Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 28
Filtrar
1.
Kidney Int ; 91(5): 1214-1223, 2017 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28209335

RESUMEN

In hemodialysis patients extracellular fluid overload is a predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, and a relation with inflammation has been reported in previous studies. The magnitude and nature of this interaction and the effects of moderate fluid overload and extracellular fluid depletion on survival are still unclear. We present the results of an international cohort study in 8883 hemodialysis patients from the European MONDO initiative database where, during a three-month baseline period, fluid status was assessed using bioimpedance and inflammation by C-reactive protein. All-cause mortality was recorded during 12 months of follow up. In a second analysis a three-month baseline period was added to the first baseline period, and changes in fluid and inflammation status were related to all-cause mortality during six-month follow up. Both pre-dialysis estimated fluid overload and fluid depletion were associated with an increased mortality, already apparent at moderate levels of estimated pre-dialysis fluid overload (1.1-2.5L); hazard ratio 1.64 (95% confidence interval 1.35-1.98). In contrast, post-dialysis estimated fluid depletion was associated with a survival benefit (0.74 [0.62-0.90]). The concurrent presence of fluid overload and inflammation was associated with the highest risk of death. Thus, while pre-dialysis fluid overload was associated with inflammation, even in the absence of inflammation, fluid overload remained a significant risk factor for short-term mortality, even following improvement of fluid status.


Asunto(s)
Inflamación/complicaciones , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Desequilibrio Hidroelectrolítico/complicaciones , Anciano , Líquidos Corporales , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Impedancia Eléctrica , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Inflamación/metabolismo , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Factores de Riesgo , Desequilibrio Hidroelectrolítico/sangre , Desequilibrio Hidroelectrolítico/mortalidad
2.
J Vasc Access ; 18(2): 114-119, 2017 Mar 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27834451

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIM: Vascular access (VA) cannulation is an essential skill for dialysis nurses: failure to correctly repeat this operation daily may result in serious complications for the patients. This study investigates if different aspects of arteriovenous fistula and graft cannulation have an effect on the development of acute access complications, which may affect the VA survival. METHODS: In April 2009 a cross-sectional survey was conducted in 171 dialysis units located in Europe, the Middle East and Africa to collect details on VA cannulation practices. Information on cannulation retrieved from the survey comprised fistula type and location, cannulation technique, needle size, use of disinfectants and of local anaesthetics, application of arm compression at the time of cannulation, needle and bevel direction, needle rotation, and needle fixation. Five categories of complications were investigated: multiple-cannulation, infiltration, haematoma, haemorrhage and unknown. RESULTS: There were 10,807 cannulation procedures evaluated in the same number of patients. Of these, 367 showed some kind of complication, the most frequent (33.8%) being the need for multiple-cannulation. The following were associated with a significantly higher odds ratio for occurrence of an acute complication: prescription of back-eye needles, use of rope-ladder cannulation technique, insertion of venous needle as first needle, and rotation of the arterial needle. Use of 16-17-gauge needles was also significantly associated with complications, but this possibly reflects poor quality of the VA. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of an acute VA complication could be reduced with appropriate training of nurses, physicians and patients. This could potentially prolong the VA life.


Asunto(s)
Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/enfermería , Cateterismo/enfermería , Rol de la Enfermera , Personal de Enfermería , Diálisis Renal/enfermería , Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/educación , Cateterismo/efectos adversos , Competencia Clínica , Estudios Transversales , Educación Continua en Enfermería , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Capacitación en Servicio , Oportunidad Relativa , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Clin Kidney J ; 9(3): 476-80, 2016 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27274836

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are significant differences between countries in the mortality rates of haemodialysis (HD) patients. The extent of these differences and possible contributing factors are worthy of investigation. METHODS: As of March 2009, all patients undergoing HD or haemodiafiltration for >3 months (n = 4041) in the Turkish clinics of the NephroCare network were enrolled. Data were prospectively collected for 2 years through the European Clinical Dialysis Database. Mean age ± standard deviation was 58.7 ± 14.7 years, 45.9% were female and 22.9% were diabetic. Comparison with US data was performed by applying an indirect standardization technique, using specific mortality rates for patients on HD by age, gender, race and primary diagnosis as provided by the 2012 US Renal Data System Annual Data Report as reference. RESULTS: The crude mortality rate in Turkey was 95.1 per 1000 patient-years. Compared with the US reference population, the annual mortality rate for Turkey was significantly lower, irrespective of gender, age and diabetes. After adjustments for age, gender and diabetes, the mortality risk in the Turkish cohort was 50% lower than US whites [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46-0.54, P < 0.001], 44% lower than US African-Americans (95% CI 0.52-0.61, P < 0.001) and 20% lower than Asian-Americans (95% CI 0.74-0.86, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The annual mortality rate of prevalent HD patients was found to be significantly lower in the studied Turkish cohort compared with that published by the US Renal Data System Annual Data Report. Differences in practice patterns may contribute to the divergence.

