RESUMEN
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide, and up to 50% of all patients diagnosed will develop metastatic disease. Management of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) has been constantly improving, aided by newer and more effective chemotherapy agents and the use of multidisciplinary teams. However, the only curative treatment remains surgical resection of the CRLM. Although survival for surgically resected patients has shown modest improvement, this is mostly because of the fact that what is constantly evolving is the indication for resection. Surgeons are constantly pushing the limits of what is considered resectable or not, thus enhancing and enlarging the pool of patients who can be potentially benefited and even cured with aggressive surgical procedures. There are a variety of procedures that have been developed, which range from procedures to stimulate hepatic growth, such as portal vein embolization, two-staged hepatectomy, or the association of both, to technically challenging procedures such as simultaneous approaches for synchronous metastasis, ex-vivo or in-situ perfusion with total vascular exclusion, or even liver transplant. This article reviewed the major breakthroughs in liver surgery for CRLM, showing how much has changed and what has been achieved in the field of CRLM.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Biliary fistulas may result as a complication of gallstone disease. According to their tract, abdominal internal biliary fistulas may be classified into cholecystobiliary and bilioenteric fistulas. Surgical treatment is challenging and requires highly trained surgeons with high preoperative suspicion. Conventional surgery is still of choice by most of the authors. However, laparoscopy is emerging as a minimally invasive alternative. We investigated the surgical approach, conversion rate, and outcomes according to the type of biliary fistula. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 11,130 laparoscopic cholecystectomies, 31 open cholecystectomies, and 31 surgeries for gallstone ileus at our institution from May 2007 to May 2020. We diagnosed internal biliary fistula in 73 patients and divided them into two groups according to their fistulous tract: cholecystobiliary fistula and bilioenteric fistula. We described demographic characteristics, preoperative imaging modalities, surgical approach, conversion rates, surgical procedures, and outcomes. We additionally revised the literature and compared our results with 13 studies from the past 10 years. RESULTS: There were 22 and 51 patients in the cholecystobiliary and bilioenteric groups, respectively. Our preoperative suspicion of a fistula was 80%. We started 88% of procedures by laparoscopic approach. The effectiveness of laparoscopy in the resolution of internal biliary fistula was 40% for cholecystobiliary fistula and 55% for bilioenteric fistulas. The most frequent cause for conversion to laparotomy was the difficulty to identify anatomical features, in addition to the need to perform a Roux en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Choledocholithiasis was not associated with an increase in conversion rates. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic resolution of a biliary fistula is still a matter of controversy. Despite the high conversion rates, we believe that a great number of patients benefit from this minimally invasive technique. A high preoperative suspicion and trained surgeons are vital in the treatment of internal biliary fistulas.
Asunto(s)
Fístula Biliar , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica , Coledocolitiasis , Laparoscopía , Fístula Biliar/etiología , Fístula Biliar/cirugía , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/efectos adversos , Coledocolitiasis/complicaciones , Coledocolitiasis/cirugía , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Resumen Los aneurismas esplénicos verdaderos son dilataciones saculares que involucran todas las capas de la arteria esplénica. Se presentan más frecuentemente en mujeres, en el embarazo y pacientes con hipertensión portal. Son habitualmente asintomáticos y diagnosticados incidentalmente durante el estudio de otra afección abdominal. Hasta un 10% se puede presentar con ruptura, lo que supone un escenario con una alta morbilidad y mortalidad. El tratamiento de los aneurismas esplénicos es aún un tema de controversia y existen variadas modalidades terapéuticas. Presentamos dos casos de pacientes con aneurismas esplénicos: uno de ellos que se manifestó con rotura y el otro por un diagnóstico incidental. Ambos fueron resueltos mediante embolización endovascular con resultados óptimos. Esta modalidad terapéutica poco difundida para el tratamiento de aneurismas esplénicos gigantes o rotos, nos permitió resolver el cuadro de forma segura y efectiva, con mínima morbilidad y mortalidad.
