Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Aviat Space Environ Med ; 85(8): 823-7, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25199124

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: U.S. astronauts undergo extensive job-related screening and medical examinations prior to selection in order to identify candidates optimally suited for careers in spaceflight. Screening medical standards evolved over many years and after extensive spaceflight experience. These standards assess health-related risks for each astronaut candidate, minimizing the potential for medical impact on future mission success. This document discusses the evolution of the Shuttle-era medical selection standards and the most common reasons for medical dis-qualification of applicants. METHODS: Data for astronaut candidate finalists were compiled from medical records and NASA archives from the period of 1978 to 2004 and were retrospectively reviewed for medically disqualifying conditions. RESULTS: During Shuttle selection cycles, a total of 372 applicants were disqualified due to 425 medical concerns. The most common disqualifying conditions included visual, cardiovascular, psychiatric, and behavioral disorders. During this time period, three major expert panel reviews resulted in refinements and alterations to selection standards for future cycles. DISCUSSION: Shuttle-era screening, testing, and specialist evaluations evolved through periodic expert reviews, evidence-based medicine, and astronaut medical care experience. The Shuttle medical program contributed to the development and implementation of NASA and international standards, longitudinal data collection, improved medical care, and occupational surveillance models. The lessons learned from the Shuttle program serve as the basis for medical selection for the ISS, exploration-class missions, and for those expected to participate in commercial spaceflight.


Asunto(s)
Astronautas , Selección de Personal/normas , Adulto , Medicina Aeroespacial , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vuelo Espacial , Estados Unidos , United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration
3.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) ; 214(2): 515-23, 2011 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21069516

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Melatonin and light treatment are recommended for hastening adaptation to time zone change. We evaluated an afternoon regimen of 3 mg sustained release (SR) melatonin with and without next morning green light treatment for circadian phase advance. Effects of melatonin and light were tested separately and then combined to determine if the total phase change is additive or synergistic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: For each condition (melatonin, placebo, light, melatonin plus light), 11 subjects spent from Tuesday evening until Friday afternoon in the laboratory. For all four conditions, the following sleep schedule was maintained: night 1, 2345 to 0630 hours, night 2, 1600 to 0530 hours, and night 3, 2345 to 0700 hours. For the light-only condition, light treatment was administered between 0700 and 0800 hours on Thursday. For melatonin-only or placebo conditions, capsules were administered at 1600 hours on Wednesday. For the combined condition, melatonin was administered at 1600 hours on Wednesday with light treatment between 0600 and 0700 hours on Thursday. Circadian phase was assessed by calculating dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) from salivary melatonin, using a mean baseline +2 standard deviations (BL+2 SD) threshold. For all four conditions, pre-treatment and post-treatment DLMO assessments were on Tuesday and Thursday evenings, respectively. RESULTS: Phase advances were: melatonin at 1600 hours, 0.72 h p<0.005, light treatment from 0700 to 0800 hours, 0.31 h, non-significant, and the combined treatment, 1.04 h p<0.0002. CONCLUSION: The phase advance from the combination of afternoon melatonin with next morning light is additive.


Asunto(s)
Relojes Biológicos , Ritmo Circadiano , Síndrome Jet Lag/prevención & control , Melatonina/administración & dosificación , Fototerapia , Viaje , Actigrafía , Adaptación Fisiológica , Administración Oral , Adulto , Análisis de Varianza , Relojes Biológicos/efectos de los fármacos , Relojes Biológicos/efectos de la radiación , Cápsulas , Ritmo Circadiano/efectos de los fármacos , Ritmo Circadiano/efectos de la radiación , Terapia Combinada , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Síndrome Jet Lag/etiología , Síndrome Jet Lag/metabolismo , Síndrome Jet Lag/fisiopatología , Masculino , Melatonina/metabolismo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ontario , Saliva/metabolismo , Sueño/efectos de los fármacos , Sueño/efectos de la radiación , Factores de Tiempo
4.
Aviat Space Environ Med ; 81(12): 1128-32, 2010 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21197858

