EASI™ 12­lead ECG with a handheld computer refines cardiovascular diagnosis in general practice.

BACKGROUND: Electrocardiogram (ECG) is used to a small extent in general medicine, because of general practitioner (GP) apprehension about interpretation and time consumption. AIM: This study tested the hypothesis that user-friendly EASI ECG improves GP diagnosis of cardiovascular symptoms. METHOD: Patients over 18 years with recent cardiovascular symptoms or auscultation rhythm abnormalities were included in this prospective, multicentric study (10 practices, 17 GPs). ECG recordings were made with Cardiosecur® (4­lead ECG connected to a handheld computer for EASI™ processing). Besides clinical data, diagnosis/patient referral were noted before and after ECG and interpretation. GP diagnosis and ECG interpretation were compared with a reference diagnosis made by ECG specialist. RESULTS: There were 338 patients; 66% had cardiovascular risk factors. ECGs were performed for chest pain (41%), auscultation rhythm abnormalities (33%) or palpitations (19%). Average time to perform ECG was 4.7 ± 2.1 min, with possible home recordings. Compared with standard ECG, improvement provided by Cardiosecur® was scored 9/10 (range 7-10) by GPs. GPs correctly interpreted ECG normality/abnormality in 77% of patients. Diagnosis was correctly changed for 14% of patients thanks to the ECG, and wrongly changed for 2%. One new appropriate final diagnosis was achieved for 9 ECG recordings (p < 0.001). Diagnostic certainty increased 1.9 ± 2.1/10 (p < 0.001). ECG brought about changes in GP decision making: referral or treatment changed for 82 patients (24%) and complementary test for 69 patients (20%). CONCLUSION: The EASI™ algorithm coupled with a handheld computer facilitates ECG recordings in the primary care setting, providing improved diagnosis.

Clinical Significance of Global Wasted Work in Patients with Heart Failure Receiving Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between myocardial work assessment using pressure-strain loops by echocardiography before cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and response to CRT has been recently revealed. Among myocardial work parameters, the impact of left ventricular myocardial global wasted work (GWW) on response to CRT and outcome following CRT has been seldom studied. Hence, the authors evaluated the relationship between preprocedural GWW and outcome in a large prospective cohort of patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction receiving CRT. METHODS: The study included 249 patients with HF. Myocardial work indices including GWW were calculated using speckle-tracking strain two-dimensional echocardiography using pressure-strain loops. End points of the study were (1) response to CRT, defined as left ventricular reverse remodeling and/or absence of hospitalization for HF, and (2) all-cause death during follow-up. RESULTS: Median follow-up duration was 48 months (interquartile range, 43-54 months). Median preoperative GWW was 281 mm Hg% (interquartile range, 184-388 mm Hg%). Preoperative GWW was associated with CRT response (area under the curve, 0.74; P < .0001), and a 200 mm Hg% threshold discriminated CRT nonresponders from responders with 85% specificity and 50% sensitivity, even after adjustment for known predictors of CRT response (adjusted odds ratio, 4.03; 95% CI, 1.91-8.68; P < .001). After adjustment for established predictors of outcome in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction receiving CRT, GWW < 200 mm Hg% remained associated with a relative increased risk for all-cause death compared with GWW ≥ 200 mm Hg% (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.9; P = .0245). Adding GWW to a baseline model including known predictors of outcome in CRT resulted in an improvement of this model (χ2 to improve 4.85, P = .028). The relationship between GWW and CRT response and outcome was stronger in terms of size effect and statistical significance than for other myocardial work indices. CONCLUSIONS: Low preoperative GWW (<200 mm Hg%) is associated with absence of CRT response in CRT candidates and with a relative increased risk for all-cause death. GWW appears to be a promising parameter to improve selection for CRT of patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction.

Clinical and prognostic implications of phenomapping in patients with heart failure receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.

