Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 15 de 15
Filtrar
Más filtros













Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pathogens ; 12(5)2023 Apr 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37242308

RESUMEN

Invasive feral swine (Sus scrofa) are one of the most important wildlife species for disease surveillance in the United States, serving as a reservoir for various diseases of concern for the health of humans and domestic animals. Brucella suis, the causative agent of swine brucellosis, is one such pathogen carried and transmitted by feral swine. Serology assays are the preferred field diagnostic for B. suis infection, as whole blood can be readily collected and antibodies are highly stable. However, serological assays frequently have lower sensitivity and specificity, and few studies have validated serological assays for B. suis in feral swine. We conducted an experimental infection of Ossabaw Island Hogs (a breed re-domesticated from feral animals) as a disease-free proxy for feral swine to (1) improve understanding of bacterial dissemination and antibody response following B. suis infection and (2) evaluate potential changes in the performance of serological diagnostic assays over the course of infection. Animals were inoculated with B. suis and serially euthanized across a 16-week period, with samples collected at the time of euthanasia. The 8% card agglutination test performed best, whereas the fluorescence polarization assay demonstrated no capacity to differentiate true positive from true negative animals. From a disease surveillance perspective, using the 8% card agglutination test in parallel with either the buffered acidified plate antigen test or the Brucella abortus/suis complement fixation test provided the best performance with the highest probability of a positive assay result. Application of these combinations of diagnostic assays for B. suis surveillance among feral swine would improve understanding of spillover risks at the national level.

2.
Virology ; 568: 49-55, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35114499

RESUMEN

West Nile virus (WNV) overwintering is poorly understood and likely multifactorial. Interest in alligators as a potential amplifying host arose when it was shown that they develop viremias theoretically sufficient to infect mosquitoes. We examined potential ways in which alligators may contribute to the natural ecology of WNV. We experimentally demonstrated that alligators are capable of WNV amplification with subsequent mosquito infection and transmission capability, that WNV-infected mosquitoes readily infect alligators and that water can serve as a source of infection for alligators but does not easily serve as in intermediate means for transmission between birds and alligators. These findings indicate potential mechanisms for maintenance of WNV outside of the primary bird-mosquito transmission cycle.


Asunto(s)
Caimanes y Cocodrilos/virología , Culicidae/virología , Mosquitos Vectores/virología , Replicación Viral , Fiebre del Nilo Occidental/transmisión , Virus del Nilo Occidental/fisiología , Animales , Aves/virología , Chlorocebus aethiops , Reservorios de Enfermedades/virología , Células Vero , Zoonosis Virales , Fiebre del Nilo Occidental/virología
3.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 27(8): 2073-2080, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34286685

RESUMEN

Wild animals have been implicated as the origin of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), but it is largely unknown how the virus affects most wildlife species and if wildlife could ultimately serve as a reservoir for maintaining the virus outside the human population. We show that several common peridomestic species, including deer mice, bushy-tailed woodrats, and striped skunks, are susceptible to infection and can shed the virus in respiratory secretions. In contrast, we demonstrate that cottontail rabbits, fox squirrels, Wyoming ground squirrels, black-tailed prairie dogs, house mice, and racoons are not susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our results expand the knowledge base of susceptible species and provide evidence that human-wildlife interactions could result in continued transmission of SARS-CoV-2.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Animales , Animales Salvajes , Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades , Humanos , Mamíferos , Ratones
4.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 9(4)2021 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33916180