4.
Kidney Int ; 90(1): 192-202, 2016 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27178833

RESUMEN

Hyporesponsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agent therapy in dialysis patients is poorly understood. Some studies report an improvement in the erythropoiesis-stimulating agent resistance index (ERI) with hemodiafiltration (HDF) versus high-flux hemodialysis (HD). We explored ERI dynamics in 38,340 incident HDF and HD patients treated in 22 countries over a 7-year period. Groups were matched by propensity score at baseline (6 months after dialysis initiation). The follow-up period (mean of 1.31 years) was stratified into 1 month intervals with delta analyses performed for key ERI-related parameters. Dialysis modality, time interval, and polycystic kidney disease were included in a linear mixed model with the outcome ERI. Baseline ERI was nonsignificantly higher in HDF versus HD treatment. ERI decreased significantly faster in HDF-treated patients than in HD-treated patients, was decreased in both HD and HDF when patients were treated with intravenous darbepoetin alfa, but only in HDF when treated with intravenous recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO). A clear difference between HD- and HDF-treated patients could only be found for patients with high baseline ERI and assigned to intravenous rHuEPO treatment. A significant advantage in terms of lower ERI for patients treated by HDF was found. Sensitivity analysis limited this advantage for HDF to those patients treated with intravenous rHuEPO (not darbepoetin alfa or subcutaneous rHuEPO) and to patients with a high baseline ERI. Thus, our results allow more accurate planning for future clinical trials addressing anemia management in dialysis patients.


Asunto(s)
Anemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Hematínicos/farmacología , Hemodiafiltración , Hemoglobinas/análisis , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Diálisis Renal , Administración Intravenosa , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Darbepoetina alfa/administración & dosificación , Darbepoetina alfa/farmacología , Darbepoetina alfa/uso terapéutico , Eritropoyetina/administración & dosificación , Eritropoyetina/farmacología , Eritropoyetina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Hematínicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Fallo Renal Crónico/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Renales Poliquísticas/sangre , Enfermedades Renales Poliquísticas/terapia , Proteínas Recombinantes/administración & dosificación , Proteínas Recombinantes/farmacología , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapéutico
5.
J Ren Nutr ; 26(2): 72-80, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26627050

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: In patients with advanced kidney disease, metabolic and nutritional derangements induced by uremia interact and reinforce each other in a deleterious vicious circle. Literature addressing the effect of dialysis initiation on changes in body composition (BC) is limited and contradictory. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in BC in a large international cohort of incident hemodialysis patients. METHODS: A total of 8,227 incident adult end-stage renal disease patients with BC evaluation within the initial first 6 months of baseline, defined as 6 months after renal replacement therapy initiation, were considered. BC, including fat tissue index (FTI) and lean tissue index (LTI), were evaluated by Body Composition Monitor (BCM, Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany). Exclusion criteria at baseline were lack of a BCM measurement before or after baseline, body mass index (BMI) < 18.5 kg/m(2), presence of metastatic solid tumors, treatment with a catheter, and prescription of less or more than 3 treatments per week. Maximum follow-up was 2 years. Descriptive analysis was performed comparing current values with the baseline in each interval (delta analysis). Linear mixed models considering the correlation structure of the repeated measurements were used to evaluate factors associated with different trends in FTI and LTI. RESULTS: BMI increased about 0.6 kg/m(2) over 24 months from baseline. This was associated with increase in FTI of about 0.95 kg/m(2) and a decrease in LTI of about 0.4 kg/m(2). Female gender, diabetic status, and low baseline FTI were associated with a significant greater increase of FTI. Age > 67 years, diabetes, male gender, high baseline LTI, and low baseline FTI were associated with a significant greater decrease of LTI. CONCLUSIONS: With the transition to hemodialysis, end-stage renal disease patients presented with distinctive changes in BC. These were mainly associated with gender, older age, presence of diabetes, low baseline FTI, and high baseline LTI. BMI increases did not fully represent the changes in BC.


