand the technique. We previously developed SUPER (surgical technique reporting checklist and standards) to assist authors in reporting their research that contains surgical technique more transparently. However, further explanation and elaboration of each item are needed for better understanding and reporting practice. Methods: We searched surgical literature in PubMed, Google Scholar and journal websites published up to January 2023 to find multidiscipline examples in various article types for each SUPER item. Results: We explain the 22 items of the SUPER and provide rationales item by item alongside. We provide 69 examples from 53 literature that present optimal reporting of the 22 items. Article types of examples include pure surgical technique, and case reports, observational studies and clinical trials that contain surgical technique. Examples are multidisciplinary, including general surgery, orthopaedical surgery, cardiac surgery, thoracic surgery, gastrointestinal surgery, neurological surgery, oncogenic surgery, and emergency surgery etc. Conclusions: Along with SUPER article, this explanation and elaboration file can promote deeper understanding on the SUPER items. We hope that the article could further guide surgeons and researchers in reporting, and assist editors and peer reviewers in reviewing manuscripts related to surgical technique.

Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopy in pediatrics-initial experience.

Background: It has become apparent that the endoscopic surgeries are rapidly developing, and they have become an essential part of every specialty of surgery. Single port thoracoscopic surgery is developing, enhancing the advantages of muti-portal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Although becoming a well-recognised approach for adult patients, extremely limited literature exists concerning uniportal VATS among pediatric cases. This study aims to present our initial experience with this approach in a single tertiary hospital and extrapolate its feasibility and safety in this specific context. Methods: Perioperative parameters and surgical outcomes for all pediatric patients who underwent an intercostal or subxiphoid uniportal VATS surgery in our department in 2 years retrospectively reviewed. The median length of follow-up was 8 months. Results: Sixty-eight pediatric patients underwent different uniportal VATS operation for different types of pathology. The median age was (3.5 years). Median operating time was 116 minutes. Three cases converted to open. The mortality rate was zero. The median length of stay was 5 days. Three patients presented complications. Three patients lost from follow-up. Conclusions: Despite literature data heterogeneity, these results provide support to the feasibility and applicability of uniportal VATS in the pediatric population. Further studies are required to explore the benefit of uniportal over multi-portal VATS (including chest wall deformities, cosmesis and quality of life).

Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy.

Standard minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy is performed through a multiport technique using carbon dioxide. However, access to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is increasingly shifting to a single-port approach due to its proven safety and efficacy in lung surgeries. Therefore, the preamble of this submission is to describe, 'How I do differently' uniportal VATS MIO in three major steps: (a) VATS dissection through a single 4-cm incision in a semi-prone position without artificial capnothorax; (b) fluorescence dye to check conduit perfusion and (c) intrathoracic overlay anastomosis with a linear stapler.

Salvage Surgery for Small-Cell Lung Cancer-A Literature Review.

(1) Background: Salvation surgery for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is exceptionally performed, and only a few cases are published. (2) Methods: There are 6 publications that present 17 cases of salvation surgery for SCLC-the salvation surgery was performed in the context of modern clearly established protocols for SCLC and after including SCLC in the TNM (tumor, node, metastasis) staging in 2010. (3) Results: After a median follow-up of 29 months, the estimated overall survival (OS) was 86 months. The median estimated 2-year survival was 92%, and the median estimated 5-year survival was 66%. (4) Conclusion: Salvage surgery for SCLC is a relatively new and extremely uncommon concept and represents an alternative to second-line chemotherapy. It is valuable because it may offer a reasonable treatment for selected patients, good local control, and a favorable survival outcome.

The transition to uniportal robotic surgery in the second decade of uniportal surgery.