BACKGROUND: Despite having an indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy according to current guidelines, patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction who receive cardiac resynchronization therapy do not consistently derive benefit from it. AIM: To determine whether unsupervised clustering analysis (phenomapping) can identify distinct phenogroups of patients with differential outcomes among cardiac resynchronization therapy recipients from routine clinical practice. METHODS: We used unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis of phenotypic data after data reduction (55 clinical, biological and echocardiographic variables) to define new phenogroups among 328 patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction from routine clinical practice enrolled before cardiac resynchronization therapy. Clinical outcomes and cardiac resynchronization therapy response rate were studied according to phenogroups. RESULTS: Although all patients met the recommended criteria for cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation, phenomapping analysis classified study participants into four phenogroups that differed distinctively in clinical, biological, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic characteristics and outcomes. Patients from phenogroups 1 and 2 had the most improved outcome in terms of mortality, associated with cardiac resynchronization therapy response rates of 81% and 78%, respectively. In contrast, patients from phenogroups 3 and 4 had cardiac resynchronization therapy response rates of 39% and 59%, respectively, and the worst outcome, with a considerably increased risk of mortality compared with patients from phenogroup 1 (hazard ratio 3.23, 95% confidence interval 1.9-5.5 and hazard ratio 2.49, 95% confidence interval 1.38-4.50, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction with an indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy from routine clinical practice, phenomapping identifies subgroups of patients with differential clinical, biological and echocardiographic features strongly linked to divergent outcomes and responses to cardiac resynchronization therapy. This approach may help to identify patients who will derive most benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy in "individualized" clinical practice.

Periprocedural, early, and long-term risks of pacemaker implantation after atrioventricular nodal re-entry tachycardia ablation: a French nationwide cohort.

AIMS: Pacemaker implantation (PI) after atrioventricular nodal re-entry tachycardia (AVNRT) ablation is a dreadful complication. We aimed to assess periprocedural, early, and late risks for PI. METHODS AND RESULTS: All 27 022 patients who underwent latest AVNRT ablation in France from 2009 to 2017, were identified in the nationwide medicalization database. A control group of 305 152 patients hospitalized for arm, leg, or skin injuries with no history of AVNRT or supraventricular tachycardia were selected. After propensity score matching, both groups had mean age of 53 ± 18 years and were predominantly female (64%). During this 9-year period, 822 of 27 022 (3.0%) AVNRT patients underwent PI, with significant higher risk in propensity-matched AVNRT patients compared to propensity-matched controls [2.9% vs. 0.9%; hazard ratio 3.4 (2.9-3.9), P < 0.0001]. This excess risk was significant during all follow-up, including periprocedural (1st month), early (1-6 months), and late (>6 months) risk periods. Annualized late risk per 100 AVNRT patients was 0.2%. In comparison to controls, excess risk was 0.2% in <30-year-old AVNRT patients; 0.7% in 30-50-year-old; 1.1% in 50-70-year-old and 6.5% over 70-year-olds. Risk for PI was also significantly different according to three procedural factors: centres, experience, and ablation date, with a 30% decrease since 2015. CONCLUSION: Periprocedural, early, and late risks for PI were higher after AVNRT ablation compared to propensity-matched controls. Longer follow-up is needed as the excess risk seems to persist late after AVNRT ablation.

Correlates of the ratio of acceleration time to ejection time in patients with aortic stenosis: An echocardiographic and computed tomography study.

BACKGROUND: An increased acceleration time to ejection time (AT/ET) ratio is associated with increased mortality in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). AIM: To identify the factors associated with an increased AT/ET ratio. METHODS: The relationships between the AT/ET ratio and clinical and Doppler echocardiographic variables of interest in the setting of AS were analysed retrospectively in 1107 patients with AS and preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF). The computed tomography aortic valve calcium (CT-AVC) score was studied in a subgroup of 342 patients. RESULTS: In the univariate analysis, the AT/ET ratio was found to correlate with peak aortic jet velocity (r=0.57; P<0.0001), mean pressure gradient (r=0.60; P<0.0001), aortic valve area (r=-0.50; P<0.0001) and CT-AVC score (r=0.24; P<0.0001). The AT/ET ratio had good accuracy in predicting a peak aortic jet velocity≥4 m/s, a mean pressure gradient≥40mmHg and an aortic valve area≤1.0cm2, with an optimal cut-off value of 0.34. Multivariable linear regression analysis showed that presence of AS-related symptoms, decreased LV stroke volume index, LVEF, absence of diabetes mellitus, systolic blood pressure, increased LV mass index, relative wall thickness and peak aortic jet velocity were independently associated with an increased AT/ET ratio (all P<0.05). In the subgroup of patients who underwent CT-AVC scoring, the CT-AVC score was independently associated with an increased AT/ET ratio (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The AT/ET ratio is related to echocardiographic and CT-AVC indices of AS severity. However, multiple intricate factors beyond the haemodynamic and anatomical severity of AS influence the AT/ET ratio, including LV geometry, function and systolic blood pressure. These findings should be considered when assessing the AT/ET ratio in patients with AS and preserved LVEF.