Asunto(s)
Composición Corporal , Diálisis Renal , Adiposidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Índice de Masa Corporal , Impedancia Eléctrica , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , América Latina , Estudios Longitudinales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sudáfrica , Adulto Joven
6.
Nephron ; 130(4): 263-70, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26182958

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIM: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), defined as the neutrophil count divided by lymphocyte count, is an inexpensive and readily available parameter, which may serve as a surrogate for inflammation markers, such as C-reactive protein (CRP). The aim of this study was to determine the utility of NLR in the prediction of elevated CRP levels in hemodialysis (HD) patients. METHODS: We analyzed 43,272 HD patients from 2 distinct cohorts within the Monitoring Dialysis Outcomes research collaboration in whom contemporaneous measurements of neutrophil and lymphocyte counts, serum albumin and CRP levels were available. Logistic regression was used to determine the relationship of trichotomized NLR (<2.5, 2.5-5 and >5.0) and albumin levels (<3.1, 3.1-4.0 and >4.0 g/dl) with elevated CRP levels (>10.0, >20.0 and >30.0 mg/l). Congruence of the prediction models was examined by comparing the regression parameters and by cross-validating each regression equation within the other cohort. RESULTS: We found that NLR >5.0 vs. <2.5 (cohort 1: OR 2.3; p < 0.0001 and cohort 2: OR 2.0; p < 0.0001) was associated with CRP levels >10.0 mg/l. Stepwise increase in odds ratio for CRP >10.0 mg/l was observed with the combination of high NLR and low albumin levels (NLR >5.0 and albumin <3.1) (cohort 1: OR 7.6; p < 0.0001 and cohort 2: OR 11.9; p < 0.0001). Cross-validation of the 2 regression models revealed a predictive accuracy of 0.68 and 0.69 in the respective cohorts. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that NLR could serve as a potential surrogate marker for CRP. Our results may add to diagnostic abilities in settings where CRP is not measured routinely in HD patients. NLR is easy to integrate into daily practice and may be used as a marker of systemic inflammation.


Asunto(s)
Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Linfocitos/fisiología , Neutrófilos/fisiología , Diálisis Renal , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/sangre , Albúmina Sérica/análisis , Anciano , Biomarcadores , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Recuento de Leucocitos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Int J Artif Organs ; 38(5): 244-50, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26080930

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim was to investigate factors associated with the successful achievement of ≥21 l/session of substitution fluid volume in patients on post-dilution hemodiafiltration. METHODS: 3315 patients treated in 6 European countries with the Fresenius 5008 CorDiax machine including the AutoSub Plus feature were considered. Variables that showed a relationship with convection volume were entered in a multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: Mean blood flow was 379 ± 68 ml/min. Median substitution volume was 24.7 L (IQR 22.0-27.4 L). Mean filtration fraction was 28.3 ± 4.1%. 81.5% of sessions qualified as high-volume HDF (substitution volumes ≥21 L). Higher age, dialyzer surface area, blood flow and treatment time were positively associated with the achievement of ≥21 L substitution volume; higher body mass index, male gender, higher hematocrit, graft or catheter vs. fistula, and start of week vs. mid-week were negatively associated. CONCLUSIONS: Dialysis center policy in terms of blood flow, treatment time, filter size, and perhaps even hemoglobin targets plays a key role in achieving high-volume HDF. All of these are modifiable factors that can help in prescribing an optimal combination of dialyzer size, achievable blood flows, and treatment times.


Asunto(s)
Hemodiafiltración/métodos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Anciano , Velocidad del Flujo Sanguíneo/fisiología , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
8.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy ; 13(6): 647-59, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26071951