RESUMEN

The COVID-19 pandemic has generated intense interest in the rapid development and evaluation of vaccine candidates for this disease and other emerging diseases. Several novel methods for preparing vaccine candidates are currently undergoing clinical evaluation in response to the urgent need to prevent the spread of COVID-19. In many cases, these methods rely on new approaches for vaccine production and immune stimulation. We report on the use of a novel method (SolaVAX) for production of an inactivated vaccine candidate and the testing of that candidate in a hamster animal model for its ability to prevent infection upon challenge with SARS-CoV-2 virus. The studies employed in this work included an evaluation of the levels of neutralizing antibody produced post-vaccination, levels of specific antibody sub-types to RBD and spike protein that were generated, evaluation of viral shedding post-challenge, flow cytometric and single cell sequencing data on cellular fractions and histopathological evaluation of tissues post-challenge. The results from this preliminary evaluation provide insight into the immunological responses occurring as a result of vaccination with the proposed vaccine candidate and the impact that adjuvant formulations, specifically developed to promote Th1 type immune responses, have on vaccine efficacy and protection against infection following challenge with live SARS-CoV-2. This data may have utility in the development of effective vaccine candidates broadly. Furthermore, the results of this preliminary evaluation suggest that preparation of a whole virion vaccine for COVID-19 using this specific photochemical method may have potential utility in the preparation of one such vaccine candidate.

5.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 117(42): 26382-26388, 2020 10 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32994343

RESUMEN

The pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has reached nearly every country in the world with extraordinary person-to-person transmission. The most likely original source of the virus was spillover from an animal reservoir and subsequent adaptation to humans sometime during the winter of 2019 in Wuhan Province, China. Because of its genetic similarity to SARS-CoV-1, it is probable that this novel virus has a similar host range and receptor specificity. Due to concern for human-pet transmission, we investigated the susceptibility of domestic cats and dogs to infection and potential for infected cats to transmit to naive cats. We report that cats are highly susceptible to infection, with a prolonged period of oral and nasal viral shedding that is not accompanied by clinical signs, and are capable of direct contact transmission to other cats. These studies confirm that cats are susceptible to productive SARS-CoV-2 infection, but are unlikely to develop clinical disease. Further, we document that cats developed a robust neutralizing antibody response that prevented reinfection following a second viral challenge. Conversely, we found that dogs do not shed virus following infection but do seroconvert and mount an antiviral neutralizing antibody response. There is currently no evidence that cats or dogs play a significant role in human infection; however, reverse zoonosis is possible if infected owners expose their domestic pets to the virus during acute infection. Resistance to reinfection holds promise that a vaccine strategy may protect cats and, by extension, humans.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus/patogenicidad , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Neumonía Viral/virología , Animales , Animales Domésticos , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/sangre , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/inmunología , Antígenos Virales/inmunología , Betacoronavirus/inmunología , COVID-19 , Gatos , Infecciones por Coronavirus/patología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Perros , Femenino , Masculino , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/patología , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , SARS-CoV-2 , Esparcimiento de Virus
6.
mSphere ; 5(3)2020 05 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32404509