Impact of Increased Right Atrial Size on Long-Term Mortality in Patients With Heart Failure Receiving Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

The ability to visualize the right atrium (RA) by echocardiography allows a quantitative, highly reproducible assessment of the RA volume (RAV). The aim of this study is to evaluate the relation between RAV and long-term mortality in a prospective cohort of heart failure and reduced ejection fraction patients in sinus rhythm receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy. 172 patients were included. The right atrium volume index (RAVI) was calculated using Simpson's method from the apical four-chamber view and indexed to body surface area. The relation between RAVI and mortality during follow up was studied. Median follow up was 68 months (interquartile range 62 to 73 months). Mean RAVI was 27 ± 14 mL/m² (IQR 22 to 33 mL/m²). Cumulative 5-year all-cause mortality was 22 ± 6% in patients with RAVI ≤ 19 mL/m², 24 ± 6% for RAVI 19 to 29 mL/m² and 58 ± 7% for RAVI >29 mL/m² (p for trend <0.001). After adjustment on clinical and echocardiographic predictors of outcome including indices of right ventricular function, there was a significant increase in overall mortality risk with increasing RAVI (adjusted hazard ratio 1.02 [95% confidence interval, 1.00 to 1.03], per 1 mL/m2 increment; p = 0.042). Patients in the highest tertile (RAVI >29 mL/m²) had significantly greater risk of death compared with those with RAVI ≤29 mL/m² (adjusted hazard ratio 2.01 [95% confidence interval, 1.15 to 3.50]; p = 0.014). In conclusion, RA enlargement is a powerful and highly reproducible independent predictor of long-term mortality in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction in sinus rhythm receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Clinical Significance of Electromechanical Dyssynchrony and QRS Narrowing in Patients With Heart Failure Receiving Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that preoperative electromechanical dyssynchrony amenable to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and QRS narrowing immediately after CRT are both correlated and have a cumulative impact on response and outcome after CRT. METHODS: A total of 233 CRT candidates (heart failure New York Heart Association classes II-IV, ejection fraction < 35%, QRS ≥ 120 milliseconds, 44% women, 71 ± 11 years old) were prospectively included. Preoperative electromechanical dyssynchrony amenable to CRT was assessed by septal deformation patterns using speckle tracking echocardiography. QRS narrowing was calculated from 12-lead electrocardiograms before and immediately after CRT implantation. The primary endpoint was overall mortality during long-term follow-up. The NTC clinical trial number is NCT02986633. RESULTS: Eighty-seven percent of patients with preoperative electromechanical dyssynchrony experienced QRS narrowing after CRT (118/136), whereas 69% of patients without preoperative electromechanical dyssynchrony (67/97) experienced QRS narrowing after CRT (P < 0.001). By Cox multivariate analysis, both preoperative electromechanical dyssynchrony and lack of postoperative QRS narrowing were independently associated with an increased risk of mortality during follow-up (adjusted hazards ratio [HR] 2.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.43-3.50 and HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.06-3.38, respectively). Compared with patients with preoperative electromechanical dyssynchrony, patients without both electromechanical dyssynchrony and postoperative QRS narrowing experienced a considerable increased risk of mortality during follow-up (adjusted HR 3.70, 95% CI 1.96-6.97). CONCLUSIONS: Lack of postoperative QRS narrowing after CRT is associated with preoperative electromechanical dyssynchrony. Both preoperative electromechanical dyssynchrony and postoperative QRS narrowing have a favourable cumulative impact on outcome after CRT.

Assessment of left ventricular size and function by 3-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography: Impact of the echocardiography platform and analysis software.