Abstract True splenic aneurysms are saccular dilations of all the layers of the splenic artery, more common in women, pregnancy and portal hypertension. They are usually asymptomatic and diagnosed incidentally during the study of other abdominal diseases. Up to 10% may present with rupture, which implies a high morbidity and mortality. Treatment of splenic aneurysms is still a subject of controversy and there is a great variety of therapeutic modalities. We present two cases of patients with splenic aneurysms: one who presented with rupture and the other one incidentally diagnosed. Both were treated with endovascular embolization achieving optimal results. Although the utility of this therapy has not been assessed for giant or ruptured aneurysms, it allowed us to solve these scenarios in a secure and effective way, with minimum morbidity and mortality.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Aneurisma Roto/terapia , Aneurisma Roto/diagnóstico por imagen , Embolización Terapéutica , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Arteria Esplénica/diagnóstico por imagen , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
True splenic aneurysms are saccular dilations of all the layers of the splenic artery, more common in women, pregnancy and portal hypertension. They are usually asymptomatic and diagnosed incidentally during the study of other abdominal diseases. Up to 10% may present with rupture, which implies a high morbidity and mortality. Treatment of splenic aneurysms is still a subject of controversy and there is a great variety of therapeutic modalities. We present two cases of patients with splenic aneurysms: one who presented with rupture and the other one incidentally diagnosed. Both were treated with endovascular embolization achieving optimal results. Although the utility of this therapy has not been assessed for giant or ruptured aneurysms, it allowed us to solve these scenarios in a secure and effective way, with minimum morbidity and mortality.
Los aneurismas esplénicos verdaderos son dilataciones saculares que involucran todas las capas de la arteria esplénica. Se presentan más frecuentemente en mujeres, en el embarazo y pacientes con hipertensión portal. Son habitualmente asintomáticos y diagnosticados incidentalmente durante el estudio de otra afección abdominal. Hasta un 10% se puede presentar con ruptura, lo que supone un escenario con una alta morbilidad y mortalidad. El tratamiento de los aneurismas esplénicos es aún un tema de controversia y existen variadas modalidades terapéuticas. Presentamos dos casos de pacientes con aneurismas esplénicos: uno de ellos que se manifestó con rotura y el otro por un diagnóstico incidental. Ambos fueron resueltos mediante embolización endovascular con resultados óptimos. Esta modalidad terapéutica poco difundida para el tratamiento de aneurismas esplénicos gigantes o rotos, nos permitió resolver el cuadro de forma segura y efectiva, con mínima morbilidad y mortalidad.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Roto , Embolización Terapéutica , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Aneurisma Roto/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma Roto/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Arteria Esplénica/diagnóstico por imagen , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Endometriosis is defined as the presence of endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity. It affects ~5-10% of women in their reproductive years. When it affects the intestine, it tends to be confused clinically with a wide variety of affections, which is why it has sometimes been called "the great simulator". A review of the literature shows that intestinal localization is rare and that obstruction secondary to this cause is even more unusual, with preoperative diagnosis being a challenge for surgeons. With the purpose of highlighting clinical and diagnostic imaging characteristics that help the preoperative suspicion of this entity, so rare in routine practice, we present two cases of women who underwent emergency surgery, without a previous diagnosis of endometriosis and with intestinal occlusion as the first manifestation of the disease. Treatment of intestinal occlusion by endometriosis consists of intestinal resection of the affected sector and primary anastomosis. Diagnosis of intestinal occlusion secondary to ileal endometriosis is based on a high index of suspicion and should be considered in women of childbearing age, without a history of disease and with a history of painful menstruation.