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: In the process of crewmember evaluation and certification for long-duration orbital missions, the International Space Station (ISS) Multilateral Space Medicine Board (MSMB) encounters a surprisingly wide spectrum of clinical problems. Some of these conditions are identified within the ISS Medical Standards as requiring special consideration, or as falling outside the consensus Medical Standards promulgated for the ISS program. METHODS: To assess the suitability for long-duration missions on ISS for individuals with medical problems that fall outside of standards or are otherwise of significant concern, the MSMB has developed a risk matrix approach to assess the risks to the individual, the mission, and the program. The goal of this risk assessment is to provide a more objective, evidence- and risk-based approach for aeromedical disposition. Using a 4 x 4 risk matrix, the probability of an event is plotted against the potential impact. Event probability is derived from a detailed review of clinical and aerospace literature, and based on the best available evidence. The event impact (consequences) is assessed and assigned within the matrix. RESULTS: The result has been a refinement of MSMB case assessment based on evidence-based data incorporated into a risk stratification process. This has encouraged an objective assessment of risk and, in some cases, has resulted in recertification of crewmembers with medical conditions which hitherto would likely have been disqualifying. CONCLUSIONS: This paper describes a risk matrix approach developed for MSMB disposition decisions. Such an approach promotes objective, evidence-based decision-making and is broadly applicable within the aerospace medicine community.


Asunto(s)
Medicina Aeroespacial , Gestión de Riesgos/métodos , Vuelo Espacial/normas , Certificación/normas , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Hipotiroidismo/epidemiología , Cooperación Internacional , Salud Laboral , Selección de Personal/normas , Examen Físico/normas , Medición de Riesgo , Taquicardia Supraventricular/epidemiología , Tiroiditis Autoinmune/epidemiología
5.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) ; 208(3): 377-86, 2010 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20013115

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Melatonin is recommended for hastening adaptation to phase shift, but there is little information on appropriate formulations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the efficacy of three melatonin formulations for circadian phase advance and delay: (a) 3 mg regular release (RR), (b) 3 mg sustained release (SR), and (c) 3 mg surge-sustained release (SSR; consisting of 1 mg RR and 2 mg SR). Circadian phase was assessed by salivary melatonin dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) or offset (MelOff) using thresholds of (1) 1.0 pg/ml and (2) mean baseline + 2 standard deviations (BL + 2SD). Subjects spent from Tuesday evenings until Thursday in the laboratory. Melatonin (or placebo) was administered at 1600 hours (phase advance) Wednesday, with DLMO assessment on Tuesday and Thursday and at 0600 hours (phase delay) Wednesday, with DLMO assessment Tuesday, Wednesday, and MelOff Thursday morning. Phase advances using the 1.0 pg/ml DLMO were as follows: placebo, 0.73 h; RR, 1.23 h (p < 0.003); SR, 1.44 h (p < 0.0002); SSR, 1.16 h (p < 0.012), with no difference between formulations. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Similar but smaller phase advances were found with BL + 2SD. Using MelOff, posttreatment phase position for the RR formulation was delayed compared to placebo by 1.12 h (p < 0.012), 1.0 pg/ml, and 0.75 h (p < 0.036), BL+2SD. Phase shifts for the SR and SSR conditions could not be determined due to persistent high melatonin levels during sampling times. Similar phase advances were induced by all formulations, and slow clearance of slow release preparations impeded the determination of phase delays. CONCLUSION: Appropriately timed 0.5 mg melatonin doses may avoid these problems.


Asunto(s)
Relojes Biológicos/efectos de los fármacos , Ritmo Circadiano/efectos de los fármacos , Melatonina/farmacología , Viaje , Adulto , Ritmo Circadiano/fisiología , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Humanos , Síndrome Jet Lag/fisiopatología , Luz , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Saliva/efectos de los fármacos
6.
Aviat Space Environ Med ; 79(6): 629-35, 2008 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18581950

RESUMEN

Future long-duration spaceflights are now being planned to the Moon and Mars as a part of the "Vision for Space Exploration" program initiated by NASA in 2004. This report describes the design reference missions for the International Space Station, Lunar Base, and eventually a Mars Expedition. There is a need to develop more stringent preflight medical screening for crewmembers to minimize risk factors for diseases which cannot be effectively treated in flight. Since funding for space life sciences research and development has been eliminated to fund program development, these missions will be enabled by countermeasures much like those currently in use aboard the International Space Station. Artificial gravity using centrifugation in a rotating spacecraft has been suggested repeatedly as a "universal countermeasure" against deconditioning in microgravity and could be an option if other countermeasures are found to be ineffective. However, the greatest medical unknown in interplanetary flight may be the effects of radiation exposure. In addition, a Mars expedition would lead to a far greater level of isolation and psychological stress than any space mission attempted previously; because of this, psychiatric decompensation remains a risk. Historically, mortality and morbidity related to illness and injury have accounted for more failures and delays in new exploration than have defective transportation systems. The medical care system on a future Mars expedition will need to be autonomous and self-sufficient due to the extremely long separation from definitive medical care. This capability could be expanded by the presence of a physician in the crew and including simple, low-technology surgical capability.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas Ecológicos Cerrados , Sistemas de Manutención de la Vida , Vuelo Espacial , Ingravidez/efectos adversos , Medicina Aeroespacial , Planificación de Instituciones de Salud , Humanos , Protección Radiológica , Tiempo , Estados Unidos , United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration , Medidas contra la Ingravidez
7.
Aviat Space Environ Med ; 78(12): 1162-9, 2007 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18064923