RESUMEN

As a natural host species for Brucella melitensis, pregnant sheep offer an ideal model to evaluate vaccine candidates for safety. B. melitensis strain Rev. 1 has been used almost exclusively to prevent brucellosis in small ruminants, but it causes abortions when given to pregnant animals. To evaluate the comparative safety of the candidate Brucella melitensis 16MΔvjbR, pregnant sheep (n = 6) were vaccinated subcutaneously with 1 × 1010 CFU/ml of 16MΔvjbR or 1 × 109 CFU/ml Rev. 1 at a highly susceptible stage of gestation (approximately 70 days). 16MΔvjbR resulted in only 1 abortion (1 of 6) compared with 4 of 6 (66.7%) abortions in the Rev. 1 cohort. The placenta was evaluated by culture to determine if vaccination resulted in colonization. As another measure of safety, effects of B. melitensis on the fetus/offspring (vertical transmission) was evaluated by culture and histopathology of fetal tissues to determine if vaccination prevented infection of the fetus. Vaccination with 16MΔvjbR resulted in less vertical transmission than Rev. 1. To determine if vaccination was efficacious and could reduce tissue colonization in sheep, the same cohort of sheep were challenged 5 weeks postpartum by conjunctival inoculation with 1 × 107 CFU/ml B. melitensis Protection was similar between Rev. 1 and 16MΔvjbR, with no statistical difference in colonization in the target organs. Overall, the 16MΔvjbR vaccine was considered safer than Rev. 1 based on a reduced number of abortions and limited infection in the offspring. Future experiments are needed to further refine the vaccine dose to increase the safety margin and to evaluate protection in pregnant ewes.IMPORTANCE Brucellosis is one of the most commonly reported zoonotic disease with a worldwide distribution. Of the 12 Brucella species, Brucella melitensis is considered the most virulent and causes reproductive failure (abortions/stillbirths) in small ruminants, which can spread the disease to other animals or to humans. Vaccination of small ruminants is a key measure used to protect both human and animal health. However, the commercially available live-attenuated vaccine for Brucella melitensis Rev. 1 retains virulence and can cause disease in animals and humans. In order to evaluate the safety and efficacy in sheep, we vaccinated pregnant sheep with 16MΔvjbR Our results indicate that 16MΔvjbR was safer for use during pregnancy, provided a similar level of protection as Rev. 1, and could be considered an improved candidate for future vaccine trials.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra la Brucelosis/inmunología , Brucella melitensis/genética , Brucella melitensis/inmunología , Brucelosis/veterinaria , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/prevención & control , Vacunación/veterinaria , Animales , Vacuna contra la Brucelosis/administración & dosificación , Brucelosis/prevención & control , Conjuntiva/microbiología , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Femenino , Embarazo , Ovinos/inmunología , Vacunas Atenuadas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Atenuadas/inmunología
7.
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis ; 17(3): 161-164, 2017 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28145811

RESUMEN

The recent emergence of the mosquito-borne Zika virus (ZIKV) in the Americas has become a global public health concern. We describe a series of experimental infections designed to investigate whether animals within certain taxonomic groups in North America have the potential to serve as ZIKV amplifying or maintenance hosts. Species investigated included armadillos, cottontail rabbits, goats, mink, chickens, pigeons, ground hogs, deer mice, cattle, raccoons, ducks, Syrian Golden hamsters, garter snakes, leopard frogs, house sparrows, and pigs. Infectious virus was isolated from blood only in frogs and armadillos; however, the magnitude of viremia was low. In addition, neutralizing antibodies were detected after infection in goats, rabbits, ducks, frogs, and pigs. This study indicates that the animals tested to date are unlikely to act as animal reservoirs for ZIKV, but that rabbits and pigs could potentially serve as sentinel species. Understanding the transmission cycle and maintenance of ZIKV in animals will help in developing effective surveillance programs and preventative measures for future outbreaks.


Asunto(s)
Reservorios de Enfermedades/veterinaria , Virus Zika/fisiología , Animales , Aves/virología , Cricetinae , Reservorios de Enfermedades/virología , Mamíferos/virología , América del Norte/epidemiología , Ranidae/virología , Serpientes/virología , Zoonosis
8.
J Wildl Dis ; 51(3): 564-75, 2015 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25984770

RESUMEN

Francisella tularensis is a highly virulent, zoonotic bacterium that causes significant natural disease and is of concern as an organism for bioterrorism. Serologic testing of wildlife is frequently used to monitor spatial patterns of infection and to quantify exposure. Cottontail rabbits (Sylvilagus spp.) are a natural reservoir for F. tularensis in the US, although very little work has been done experimentally to determine how these animals respond to infection; thus, information gathered from field samples can be difficult to interpret. We characterized clinical disease, bacteremia, pathology, and antibody kinetics of North American cottontail rabbits experimentally infected with five strains of F. tularensis. Rabbits were infected with four field strains, including MA00-2987 (type A1b), WY96-3418 (type A2), KY99-3387, and OR96-0246 (type B), and with SchuS4 (type A1a), a widely used, virulent laboratory strain. Infection with the different strains of the bacterium resulted in varied patterns of clinical disease, gross pathology, and histopathology. Each of the type A strains were highly virulent, with rabbits succumbing to infection 3-13 d after infection. At necropsy, numerous microabscesses were observed in the livers and spleens of most rabbits, associated with high bacterial organ burdens. In contrast, most rabbits infected with type B strains developed mild fever and became lethargic, but the disease was infrequently lethal. Those rabbits infected with type B strains that survived past 14 d developed a robust humoral immune response, and F. tularensis was not isolated from liver, spleen, or lung of those animals. Understanding F. tularensis infection in a natural reservoir species can guide serosurveillance and generate new insights into environmental maintenance of this pathogen.


