Prevalence of frailty and cognitive impairment in older transplant candidates - a preview to the Kidney Transplantation in Older People (KTOP): impact of frailty on outcomes study.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation in older people has increased, however older transplant recipients experience mixed outcomes that invariably impacts on their quality of life. The increased vulnerability of older end stage kidney disease patients to frailty and cognitive impairment, may partially explain the differences in outcomes observed. The Kidney Transplantation in Older People (KTOP): impact of frailty on clinical outcomes study is an active clinical study aiming to explore the experience of older people waiting for and undergoing transplantation. In this manuscript we present the study protocol, the study cohort, and the prevalence of frailty and cognitive impairment identified at recruitment. METHODS: The KTOP study is a single centre, prospective, mixed methods, observational study. Recruitment began in October 2019. All patients aged 60 or above either active on the deceased donor waitlist or undergoing live donor transplantation were eligible for recruitment. Recruited participants completed a series of questionnaires assessing frailty, cognition, and quality of life, which are repeated at defined time points whilst on the waitlist and post-transplant. Clinical data was concurrently collected. Any participants identified as frail or vulnerable were also eligible for enrolment into the qualitative sub-study. RESULTS: Two hundred eight participants have been recruited (age 60-78). Baseline Montreal Cognitive Assessments were available for 173 participants, with 63 (36.4%) participants identified as having scores below normal (score < 26). Edmonton Frail Scale assessments were available for 184 participants, with 29 participants (15.8%) identified as frail (score ≥ 8), and a further 37 participants (20.1%) identified as being vulnerable (score 6-7). CONCLUSION: In the KTOP study cohort we have identified a prevalence of 36.4% of participants with MoCA scores suggestive of cognitive impairment, and a prevalence of frailty of 15.8% at recruitment. A further 20.1% were vulnerable. As formal testing for cognition and frailty is not routinely incorporated into the work up of older people across many units, the presence and significance of these conditions is likely not known. Ultimately the KTOP study will report on how these parameters evolve over time and following a transplant, and describe their impact on quality of life and clinical outcomes.

Lack of seroresponse to SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccines given early post-transplant in patients primed pre-transplantation.

SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are recommended pre-transplantation, however, waning immunity and evolving variants mandate booster doses. Currently there no data to inform the optimal timing of booster doses post-transplant, in patients primed pre-transplant. We investigated serial serological samples in 204 transplant recipients who received 2 or 3 SARS-CoV-2 vaccines pre-transplant. Spike protein antibody concentrations, [anti-S], were measured on the day of transplantation and following booster doses post-transplant. In infection-naïve patients, post-booster [anti-S] did not change when V3 (1st booster) was given at 116(78-150) days post-transplant, falling from 122(32-574) to 111(34-682) BAU/ml, p=0.78. Similarly, in infection-experienced patients, [anti-S] on Day-0 and post-V3 were 1090(133-3667) and 2207(650-5618) BAU/ml respectively, p=0.26. In patients remaining infection-naïve, [anti-S] increased post-V4 (as 2nd booster) when given at 226(208-295) days post-transplant, rising from 97(34-1074) to 5134(229-5680) BAU/ml, p=0.0016. Whilst in patients who had 3 vaccines pre-transplant, who received V4 (as 1st booster) at 82(49-101) days post-transplant, [anti-S] did not change, falling from 981(396-2666) to 871(242-2092) BAU/ml, p=0.62. Overall, infection pre-transplant and [anti-S] at the time of transplantation predicted post-transplant infection risk. As [Anti-S] fail to respond to SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccines given early post-transplant, passive immunity may be beneficial to protect patients during this period.

Molecular Assessment of C4d-Positive Renal Transplant Biopsies Without Evidence of Rejection.

