Risk factors for colonisation by Multidrug-Resistant bacteria in critical care units.

INTRODUCTION: Antimicrobial resistance is a major public health challenge recognised by the WHO as an urgent global healthcare concern. Patients in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) are particularly prone to colonisation and/or infection by multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). OBJECTIVES: Delineate the epidemiological characteristics and risk factors for MDROs colonisation in mixed ICUs and Resuscitation Units by focusing on initial and nosocomial colonisation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A descriptive observational study with analytical elements. It uses the Zero-Resistance register from the Preventive Medicine Service of the Albacete General University Hospital (Spain) from April 2016 to December 2021. It identifies the risk factors for MDROs colonisation. RESULTS: Of 7,541 cases, 61.0 % with initial colonisation had risk factors for MDROs versus 34.0 % not colonised upon hospitalisation (p < 0.001). Significant risk factors for initial colonisation included hospitalisation for ≥ 5 days within the last 3 months, prior MDROs colonisation/infection and institutionalization. No significant risk factor differences were found for nosocomial colonisation. An association between longer ICU stays and nosocomial colonisation (p < 0.001) was noted. CONCLUSIONS: Significant risk factors for initial MDROs colonisation were hospitalisation for ≥ 5 days in the last 3 months, prior MDROs colonisation/infection and institutionalisation. Longer ICU stays increased the nosocomial colonisation risk. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: This study underscores the importance to early identify and manage patients at risk for MDROs colonisation in ICUs. By recognising factors (i.e. previous hospitalisations, existing colonisation or infection, impact of prolonged ICU stay), healthcare providers can implement targeted strategies to mitigate the spread of MDROs; e.g. enhanced surveillance, stringent infection control measures and judicious antibiotics use. Our findings highlight the need for a comprehensive approach to manage antimicrobial resistance in critical care settings to ultimately improve patient outcomes and reduce MDROs burden in hospitals.

Comprehensive spatial distribution of patients with first-episode psychosis (FEP) and its relation to socio-economic factors.

BACKGROUND: The functional-cognitive impact of first-episode psychosis (FEP) is extremely relevant and implies dysfunction from early life stages like adolescence and youth. Like other illnesses, FEP incidence is also influenced by environmental factors. It is necessary to attend to this age group with early interventions and to act on the environmental factors that the literature correlates with increased FEP incidence: socio-economic aspects, social adversity, bullying at school or cannabis use. In this context, identifying the areas of cities where FEP patients concentrate is important to perform early interventions. The spatial analysis of patient distribution in a whole city is one way to identify the most vulnerable areas and to propose psycho-social interventions for the possible prevention and/or early detection of FEP by improving urban mental health. METHODS: An epidemiological study of point patterns to determine the areas of a city with a higher incidence of patients with FEP. To do so, the addresses of FEP cases were georeferenced from 1 January 2016 to 31 October 2022, and 109 FEP patients were analysed. Data from a random sample of 383 controls, comprising their addresses, age, and sex, were randomly obtained from the official city council database. By GIS, the areas with higher FEP incidence were analysed to see if they coincided with the zones where inhabitants with lower incomes lived. RESULTS: The risk ratio of the FEP patients was compatible with the constant risk ratio in Albacete (p = 0.22). When performing the process separately with cases and controls only in men and women, the results were not significant for both distributions (p value: 0.12 and 0.57, respectively). Nonetheless, areas within the city had a significantly higher risk. These groups of cases coincided with those who had lower income and more inequality for women, but this pattern was not clear for men. CONCLUSIONS: Classifying city areas per income can help to determine the zones at higher risk of FEP, which would allow early healthcare and preventive measures for these zones.

Using the AS04C-adjuvanted hepatitis B vaccine in patients classified as non-responders.

