Synergistic effects of a combination of dietary factors sulforaphane and (-) epigallocatechin-3-gallate in HT-29 AP-1 human colon carcinoma cells.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to investigate combinations of two chemopreventive dietary factors: EGCG 20 microM (or 100 microM) and SFN (25 microM) in HT-29 AP-1 human colon carcinoma cells. METHODS: After exposure of HT-29 AP-1 cells to SFN and EGCG, individually or in combination, we performed AP-1 luciferase reporter assays, cell viability assays, isobologram analyses, senescence staining, quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) assays, Western blotting, and assays for HDAC activity and hydrogen peroxide. In some experiments, we exposed cells to superoxide dismutase (SOD) or Trichostatin A (TSA) in addition to the treatment with dietary factors. RESULTS: The combinations of SFN and EGCG dramatically enhanced transcriptional activation of AP-1 reporter in HT-29 cells (46-fold with 25 microM SFN and 20 microM EGCG; and 175-fold with 25 microM SFN and 100 microM EGCG). Isobologram analysis showed synergistic activation for the combinations with combination index, CI < 1. Interestingly, co-treatment with 20units/ml of SOD, a free radical scavenger, attenuated the synergism elicited by the combinations (2-fold with 25 muM SFN and 20 muM EGCG; and 15-fold with 25 microM SFN and 100 microM EGCG). Cell viability assays showed that the low-dose combination decreased cell viability to 70% whereas the high-dose combination decreased cell viability to 40% at 48 h, with no significant change in cell viability at 24 h as compared to control cells. In addition, 20 microM and 100 microM EGCG, but not 25 microM SFN, showed induction of senescence in the HT-29 AP-1 cells subjected to senescence staining. However, both low- and high-dose combinations of SFN and EGCG attenuated the cellular senescence induced by EGCG alone. There was no significant change in the protein levels of phosphorylated forms of ERK, JNK, p38, and Akt-Ser473 or Akt-Thr308. Besides, qRT-PCR assays corroborated the induction of the luciferase gene seen with the combinations in the reporter assay. Relative expression levels of transcripts of many other genes known to be either under the control of the AP-1 promoter or involved in cell cycle regulation or cellular influx-efflux such as cyclin D1, cMyc, ATF-2, Elk-1, SRF, CREB5, SLCO1B3, MRP1, MRP2 and MRP3 were also quantified by qRT-PCR in the presence and absence of SOD at both 6 and 10 h. In addition, pre-treatment with 100 ng/ml TSA, a potent HDAC inhibitor, potentiated (88-fold) the synergism seen with the low-dose combination on the AP-1 reporter transcriptional activation. Cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions of treated cells were tested for HDAC activity at 2 and 12 h both in the presence and absence of TSA, however, there was no significant change in their HDAC activity. In addition, the H2O2 produced in the cell system was about 2 microM for the low-dose combination which was scavenged to about 1 microM in the presence of SOD. CONCLUSION: Taken together, the synergistic activation of AP-1 by the combination of SFN and EGCG that was potentiated by HDAC inhibitor TSA and attenuated by free radical scavenger SOD point to a possible multifactorial control of colon carcinoma that may involve a role for HDACs, inhibition of cellular senescence, and SOD signaling.

Toxicogenomics of endoplasmic reticulum stress inducer tunicamycin in the small intestine and liver of Nrf2 knockout and C57BL/6J mice.

This objective of this study was to investigate the toxicogenomics and the spatial regulation of global gene expression profiles elicited by endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress inducer tunicamycin (TM) in mouse small intestine and liver as well as to identify TM-modulated nuclear factor-E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2)-dependent genes. Gene expression profiles were analyzed using 45,000 Affymetrix mouse genome 430 2.0 array and GeneSpring 7.2 software. Microarray results were validated by quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR analyses. Clusters of genes that were either induced or suppressed more than two-fold by TM treatment compared with vehicle in C57BL/6J/Nrf2 (-/-; knockout) and C57BL/6J Nrf2 (+/+; wildtype) mice genotypes were identified. Amongst these, in small intestine and liver, 1291 and 750 genes, respectively, were identified as Nrf2-dependent and upregulated, and 1370 and 943 genes, respectively, as Nrf2-dependent and downregulated. Based on their biological functions, these genes can be categorized into molecular chaperones and heat shock proteins, ubiquitination/proteolysis, apoptosis/cell cycle, electron transport, detoxification, cell growth/differentiation, signaling molecules/interacting partners, kinases and phosphatases, transport, biosynthesis/metabolism, nuclear assembly and processing, and genes related to calcium and glucose homeostasis. Phase II detoxification/antioxidant genes as well as putative interacting partners of Nrf2 such as nuclear corepressors and coactivators, were also identified as Nrf2-dependent genes. The identification of TM-regulated and Nrf2-dependent genes in the unfolded protein response to ER stress not only provides potential novel insights into the gestalt biological effects of TM on the toxicogenomics and spatial regulation of global gene expression profiles in cancer pharmacology and toxicology, but also points to the pivotal role of Nrf2 in these biological processes.

Pharmacogenomics of phenolic antioxidant butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) in the small intestine and liver of Nrf2 knockout and C57BL/6J mice.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to investigate the pharmacogenomics and the spatial regulation of global gene expression profiles elicited by cancer chemopreventive agent butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) in mouse small intestine and liver as well as to identify BHA-modulated nuclear factor-E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2)-dependent genes. METHODS: C57BL/6J (+/+; wildtype) and C57BL/6J/Nrf2(-/-; knockout) mice were administered a single 200 mg/kg oral dose of BHA or only vehicle. Both small intestine and liver were collected at 3 h after treatment and total RNA was extracted. Gene expression profiles were analyzed using 45,000 Affymetrix mouse genome 430 2.0 array and GeneSpring 7.2 software. Microarray results were validated by quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR analyses. RESULTS: Clusters of genes that were either induced or suppressed more than two fold by BHA treatment compared with vehicle in C57BL/6J/Nrf2(-/-; knockout) and C57BL/6J Nrf2 (+/+; wildtype) mice genotypes were identified. Amongst these, in small intestine and liver, 1,490 and 493 genes respectively were identified as Nrf2-dependent and upregulated, and 1,090 and 824 genes respectively as Nrf2-dependent and downregulated. Based on their biological functions, these genes can be categorized into ubiquitination/proteolysis, apoptosis/cell cycle, electron transport, detoxification, cell growth/differentiation, transcription factors/interacting partners, kinases and phosphatases, transport, biosynthesis/metabolism, RNA/protein processing and nuclear assembly, and DNA replication genes. Phase II detoxification/antioxidant genes as well as novel molecular target genes, including putative interacting partners of Nrf2 such as nuclear corepressors and coactivators, were also identified as Nrf2-dependent genes. CONCLUSIONS: The identification of BHA-regulated and Nrf2-dependent genes not only provides potential novel insights into the gestalt biological effects of BHA on the pharmacogenomics and spatial regulation of global gene expression profiles in cancer chemoprevention, but also points to the pivotal role of Nrf2 in these biological processes.