Asunto(s)
Francisella tularensis/inmunología , Conejos/microbiología , Tularemia/veterinaria , Animales , Animales Salvajes/inmunología , Animales Salvajes/microbiología , Reservorios de Enfermedades/microbiología , Femenino , Inmunidad Humoral , Hígado/microbiología , Pulmón/microbiología , Masculino , Conejos/inmunología , Bazo/microbiología , Tularemia/inmunología , Tularemia/microbiología
9.
Transfusion ; 55(4): 858-63, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25438832

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Two studies were performed to test the effectiveness of riboflavin and ultraviolet (UV) light treatment (Mirasol PRT, Terumo BCT) against murine cytomegalovirus (MCMV). The first study utilized immune-compromised mice to measure the reduction of cell-free MCMV. A second study used a murine model to evaluate the ability of Mirasol PRT to prevent transfusion-transmitted (TT)-MCMV infection. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Human plasma was inoculated with MCMV and then treated with Mirasol PRT. The viral titer was measured using an infectious dose 50% assay in nude mice. Mice were euthanized on Day 10 posttransfusion, and their spleens were tested for the presence of MCMV DNA using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Mirasol PRT was also evaluated to determine its effectiveness in preventing TT-MCMV in platelets (PLTs) stored in PLT additive solution. PLTs were inoculated with either cell-associated MCMV or cell-free MCMV and then treated with Mirasol PRT. Mice were transfused with treated or untreated product and were euthanized 14 days posttransfusion. Blood and spleens were assayed for MCMV DNA by real-time-PCR. RESULTS: Using nude mice to titer MCMV, a modest 2.1-log reduction was observed in plasma products after Mirasol PRT treatment. TT-MCMV was not observed in the mouse transfusion model when either cell-free or cell-associated MCMV was treated with Mirasol PRT; MCMV transmission was uniformly observed in mice transfused with untreated PLTs. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that using riboflavin and UV light treatment may be able to reduce the occurrence of transmission of human CMV from infectious PLTs and plasma units.


Asunto(s)
Plaquetas/virología , Seguridad de la Sangre/métodos , Patógenos Transmitidos por la Sangre/efectos de los fármacos , Patógenos Transmitidos por la Sangre/efectos de la radiación , Muromegalovirus/efectos de los fármacos , Muromegalovirus/efectos de la radiación , Fármacos Fotosensibilizantes/farmacología , Plasma/virología , Transfusión de Plaquetas/efectos adversos , Riboflavina/farmacología , Rayos Ultravioleta , Animales , ADN Viral/análisis , ADN Viral/sangre , Infecciones por Herpesviridae/prevención & control , Infecciones por Herpesviridae/transmisión , Humanos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Ratones Desnudos , Plasma/efectos de los fármacos , Plasma/efectos de la radiación , Bazo/virología , Carga Viral
10.
Arch Virol ; 158(4): 809-20, 2013 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23208279

RESUMEN

Rabies virus infection has been documented in several North American bat species, including Eptesicus fuscus. The virus-host relationship between bats and rabies virus (RV) is not well understood. The incidence of non-lethal RV exposure, based on the presence of viral neutralizing antibodies, demonstrates that exposure to RV does not always lead to clinical infection in bats. It is unknown how the route of exposure, rabies virus variant, or health of the bat affects the outcome following exposure. This paper describes the pathogenesis of two big brown bat RV variants in homologous host species. Our study demonstrates that RV variants obtained from the same species of bat from similar geographical areas may result in a diverse clinical progression of disease.