BACKGROUND: Whether echocardiography platform and analysis software impact left ventricular (LV) volumes, ejection fraction (EF), and stroke volume (SV) by transthoracic tridimensional echocardiography (3DE) has not yet been assessed. Hence, our aim was to compare 3DE LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (EDV and ESV), LVEF, and SV obtained with echocardiography platform from 2 different manufacturers. METHODS: 3DE was performed in 84 patients (65% of screened consecutive patients), with equipment from 2 different manufacturers, with subsequent off-line postprocessing to obtain parameters of LV function and size (Philips QLAB 3DQ and General Electric EchoPAC 4D autoLVQ). Twenty-five patients with clinical indication for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging served as a validation subgroup. RESULTS: LVEDV and LVESV from 2 vendors were highly correlated (r = 0.93), but compared with 4D autoLVQ, the use of Qlab 3DQ resulted in lower LVEDV and LVESV (bias: 11 mL, limits of agreement: -25 to +47 and bias: 6 mL, limits of agreement: -22 to +34, respectively). The agreement between LVEF values of each software was poor (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.62) despite no or minimal bias. SVs were also lower with Qlab 3DQ advanced compared with 4D autoLVQ, and both were poorly correlated (r = 0.66). Consistently, the underestimation of LVEDV, LVESV, and SV by 3DE compared with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was more pronounced with Philips QLAB 3DQ advanced than with 4D autoLVQ. CONCLUSIONS: The echocardiography platform and analysis software significantly affect the values of LV parameters obtained by 3DE. Intervendor standardization and improvements in 3DE modalities are needed to broaden the use of LV parameters obtained by 3DE in clinical practice.

Prospective assessment of the frequency of low gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: Critical impact of aortic flow misalignment and pressure recovery phenomenon.

BACKGROUND: The frequency of paradoxical low-gradient severe aortic stenosis (AS) varies widely across studies. The impact of misalignment of aortic flow and pressure recovery phenomenon on the frequency of low-gradient severe AS with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) has not been evaluated in prospective studies. AIMS: To investigate prospectively the impact of aortic flow misalignment by Doppler and lack of pressure recovery phenomenon correction on the frequency of low-gradient (LG) severe aortic stenosis (AS) with preserved LVEF. METHODS: Aortic jet velocities and mean pressure gradient (MPG) were obtained by interrogating all windows in 68 consecutive patients with normal LVEF and severe AS (aortic valve area [AVA] ≤1cm2) on the basis of the apical imaging window alone (two-dimensional [2D] apical approach). Patients were classified as having LG or high-gradient (HG) AS according to MPG <40mmHg or ≥40mmHg, and normal flow (NF) or low flow (LF) according to stroke volume index >35mL/m2 or ≤35mL/m2, on the basis of the 2D apical approach, the multiview approach (multiple windows evaluation) and AVA corrected for pressure recovery. RESULTS: The proportion of LG severe AS was 57% using the 2D apical approach alone. After the multiview approach and correction for pressure recovery, the proportion of LG severe AS decreased from 57% to 13% (LF-LG severe AS decreased from 23% to 3%; NF-LG severe AS decreased from 34% to 10%). As a result, 25% of patients were reclassified as having HG severe AS (AVA ≤1cm2 and MPG ≥40mmHg) and 19% as having moderate AS. Hence, 77% of patients initially diagnosed with LG severe AS did not have "true" LG severe AS when the multiview approach and the pressure recovery phenomenon correction were used. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic flow misevaluation, resulting from lack of use of multiple windows evaluation and pressure recovery phenomenon correction, accounts for a large proportion of incorrectly graded AS and considerable overestimation of the frequency of LG severe AS with preserved LVEF.

