RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: There is a need to strengthen the evidence base regarding medication use during pregnancy and to facilitate the early detection of safety signals. EudraVigilance (EV) serves as the primary system for managing and analysing information concerning suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) within the European Economic Area. Despite its various functionalities, the current format for electronic submissions of safety reports lacks a specific data element indicating medicine exposure during pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to address the limitations of existing approaches by developing a rule-based algorithm in EV that more reliably identifies cases that are truly representative of an ADR during pregnancy. METHODS: The study utilised the standardised MedDRA query (SMQ) 'Pregnancy and neonatal topics' (PNT) as a benchmark for comparison. Recognising that the SMQ PNT also retrieves healthy pregnancy outcomes, contraceptive failure, failed abortifacients as well as ADRs not associated with pregnancy, a novel algorithm was tailored to improve the accuracy of identifying suspected ADRs occurring during pregnancy. RESULTS: Upon testing, the algorithm demonstrated superior performance, correctly predicting 90% of cases reporting an ADR during pregnancy, compared to 54% achieved by the SMQ PNT. The implementation of the algorithm in EV led to the retrieval of 202,426 cases. CONCLUSION: The development and successful testing of the novel algorithm represents a step forward in pregnancy-specific signal detection in EV. Because signals associated with pregnancy may be diluted in a large database such as EV, this study lays the groundwork for future research to evaluate the effectiveness of disproportionality methods on a more refined subset of pregnancy-related ADR reports.
RESUMEN
CETP inhibitors are a class of lipid-lowering drugs in development for treatment of coronary heart disease (CHD). Genetic studies in East Asian ancestry have interpreted the lack of CETP signal with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and lack of drug target Mendelian randomization (MR) effect on CHD as evidence that CETP inhibitors might not be effective in East Asian participants. Capitalizing on recent increases in sample size of East Asian genetic studies, we conducted a drug target MR analysis, scaled to a standard deviation increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Despite finding evidence for possible neutral effects of lower CETP levels on LDL-C, systolic blood pressure and pulse pressure in East Asians (interaction p-values < 1.6 × 10-3), effects on cardiovascular outcomes were similarly protective in both ancestry groups. In conclusion, on-target inhibition of CETP is anticipated to decrease cardiovascular disease in individuals of both European and East Asian ancestries.
Asunto(s)
Proteínas de Transferencia de Ésteres de Colesterol , LDL-Colesterol , Análisis de la Aleatorización Mendeliana , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anticolesterolemiantes/uso terapéutico , Presión Sanguínea/genética , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/genética , Proteínas de Transferencia de Ésteres de Colesterol/genética , HDL-Colesterol/sangre , LDL-Colesterol/sangre , Enfermedad Coronaria/genética , Enfermedad Coronaria/sangre , Pueblos del Este de Asia/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Población Blanca/genéticaRESUMEN
During the COVID-19 vaccination campaign, observed-to-expected analysis was used by the European Medicines Agency to contextualise data from spontaneous reports to generate real-time evidence on emerging safety concerns that may impact the benefit-risk profile of COVID-19 vaccines. Observed-to-expected analysis compares the number of cases spontaneously reported for an event of interest after vaccination ('observed') to the 'expected' number of cases anticipated to occur in the same number of individuals had they not been vaccinated. Observed-to-expected analysis is a robust methodology that relies on several assumptions that have been described in regulatory guidelines and scientific literature. The use of observed-to-expected analysis to support the safety monitoring of COVID-19 vaccines has provided valuable insights and lessons on its design and interpretability, which could prove to be beneficial in future analyses. When undertaking an observed-to-expected analysis within the context of safety monitoring, several aspects need attention. In particular, we emphasise the importance of stratified and harmonised data collection both for vaccine exposure and spontaneous reporting data, the need for alignment between coding dictionaries and the crucial role of accurate background incidence rates for adverse events of special interest. While these considerations and recommendations were determined in the context of the COVID-19 mass vaccination setting, they are generalisable in principle.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Vacunación Masiva , Humanos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , COVID-19/prevención & control , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: During the COVID-19 vaccination campaign, over 34,000 reports of heavy menstrual bleeding following the administration of COVID-19 vaccines originating in the Economic European Area were submitted to EudraVigilance, the European Union database of suspected adverse drug reactions. More than 90% of these reports were sent by consumers while the remaining by healthcare professionals. Public concerns regarding menstruation disorders in COVID-19 vaccinees were also covered by the media. We investigated the impact of media attention on the reporting trends of heavy menstrual bleeding to EudraVigilance. METHODS: We used media outlets published in the Economic European Area on menstrual disorders and COVID-19 vaccines from the beginning of the vaccination campaign in the Economic European Area (1 January, 2021) until December 2022 (i.e., after the regulatory request to add the adverse event to the product information) and spontaneous reports from EudraVigilance. RESULTS: We found that the publication of safety updates from regulatory authorities and subsequent coverage in media outlets preceded increased reporting to EudraVigilance. Furthermore, the heavy menstrual bleeding reported in the cases occurred several weeks or months earlier and were not submitted to the respective date. The analysis suggests that the spikes in reporting of heavy menstrual bleeding were to some extent influenced by media coverage in some countries. CONCLUSIONS: Consumer reporting to the European Union spontaneous data collection system, EudraVigilance, was of high value for regulatory safety reviews, albeit the reporting behaviours were not free of the influence of the media. These sources of information can be investigated to understand the context of safety concerns of public health interest.
Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Menorragia , Femenino , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Unión Europea , Medios de Comunicación de Masas , Menorragia/epidemiología , FarmacovigilanciaRESUMEN
Introduction: Periodic Safety Update Reports (PSURs) are a key pharmacovigilance tool for the continuous evaluation of the benefit-risk balance of a medicinal product in the post-authorisation phase. The PSUR submission frequency for authorised active substances and combinations of active substances across the EU is individually determined. The objective of this research was the development and application of the EURD tool, a statistical method based on readily available safety data to predict PSUR frequencies and to ensure a consistent risk-based approach. Methods: First, variables considered relevant in determining the PSUR frequency were identified from data sources available at the European Medicines Agency. A subsequent first survey with National Competent Authorities in Europe lead to a prioritisation of identified variables, while a second survey was carried out to propose the PSUR frequencies for a set of substances. Finally, a regression model was built on the information collected, applied to a larger list of substances and its results tested via a third survey with the same experts. Results: The developed EURD tool was applied to the 1,032 EURD list entries with a PSUR assessment deferred to 2025 at the time of the creation of the list in 2012. As the number of procedures would have had a significant impact on the workload for the European Medicines Regulatory Network (EMRN), in a second step the workload impact was estimated after allocating the entries according to their proposed frequency. The analysis suggests that all entries could be reviewed by 2038 by increasing the median workload by 15% (from 868 to 1,000 substances/year). Conclusion: The EURD tool is the first data-driven application for supporting decision making of PSUR frequencies based on relevant active substance safety data. While we illustrated its potential for improving the assignment of PSUR submission frequencies for active substances authorised in the EU, other institutions requiring periodic assessment of safety data and balancing of the resulting workload could benefit from it.