INTRODUCTION: Immunohistochemical staining for C4d in peritubular capillaries has been part of antibody-mediated rejection (AbMR) definition in the Banff Classification for Allograft Pathology since 2003. However, it has limited sensitivity and specificity, therefore the clinical significance of C4d-positive biopsies without evidence of rejection (C4d+ WER) is unknown. We investigated the transcript levels of genes associated with AbMR in C4d+ WER biopsies from both ABO-compatible and incompatible renal transplant patients. METHODS: RNA was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded renal transplant biopsies (n = 125) and gene expression analysis of 35 AbMR-associated transcripts carried out using the NanoString nCounter system. RESULTS: AbMR-associated transcripts were significantly increased in samples with AbMR or suspicious AbMR. A subgroup of 17 of 35 transcripts that best distinguished AbMR from C4d-negative biopsies without evidence of rejection was used to study C4d+ WER samples. There was no differential expression between C4d-negative and C4d+ WER from both ABO-incompatible and -compatible transplants. The geometric mean of 17 differentially expressed genes was used to assign the C4d+ WER biopsies a high- or low-AbMR transcript score. Follow-up biopsies showed AbMR within 1 year of initial biopsy in 5 of 7 high-AbMR transcript patients but only 2 of 46 low-AbMR transcript patients. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, elevated transcript levels in a C4d+ WER biopsy were associated with increased odds for biopsy-proven AbMR on follow-up (P = 0.032, odds ratio 16.318), whereas factors including donor-specific antibody (DSA) status and time since transplantation were not. CONCLUSION: Gene expression analysis in C4d+ WER samples has the potential to identify patients at higher risk of developing AbMR.

High Intrapatient Variability of Tacrolimus Levels and Outpatient Clinic Nonattendance Are Associated With Inferior Outcomes in Renal Transplant Patients.

BACKGROUND: Nonadherence to immunosuppressants is associated with rejection and allograft loss. Intrapatient variability (IPV) of immunosuppression levels is a marker of nonadherence. This study describes the impact of IPV of tacrolimus levels in patients receiving a tacrolimus monotherapy immunosuppression protocol. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the outpatient tacrolimus levels of kidney-only transplant patients taken between 6 and 12 months posttransplant. IPV was determined using the coefficient of variance. RESULTS: Six hundred twenty-eight patients with a mean number of 8.98 ± 3.81 tacrolimus levels and a mean follow-up of 4.72 ± 2.19 years were included. Multivariate analysis showed death was associated with increasing age (1.04 [1.01-1.07], P = 0.0055), diabetes at time of transplant (2.79 [1.44-5.41], P = 0.0024), and rejection (2.34 [1.06-5.19], P = 0.036). Variables associated with graft loss included the highest variability group (2.51 [1.01-6.27], P = 0.048), mean tacrolimus level less than 5 ng/mL (4.32 [1.94-9.63], P = 0.0003), a high clinic nonattendance rate (1.10 [1.01-1.20], P = 0.03), and rejection (9.83 [4.62-20.94], P < 0.0001). Independent risk factors for rejection were de novo donor-specific antibody (3.15 [1.84-5.39], P < 0.0001), mean tacrolimus level less than 5 ng/mL (2.57 [1.27-5.19], P = 0.00860, and a high clinic nonattendance rate (1.11 [1.05-1.18], P = 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that high tacrolimus IPV and clinic nonattendance are associated with inferior allograft survival. Interventions to minimize the causes of high variability, particularly nonadherence are essential to improve long-term allograft outcomes.

Alemtuzumab dose adjusted for body weight is associated with earlier lymphocyte repletion and less infective episodes in the first year post renal transplantation - a retrospective study.

The optimal dose of alemtuzumab for renal transplant induction is not known, and the doses reported in the literature vary. This study compares two separate dosing regimens of alemtuzumab in renal transplantation. The first is a standard fixed dose of 30 mg (SD), and the second is a dose adjusted for body weight at 0.4 mg/kg (AD). In this first year post-transplant, there was no difference in patient [HR 0.64 (0.22-1.86), P = 0.39] or allograft survival [HR 1.18 (0.48-2.90), P = 0.72] between the two groups. There was also no difference in overall rejection-free survival [HR 1.12 (0.79-1.58), P = 0.53]. However, absolute lymphocyte count was significantly higher at all measured time points in the first year in the AD group. There were also less episodes of urosepsis [HR 1.38 (1.03-1.85), P = 0.037] and fungal infection [HR 5.15 (2.00-13.28), P = 0.015] in the AD group compared with the SD group. This study shows that AD alemtuzumab is associated with earlier lymphocyte repletion and less infective episodes in the first year postrenal transplant, without increasing the risk of rejection. This work highlights the need for studies into the optimal dosing of monoclonal antibodies used in transplantation.