La endometriosis se define como la presencia de tejido endometrial fuera de la cavidad uterina. Ocurre en aproximadamente 5 a 10% de las mujeres en edad fértil. Cuando afecta al intestino tiende a confundirse clínicamente con una gran variedad de afecciones por lo cual en algunas oportunidades se le ha llamado también "la gran simuladora". La revisión de la literatura muestra que la localización intestinal es poco frecuente y que la obstrucción secundaria a esta causa es aún más inusual, siendo el diagnóstico preoperatorio un desafío para los cirujanos. Con el propósito de resaltar características clínicas y de estudio por imágenes que ayuden a la sospecha preoperatoria de esta entidad tan infrecuente en la práctica habitual, se presentan dos casos de mujeres operadas de urgencia, sin diagnóstico previo de endometriosis y con oclusión intestinal como primera manifestación de la enfermedad. El tratamiento consiste en la resección intestinal del sector afectado y anastomosis primaria. El diagnóstico se basa en un alto índice de sospecha y debería ser considerado en mujeres en edad fértil, sin antecedentes patológicos y con historia de menstruaciones dolorosas.
Asunto(s)
Endometriosis/diagnóstico , Endometriosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Obstrucción Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Obstrucción Intestinal/etiología , Obstrucción Intestinal/cirugíaRESUMEN
Resumen La endometriosis se define como la presencia de tejido endometrial fuera de la cavidad uterina. Ocurre en aproximadamente 5 a 10% de las mujeres en edad fértil. Cuando afecta al intestino tiende a confundirse clínicamente con una gran variedad de afecciones por lo cual en algunas oportunidades se le ha llamado también "la gran simuladora". La revisión de la literatura muestra que la localización intestinal es poco frecuente y que la obstrucción secundaria a esta causa es aún más inusual, siendo el diagnóstico preoperatorio un desafío para los cirujanos. Con el propósito de resaltar características clínicas y de estudio por imágenes que ayuden a la sospecha preoperatoria de esta entidad tan infrecuente en la práctica habitual, se presentan dos casos de mujeres operadas de urgencia, sin diagnóstico previo de endometriosis y con oclusión intestinal como primera manifestación de la enfermedad. El tratamiento consiste en la resección intestinal del sector afectado y anastomosis primaria. El diagnóstico se basa en un alto índice de sospecha y debería ser considerado en mujeres en edad fértil, sin antecedentes patológicos y con historia de menstruaciones dolorosas.
Abstract Endometriosis is defined as the presence of endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity. It affects ~5-10% of women in their reproductive years. When it affects the intestine, it tends to be confused clinically with a wide variety of affections, which is why it has sometimes been called "the great simulator". A review of the literature shows that intestinal localization is rare and that obstruction secondary to this cause is even more unusual, with preoperative diagnosis being a challenge for surgeons. With the purpose of highlighting clinical and diagnostic imaging characteristics that help the preoperative suspicion of this entity, so rare in routine practice, we present two cases of women who underwent emergency surgery, without a previous diagnosis of endometriosis and with intestinal occlusion as the first manifestation of the disease. Treatment of intestinal occlusion by endometriosis consists of intestinal resection of the affected sector and primary anastomosis. Diagnosis of intestinal occlusion secondary to ileal endometriosis is based on a high index of suspicion and should be considered in women of childbearing age, without a history of disease and with a history of painful menstruation.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Endometriosis/diagnóstico , Endometriosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Obstrucción Intestinal/cirugía , Obstrucción Intestinal/etiología , Obstrucción Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The recent advent of more effective chemotherapy and the development of surgical procedures have expanded the pool of resectable patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Two-stage hepatectomy (TSH), associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS), and ultrasound-guided enhanced one-stage hepatectomy (e-OSH) are the surgical solutions proposed for these patients, but the range of indications for these procedures vary from institution to institution. SUMMARY: The advantages and disadvantages of each approach are herein discussed. Patients who drop out between the staged operations of TSH limit its success rate, although predictive scores may help with patient selection and thereby optimize the results. Safety and oncological suitability are concerns to be addressed when considering ALPPS. These concerns notwithstanding, ALPPS has introduced an innovative concept in surgery: the monosegmental remnant liver. Studies involving e-OSH have proven the oncological suitability of tumor exposure once the CLM is detached from major intrahepatic vessels. This finding could expand the indications for e-OSH, although the technical challenges that it entails limit its spread among the surgical community. The liver-first approach involves the clearance of tumors from the liver before the colorectal primary is tackled. This approach fully justifies the complexity of e-OSH. KEY MESSAGES: Predictive scores limiting the interstage dropout of TSH, partial and monosegmental ALPPS, and R1 vascular e-OSH justified by solid long-term results represent new insights that could help refne the patient assignment to each of these approaches. Additionally, liver transplantation is an emerging treatment for CLM that should be taken into account.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Acute calculous cholecystitis represents one of the most common complications of cholelithiasis. While laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the standard treatment in mild and moderate forms, the need for antibiotic therapy after surgery remains undefined. The aim of the randomised controlled Cholecystectomy Antibiotic Randomised Trial (CHART) is therefore to assess if there are benefits in the use of postoperative antibiotics in patients with mild or moderate acute cholecystitis in whom a laparoscopic cholecystectomy is performed. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A single-centre, double-blind, randomised trial. After screening for eligibility and informed consent, 300 patients admitted for acute calculus cholecystitis will be randomised into two groups of treatment, either receiving amoxicillin/clavulanic acid or placebo for 5 consecutive days. Postoperative evaluation will take place during the first 30â days. Postoperative infectious complications are the primary end point. Secondary end points are length of hospital stay, readmissions, need of reintervention (percutaneous or surgical reinterventions) and overall mortality. The results of this trial will provide strong evidence to either support or abandon the use of antibiotics after surgery, impacting directly in the incidence of adverse events associated with the use of antibiotics, the emergence of bacterial resistance and treatment costs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study and informed consent sheets have been approved by the Research Projects Evaluating Committee (CEPI) of Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (protocol N° 2111). RESULTS: The results of the trial will be reported in a peer-reviewed publication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02057679.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica , Colecistitis Aguda/tratamiento farmacológico , Colecistitis Aguda/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos de Investigación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
La resección hepática es el único tratamiento con intención curatva para pacientes con enfermedades hepáticas malignas, primarias o secundarias. La posibilidad de lograr una resección curatva está limitada por el remanente hepático futuro y la insuficiencia hepática poshepatectomía es la complicación más grave de estos procedimientos. La asociación de partición hepática y ligadura portal para hepa-tectomía diferida (ALPPS) ha sido introducida en los últmos años como una estrategia novedosa para evitar la insuficiencia hepática poshepatectomía y permitr la resección en pacientes con enfermedad localmente avanzada, considerados previamente irresecables debido a un remanente hepático insuf-ciente. Esta técnica basa sus principios en dejar el hemihígado tumoral privado de fujo portal dirigiendo este al hígado para hipertrofar, mientras que la prevención de fujo cruzado intraparenquimatoso mediante la transección hepática maximiza el aumento de volumen en el remanente hepático. Son candidatos a esta cirugía aquellos pacientes con lesiones marginalmente resecables o primariamente irresecables unilaterales o bilaterales debido a un remanente hepático futuro inadecuado ya sea en volumen y/o calidad. La mayor parte de la evidencia actual obtenida respecto de ALPPS muestra hasta el momento resultados prometedores a corto plazo; de igual forma estos son dificiles de interpretar desde el punto de vista oncológico debido al grupo heterogéneo de pacientes con diferentes patologías de base, el uso variable de quimioterapia y las variaciones técnicas aplicadas. Sin embargo, el ALPPS es una estrategia factble y segura en manos de cirujanos experimentados, que debería ser tenida en cuenta como opción de tratamiento multdisciplinario, en pacientes oncológicos correctamente seleccionados y que hayan sido evaluados previamente en comités de tumores mult-disciplinarios. De esta forma, es necesario contar con mayor experiencia y resultados a largo plazo para poder defnir con mayor claridad cuál es el papel de este nuevo método.