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The medical community of the International Space Station (ISS) has developed joint medical standards and evaluation requirements for Space Flight Participants ("space tourists") which are used by the ISS medical certification board to determine medical eligibility of individuals other than professional astronauts (cosmonauts) for short-duration space flight to the ISS. These individuals are generally fare-paying passengers without operational responsibilities. MATERIAL AND CONTEXT: By means of this publication, the medical standards and evaluation requirements for the ISS Space Flight Participants are offered to the aerospace medicine and commercial spaceflight communities for reference purposes. It is emphasized that the criteria applied to the ISS spaceflight participant candidates are substantially less stringent than those for professional astronauts and/or crewmembers of visiting and long-duration missions to the ISS. CONCLUSIONS: These medical standards are released by the government space agencies to facilitate the development of robust medical screening and medical risk assessment approaches in the context of the evolving commercial human spaceflight industry.


Asunto(s)
Vuelo Espacial/normas , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional , Anamnesis , Examen Físico/normas , Medición de Riesgo , Seguridad
8.
Aviat Space Environ Med ; 78(7): 693-7, 2007 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17679567

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Standard aeromedical doctrine dictates that aircrew receiving treatment for depression are grounded during treatment and follow-up observation, generally amounting to at least 1 yr. The Canadian Forces has initiated a program to return selected aircrew being treated for depression to restricted flying duties once stabilized on an approved antidepressant with resolution of depression. The currently approved medications are sertraline (a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor) and bupropion (noradrenaline and dopamine reuptake inhibitor). This study was undertaken to determine whether or not citalopram or escitalopram affect psychomotor performance. METHOD: In a double-blind crossover protocol with counter-balanced treatment order, 24 normal volunteer subjects (14 men and 10 women) were assessed for psychomotor performance during placebo, citalopram (40 mg), and escitalopram (20 mg) treatment. Each treatment arm lasted 2 wk, involving a daily morning ingestion of one capsule. There was a 1-wk washout period between medication courses. Subjects completed a drug side-effect questionnaire and were tested on three psychomotor test batteries once per week. RESULTS: Neither citalopram nor escitalopram affected serial reaction time, logical reasoning, serial subtraction, multitask, or MacWorth clock task performance. CONCLUSIONS: While we found some of the expected side effects due to citalopram and escitalopram, there was no impact on psychomotor performance. These findings support the possibility of using citalopram and escitalopram for returning aircrew to restricted flight duties (non-tactical flying) under close observation as a maintenance treatment after full resolution of depression.


Asunto(s)
Citalopram/farmacología , Desempeño Psicomotor/efectos de los fármacos , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/farmacología , Adulto , Medicina Aeroespacial , Cognición/efectos de los fármacos , Estudios Cruzados , Método Doble Ciego , Fatiga/inducido químicamente , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Tiempo de Reacción/efectos de los fármacos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
9.
Aviat Space Environ Med ; 75(4): 367-9, 2004 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15086129

RESUMEN

A case of a seizure in an active pilot with multiple sclerosis is presented. A 40-yr-old Canadian Forces pilot experienced a secondary generalized tonic-clonic seizure while taxiing a CC-130 (Hercules) transport after landing. His multiple sclerosis had been in remission since 1997 and he had been returned to restricted flying duties. He was assessed and treated, with no further seizures or adverse sequelae. An MRI showed a new demyelinating lesion in the anterior corpus callosum. His seizure was the only clinical manifestation of his MS relapse. The prevalence of seizures in MS patients, possible causal mechanisms, and the disposition of pilots with MS are discussed.


Asunto(s)
Medicina Aeroespacial , Personal Militar , Esclerosis Múltiple/fisiopatología , Convulsiones/etiología , Adulto , Canadá , Humanos , Masculino , Esclerosis Múltiple/complicaciones , Recurrencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...