Gluteal Tendinopathy Is Associated With Lower Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Posterior Approach: A Prospective Cohort Study of 1,538 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Gluteal tendinopathy (GT) is found in 20 to 25% of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). Despite this, there is a scarcity of literature assessing the association between GT and THA outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether intraoperative diagnosis of GT negatively affected postoperative outcomes. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing primary THA for osteoarthritis via a posterior approach over 5 years were recruited in a prospective study. Gluteal tendinopathy was assessed and graded at the time of surgery, but not repaired. A total of 1,538 (93%) completed the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at 1 year after surgery and were included in the analysis. The PROMs included the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement (HOOS JR), and EuroQol 5-Dimension, and were collected preoperatively and one year after THA. RESULTS: The gluteal tendons were graded as 4 distinct grades: normal (n = 1,023, 66%), tendinopathy but no tear (n = 337, 22%), partial thickness tear (n = 131, 9%), and full thickness tear (n = 47, 3%). The occurrence of GT was associated with age, body mass index, and sex. There was no significant difference in baseline OHS or HOOS JR scores according to GT grade. As GT grade increased, lower median 1-year OHS (P = .001) and HOOS JR (P = .016) were observed. This association was confirmed by linear regression analysis with 1-year OHS (B = 0.5, 95% CI = -0.9 to -0.1, P = .011) when controlled for age and sex. CONCLUSIONS: Gluteal tendinopathy was commonly observed and was associated with inferior 1-year PROMs in patients undergoing THA via posterior approach. Increasing degree of tendinopathy was a negative prognostic factor for outcomes and patient satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2 (High quality prospective cohort study).

Improvement in Sleep Patterns After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study in 780 Patients.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed change in sleep patterns before and after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and its relationship to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS: Between July 2016 and June 2018, surgical data and PROMs were collected on 780 subjects before and 12 months after THA or TKA. PROMs included Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, patient satisfaction, and 2 questions from the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. RESULTS: Before surgery, 35% (270 of 780) reported poor quality sleep. Sleep quality and duration were worse in females over males, and in THA patients (39%) over TKA patients (30%; P = .011). Of those reporting bad sleep, 74% (201 of 270) were improved after arthroplasty. Satisfaction was higher in subjects reporting good sleep quality (626 of 676; 93%) compared with those reporting bad sleep quality (67 of 86; 78%) (P = .001). Sleep was positively correlated with better Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score/Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (r = 0.2-0.3). CONCLUSION: Improvement in sleep quality and duration can be expected after THA and TKA and is associated with better outcome scores and satisfaction.

The Use of Routine Postoperative Microscopy and Culture Screening Following Elective Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: An Unnecessary Cost With No Effect on Clinical Management?

BACKGROUND: The use of microscopy and culture screening to detect pathogenic microorganisms followed by a decolonization protocol is a widely performed practice prior to elective hip and knee arthroplasty. In our center, the routine care of hip and knee arthroplasty also involves postoperative screening including direct culture of the surgical site. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of pathogen detection following these tests and to determine whether routine postoperative screening, with particular reference to postoperative surgical site culture, led to any change in clinical management of these patients. METHODS: A series of 1000 patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty at The Mater Hospital between January 2014 and December 2015 were identified from our arthroplasty database. Results of preoperative and postoperative microscopy and culture screening were reviewed by 2 independent researchers. RESULTS: Of the 1000 subjects, positive microscopy and culture results were identified in 88 patients (8.8%) preoperatively and 5 patients (0.5%) postoperatively. None of the 1000 postoperative surgical site swabs had a positive microscopy and culture screen. All the 5 positive postoperative microscopy and culture screen results were in patients who had positive cultures preoperatively. There were no positive postoperative microscopy and culture screen results in patients who had had negative preoperative results. Postoperative screening was performed at a cost of AUS$213 per patient. CONCLUSION: Routine postoperative surgical site culture following hip and knee arthroplasty does not alter clinical management, has a significant associated financial cost, and has the potential to expose the patient to a risk of surgical site infection and is therefore not supported.