Surgical treatment of distal hamstring tendon injuries yield a higher return-to-sports rate: A systematic review.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare the patient-reported outcomes and return to sports of the conservative and surgical treatment of distal hamstring tendon injuries. METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, two reviewers searched PubMed, Scopus and Virtual Health Library databases in January 2023. Clinical studies evaluating conservative or surgical management outcomes of distal hamstring tendon injuries were considered eligible for this systematic review if predefined criteria were fulfilled: (1) published in English or Spanish; (2) evaluated any of the following: patient-reported outcomes, return-to-sports rate (RTS-R) or return-to-sports time (RTS-T). Data were presented in tables using absolute values from individual studies and derived pooled percentages. RESULTS: Eighteen studies were included for 67 patients and 68 distal hamstring tendon injuries. Initially, 39 patients (58.2%) underwent surgical treatment, whereas 28 (41.8%) were treated conservatively. Among conservative treatment patients, 15 failed and had to be operated on (53.6%), all with distal semitendinosus tendon injuries. Anchor fixation was the technique of choice in 20 lesions (36.4%), tenodesis in 16 (29.1%), tenectomy in 14 (25.5%) and sutures were preferred in five (9%). Thirteen out of 28 patients (46.4%) undergoing initial conservative treatment returned to sports at a mean of 3.6 months (range 1 week to 12 months), in contrast to surgical treatment, in which 36 out of 39 patients (92.3%) returned at a mean of 4.2 months (range 6 weeks to 12 months). Additionally, 14 of 15 patients (93.3%) converted to surgical treatment after failed conservative treatment returned to sports at a mean of 7.6 months after injury. CONCLUSION: Initial surgical treatment of distal hamstring tendon injuries yields a high RTS-R (92.3%) at a mean of 4.2 months. Furthermore, 15 out of 28 patients (53.6%) initially treated conservatively had to be operated on, delaying the RTS-T (mean 7.6 months after injury) without affecting their RTS-R. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Diagnosis and treatment of the most common neuropathies following knee injuries and reconstructive surgery - A narrative review.

The main nerves in the knee region are the tibial nerve, the common peroneal nerve, and the saphenous nerve. These three nerves innervate the lower leg and foot, providing sensory and motor function. The large sciatic nerve splits just above the knee to form the tibial and common peroneal nerves. The tibial nerve travels down in the posterior region, while the common peroneal nerve runs around the lateral side of the knee and runs down the front of the leg to the foot. Although all these nerves can be affected by injuries of the knee, the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve (IPBSN) and the common peroneal nerve (CPN) are most affected. In this narrative review we focus on neuropathies associated with nerves located in the region of the knee joint in the context of their injuries and possible iatrogenic damage during reconstructive surgery.

Talus Fracture Accompanied by Irreducible Dislocation of Talar Trochlea - Treatment Strategy.

A talus fracture accompanied by trochlear dislocation is an ever-present therapeutic problem as it requires immediate surgery since any delay may result in necrosis of soft tissues and the talus, which, consequently, leads to permanent disability. Of crucial importance in the treatment of such injury is accurate analysis of fracture morphology, immediate institution of treatment and minimally invasive surgery allowing early movement of the affected limb. We operated on a male patient after a high-energy injury using a low-invasive method we had modified, which allowed for early kinesiotherapy. The functional outcome of the procedure was very good.

Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair With Hyaluronic Scaffold and Autogenous Bone Marrow Aspirate Augmentation in Adolescents With Open Physes.

It is well known that the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is the main stabilizer to the anterior tibial translation in the knee. The current gold standard of treatment for such lesions is ACL reconstruction. However, there are notable disadvantages to ACL reconstruction that include loss of proprioception, donor site morbidity, incomplete return to high-demand sports, and the inability to restore normal kinematics of the knee joint. Additionally, in adolescents who have open physes, there is a risk of potential iatrogenic growth plate injury. Tibial-sided soft-tissue avulsion is a rare subtype of ACL injuries. This Technical Note presents a method for primary anatomic ACL repair with a bioabsorbable scaffold and bone marrow concentrate augmentation for an acute distal ACL injury. Our technique is an alternative to reconstruction as it allows the preservation of the native insertion site and has the potential to reduce the risk of posttraumatic osteoarthritis.

Management of an iatrogenic injury to the tibial nerve in a 24-year-old hurdle runner.

According to previously published papers, neurovascular injuries seem to be the most unfortunate complications after surgical procedures. In this report, we present our therapeutic approach to iatrogenic injury of the posterior tibial nerve that occurred during ankle arthroscopy in a 24-year-old patient. The outcome of the therapy was a full sensory return and partial motor return (S4 and M3 according to the Medical Research Council Grading System for Nerve Recovery). Our patient was able to resume her typical training. In comparison with available reports, our therapeutic approach enabled earlier functional recovery after nerve injury. While sensory return is beneficial, motor improvement is also important. However, we are conscious of the poor functional outcomes reported by other researchers.