BACKGROUND: Chronic hepatitis B (HB) remains a significant global health concern, despite the widespread availability of the HB vaccine. While the standard vaccine demonstrates an impressive serological response rate exceeding 90%, a subset of individuals exhibit suboptimal immunity. This study aims to elucidate the efficacy of the AS04C-adjuvanted HB vaccine in addressing non-responsiveness. METHODS: Conducted at the Preventive Medicine Service of the University Albacete Hospital in Spain from 2017 to 2021, this single-center observational study enrolled 195 patients. Among them, 126 (65%) were classified as non-responders following one or two complete standard vaccination courses. RESULTS: After the administration of a complete four-dose regimen of the AS04C-adjuvanted vaccine, 73.81% of non-responder patients exhibited antibody titers indicative of robust immunity (anti-HBs >10). CONCLUSIONS: These findings underscore the pivotal role of the AS04C-adjuvanted HB vaccine in addressing non-responsiveness, emphasizing its potential as a crucial tool in augmenting immunization strategies for various populations. This includes non-responders to standard vaccination, individuals with chronic kidney disease, those requiring seroprotection due to factors like immunosuppression or occupational hazards, as well as patients for whom conventional revaccination strategies have proven futile. Additional research is needed to expand on the promising results obtained through our protocol.

Effect of the Early Combination of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and High-Flow Nasal Cannula on Mortality and Intubation Rates in Patients With COVID-19 and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. The DUOCOVID Study.

INTRODUCTION: Non invasive respiratory support (NIRS) is useful for treating acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) secondary to COVID-19, mainly in mild-moderate stages. Although continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) seems superior to other NIRS, prolonged periods of use and poor adaptation may contribute to its failure. The combination of CPAP sessions and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) breaks could improve comfort and keep respiratory mechanics stable without reducing the benefits of positive airway pressure (PAP). Our study aimed to determine if HFNC+CPAP initiates early lower mortality and endotracheal intubation (ETI) rates. METHODS: Subjects were admitted to the intermediate respiratory care unit (IRCU) of a COVID-19 monographic hospital between January and September 2021. They were divided according to Early HFNC+CPAP (first 24h, EHC group) and Delayed HFNC+CPAP (after 24h, DHC group). Laboratory data, NIRS parameters, and the ETI and 30-day mortality rates were collected. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify the risk factors associated with these variables. RESULTS: The median age of the 760 included patients was 57 (IQR 47-66), who were mostly male (66.1%). The median Charlson Comorbidity Index was 2 (IQR 1-3) and 46.8% were obese. The median PaO2/FiO2 upon IRCU admission was 95 (IQR 76-126). The ETI rate in the EHC group was 34.5%, with 41.8% for the DHC group (p=0.045), while 30-day mortality was 8.2% and 15.5%, respectively (p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Particularly in the first 24h after IRCU admission, the HFNC+CPAP combination was associated with a reduction in the 30-day mortality and ETI rates in patients with ARDS secondary to COVID-19.

Clinical characteristics and respiratory care in hospitalized vaccinated SARS-CoV-2 patients.

Background: The main objective of the present study was to analyze both clinical characteristics and evolution during hospitalization of a cohort of patients admitted for COVID-19 pneumonia who were not vaccinated, or with a complete or incomplete vaccination schedule. Methods: This COVID-19 specialized single-center cohort study of 1888 COVID-19 patients hospitalized at the "Enfermera Isabel Zendal" Emergencies Hospital (HEEIZ), Madrid (Spain) was performed between July 1 and September 30, 2021. It compared the results of 1327 hospitalized unvaccinated patients to 209 hospitalized fully vaccinated and 352 hospitalized partially vaccinated patients. The four different COVID-19 vaccines authorized in Spain during the time-period studied were: BNT162b2 (Pfizer); ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca), mRNA-1273 (Moderna); Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen). Findings: Hospitalized patients' median age was 41 years (IQR 33-50) for the unvaccinated and 61 years (IQR 53-67) for the fully vaccinated ones. The main comorbidities were obesity, hypertension and diabetes mellitus. 20% of unvaccinated patients (266) required noninvasive respiratory care, as did 14% (51) of partially and 14% (30) of fully vaccinated; 6% (78) of the unvaccinated patients also needed invasive respiratory care, as did 5% (16) of partially and 11 (5%) fully vaccinated. Interpretation: Fully vaccinated patients were 84% (95% CI: 82-86%) less likely to be admitted to hospital, and protection rose for those aged <50 years. Once hospitalized, vaccinated patients displayed more protection against requiring respiratory care than unvaccinated ones, despite being older and having more comorbidities. No differences appeared for the four studied COVID-19 vaccines and complying with vaccination recommendations proved relevant. Funding: The research was funded by the "Plan Propio de Investigación" Program of the Castilla-La Mancha University /European Regional Development Fund (2021-GRIN-31,039).