Risk factors and outcomes of delayed graft function in renal transplant recipients receiving a steroid sparing immunosuppression protocol.

AIM: To analyse the risk factors and outcomes of delayed graft function (DGF) in patients receiving a steroid sparing protocol. METHODS: Four hundred and twenty-seven recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants were studied of which 135 (31.6%) experienced DGF. All patients received monoclonal antibody induction with a tacrolimus based, steroid sparing immunosuppression protocol. RESULTS: Five year patient survival was 87.2% and 94.9% in the DGF and primary graft function (PGF) group respectively, P = 0.047. Allograft survival was 77.9% and 90.2% in the DGF and PGF group respectively, P < 0.001. Overall rejection free survival was no different between the DGF and PGF groups with a 1 and 5 year rejection free survival in the DGF group of 77.7% and 67.8% compared with 81.3% and 75.3% in the PGF group, P = 0.19. Patients with DGF who received IL2 receptor antibody induction were at significantly higher risk of rejection in the early post-transplant period than the group with DGF who received alemtuzumab induction. On multivariate analysis, risk factors for DGF were male recipients, recipients of black ethnicity, circulatory death donation, preformed DSA, increasing cold ischaemic time, older donor age and dialysis vintage. CONCLUSION: Alemtuzumab induction may be of benefit in preventing early rejection episodes associated with DGF. Prospective trials are required to determine optimal immunotherapy protocols for patients at high risk of DGF.

Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of stroke post-transplantation in patients receiving a steroid sparing immunosuppression protocol.

Corticosteroid use after transplantation is associated with an increased incidence of cardiovascular events and death. Cerebrovascular disease is a common cause of morbidity and mortality post-renal transplantation; however, a dedicated analysis of cerebrovascular disease in recipients of a steroid sparing protocol has not been reported. The aim of this study was to examine the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of CVA in transplant recipients receiving a steroid sparing protocol. We retrospectively analyzed 1237 patients who received a kidney alone or a simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplant. Fifty-six of 1237 (4.53%) patients had a CVA post-transplant. All-cause mortality was significantly higher in the CVA group compared with the non-CVA group, OR: 3.4 (1.7-7.0), p < 0.001. Factors found to be associated with increased risk of CVA by multivariate analysis were older age, HR: 1.07 (1.04-1.09), p < 0.001; diabetes at the time of transplantation, HR: 2.83 (1.42-5.64), p = 0.003; corticosteroid use pre-transplant, HR: 3.27 (1.29-8.27), p = 0.013 and recipients of a SPK, HR: 4.03 (1.85-8.79), p < 0.001. This study has identified subgroups of patients who are at increased risk of CVA post-transplant in patients otherwise receiving a steroid sparing immunosuppression protocol.

Kidney transplantation with minimized maintenance: alemtuzumab induction with tacrolimus monotherapy--an open label, randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressive regimens for kidney transplantation which reduce the long-term burden of immunosuppression are attractive, but little data are available to judge the safety and efficacy of the different strategies used. We tested the hypothesis that the simple, cheap, regimen of alemtuzumab induction combined with tacrolimus monotherapy maintenance provided equivalent outcomes to the more commonly used combination of interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibody induction with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil combination maintenance, both regimens using steroid withdrawal after 7 days. METHODS: One hundred twenty-three live or deceased donor renal transplant recipients were randomized 2:1 to receive alemtuzumab/tacrolimus or daclizumab/tacrolimus/mycophenolate. The primary endpoint was survival with a functioning graft at 1 year. RESULTS: Both regimens produced equivalent, excellent outcomes with the primary outcome measure of 97.6% in the alemtuzumab arm and 95.1% in the daclizumab arm at 1 year (95% confidence interval of difference 6.9% to -1.7%) and at 2 years 92.6% and 95.1%. Rejection was less frequent in the alemtuzumab arm with 1- and 2-year rejection-free survival of 91.2% and 89.9% compared with 82.3% and 82.3% in the daclizumab arm. There were no significant differences in terms of the occurrence of opportunistic infections. CONCLUSION: Alemtuzumab induction with tacrolimus maintenance monotherapy and short-course steroid use provides a simple, safe, and effective immunosuppressive regimen for renal transplantation.