Time course of secondary mitral regurgitation in patients with heart failure receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy: Impact on long-term outcome beyond left ventricular reverse remodelling.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) at baseline versus immediately after and several months after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), beyond left ventricular (LV) reverse remodelling, has yet to be investigated. AIM: To evaluate the clinical significance of secondary MR before and at two timepoints after CRT in a large cohort of consecutive patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced LV ejection fraction. METHODS: A total of 198 patients were recruited prospectively into a registry, and underwent echocardiography at baseline and immediately after CRT (on the day of hospital discharge). Echocardiography was also performed 9 months after CRT in 172 patients. The impact of significant secondary MR (≥moderate) on all-cause death, cardiovascular death and hospitalization for HF was studied at each stage. RESULTS: The frequency of significant secondary MR decreased from 23% (n=45) to 8% (n=16) immediately after CRT. Among the 172 patients who underwent echocardiography 9 months after CRT, 17 (10%) had significant secondary MR. During a median follow-up of 48 months, 49 patients died and 36 were hospitalized for HF. Patients with significant secondary MR immediately after or 9 months after CRT had an increased risk of all-cause death, cardiovascular death and hospitalization for HF during follow-up (P<0.05 for all endpoints). After adjustment for LV reverse remodelling, significant secondary MR 9 months after CRT remained associated with an increased risk of all-cause death (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 3.77; P=0.014), cardiovascular death (adjusted HR 5.36; P=0.037), and hospitalization for HF (adjusted HR 7.33; P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Significant secondary MR despite CRT provides important prognostic information beyond LV reverse remodelling. Further studies are needed to evaluate the potential role of new percutaneous procedures for mitral valve repair in improving outcome in these very high-risk patients.

Correction: Asymptomatic aortic stenosis: An assessment of patients' and of their general practitioners' knowledge, after an indexed specialized assessment in community practice.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179988.].

Asymptomatic aortic stenosis: An assessment of patients' and of their general practitioners' knowledge, after an indexed specialized assessment in community practice.

BACKGROUND: Clinical and echocardiography follow-up is recommended in patients with aortic stenosis to detect symptom onset, thus a watchful waiting approach has to be safe and effective. For both AS patients and their general practitioners, evaluation of valvular heart disease (VHD) knowledge, after the indexed specialized assessment has never been measured. AIMS: To evaluate the knowledge of clinical symptoms of aortic stenosis by both patients and their general practitioner. METHODS: Sixty-four patients, with moderate to severe and initially asymptomatic AS (median AVA (interquartile range) 1.01(0.80-1.15) cm2) previously referred to a tertiary center and medically managed for at least 6 months after the index echocardiogram, and their primary care doctors were interviewed on the phone and asked to answer specific questions related to knowledge of aortic stenosis symptoms. RESULTS: Fifty-six percent of patients quoted shortness of breath as one of the aortic stenosis symptoms, and only 16% knew the 3 aortic stenosis symptoms. Fifty percent of patients reported having received sufficient information regarding aortic stenosis; only 48% remembered receiving information regarding specific symptoms. Only 14% general practitioners quoted the 3 specific symptoms. According to the initial recommendation, only 41 patients (64%) benefitted from a 6-to-12 month clinical and echocardiography follow up. CONCLUSION: GPs are not sufficiently trained to safely manage AS patients in the community and to ensure adequate follow-up and monitoring. AS patients were not properly informed about their diagnosis and symptomatology. Hence, therapeutic education should be improved for patients with asymptomatic AS and continuous medical education on VHD should be reinforced, for GPs.

Relationship between exercise pressure gradient and haemodynamic progression of aortic stenosis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We hypothesized that large exercise-induced increases in aortic mean pressure gradient can predict haemodynamic progression during follow-up in asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with asymptomatic moderate or severe aortic stenosis (aortic valve area<1.5cm2 or<1cm2) and normal ejection fraction, who underwent an exercise stress echocardiography at baseline with a normal exercise test and a resting echocardiography during follow-up. The relationship between exercise-induced increase in aortic mean pressure gradient and annualised changes in resting mean pressure gradient during follow-up was investigated. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients (mean age 66±15 years; 45% severe aortic stenosis) were included. Aortic mean pressure gradient significantly increased from rest to peak exercise (P<0.001). During a median follow-up of 1.6 [1.1-3.2] years, resting mean pressure gradient increased from 35±13mmHg to 48±16mmHg, P<0.0001. Median annualised change in resting mean pressure gradient during follow-up was 5 [2-11] mmHg. Exercise-induced increase in aortic mean pressure gradient did correlate with annualised changes in mean pressure gradient during follow-up (r=0.35, P=0.01). Hemodynamic progression of aortic stenosis was faster in patients with large exercise-induced increase in aortic mean pressure gradient (≥20mmHg) as compared to those with exercise-induced increase in aortic mean pressure gradient<20mmHg (median annualised increase in mean pressure gradient 19 [6-28] vs. 4 [2-10] mmHg/y respectively, P=0.002). Similar results were found in the subgroup of 30 patients with moderate aortic stenosis. CONCLUSION: Large exercise-induced increases in aortic mean pressure gradient correlate with haemodynamic progression of stenosis during follow-up in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis. Further studies are needed to fully establish the role of ESE in the decision-making process in comparison to other prognostic markers in asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis.