Spatial analysis of COVID-19 hospitalised cases in an entire city: The risk of studying only lattice data.

We live in a global pandemic caused by the COVID-19 disease where severe social distancing measures are necessary. Some of these measures have been taken into account by the administrative boundaries within cities (neighborhoods, postal districts, etc.). However, considering only administrative boundaries in decision making can prove imprecise, and could have consequences when it comes to taking effective measures. To solve the described problems, we present an epidemiological study that proposes using spatial point patterns to delimit spatial units of analysis based on the highest local incidence of hospitalisations instead of administrative limits during the first COVID-19 wave. For this purpose, the 579 addresses of the cases hospitalised between March 3 and April 6, 2020, in Albacete (Spain), and the addresses of the random sample of 383 controls from the Inhabitants Register of the city of Albacete, were georeferenced. The risk ratio in those hospitalised for COVID-19 was compatible with the constant risk ratio in Albacete (p = 0.49), but areas with a significantly higher risk were found and coincided with those with greater economic inequality (Gini Index). Moreover, two districts had areas with a significantly high incidence that were masked by others with a significantly low incidence. In conclusion, taking measures conditioned exclusively by administrative limits in a pandemic can cause problems caused by managing entire districts with lax measures despite having interior areas with high significant incidences. In a pandemic context, georeferencing disease cases in real time and spatially comparing them to updated random population controls to automatically and accurately detect areas with significant incidences are suggested. This would facilitate decision making, which must be fast and accurate in these situations.

Personal Exposure Assessment to Wi-Fi Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields in Mexican Microenvironments.

In recent years, personal exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields (RF-EMF) has substantially increased, and most studies about RF-EMF with volunteers have been developed in Europe. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study carried out in Mexico with personal exposimeters. The main objective was to measure personal exposure to RF-EMF from Wireless Fidelity or wireless Internet connection (Wi-Fi) frequency bands in Tamazunchale, San Luis Potosi, Mexico, to compare results with maximum levels permitted by international recommendations and to find if there are differences in the microenvironments subject to measurements. The study was conducted with 63 volunteers in different microenvironments: home, workplace, outside, schools, travel, and shopping. The mean minimum values registered were 146.5 µW/m2 in travel from the Wi-Fi 2G band and 116.8 µW/m2 at home from the Wi-Fi 5G band, and the maximum values registered were 499.7 µW/m2 and 264.9 µW/m2 at the workplace for the Wi-Fi 2G band and the Wi-Fi 5G band, respectively. In addition, by time period and type of day, minimum values were registered at nighttime, these values being 129.4 µW/m2 and 93.9 µW/m2, and maximum values were registered in the daytime, these values being 303.1 µW/m2 and 168.3 µW/m2 for the Wi-Fi 2G and Wi-Fi 5G bands, respectively. In no case, values exceeded limits established by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). Of the study participants (n = 63), a subgroup (n = 35) answered a survey on risk perception. According to these results, the Tamazunchale (Mexico) population is worried about this situation in comparison with several European cities; however, the risk perception changes when they are informed about the results for the study.

Response to the Comment on "A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Hospitalised Current Smokers and COVID-19".

This is a reply to the comment by Ivan Berlin and Daniel Thomas on our recently published work [...].