RESUMEN

AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness of high-efficiency on-line hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) compared with low-flux hemodialysis (LF-HD) for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) based on the Canadian (Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal) arm of a parallel-group randomized controlled trial (RCT), the CONvective TRAnsport STudy. METHODS: An economic evaluation was conducted for the period of the RCT (74 months). In addition, a Markov state transition model was constructed to simulate costs and health benefits over lifetime. The primary outcome was costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. The analysis had the perspective of the Quebec public healthcare system. RESULTS: A total of 130 patients were randomly allocated to OL-HDF (n = 67) and LF-HD (n = 63). The cost-utility ratio of OL-HDF versus LF-HD was Can$53,270 per QALY gained over lifetime. This ratio was fairly robust in the sensitivity analysis. The cost-utility ratio was lower than that of LF-HD compared with no treatment (immediate death), which was Can$93,008 per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: High-efficiency OL-HDF can be considered a cost-effective treatment for ESRD in a Canadian setting. Further research is needed to assess cost effectiveness in other settings and healthcare systems.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Hemodiafiltración/economía , Hemodiafiltración/métodos , Diálisis Renal/economía , Diálisis Renal/métodos , Anciano , Canadá , Femenino , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/fisiopatología , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Masculino , Cadenas de Markov , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Calidad de Vida
9.
Nephron ; 129(4): 269-75, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25825336

RESUMEN

Survival of haemodialysis (HD) patients is influenced by many factors. Mortality is mainly of cardiovascular (CV) origin and related to both traditional and nontraditional CV risk factors. Low plasma Beta2-microglobulin (ß2m) levels are associated with improved HD patient survival. HD session times that are longer than the conventional 4 h (i.e., extended dialysis) provide better middle molecule clearance and are also associated with a survival advantage. In this crossover randomised trial, we investigated the effect of membrane flux on CV risk factors and on ß2m plasma levels in patients treated with extended dialysis. Dialysis session duration was between 5 and 8 h for all patients. Patients were randomly assigned to the treatment sequences low-flux/high-flux dialysis versus high-flux/low-flux dialysis in a crossover design after a 3-month run-in period, with each phase lasting 9 months. Of the initially enrolled 168 patients, 155 patients started the study after the run-in period, 117 patients completed Phase 1, and 83 patients completed the whole study. Lp(a), homocystein, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol and serum albumin were comparable in the low-flux and high-flux treatments. The average ß2m level was 43.3 ± 11.1 mg/l at the end of the low-flux phase. Independent of sequence assignation, average ß2m was significantly lower at the end of the high-flux phase (27.5 ± 76.0 mg/l, p < 0.0001 versus end of low-flux phase). Both phosphate and nPNA were significantly lower at the end of the high-flux phase compared to the low-flux phase (p = 0.045 and p = 0.002, respectively). Inclusion of those patients who completed Phase 1 and who dropped out of the study during Phase 2 did not significantly change the results. In conclusion, this study did not find an influence of high-flux filters on several traditional CV risk factors in a population of HD patients treated with extended dialysis. However, high-flux filters are necessary to optimise middle molecule clearance and reduce the ß2m level.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/metabolismo , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Diálisis Renal/métodos , Microglobulina beta-2/análisis , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/patología , Estudios Cruzados , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/metabolismo , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Masculino , Membranas Artificiales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Permeabilidad , Diálisis Renal/instrumentación , Diálisis Renal/mortalidad , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia
10.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 10(7): 1192-200, 2015 Jul 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25901091

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: High body mass index appears protective in hemodialysis patients, but uncertainty prevails regarding which components of body composition, fat or lean body mass, are primarily associated with survival. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Data between April 2006 and December 2012 were extracted from the Fresenius Medical Care Europe subset of the international MONitoring Dialysis Outcomes initiative. Fresenius Medical Care Europe archives a unique repository of predialysis body composition measurements determined by multifrequency bioimpedance (BCM Body Composition Monitor). The BCM Body Composition Monitor reports lean tissue indices (LTIs) and fat tissue indices (FTIs), which are the respective tissue masses normalized to height squared, relative to an age- and sex-matched healthy population. The relationship between LTI and FTI and all-cause mortality was studied by Kaplan-Meier analysis, multivariate Cox regression, and smoothing spline ANOVA logistic regression. RESULTS: In 37,345 hemodialysis patients, median (25th-75th percentile) LTI and FTI were 12.2 (10.3-14.5) and 9.8 (6.6-12.4) kg/m(2), respectively. Median (25th-75th percentile) follow-up time was 266 (132-379) days; 3458 (9.2%) patients died during follow-up. Mortality was lowest with both LTI and FTI in the 10th-90th percentile (reference group) and significantly higher at the lower LTI and FTI extreme (hazard ratio [HR], 3.37; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.94 to 3.87; P<0.001). Survival was best with LTI between 15 and 20 kg/m(2) and FTI between 4 and 15 kg/m(2) (probability of death during follow-up: <5%). When taking the relation between both compartments into account, the interaction was significant (P=0.01). Higher FTI appeared protective in patients with low LTI (HR, 3.37; 95% CI, 2.94 to 3.87; P<0.001 at low LTI-low FTI, decreasing to HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.47 to 2.17; P<0.001 at low LTI-high FTI). CONCLUSIONS: This large international study indicates best survival in patients with both LTI and FTI in the 10th-90th percentiles of a healthy population. In analyses of body composition, both lean tissue and fat tissue compartments and also their relationship should be considered.


Asunto(s)
Composición Corporal , Enfermedades Renales/terapia , Diálisis Renal , Adiposidad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Índice de Masa Corporal , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Bases de Datos Factuales , Impedancia Eléctrica , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Enfermedades Renales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Renales/mortalidad , Enfermedades Renales/fisiopatología , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Prevalencia , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Diálisis Renal/mortalidad , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis Espectral , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
PLoS One ; 10(3): e0120167, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25793464

RESUMEN

The hypothesis that central volume plays a key role in the source of low frequency (LF) oscillations of heart rate variability (HRV) was tested in a population of end stage renal disease patients undergoing conventional hemodialysis (HD) treatment, and thus subject to large fluid shifts and sympathetic activation. Fluid overload (FO) in 58 chronic HD patients was assessed by whole body bioimpedance measurements before the midweek HD session. Heart Rate Variability (HRV) was measured using 24-hour Holter electrocardiogram recordings starting before the same HD treatment. Time domain and frequency domain analyses were performed on HRV signals. Patients were retrospectively classified in three groups according to tertiles of FO normalized to the extracellular water (FO/ECW%). These groups were also compared after stratification by diabetes mellitus. Patients with the low to medium hydration status before the treatment (i.e. 1st and 2nd FO/ECW% tertiles) showed a significant increase in LF power during last 30 min of HD compared to dialysis begin, while no significant change in LF power was seen in the third group (i.e. those with high pre-treatment hydration values). In conclusion, several mechanisms can generate LF oscillations in the cardiovascular system, including baroreflex feedback loops and central oscillators. However, the current results emphasize the role played by the central volume in determining the power of LF oscillations.


Asunto(s)
Volumen Sanguíneo , Síndrome Cardiorrenal/fisiopatología , Frecuencia Cardíaca , Anciano , Análisis de Varianza , Síndrome Cardiorrenal/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diálisis Renal
12.
Nephron ; 129(3): 179-88, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25765538

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Haemodiafiltration (HDF) is the preferred dialysis modality in many countries. The aim of the study was to compare the survival of incident patients on high-volume HDF (HV-HDF) with high-flux haemodialysis (HD) in a large-scale European dialysis population. METHODS: The study population was extracted from 47,979 patients in 369 NephroCare centres throughout 12 countries. Baseline was six months after dialysis initiation; maximum follow-up was 5 years. Patients were either on HV-HDF (defined as with ≥21 litres substitution fluid volume per session) or on HD if on that treatment for ≥75% of the 3 months before baseline. The main predictor was treatment modality. Other parameters included country, age, gender, BMI, haemoglobin, albumin and Charlson comorbidity index. Propensity score matching and Inverse Probability of Censoring Weighting (IPCW) were applied to reduce bias by indication and consider modality crossover, respectively. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 1,590 incident patients remained. Kaplan-Meier and proportional Cox regression analyses revealed no significant survival advantage of HV-HDF. Results were biased by modality crossover: during the 5-year study period, 7% of HV-HDF patients switched to HD, and 55% of HD patients switched to HV-HDF. IPCW uncovered a statistically significant survival advantage of HV-HDF (OR 0.501; CI 0.366-0.684; p < 0.001). A higher benefit of HV-HDF for some subgroups was revealed, for example, non-diabetics, patients 65-74 years, patients with obesity or high blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: This large-scale study supports the generalizability of previous RCT findings regarding the survival benefit of HV-HDF. Sub-group analysis showed that some sub-cohorts appear to benefit more from HV-HDF than others.