Asunto(s)
Quirópteros/virología , Virus de la Rabia/genética , Virus de la Rabia/fisiología , Rabia/veterinaria , Secuencia de Aminoácidos , Animales , ADN Complementario/genética , ADN Viral/genética , Regulación Viral de la Expresión Génica , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos ICR , Datos de Secuencia Molecular , Rabia/virología , Virus de la Rabia/clasificación , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa , Proteínas Virales/genética , Proteínas Virales/metabolismo
11.
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis ; 12(1): 55-60, 2012 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21923271

RESUMEN

The study of a zoonotic disease requires an understanding of the disease incidence in animal reservoirs. Rabies incidence in bats submitted to diagnostic laboratories does not accurately reflect the true incidence in wild bat populations as a bias exists for testing bats that have been in contact with humans or pets. This article details the rabies incidence in two species of bats collected from natural settings without such bias. In this study, brain smears from 0.6% and 2.5% of wild-caught and apparently healthy Tadarida brasiliensis and Eptesicus fuscus, respectively, were positive for rabies virus (RV) antigen. Conversely, 92% of the grounded T. brasiliensis were positive for RV. Serology performed on captive colony and sick bats reveal an immune response to rabies. This work illustrates the complex interplay between immunity, disease state, and the conundrum of RV maintenance in bats.


Asunto(s)
Quirópteros , Virus de la Rabia/aislamiento & purificación , Rabia/veterinaria , Animales , Antígenos Virales/aislamiento & purificación , Encéfalo/virología , Rabia/epidemiología , Rabia/virología , Glándulas Salivales/virología
12.
Avian Dis ; 51(2): 573-7, 2007 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17626486

RESUMEN

The New York 1999 strain of West Nile virus (WNV) is nearly 100% fatal in the American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos). We evaluated four WNV vaccine formulations in American crows, including intramuscular (i.m.) DNA vaccine, i.m. DNA vaccine with adjuvant, orally administered microencapsulated DNA vaccine, and i.m. killed vaccine. Neutralizing antibodies developed in approximately 80% of crows that received the DNA vaccine i.m. (with or without adjuvant), and in 44% that received the killed vaccine. However, no crows that received the oral microencapsulated DNA vaccine or the placebo developed WNV antibodies. All crows were challenged 10 wk after initial vaccination. No unvaccinated crows survived challenge, and survival rates were 44% (i.m. DNA vaccine), 60% (i.m. DNA vaccine with adjuvant), 0% (oral microencapsulated DNA vaccine), and 11% (killed vaccine). Peak viremia titers in the birds that survived were significantly lower as compared to titers in birds that died. Parenteral administration of a WNV DNA vaccine was associated with reduced mortality but did not provide sterile immunity.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de las Aves/prevención & control , Enfermedades de las Aves/virología , Cuervos , Vacunas de ADN/inmunología , Fiebre del Nilo Occidental/veterinaria , Vacunas contra el Virus del Nilo Occidental/inmunología , Animales , Enfermedades de las Aves/inmunología , Enfermedades de las Aves/mortalidad , ADN Viral/inmunología , Fiebre del Nilo Occidental/inmunología , Fiebre del Nilo Occidental/mortalidad , Fiebre del Nilo Occidental/prevención & control
13.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 73(2): 467-9, 2005 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16103624