Clinical significance of septal deformation patterns in heart failure patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.

AIMS: Specific septal motion related to dyssynchrony is strongly linked to reverse remodelling, in patients with systolic heart failure (HF) receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We aimed to investigate the relationship between septal deformation patterns studied by longitudinal speckle tracking and clinical outcome following CRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 284 CRT candidates from two centres (HF NYHA classes II-IV, ejection fraction < 35%, QRS ≥ 120 ms) were prospectively included. Longitudinal strain of the septum in the apical four-chamber view determined three patterns of septal contraction. The endpoints were overall mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and hospitalization for HF. Compared with patterns 1 or 2, pattern 3 was associated with an increased risk for both overall and cardiovascular mortality [hazard ratio (HR) = 3.78, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.85-7.75, P < 0.001 and HR = 3.84, 95% CI: 1.45-10.16, P = 0.007, respectively] and HF hospitalization (HR = 4.41, 95% CI: 2.18-8.90, P < 0.001). Addition of septal patterns to multivariable models, including baseline QRS width and presence of left bundle branch block, improved risk prediction, and discrimination. In patients with intermediate QRS duration (120-150 ms), pattern 3 remained associated with a worse outcome than pattern 1 or 2 (P < 0.05 for all endpoints). CONCLUSION: The identification of septal deformation patterns provides important prognostic information in CRT candidates in addition to ordinary clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic predictors of outcome in HF patients. This parameter may be particularly useful in patients with intermediate QRS duration in whom the benefit of CRT remains uncertain.

Role of echocardiography before cardiac resynchronization therapy: new advances and current developments.

The role of echocardiography in improving the selection of patients who will benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remains a source of debate. Although previous landmark reports have demonstrated a link between mechanical dyssynchrony, assessed by delays between left ventricle (LV) walls and response to CRT, the predictive value of these findings has not yet been confirmed in multicenter trials. Indeed, recent studies demonstrated that the classical assessment of LV mechanical dyssynchrony using delay between walls by echocardiography depends not only on LV electrical activation delay (electrical dyssynchrony), but also on abnormalities in regional contractility of the LV and/or loading conditions, which do not represent an appropriate target for CRT. Recent reports highlighted the value of new indices of electromechanical dyssynchrony obtained by echocardiography, to predict LV response and outcome after CRT including septal flash, left bundle branch block-typical pattern by longitudinal strain, apical rocking, septal strain patterns, and systolic stretch index. This was achieved using a mechanistic approach, based on the contractile consequences of electrical dyssynchrony. These indices are rarely found in patients with narrow QRS (<120 ms), whereas their frequency rises in patients with an increase in QRS duration (>120 ms). Theses indices should improve candidate selection for CRT in clinical practice, especially for patients in whom the benefit of CRT remains uncertain, for example, patients with intermediate QRS width (120-150 ms).

Prognostic importance of postoperative QRS widening in patients with heart failure receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.

BACKGROUND: Landmark reports have suggested that patients with QRS widening immediately after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) experienced less frequently reverse left ventricular remodeling during follow-up. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the relationship between postoperative QRS widening relative to baseline and mortality in a prospective cohort of heart failure patients receiving CRT. METHODS: A 12-lead electrocardiogram was recorded for 237 heart failure patients (New York Heart Association class II to IV, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, and QRS width ≥120 ms) before and immediately after CRT device implantation. The relationships between QRS widening, all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, and echocardiographic response to CRT were studied. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 24 months, 39 patients died. Fifty patients (21%) experienced QRS widening after CRT [QRS(+) group]. During follow-up, all-cause mortality was higher in QRS(+) patients than in QRS(-) patients (36-month survival free from death 81% ± 7% vs 64% ± 16%; log rank, P = .029). After adjustment for important prognostic confounders, QRS(+) patients remained associated with an excess overall mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.67; 95% confidence interval 1.07-6.65; P = .035) and cardiovascular mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 3.63; 95% confidence interval 1.13-11.65; P = .03). QRS(+) patients were less frequent responders to CRT than were QRS(-) patients (20 [47%] vs 136 [83%]; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Postoperative QRS widening relative to baseline after CRT is associated with a considerable increased mortality risk during follow-up. Whether QRS narrowing should be achieved to optimize CRT placement, and thereby increase the rate of CRT responders and improve outcome, deserves further research.