Asunto(s)
Hemodiafiltración/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Pruebas de Función Renal , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diálisis Renal , Análisis de Supervivencia
13.
J Nephrol ; 28(5): 523-30, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25791209

RESUMEN

This article aims to provide an overview of the different nutritional markers and the available methodologies for the physical assessment of nutrition status in hemodialysis patients, with special emphasis on early detection of protein energy wasting (PEW). Nutrition status assessment is made on the basis of anamnesis, physical examination, evaluation of nutrient intake, and on a selection of various screening/diagnostic methodologies. These methodologies can be subjective, e.g. the Subjective Global Assessment score (SGA), or objective in nature (e.g. bioimpedance analysis). In addition, certain biochemical tests may be employed (e.g. albumin, pre-albumin). The various subjective-based and objective methodologies provide different insights for the assessment of PEW, particularly regarding their propensity to differentiate between the important body composition compartments-fluid overload, fat mass and muscle mass. This review of currently available methods showed that no single approach and no single marker is able to detect alterations in nutrition status in a timely fashion and to follow such changes over time. The most clinically relevant approach presently appears to be the combination of the SGA method with the bioimpedance spectroscopy technique with physiological model and, additionally, laboratory tests for the detection of micro-nutrient deficiency.


Asunto(s)
Ingestión de Energía/fisiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Evaluación Nutricional , Estado Nutricional , Diálisis Renal , Índice de Masa Corporal , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/metabolismo
14.
Artif Organs ; 39(2): 142-9, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25277688

RESUMEN

Hemodiafiltration (HDF) with 20-22 L of substitution fluid is increasingly recognized as associated with significant benefits regarding patient outcome. However, some doubt exists as to whether these high volumes can be achieved in routine clinical practice. A total of 4176 sessions with 366 patients on postdilution HDF were analyzed in this 1-month observational cohort study with prospective data collection. All dialysis machines were equipped with AutoSub plus signal analysis software that automatically and continuously adapts the substitution fluid flow according to the blood flow, blood viscosity, and dialyzer characteristics. Percentages of sessions with different types of vascular access were compared regarding achievement of ≥21 L substitution fluid. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to study the independent relationship of selected variables with achievement of ≥21 L substitution volume. Patient- and dialysis-related variables that showed an association with the convection volume were entered in a multivariable model that included hematocrit up front. Respectively, 87%, 84%, and 33% of routine sessions conducted with fistulas, grafts, and catheters qualified as high-volume HDF. Serum albumin levels ≥4.2 g/dL were positively associated with the achievement of at least 21 L substitution volume. Positive associations were also observed for blood flows in the ranges 350-399 and ≥400 mL/min compared with the reference range (300-350 mL/min), for longer treatment time, for fistula versus catheter, for higher filtration fraction, and for dialysis conducted at the end of the week versus Monday. It can be concluded that implementation and sustainability of high-volume HDF is possible in routine clinical practice for almost all patients treated with fistulas and grafts.


Asunto(s)
Hemodiafiltración/métodos , Anciano , Velocidad del Flujo Sanguíneo , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Hematócrito , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Albúmina Sérica/análisis
15.
Hemodial Int ; 19(2): 314-22, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25377921

RESUMEN

Hemodiafiltration with high-convective volumes is associated with improved patient survival, whereby practical realization is contingent on high extracorporeal blood flow (Qb) and dialysis treatment time. However, Qb is restricted by vascular access (VA) quality and/or concerns that high Qb could damage the VA. Taking VA quality into consideration, one can investigate the relationship between Qb and VA survival. We analyzed data from 1039 patients treated by hemodiafiltration over a 21-month period where access blood flow (Qa) measurements were also available at baseline. VA failure was defined as a surgical intervention resulting in the generation of a new VA. Qa was included as a stratification variable within a Cox regression model. A second Cox proportional hazard model with a penalized spline was used to describe the association between Qb and VA survival. Compared with Qb in the 350-357 mL/min range, a significantly higher hazard ratio (HR) for VA failure was detected for fistula only, and then only for Qb < 312 mL/min (HR: 2.361, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.251-4.453), Qb = 387-397 mL/min (HR: 1.920, 95% CI: 1.007-3.660) and Qb >414 mL/min (HR: 2.207, 95% CI: 1.101-4.424). Age, gender, diabetes, VA vintage, position of the VA, and arterial pressure were not significantly associated with outcome. The form of the penalized spline confirmed higher risk for VA failure for the lowest and the highest values of Qb. Taking Qa into consideration, no association was found between VA failure and Qb up to flows as high as approximately 390 mL/min.