RESUMEN

Big brown (Eptesicus fuscus) and Mexican free-tailed (Tadarida brasiliensis) bats were inoculated with the New York 99 strain of West Nile virus to assess their potential to serve as amplifying hosts and determine the clinical effect of infection. Groups of three or four bats were bled at daily intervals between 1 and 6 days after inoculation to determine the pattern of viremia. Beginning 2 days after inoculation, virus was isolated each day from one or more E. fuscus bats, in titers ranging from 10 to 180 plaque-forming units per milliliter of serum. Virus was not isolated from any of the sera collected from T. brasiliensis bats. None of the bats from either species showed clinical signs associated with exposure to virus. Sera from an additional 149 bats collected in Louisiana in 2002 during an epizootic of West Nile fever were tested for antibodies to virus, and two were found to be positive. These data suggest that bats from these two widely distributed species are unlikely to serve as amplifying hosts for West Nile virus.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Quirópteros/virología , Fiebre del Nilo Occidental/transmisión , Virus del Nilo Occidental/patogenicidad , Animales , Quirópteros/clasificación , Vectores de Enfermedades , Louisiana/epidemiología , América del Norte/epidemiología , Fiebre del Nilo Occidental/epidemiología , Fiebre del Nilo Occidental/veterinaria , Fiebre del Nilo Occidental/virología , Virus del Nilo Occidental/inmunología , Virus del Nilo Occidental/aislamiento & purificación
14.
Am J Vet Res ; 65(11): 1459-62, 2004 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15566080

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the onset of immunity after IM administration of a single dose of a recombinant canarypox virus vaccine against West Nile virus (WNV) in horses in a blind challenge trial. ANIMALS: 20 mixed-breed horses. PROCEDURE: Horses with no prior exposure to WNV were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups (10 horses/group). In 1 group, a recombinant canarypox virus vaccine against WNV was administered to each horse once (day 0). The other 10 control horses were untreated. On day 26, 9 treated and 10 control horses were challenged via the bites of mosquitoes (Aedes albopictus) infected with WNV. Clinical responses and WNV isolation were monitored for 14 days after challenge exposure; antibody responses against WNV after administration of the vaccine and challenge were also assessed in both groups. RESULTS: Following challenge via WNV-infected mosquitoes, 1 of 9 treated horses developed viremia. In contrast, 8 of 10 control horses developed viremia after challenge exposure to WNV-infected mosquitoes. All horses seroconverted after WNV challenge; compared with control horses, antibody responses in the horses that received the vaccine were detected earlier. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In horses, a single dose of the recombinant canarypox virus-WNV vaccine appears to provide early protection against development of viremia after challenge with WNV-infected mosquitoes, even in the absence of measurable antibody titers in some horses. This vaccine may provide veterinarians with an important tool in controlling WNV infection during a natural outbreak or under conditions in which a rapid onset of protection is required.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Caballos/inmunología , Enfermedades de los Caballos/prevención & control , Enfermedades de los Caballos/virología , Vacunas Virales/inmunología , Fiebre del Nilo Occidental/veterinaria , Virus del Nilo Occidental/inmunología , Aedes/virología , Análisis de Varianza , Animales , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Virus de la Viruela de los Canarios/inmunología , Caballos
15.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 10(12): 2150-5, 2004 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15663852

RESUMEN

Recent evidence suggests that American alligators (Alligator mississippiensis) may be capable of transmitting West Nile virus (WNV) to other alligators. We experimentally exposed 24 juvenile alligators to WNV parenterally or orally. All became infected, and all but three sustained viremia titers >5.0 log10 PFU/mL (a threshold considered infectious for Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes) for 1 to 8 days. Noninoculated tankmates also became infected. The viremia profiles and multiple routes of infection suggest alligators may play an important role in WNV transmission in areas with high population densities of juvenile alligators.


Asunto(s)
Caimanes y Cocodrilos/virología , Reservorios de Enfermedades , Replicación Viral , Virus del Nilo Occidental/fisiología , Caimanes y Cocodrilos/inmunología , Animales , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Ambiente , Temperatura , Carga Viral/veterinaria , Viremia/veterinaria , Virus del Nilo Occidental/inmunología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA