RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Fabry disease (FD) is a multisystem, monogenic, X-linked storage disorder caused by mutations in the GLA gene, resulting in reduced alfa-galactosidase A enzyme activity. This effect leads to the accumulation of glycosphingolipids, particularly globotriosylceramide, in various tissues, including the heart, kidney, vasculature, smooth muscle and peripheral nervous system. Hemizygous males are usually more severely affected than females, in whom random inactivation of an X-chromosome may lead to variable phenotype. SUMMARY: Among the manifestations of FD, exercise intolerance is commonly diagnosed but often underestimated, even though it significantly limits quality of life, especially in young patients. This review primarily discusses the various pathophysiological mechanisms involved in exercise intolerance in FD patients, such as altered muscle composition, compromised cardiopulmonary framework, and peripheral neuropathy. Secondarily, it explores the potential effect of available therapy, including Enzyme Replacement Therapy (ERT) and chaperone therapy (migalastat), in reducing exercise intolerance while considering the potential impact of physical activity and exercise training as adjunctive treatments. CONCLUSION: Exercise intolerance has a major impact on the well-being of people with Fabry disease. Exercise training can play an important role in addition to drug therapy.
RESUMEN
Although contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a widespread and easily manageable technique, image interpretation errors can occur due to the operator's inexperience and/or lack of knowledge of the frequent pitfalls, which may cause uncertain diagnosis and misdiagnosis. Indeed, knowledge of the basic physical and technical principles of ultrasound is needed both to understand sonographic image findings and to evaluate the potential and limits of the method. Like the B-mode ultrasound, the quality of the CEUS examination is also subject not only to the adequate manual skill of the operator but also to his/her deep knowledge of the technique which improves the quality of the image helping avoid misleading artifacts. In this review, the main parameters influencing a CEUS examination will be described by taking into account the most common errors and pitfalls and their possible solutions.
Asunto(s)
Artefactos , Medios de Contraste , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Errores DiagnósticosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate total testosterone distribution in male idiopathic infertility. METHODS: A retrospective, real-world case-control clinical study was conducted. Cases consisted of men evaluated for couple infertility, specifically those with alterations in semen parameters and normal gonadotropin levels, and after excluding all known causes of male infertility. Controls were male subjects who underwent semen analysis for screening purposes, without any abnormality detected. The total testosterone distribution was evaluated in cases and controls. Further analyses were performed subgrouping cases according to total testosterone reference threshold suggested by scientific societies (i.e., 3.5 ng/mL). RESULTS: Cases included 214 idiopathic infertile men (mean age 38.2 ± 6.2 years) and controls 224 subjects with normozoospermia (mean age 33.7 ± 7.5 years). Total testosterone was not-normally distributed in both cases and controls, with positive asymmetric distribution slightly shifted on the left in cases. The rate of subjects with testosterone lower than 3.5 ng/mL was higher in cases (23.8%) than controls (4.5%) (p < 0.001). In cases with testosterone lower than 3.5 ng/mL, a significant direct correlation between testosterone and the percentage of normal morphology sperms was highlighted, also applying multivariate stepwise linear regression analysis (R = 0.430, standard error = 0.3, p = 0.020). CONCLUSION: Although idiopathic infertile men show by definition altered semen analysis and gonadotropins within reference ranges, testosterone serum levels are widely variable in this population. Approximately a quarter of these patients present some sort of functional hypogonadism. Our data support the need to better classify idiopathic male infertility and total testosterone serum levels could be a supportive parameter in tracing the patient's therapeutic profile.
Asunto(s)
Hipogonadismo , Infertilidad Masculina , Análisis de Semen , Testosterona , Humanos , Masculino , Testosterona/sangre , Adulto , Infertilidad Masculina/sangre , Infertilidad Masculina/diagnóstico , Hipogonadismo/sangre , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Casos y ControlesRESUMEN
Although epidemiology shows that both men and woman can experience infertility, the female partner usually experiences most of the diagnostic and therapeutic burden. Thus, management of couple infertility is a unique example of gender inequality. The use of exogenous gonadotropins in assisted reproductive technology (ART) to induce multifollicular growth is well consolidated in women, but the same is not done with the same level of confidence and purpose in infertile men. Indeed, the treatment of idiopathic male infertility is based on an empirical approach that involves administration of the follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) in dosages within the replacement therapy range. This treatment has so far been attempted when the endogenous FSH serum levels are within the reference ranges. According to the most recent evidence, a "substitutive" FSH administration may not be effective enough, while a stimulatory approach could boost spermatogenesis over its basal levels without adverse extragonadal effects. This article aims to describe the rationale behind the empirical application of gonadotropins in couple infertility, highlighting the need for a change in the therapeutic approach, especially for the male partner.
Asunto(s)
Gonadotropinas , Infertilidad Masculina , Femenino , Masculino , Humanos , Gonadotropinas/uso terapéutico , Hormona Folículo Estimulante/uso terapéutico , Infertilidad Masculina/diagnóstico , Infertilidad Masculina/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
The invention of the flexible ureteroscope (fURS) and its subsequent spread have revolutionized the surgical management of urolithiasis and upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). During the last few years, single-use flexible ureteroscopes (su-fURSs) have been developed to improve the limitations of reusable fURSs, namely their cost, durability and risk of device contamination. Since the introduction of the first fully disposable digital fURS, several su-fURSs have been developed by various manufacturers. In this pictorial review, we combined the different physical and technical features of su-fURSs currently available on the market with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Conformity (CE) approval, in order to help surgeons choose the appropriate device according to each case requirement and personal preferences. To the best of our knowledge, 17 su-fURSs with CE and FDA approval have been developed to date.