Asunto(s)
Hemodiafiltración/efectos adversos , Modelos Cardiovasculares , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/efectos adversos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Velocidad del Flujo Sanguíneo , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia
17.
Kidney Int ; 86(4): 790-7, 2014 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24717298

RESUMEN

Hemodialysis patient survival is dependent on the availability of a reliable vascular access. In clinical practice, procedures for vascular access cannulation vary from clinic to clinic. We investigated the impact of cannulation technique on arteriovenous fistula and graft survival. Based on an April 2009 cross-sectional survey of vascular access cannulation practices in 171 dialysis units, a cohort of patients with corresponding vascular access survival information was selected for follow-up ending March 2012. Of the 10,807 patients enrolled in the original survey, access survival data were available for 7058 patients from nine countries. Of these, 90.6% had an arteriovenous fistula and 9.4% arteriovenous graft. Access needling was by area technique for 65.8%, rope-ladder for 28.2%, and buttonhole for 6%. The most common direction of puncture was antegrade with bevel up (43.1%). A Cox regression model was applied, adjusted for within-country effects, and defining as events the need for creation of a new vascular access. Area cannulation was associated with a significantly higher risk of access failure than rope-ladder or buttonhole. Retrograde direction of the arterial needle with bevel down was also associated with an increased failure risk. Patient application of pressure during cannulation appeared more favorable for vascular access longevity than not applying pressure or using a tourniquet. The higher risk of failure associated with venous pressures under 100 or over 150 mm Hg should open a discussion on limits currently considered acceptable.


Asunto(s)
Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Cateterismo/métodos , Supervivencia de Injerto , Diálisis Renal , Anciano , Presión Sanguínea , Cateterismo/instrumentación , Estudios Transversales , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Antebrazo/irrigación sanguínea , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Agujas , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Flujo Sanguíneo Regional , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Factores de Tiempo , Injerto Vascular
18.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 46(6): 1191-200, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24057682

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hemodiafiltration is becoming a preferred treatment modality for dialysis patients in many countries. The volume of substitution fluid delivered has been indicated as an independent mortality risk factor. The aim of this study is to compare patient survival on three different treatment modalities: high-flux hemodialysis, low-volume online HDF (oHDF) and high-volume oHDF. METHODS: Incident hemodialysis and oHDF patients treated in 13 NephroCare centers in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia and Slovenia between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2011, were included in this epidemiological cohort study. High-volume oHDF was defined as substitution volume higher than the median substitution volume infused, otherwise low-volume. Main predictor was treatment modality at baseline and in time-dependent model. Other predictors were age, gender, diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular accident, arrhythmia, hemoglobin and C-reactive protein. RESULTS: Four hundred and forty-two patients were included in the study. Median substitution fluid volume was 20.4 L. Mean difference between the oHDF groups in substitution fluid volume was 8.3 ± 5.2 L [95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI) 7.1-9.5, p < 0.0001]. The unadjusted hazard ratios (HR) with 95 % CI compared to high-flux HD were 0.87 (0.5-1.5) for low-volume oHDF and 0.29 (0.13-0.63) for high-volume oHDF. After the adjustment for covariates, the HR for patients on low-volume oHDF remained statistically insignificant compared to high-flux HD (0.84; 95 % CI 0.46-1.53), while patients on high-volume oHDF showed a marked and significantly lower HR (0.29; 95 % CI 0.13-0.68) than patients on high-flux HD in baseline model. While this effect failed to reach significance in the time-dependent model (HR 0.477; 95 % CI 0.196-1.161), possibly due to an inadequate sample size here, the consistency of results in both models supports the robustness of the findings. After switching from high-flux hemodialysis to oHDF, mean hemoglobin and albumin levels did not change significantly. Mean erythropoietin resistance index (ERI) and erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESA) consumption decreased significantly (p = 0.02, p = 0.03, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The median substitution volume used in these three countries for post-dilutional oHDF is 20.4 L. oHDF is associated with significant reductions in ERI and ESA consumption. Only high-volume oHDF is associated with improved survival compared to high-flux hemodialysis.


Asunto(s)
Soluciones para Diálisis/administración & dosificación , Hemodiafiltración/mortalidad , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Anciano , Bosnia y Herzegovina , Proteína C-Reactiva/metabolismo , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Femenino , Hematínicos/administración & dosificación , Hemodiafiltración/métodos , Hemoglobinas/metabolismo , Humanos , Incidencia , Fallo Renal Crónico/sangre , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Serbia , Albúmina Sérica/metabolismo , Eslovenia , Tasa de Supervivencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...