Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 44(4): 598-604, 2013 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23447472

RESUMEN

The standard techniques for orthotopic heart transplantation often require certain adjustments when the procedure is carried out for complex congenital heart disease. This is because of both the unusual anatomy and possible distortions caused by previous surgery. Such technical adjustments have been described in various published reports over the years. Those reports, when combined, do cover the full spectrum of the technical difficulties that may be encountered, whether the defects are in their original form or altered by surgery, such that no cardiac malformation or distortion would prohibit transplantation. However, those reports are comprehensive only when combined. None of the individual reports addresses all the possible technical challenges. Consequently, the available information is somewhat fragmented. In addition, the generic aspect of the described technical strategies is not always given the emphasis that it deserves. Indeed, occasionally a technique may be presented as a specific solution for a specific malformation, without necessarily pointing out that the same technique may be applied to other hearts with different overall pathologies but which share that specific malformation. The aim of this review article was to combine all the available published information in one article in a manner that constructs a simple but comprehensive and generic system of decision-making that may be applied to any heart in order to determine the exact technical adjustments needed for transplantation in each case. Such a strategy is possible for two reasons. First, only a few anatomical sites are technically significant, namely the points of anastomosis between the donor's organ and the recipient. The rest of the intracardiac morphology does not affect the operation and may be ignored. Second, each of those anatomical sites can present difficulties in only a few ways, and each of those few difficulties has a well-described and published solution already. Therefore, the exact technical adjustments required in each case may be worked out by the sequential assessment of the anastomotic sites alone.


Asunto(s)
Cardiopatías Congénitas/cirugía , Trasplante de Corazón/métodos , Humanos
2.
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 60(3): 195-204, 2012 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22228091

RESUMEN

Objectives The EUCon study was designed to identify risk factors for distal anastomotic stenosis after bovine jugular vein (Contegra) implantation in children. Methods Between March 2006 and August 2008, 104 devices were implanted in nine European centers. Preoperative, intraoperative, and follow-up data (at discharge, 6, 12, 24 months) including standardized echocardiography were prospectively registered, source data verified and collected in a central database. Main endpoint was distal stenosis (either postvalvular gradient of ≥50 mm Hg or need for intervention for distal stenosis). Eight potential risk factors (age <2 years, diagnosis, running suture, use of glue, flapless anastomosis, oversizing less than + 2 z, anticoagulation, implantation site) were investigated. Cox regression, decision tree analyses, and "Clustering by Response" were applied. Results Patient age ranged from 0 to18 years, mean 6.0 ± 6.1, median 3.2 years. Implantation reasons: 88% congenital malformations, 12% Ross operations. Follow-up was 88.3% complete. Durability (freedom from death, reoperation, degeneration, endocarditis, and explantation) compared well to corresponding homograft literature. Sixteen patients reached study endpoints. Age <2 years was the only invariably significant risk factor (p = 0.044); "Clustering By Response" found young anticoagulated patients with oversized conduits to be at a higher risk than the others (p = 0.018, OR = 3.2). Conclusion Patient age is the main risk factor for development of distal anastomosis stenosis after Contegra implantation. The influence of the other investigated factors is too small to be proven in 104 patients after 2 years, or other risk factors must be taken into consideration to explain outcome differences among recipients under 2 years.


Asunto(s)
Bioprótesis , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Prótesis Vascular , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/etiología , Cardiopatías Congénitas/cirugía , Venas Yugulares/trasplante , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Animales , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Bovinos , Niño , Preescolar , Análisis por Conglomerados , Constricción Patológica , Árboles de Decisión , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/mortalidad , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/cirugía , Cardiopatías Congénitas/mortalidad , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Diseño de Prótesis , Sistema de Registros , Reoperación , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...