Prognostic value of left ventricular reverse remodeling and performance improvement after cardiac resynchronization therapy: A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The present study was designed to evaluate the respective value of left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling (changes in LV end-systolic volume relative to baseline (ΔLVESV)) or LV performance improvement (ΔLV ejection fraction (ΔLVEF) or ΔGlobal longitudinal strain (GLS)) to predict long-term outcome in a prospective cohort of consecutive patients receiving routine cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). METHODS: One hundred and seventy heart failure patients (NYHA classes II-IV, LVEF ≤ 35%, QRS width ≥ 120 ms) underwent echocardiography before and 9 months after CRT. The relationships between ΔLVESV, ΔLVEF, ΔGLS and outcome (all-cause mortality and/or CHF hospitalization, overall mortality, cardiovascular mortality, CHF hospitalization) were investigated. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 32 months, 20 patients died and 27 were hospitalized for heart failure. ΔLVESV, ΔLVEF or ΔGLS were significantly associated with all-cause mortality or CHF hospitalization (adjusted hazard's ratio (HR) per standard deviation 0.58 (0.43-0.77), 0.39 (0.27-0.57) or 0.55 (0.37-0.83) respectively, all p < 0.01) and all other endpoints (all p < 0.01). Patients with ΔLVESV≥15%, ΔLVEF ≥ 10% and ΔGLS ≥ 1% had a reduced risk of mortality or CHF hospitalization (adjusted HR=0.25 (0.12-0.51), p < 0.001, adjusted HR = 0.26 (0.13-0.54), p < 0.001 and adjusted HR 0.38 (0.19-0.75), p = 0.006 respectively). Overall performance of multivariate models was better using ΔLVESV or ΔLVEF compared with ΔGLS. Interobserver agreement was excellent for ΔLVESV (Intraclass correlation coefficient - ICC-0.91) and ΔGLS (ICC 0.90) but modest for ΔLVEF (ICC 0.76) in a sample of 20 patients from the study population. CONCLUSIONS: LV reverse remodeling assessed by ΔLVESV is a strong and reproducible predictor of outcome following CRT. Compared with ΔLVESV, ΔLVEF and ΔGLS have important shortcomings: poorer reproducibility or lower predictive value.

Global longitudinal strain software upgrade: Implications for intervendor consistency and longitudinal imaging studies.

BACKGROUND: Speckle tracking can be used to measure left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS). AIMS: To study the effect of speckle tracking software product upgrades on GLS values and intervendor consistency. METHODS: Subjects (patients or healthy volunteers) underwent systematic echocardiography with equipment from Philips and GE, without a change in their position. Off-line post-processing for GLS assessment was performed with the former and most recent upgrades from these two vendors (Philips QLAB 9.0 and 10.2; GE EchoPAC 12.1 and 13.1.1). GLS was obtained in three myocardial layers with EchoPAC 13.1.1. Intersoftware and intervendor consistency was assessed. Interobserver variability was tested in a subset of patients. RESULTS: Among 73 subjects (65 patients and 8 healthy volunteers), absolute values of GLS were higher with QLAB 10.2 compared with 9.0 (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: 0.88; bias: 2.2%). Agreement between EchoPAC 13.1.1 and 12.1 varied by myocardial layer (13.1.1 only): midwall (ICC: 0.95; bias: -1.1%), endocardium (ICC: 0.93; bias: 1.6%) and epicardial (ICC: 0.80; bias: -3.3%). Although GLS was comparable for QLAB 9.0 versus EchoPAC 12.1 (ICC: 0.95; bias: 0.5%), the agreement was lower between QLAB 10.2 and EchoPAC 13.1.1 endocardial (ICC: 0.91; bias: 1.1%), midwall (ICC: 0.73; bias: 3.9%) and epicardial (ICC: 0.54; bias: 6.0%). Interobserver variability of all software products in a subset of 20 patients was excellent (ICC: 0.97-0.99; bias: -0.8 to 1.0%). CONCLUSION: Upgrades of speckle tracking software may be associated with significant changes in GLS values, which could affect intersoftware and intervendor consistency. This finding has important clinical implications for the longitudinal follow-up of patients with speckle tracking echocardiography.