RESUMEN
Groove pancreatitis (GP) is a rare form of segmental chronic pancreatitis affecting the groove area (anatomic space between the head of the pancreas, the duodenum and the common bile duct). Its clinical and radiological presentation may be similar to groove pancreatic adenocarcinoma (GPA). Nevertheless, treatment and prognosis are totally different. We report two cases of both GP and GPA and review the relevant aspects that may help to clarify the differential diagnosis between these two rare entities. The first patient is a 57-year-old man with a history of chronic alcohol consumption who presented with persistent abdominal pain. The CT-scan findings suggested GP. Due to the persistence of symptoms despite medical treatment, a pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed. Pathologic evaluation confirmed the diagnosis of GP. The second patient is a 72-year-old male who presented with cholestasis and weight loss. The tumor marker CA 19-9 was increased The CT-scan findings were consistent with duodenal dystrophy. In order to rule out malignancy a pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed. Pathologic evaluation revealed a pancreatic head adenocarcinoma (T3-N1-M0). GP is a rare entity that should be suspected in patients with a history of heavy alcohol consumption who complain of chronic abdominal pain and weight loss. Patients without a clear diagnosis even after a through imaging work-up, or those in whom symptoms are persistent in spite of medical therapy, should undergo surgical exploration.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Pancreatitis/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Raras/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Anciano , Enfermedad Crónica , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Pancreatitis/cirugía , Enfermedades Raras/cirugía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
Groove pancreatitis (GP) is a rare form of segmental chronic pancreatitis affecting the groove area (anatomic space between the head of the pancreas, the duodenum and the common bile duct). Its clinical and radiological presentation may be similar to groove pancreatic adenocarcinoma (GPA). Nevertheless, treatment and prognosis are totally different. We report two cases of both GP and GPA and review the relevant aspects that may help to clarify the differential diagnosis between these two rare entities. The first patient is a 57-year-old man with a history of chronic alcohol consumption who presented with persistent abdominal pain. The CT-scan findings suggested GP. Due to the persistence of symptoms despite medical treatment, a pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed. Pathologic evaluation confirmed the diagnosis of GP. The second patient is a 72-year-old male who presented with cholestasis and weight loss. The tumor marker CA 19-9 was increased The CT-scan findings were consistent with duodenal dystrophy. In order to rule out malignancy a pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed. Pathologic evaluation revealed a pancreatic head adenocarcinoma (T3-N1-M0). GP is a rare entity that should be suspected in patients with a history of heavy alcohol consumption who complain of chronic abdominal pain and weight loss. Patients without a clear diagnosis even after a through imaging work-up, or those in whom symptoms are persistent in spite of medical therapy, should undergo surgical exploration.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Raras/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Pancreatitis/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Enfermedad Crónica , Enfermedades Raras/cirugía , Humanos , Anciano , Masculino , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Pancreatitis/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
The small intestine is a frequent site of melanoma metastases and the most common cause of secondary intestinal tumors. Even though, its presentation with intestinal obstruction due to intussusception is very rare. We present a 47-year-old woman with a medical history of facial melanoma operated 17 years ago and recently diagnosed of cervical recurrence who complained of abdominal pain of one week duration accompanied with vomiting and abdominal distension. Computed tomography (CT) scan revealed marked distension of the small intestine with features suggesting intussusception of the distal ileum. At laparoscopic exploration a massive ileocolic intussusception was found with invagination of the last 60 cm of ileum inside the cecum and ascending colon. Surgical reduction revealed a tumor of approximately 2 cm in the distal end of the intussuscepted intestine acting as the lead point. Resection of non-viable ileum along with the tumor and end-to-end anastomosis was performed. Many other lesions of smaller size were found distantly in the proximal small bowel but were not treated. The patient had a full recovery and was discharged three days after surgery. Pathological examination showed metastatic melanoma and a positron emission tomography (PET) scan confirmed disseminated disease with brain metastasis. The patient died three months after surgery. Intestinal occlusion due to metastatic disease is a rare condition but should be taken into account particularly in patients with history of cancer. Surgical intervention with a mini-invasive laparoscopic approach is feasible. Intestinal resection and anastomosis is mandatory for either curative or palliative intentions providing a satisfactory treatment.