Uniportal robotic surgery was created by Dr. Diego Gonzalez-Rivas as a fusion of his decade of experience with uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and his recent experience with the Intuitive Robotic System. It represents, in his view, the natural evolution of the uniportal technique in the era of robotic surgery. In this article, we discuss some of the novel issues that this raises, including capacitive coupling, and we describe the technique in detail to help surgeons who may be interested in starting uniportal robotic surgery. We go through case selection, which should start with wedge resections and lymphadenectomy. We look at port placement, which is more posterior and lower than the usual uniportal VATS approach, and we discuss the optimal instruments and ports for the technique. We discuss the role of the assistant in uniportal robotic surgery, which is a key part of the operation as we regard this as a two-surgeon technique. We then discuss the future and other possible robotic platforms that might be suitable for uniportal robotic surgery. It is an exciting new development for robotic surgery, and we recommend that this technique is suitable for advanced surgeons who are experienced in uniportal VATS lobectomy and in multiportal robotic surgery.

The perioperative outcomes of uniportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgeries-a systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical cohort studies and case reports.

Background: Early results have illustrated the multiportal robotic approach to be safe and oncologically efficacious in the treatment of thoracic malignancies. Industry leaders have improved upon the lessons learned during the early multiportal studies and have now come to establish the feasibility of the biportal, and subsequently the uniportal robotic-assisted approach, all in an effort to offer patients equivalent or better outcomes with less surgical trauma. No current, coherent body of evidence currently exists outlining the early-term outcomes of patients undergoing uniportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to clarify the early-phase outcomes of these patients. Methods: An electronic search of four databases was performed to identify relevant studies outlining the immediate post-operative outcomes of patients undergoing uniportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgeries. The primary endpoint was defined as technical success (i.e., no conversion to secondary robotic, video-assisted thoracoscopic, or open approaches). Secondary endpoints of interest included post-operative outcomes and complication rates. A meta-analysis using a random effects model of proportions or means was applied, as appropriate. Results: The search strategy ultimately yielded 12 relevant studies for inclusion. A total of 240 patients (52% male) split across cohort studies and case reports were identified. The mean age of the two groups was 59.7±3.0 and 58.1±6.8 years, respectively. The mean operative time was 133.8±38.2 and 150.0±52.2 minutes, respectively. Length of hospital stay was 4.4±1.6 and 4.3±1.1 days, respectively. The mean blood loss was 80.0±25.1 mL The majority of identified procedures were lobectomies, segmentectomies, and wedge resections, though complex sleeve resections and anterior mediastinal mass resections were also completed. Cumulative technical success was 99.9%. Conclusions: The uniportal robotic-assisted approach, when completed in expert hands, has been illustrated to have exceedingly low rates of conversion to secondary procedures, along with short length of stay (LOS), minimal blood loss, and short procedural times (variable depending on operation type). Current evidence on the feasibility of this approach will be bolstered by upcoming multi-institutional series.

Video atlas of each uniportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy and lymphadenectomy.

It is important when evaluating new techniques that a surgeon can see and assess all the differences and similarities between their usual technique and the novel technique. Thus, we have collated a comprehensive atlas of videos of uniportal robotic lobectomies for every lobe. Surgeons who are considering embarking on a program of uniportal robotic lobectomies can accordingly see the different views and techniques that will be required for when they perform their first procedure. We have fully narrated the videos, so that you will be taken through each procedure. Whilst these five videos are fifty-five minutes in total, our intention is not necessarily for you to watch them all from start to finish, but rather, come to this video, select the lobe that you will shortly embark on, and watch it prior to your case so that you can visualise, as closely as possible, the procedure that you will be performing. We recommend that you watch the videos with your bedside assistant as the uniportal robotic lobectomy is a joint procedure between two surgeons, rather than a single surgeon's operation with an assistant. Though we have not provided videos on segmentectomies, the uniportal robotic lobectomy is an advanced technique and we are confident that advanced surgeons will be able to gain key insights with what has been included, even if they are proceeding to a segmentectomy for their first cases. We feel for an advanced surgeon, a segmentectomy will be just as suitable an operation as a lobectomy in the initial learning phase.