Quantitative Evaluation of Mitral Regurgitation Secondary to Mitral Valve Prolapse by Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Echocardiography.

The present prospective study was designed to evaluate the accuracy of quantitative assessment of mitral regurgitant fraction (MRF) by echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) in the modern era using as reference method the blinded multiparametric integrative assessment of mitral regurgitation (MR) severity. 2-Dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) MRF by echocardiography (2D echo MRF and 3D echo MRF) were obtained by measuring the difference in left ventricular (LV) total stroke volume (obtained from either 2D or 3D acquisition) and aortic forward stroke volume normalized to LV total stroke volume. MRF was calculated by cMRI using either (1) (LV stroke volume - systolic aortic outflow volume by phase contrast)/LV stroke volume (cMRI MRF [volumetric]) or (2) (mitral inflow volume - systolic aortic outflow volume)/mitral inflow volume (cMRI MRF [phase contrast]). Six patients had 1 + MR, 6 patients had 2 + MR, 12 patients had 3 + MR, and 10 had 4 + MR. A significant correlation was observed between MR grading and 2D echo MRF (r = 0.60, p <0.0001) and 3D echo MRF (r = 0.79, p <0.0001), cMRI MRF (volumetric) (r = 0.87, p <0.0001), and cMRI MRF (phase contrast r = 0.72, p <0.001). The accuracy of MRF for the diagnosis of MR ≥3+ or 4+ was the highest with cMRI MRF (volumetric) (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.98), followed by 3D echo MRF (AUC = 0.96), 2D echo MRF (AUC = 0.90), and cMRI MRF (phase contrast; AUC = 0.83). In conclusion, MRF by cMRI (volumetric method) and 3D echo MRF had the highest diagnostic value to detect significant MR, whereas the diagnostic value of 2D echo MRF and cMRI MRF (phase contrast) was lower. Hence, the present study suggests that both cMRI (volumetric method) and 3D echo represent best approaches for calculating MRF.

Is mechanical dyssynchrony a therapeutic target in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction?

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have found a high frequency of mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), hence suggesting that cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may be considered in HFpEF. The present study was designed to compare the amount of mechanical dyssynchrony between HFpEF patients and (1) HF with reduced EF (HFrEF) patients with an indication for CRT (HFrEF-CRT(+)) group, (2) HFrEF patients with QRS duration < 120 ms (HFrEF-QRS < 120 ms) group, and (3) hypertensive controls (HTN). METHODS: Electrical (ECG) and mechanical dyssynchrony (atrio-ventricular dyssynchrony, interventricular dyssynchrony, intraventricular dyssynchrony) were assessed using conventional, tissue Doppler, and Speckle Tracking strain echocardiography in 40 HFpEF patients, 40 age- and sex-matched HTN controls, 40 HFrEF-QRS < 120 ms patients, and 40 HFrEF-CRT(+) patients. RESULTS: The frequency of left bundle branch block was low in HFpEF patients (5%) and similar to HTN controls (5%, P = 0.85). Indices of dyssynchrony were similar between HFpEF and HTN patients or HFrEF-QRS < 120 ms patients. In contrast, most indices of dyssynchrony differed between HFpEF and HFrEF-CRT(+) patients. The principal components analysis on the entire cohort of 160 patients yielded 2 homogeneous groups of patients in terms of dyssynchrony, the first comprising HFrEF-CRT(+) patients and the second comprising HTN, HFrEF-QRS < 120 ms and HFpEF patients. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical dyssynchrony in HFpEF does not differ from that of patients with HTN or patients with HFrEF and a narrow QRS. This data raises concerns regarding the role of dyssynchrony in the pathophysiology of HFpEF and thereby the potential usage of CRT in HFpEF.